[ May 12, 2024 ]
Back in 2016, I filed the first federal lawsuit challenging Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) under the First Amendment. It was dismissed for “lack of standing.” Absurd. And the big giant giants have managed to stay one step ahead, dancing around their gross violations against our fundamental freedoms. Until now.
Finally, the case will be heard.
Supreme Court To Hear Case Challenging Tech Industry’s Section 230 Immunity
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Please contribute here.
or
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.
Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding.Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.
Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.
Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.
Follow Pamela Geller on Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.
Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.
Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.
If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.
1 Comment
D
1 year ago
Not for censorship on these media platforms unless the content is calling for attacks on certain groups, jihadi recruitment, personal attacks, or other threats of violence. And by threats of violence, if a politician says “we must fight violence,” that is not and actual threat of violence. Nor is it a threat when Trump says “we must peacefully march.” But when Maxine Waters calls on Democrats to go and confront conservatives wherever they are found, that is a clear call to harassment with the intimidation of potential mobs which is essentially setting up a threatening situation and so she should have been censured by Congress but still not censored by social media.
The thing is social media want to power of a publisher over content in their site but they want the protection of a platform as if they don’t have any responsibility of content on their platform. If they engage in censorship of political speech, they are a publisher and should be held liable for their content.
