Author: Pamela Geller

Helping Muslim girls escape dangerous situations is “anti-Muslim,” but ads run by Muslim Brotherhood groups with ties to Hamas are “pro-diversity.” There is no diversity under the sharia. Does Bill Varian consider being anti-honor violence anti-Muslim?

The righteous and devout imam murdered her in front of their four-year-old son. The lessons begin early in Islam.

Not enough. Not nearly enough. Acts of war should be given the harshest sentences. The devout convert should have gotten life. Period.

Obama and Rice and company answer to no one. Immense power without accountability. How does the complicit press let this pathological liar get away with a statement like this?…

Coptic man killed by the MB in Church attack on New Year’s Eve,” Amany Moussa, Copts United, January 3, 2014..

Asia Bibi can expect little help from a Pope who just declared “authentic Islam and the proper reading of the Koran are opposed to every form of violence.”…

Read my article, the latest on our lawsuit against Boston Transit’s sharia enforcement.

We “filthy kafir pigs” ought to sentence this Muslima to life in prison. She actively engaged in jihad activity and plotted to kill Swedish cartoonist Lars Vilks (below at our September 11th SION Freedom Congress).

Read my column here in today’s Jerusalem Post on the execrable Carolyn Karcher, who maliciously flaunts her Jewish birth in a LA Times article to provide cover for her unbridled anti-semitism and vicious hatred of Israel.

We filed our appeal in Boston, site of Marathon bombing. You would think that a city targeting by jihadists, leaving an 8-year-old boy among the dead and hundreds injured, would get it.

We know what they would do. Muhammad’s companions slaughtered those who criticized him, just as they do today. Sharia then, sharia now.

Sheikh Khalid Yasin is a U.S.-born Muslim convert (he was raised as a Christian) and a Malcolm X disciple who has been a popular guest speaker at Muslim Students Association (MSA) events on college campuses across the United States.

Perhaps Russia gave the Uighurs (Chinese Muslims) jihad-envy:

With their typical mutual respect, devout Muslims have been celebrating Christmas the world over. Jihad bombers murdered 34 people as Christians were coming out of church on Christmas morning in Baghdad, and Muslims threatened and protested against Christmas celebrations all over the world.

Obama and Rice and company answer to no one. Immense power without accountability. How does the complicit press let this pathological liar get away with a statement like this?…

Obama and Rice and company answer to no one. Immense power without accountability. How does the complicit press let this pathological liar get away with a statement like this?

When you and your family hear of the daily acts of jihad both here and abroad, where do you turn? If you are like most knowledgable freedom lovers, you come here. You support our work. Why? Because you know that no one is doing the work we are doing, going on the offense, exposing the agenda of the enemies of freedom. And you also know that your contribution will fund the fight in defense of freedom by dedicated, indefatigable freedom fighters. Your contributions have helped make scores of ad campaigns and initiaives possible.

Again Islamic supremacist groups and their leftist lapdogs are pushing pro-jihad legislation. Last week, I urged Atlas readers to call their Congressmen to vote NO on House Resolution 418, a Muslim resolution in support of the jihad in Burma (Myanmar). More on that here. I continue to urge defeat of this legislation.

The blowback and national firestorm raging in the wake of the remarks by the patriarch of “Duck Dynasty” is a stunning indictment of left-wing hypocrisy. The visceral response and resultant leftist temper tantrum gives us a revealing look behind the left’s mask of intolerant tolerance and the true objective of its “pro-gay” agenda.

Marks and Spencer is a major British multinational retailer headquartered in the City of Westminster, London, with 703 stores in the United Kingdom and 361 stores spread across more than 40 countries.

Sandinista support, and Robert Mugabe, too. Now this. And yetBill de Blasio, the Democratic nominee for mayor, leads his Republican rival, Joseph J. Lhota, by over 40 points. We have got to get the word out. Join us on October 24th for our press conference on Bill de Blasio at the Hotel Pennsylvania (across from Penn Station), 401 7th Ave, New York, NY, 10001, Gold Ballroom, 18th floor, 12:30 – 3:00 pm….

