Washington Post calls for Islamic restrictions on internet free speech
The Washington Post is arguing for sharia restrictions on free speech in a wildly dishonest, silly, and illogical article that ran in yesterday’s WaPo Religion section, entitled “Internet hate speech can lead to acts of violence,” Omar Sacirbey promotes the mythical “anti-Muslim hate” narrative that is skillfully used by sharia advocates to silence the truth…




“Mustafa Kamel Mustafa, the former north London imam more commonly known by his alias Abu Hamza, used his Finsbury Park mosque in the mid and late-1990s as his ‘base of operations for the global export of violence and terror’, a US prosecutor has told a New York court.” But with a British government that wants to make London into a global center of Sharia finance, what’s the problem with that? To be consistent, they should be embracing Abu Hamza, not sending him to the US to stand trial.
During the election for Mayor in NYC, I warned of de Blasio’s pro-terror allegiances. I submitted this ad to run on NYC subway platforms. New York media liked it — read this. A de Blasio spokeswoman called my ad “hateful and offensive.” What exactly is hateful and offensive? He did exactly as I predicted. He has disbanded the NYPD counter-terror program and vowed to go after the “real bad guys.” Who dat, Herr Wilhelm? 