Unmasking Wikipedia’s Antisemitic, Pro-Jihad Editors
I gave up on Wikipedia years ago – hard left, antisemitic etc. I am glad this group is taking them on.
I gave up on Wikipedia years ago – hard left, antisemitic etc. I am glad this group is taking them on.
I gave up on Wikipedia long ago. It’s SPLC lite
This is an illuminating example of how Wikipedia is not an actual encyclopedia, but just another propaganda outlet for the left.
Wikipedia has some limited value if you want to get some facts about Tiberius Caesar or Henry Agard Wallace or Leon Spinks, but on contemporary issues it has — like virtually everything else — a pronounced hard-Left, pro-jihad bias.
The recent allegations that American-Palestinian activist Linda Sarsour rejected a female colleague’s accusations of sexual harassment in the workplace has led to suggestions that pro-Palestinian editors at Wikipedia are keeping the story off Sarsour’s page in order to defend her public image.
Following Breitbart’s previous coverage of edits made to the Antifa Wikipedia page downplaying the group’s violence, a discussion including Antifa supporters led to the removal of language from the group’s Wikipedia entry intro noting DHS and FBI have categorized Antifa violence as terrorism.