Last Thursday, my law firm, the American Freedom Law Center, or AFLC, on behalf of my organization, the American Freedom Defense Initiative, or AFDI, filed a motion asking the federal court in Seattle, Wash., to order the King County transit authorities to run our anti-terrorism advertisement featuring photos of 16 of the world’s Most Wanted Terrorists. The link to the motion is here….

In light of the gruesome slaughter of non-Muslims selectively chosen by the jihadists in an upscale mall in Kenya, talking heads here in the States argue that such an attack might happen here. But it already has…

Today my law firm, the American Freedom Law Center (AFLC), on behalf of AFDI, filed a motion asking the federal court in Seattle, Washington, to order the King County transit authorities to run our anti-terrorism advertisement….

Biased, libelous and with the name calling we have become familiar with in the war of ideas. Opposing jihad is anti-Muslim. Opposing 9/11 (New York), 7/7 (London), 3/11 (Madrid), Mumbai, Bali, Boston, Fort Hood, Kenya’s Westgate mall, Nigeria et al is “anti-Muslim.”

SEATTLE, Oct. 9 (UPI) — An advocacy group says its free speech rights were violated when officials refused to allow it to place ads featuring wanted terrorists on Seattle-area buses.

A group criticized for running purportedly anti-Islamic ads around the country has sued King County over its refusal to allow it to run a poster of wanted terrorists on the sides of Metro buses — an ad almost identical to ones pulled down earlier this summer for being insensitive to area Muslims.

Tesing

And still the misunderstander of Islam who brutally hacked a British soldier to death on a London street in broad daylight is misunderstanding Islam and making love to his quran.

The above 3/4-page ad appeared in the New York Times in 1943. The ad was placed by the Committee for a Jewish Army of Stateless and Palestinian Jews (CJA), a pressure group founded by Peter Bergson, Broadway impresario Billy Rose, and Ben Hecht, among others, and was in response to an offer that had been made to the Allies by upper-echelon members of the Romanian government to assist in the transfer of some 70,000 Jews from their fascist state to Palestine or elsewhere.

Here is the latest filing in our free speech lawsuit against the US government’s unconstitutional denial of our SIOA trademark. Love the logo? Buy the poster (here). Want to donate to the cause? Own a piece of history, get an autographed SIOA poster for any contribution of $500 or more. Donate here.

The Ahmadis suffer persecution, oppression and slaughter at the hands of Muslims in so many Muslim countries because they attempted to reform/reinterpret jihad and Islam (claiming it to be “peaceful”). That’s bad enough. But the Ahmadis attack me for my defense of their rights. Oh yes, read this from Harris Zafar, National Spokesperson for the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community USA, in the Huffington Post: Confronting Pamela Geller (Updated With Response). My response is below Zafar’s suicidal screed. And it took an army ot tweeters to get the Puff Ho to run it.

The Jew-haters are at it again. The relentless Seattle Mideast Awareness Campaign (SeaMAC) has launched another vicious Goebbels-style blood libel against the Jews in Seattle. The ad went up this week (below).

Recently one newspaper kicked up an international controversy – and showed the dangers of today’s far-left, pro-Islamic supremacist media. A story, a fiction, was created a couple of weeks ago and advanced by a well-known, unfathomably well-regarded newspaper: London’s Guardian. Taking a page from Der Stürmer, the Guardian published an Islamic supremacist incendiary fiction, the sole objective of which was to indict an entire nation of something it did not do – all to incite Muslims to violence and further impose Islam on a put-upon people.

Clearly the monstrous carnage in the jihad mall massacre in Nairobi was an escalation of another bloody jihad offensive against another African nation.

One has to wonder how long this legal precept will last when two legal systems are in direct conflict and competition in the UK — British law and Sharia law. We see time and time again that anywhere that Western law and Sharia law conflict, it is Western law that must give way.

Syria is the new rallying point for the worldwide jihad. There has not been a secular fighting force in Syria for close to a year. Instead, it has become the destination for jihadists across the world to engage in holy war. This war is not about nationality, borders, geography. Jihadists in Syria include British, American, French, German, and Norwegian Muslims.

This is not a close call. You may criticize Israeli policy toward the Palestinians and peacemaking, or toward the Arabs within Israel (although they enjoy political rights that are the envy of most residents of the Middle East), but you cannot accuse Israel of ethnic cleansing and expect to be taken seriously by those familiar with the facts.

