News Ticker >
[ December 12, 2018 ]

Jihadi Who Stabbed Two Americans In Amsterdam Says He Would Do It Again

[ December 12, 2018 ]

Why Do WE Do What We Do?

[ December 12, 2018 ]

NY Times says U.S. part of ‘new axis of evil’

[ December 12, 2018 ]

ISIS UK: ‘Islamic State-inspired Christmas bomb plot’ is foiled in UK, town in lockdown

[ December 12, 2018 ]

Netanyahu: Italy’s Matteo Salvini is ‘great friend of Israel’

[ December 12, 2018 ]

Donald Trump Signs Genocide Relief Act for Christians in Iraq and Syria

[ December 12, 2018 ]

President Trump brilliantly eviscerates the corrupt Schumer and Pelosi on camera

[ December 12, 2018 ]

Trump Effect: U.S. Ends Reliance On Foreign Oil For First Time In 75 Years

[ December 12, 2018 ]

Israel: Baby of mother shot in recent Islamic terror attack pronounced dead

[ December 12, 2018 ]

Shouting “ALLAHU AKBAR” Strasbourg jihad murderer fired on Christmas shoppers, ID’d as “extremist,” still at...

23

AFDI and ACLU Sue D.C. Metro For First Amendment Violations Over ‘Geller Ban’ on Ads

It is good to see an uber-left organization like the ACLU, historically aligned with the jihad force, taking up a key fight for us in defense of our First Amendment freedoms.

We have moved forward with our D.C. legal action. On July 24, our legal team, AFLC, filed our opening brief in the DC Circuit in our lawsuit against Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA). Read it here:

15

SIOA Trademark Victory in the Supreme Court

Today the US Supreme Court ruled in our favor, that the government may not refuse to register “potentially offensive” names (SIOA is not offensive, that is a smear). We have been suing to trademark SIOA (Stop Islamization of America) for a number of years but were repeatedly refused because it was considered “disparaging” to Muslims. Longtime Geller Report readers are quite familiar with our First Amendment trademark case. It was, in effect, an application of sharia law (‘do not criticize Islam’).We have been fighting to trademark SIOA (Stop Islamization of America) for a number of years but were repeatedly refused because the courts considered it “disparaging” to Muslims. Longtime Geller Report readers are quite familiar with our First Amendment trademark case. It was, in effect, an application of sharia law (‘do not criticize Islam’). Today the US Supreme Court Given ruled that the government may not refuse to register potentially offensive names. Excelsior!

24

Pamela Geller, WND Column: San Francisco wages brutal war on free speech

In a unanimous vote, the uber-left San Francisco autocratic government shut down free speech on transit systems last Tuesday after our organization, the American Freedom Defense Initiative, or AFDI, submitted our latest ad campaign to the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Authority to run on buses across the city.

34

Pamela Geller, Breitbart News: DoJ Responds to Our Social Media Lawsuit

Our lawsuit proceeds to finally hold the social media giants accountable for rampant free speech violations. “Pamela Geller: Left Press Lashes Out Against Our Free Speech Lawsuit,” Breitbart News, October 16, 2016: Leftist publications and pundits are rubbing their hooves in glee at the Department of Justice’s response to our recent lawsuit challenging Section 230…

35

Pamela Geller, American Thinker: Leftist Press Lashes Out Against Our Free Speech Lawsuit

The Department of Justice responded to our Facebook/social media first amendment lawsuit. The American Thinker has it here. Leftist Press Lashes Out Against Our Free Speech Lawsuit By Pamela Geller, The American Thinker, October 10, 2016: Leftist publications and pundits are rubbing their hooves in glee at the Department of Justice’s response to our recent…

16

Eugene Volokh, Washington Post on AFDI v MTA SCOTUS Dissent: “Justices Thomas and Alito urge court to decide First Amendment”

Make no mistake — we amended our suit (more here) to correct the “factual errors,” and we will go back. The error in our ad was that we implied the reward for the capture of an FBI terrorism suspect was paid for by the FBI when in fact, the reward is paid by the State…

52

Court rules MTA’s BAN ON FREE SPEECH Ads on Subway is Legal BUT Muslim Ads are OK to Run

An appeals court judge has upheld a previous ruling that the MTA’s policy of refusing all political and religious ads in the transit system is legal, meaning the agency can continue to reject controversial posters by firebrand Pamela Geller and the anti-Muslim American Freedom law Center– for now. But Islamic supremacists who sued to run…

65

HUGE Free Speech Victory for SIOA: Federal Circuit Court Reverses 70-Year “Unconstitutional” Ban

Longtime Atlas readers are quite familiar with our First Amendment trademark case. We have been fighting to trademark SIOA (Stop Islamization of America) but were repeatedly refused because it considered “disparaging” to Muslims. It was, in effect, an application of sharia law (‘do not criticize Islam.’) Today we had a big victory against this fascist-style…

15

Breitbart — Geller: NYC & Boston Run Nazi and Anti-Semitic Ads, Ban AFDI Pro-Israel Ads

This is what happens when government arbitrarily decides what speech is good and what’s forbidden. That is the reason that our founding fathers made the freedom of speech our first (not the third or the fifth or the eight) amendment. Geller: NYC & Boston Run Nazi and Anti-Semitic Ads, Ban AFDI Pro-Israel Ads, By Pamela…

64

Boston’s MBTA Runs Anti-Israel Ads as we TAKE THEM TO SUPREME COURT FOR BANNING OUR PRO-ISRAEL ADS

The MBTA has repeatedly refused to run our pro-Israel ads, which we submitted in response to vicious anti-Israel ads like the one they are currently running (below). This is just the latest in a number of antisemitic ad campaigns. We are fighting the MBTA in the courts and  have filed a cert petition to SCOTUS….

18

Pamela Geller, WND Column: New York buses must run ‘Muslim’ ads

Check out my column in today’s WND. The latest federal ruling clearly demonstrates the continued erosion of our First Amendment rights and the gruesome imposition of blasphemy laws under the sharia (Islamic law). After banning our ads designed to increase awareness of the jihad threat, a Federal court (more like a sharia court) ruled that…

Pin It on Pinterest