The authors’ references to America are just. plain. nuts. The fact is — it is dangeorus for non-Muslims, whether atheists, Christians, Jews, Hindus, etc., to live under sharia. Islamic law is the problem. Read betwen the lines. It’s the only way to read the mainstream media these days. You have to translate from the sharia-compliant, politically correct language of subdued.

An official (name redacted) in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office wrote in a May 7 letter: “We do have concerns with some of the reasoning in the sub,” that is, the “subject profiles” that had been prepared on Spencer and me, “particularly citing pro-Israeli views.” The official explained that “pro-Israeli views (and also support for waterboarding) apply to a large number of Americans, including former presidents. If, for instance, Geller and Spencer were to request details of their exclusion under FOI/DPA or other mechanism, that being pro-Israeli is cited as a reason may be problematic and they could argue publically that their exclusion is on the basis of their support for Israel.”

Hate crimes motivated by religious bias accounted for 1,166 offenses reported by law enforcement. A breakdown of the bias motivation of religious-biased offenses showed:

During the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for temporary restraining order/preliminary injunction, the court invited the parties to further address the issue of whether Defendants have applied the MBTA’s regulations in this case in a constitutional manner. Plaintiffs contend that Defendants have not in that their application of the regulations to reject Plaintiffs’ advertisement constituted viewpoint discrimination and was unreasonable in violation of the First Amendment.1 Indeed, Defendants’ rejection of Plaintiffs’ advertisement was manifestly based upon a shifting standard of civility, consciously lowered for the anti-Israel advertisement and then raised artificially for Plaintiffs’ advertisement.

I received so much positive feedback when I re-ran my debate with Erin Burnett, I thought you might like to see these debates as a regular feature, “Flashback Friday.”

Contentious debate: Pamela Geller vs Hip Hop Rapper from “Palestine Center” on Staten Island Mosque and “Mosques in America”

So what did the British government do in the wake of this beheading of a British soldier on a public street outside of London “in order to fufill our promise to Allah”? According to recently disclosed British documents, I was banned (along with Robert Spencer) by the British government explicitly because my presence was “not conducive to the public good” and that I represented a “threat to security or our society.”

The independent free press at Boston University covered the hearing yesterday. It strikes me as odd and revealing that the writer of this article, Pariza Lovos, failed to mention (even once) the Boston Marathon jihad bombings. The bombings were mentioned several times particularly in the context of jihad. I expect that many of Pariza Lovos friends and fellow students at Boston University attended, even ran, in that Marathon. The point was made quite clearly that any reasonable person on the Boston transit system would know exactly what jihad was because of the marathon bombings. Why leave that out? It’s germaine.

It’s astonishing: every single jihadi waging holy war knows exactly who he is and why he does what he does, citing quran chapter and verse — but the West refuses to believe or accept this terrible reality, to the detriment of their dead and future victims. Instead, we are told by the conquered cultural and political elite that it is “islamophobia” that’s the problem. Perhaps it’s axophobia or homicidebombingophobia — yes, that’s the real problem.

It’s not lost on me that I find myself just a stone’s throw from Boston Harbor where the greatest of wars — the fight for freedom and individual rights — broke out in 1774. Nowhere, at no time, has there been a more righteous cause in the history of humankind.

Then, as today, an out-of-control government took outrageous and egregious actions against our most basic individual rights — and in this case, the most precious of all freedoms, the freedom of speech.

Sienkiewicz, who became interested in the MBTA’s pending case in federal court due to his studies in global media cultures and media theory, said the T will have to prove that their decision to deny an organization’s request to post billboards was not an infringement of their First Amendment rights. “It isn’t impossible. There is nothing wrong with banning demeaning speech, but you have to show you are doing it consistently,” he said.

We are in court again today, Boston this time, fighting for our free speech rights to oppose jihad and support Israel. I thought you should view this video — Erin Burnett of CNN and I debate the merits of free speech and our ads.

The British government explicitly stated that I was banned from the UK because my presence was “not conducive to the public good” and that I represented a “threat to security of or society.”