Oxford University Has Become a “Hotbed of Antisemitism” with Open Support For Islamic Terrorism

8

My old country is being bullied by militant Islamists who successive British governments have ushered right through the gates in the naive belief that they would wish to integrate into British society.

Not understanding anything about the supremacist nature of Islam these politicians succumbed to the fantasies of political correctness and multiculturalism which are the unindicted co-conspirators of culture defeat and surrender.

Other British politicians and governments and even the Crown have been seduced by massive investments in Britain made by oil producing Gulf states such as Qatar whose emir has been giving luxurious refuge to the leaders of Hamas and any other group of verminous terrorist killers who come knocking.

ADVERTISEMENT

The junior jihadis who attended the recent revolting debate at the Oxford Union are the spawn of this corrupting influence

Oxford University is becoming a “hotbed of antisemitism” with open support for Hamas and Jewish students feeling intimidated

By: CUFI, December 6, 2024:

Oxford University is becoming a “hotbed of antisemitism” after a Union debate last week exposed student support for Hamas terror.

One of the world’s most prestigious places of study, Oxford University, was founded on Judeo-Christian values and has a Biblical heritage. But it is worryingly becoming a hotbed of antisemitism with Jewish students feeling intimidated and support for Hamas now in the open.

ADVERTISEMENT

This week a “toxic” Oxford Union debate voted in support of the motion: “This house believes Israel is an apartheid state responsible for genocide.”

Over 300 academics and peers have written to Oxford’s new chancellor, Lord Hague, calling for action, describing the debate as a “failure on all counts,” suggesting that the debate subjected Jewish students to “antisemitism and intimidation.”

One speaker, Miko Peled, a pro-Palestinian activist speaking in favour of the motion, described the Oct 7 attacks as “heroism”.

Mosab Hassan Yousef, son of a senior Hamas founder who defected to Israel’s side, spoke in support of Israel and against the motion. Yousef was met with jeering derision and cries of “traitor” and “prostitute” by some in the audience as he recounted his story.

Yousef asked participants at the debate to raise their hands to indicate whether they would have reported Hamas’s plans to authorities to prevent the October 7th massacre. Shockingly, 75% of the participants voted that they would have chosen NOT to report information to the authorities.

In this week’s CUFI podcast, For Zion’s Sake, Alex and Alastair asserted that police should now be involved, especially as Hamas is a proscribed terrorist organisation and supporting the terror group in the UK is a crime.

The debate was also unfairly biased against Israel to the extent that the president of the Union, Egyptian-born Ebrahim Osman Mowafy, who is supposed to be impartial as chair of the debate, stepped into the role as a speaker when one withdrew and spoke in favour of Israel being an apartheid state.

ADVERTISEMENT

Yousef Haddad, a pro-Israel activist, was ejected from the chamber after dismissing audience members as “terrorist supporters”, at which point he put on a T-shirt that read “your terrorist is dead” with a crossed-out face of Hassan Nasrallah, the former Hezbollah leader.

Mr Haddad later took to X, formerly Twitter, to describe Oxford as being “occupied by antisemitic … and racist Middle East peoples”

https://x.com/MosabHasanYOSEF/status/1862422765829079467?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1862422765829079467%7Ctwgr%5E59f07fa291606838f29771da486ff17c1f5d2349%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cufi.org.uk%2Fnews%2Foxford-university-is-becoming-a-hotbed-of-antisemitism-with-open-support-for-hamas-and-jewish-students-feeling-intimidated%2F

One of the speakers against the motion, Jonathan Sacerdoti, the son of a Holocaust survivor, told The Telegraph: “The Union’s president deliberately cultivated an environment of hostility towards me, my colleagues, and anyone prepared to challenge the inflammatory motion he chose.

“Institutions like the Oxford Union must not become playgrounds for sinister cliques pushing divisive and prejudicial agendas.”

Rise in antisemitism at Oxford

The latest controversy at Oxford University follows concerns earlier this year about the increase in antisemitism at Oxford.

A report by YnetNews in June shared the testimony of a female student’s experience upon arriving at the prestigious university. Named by the initial “P”, her first day of classes was October 9th, which she described as being “marred by grief and anxiety”, firstly by learning of the murder of her uncle and kidnapping of her aunt, followed by being surrounded by anti-Israel protests and chants denying her country’s right to exist.

Upon visiting a student welfare officer, P. was told, “Oxford is an unpleasant place for Israelis and Jews, and there’s nothing we can do to help you.”

In interviews conducted by Ynet and Yedioth Ahronoth, Jewish and Israeli lecturers and students at the prestigious British universities of Oxford and Cambridge described recurring incidents involving both faculty and peers. Over 100 antisemitic and anti-Israel incidents were detailed in a letter submitted by a group of Israelis to the Oxford administration.

A doctoral student at Oxford, named A., said, “On October 7, I was in Israel during the holiday break between semesters when rockets began falling incessantly in my area. Amid the fear and uncertainty, I received WhatsApp notifications from my college. Someone decided to announce demonstrations in support of ‘freedom fighters who came to liberate Palestine,’ effectively endorsing the murder of Israelis. None of the other doctoral students argued with her; instead, they sent her supportive emojis. I wrote to her, hoping to discuss it, thinking she might not fully understand, but she refused, calling me a ‘child murderer.’ I approached my college head with the details, and she simply apologized, unsure of what to do. She referred me to my academic advisor, who was equally clueless. Nothing was done about it. Since then, I haven’t set foot in the college.”

Oxford University administration held several meetings with Israeli representatives after the October 7 terror attack, at the students’ request, but no progress or action plan was achieved to prevent the recurrence of antisemitic incidents, says Ynet.

When the notorious protests took place at Columbia University in New York, Oxford students arrived on campus with sleeping bags and signs, calling on the university to divest from “investments related to the Israeli occupation and genocide” and to sever institutional ties with Israeli universities. A joint statement from the organizations “Cambridge for Palestine” and “Oxford Stands for Palestine” declared: “We refuse to accept our universities’ partnership in Israel’s war crimes. Oxford’s profits cannot continue to climb at the expense of Palestinian lives.” Nearly 200 Oxford staff members signed a letter of support.

“It’s become routine for the city center, which is essentially the university center, to become an area on Saturdays where Jews avoid going,” described L., a university faculty member, with frustration. “The hostility is starting to spill more and more into the public space from the online space.”

The faculty member emphasized that her frustration stems not from the existence of pro-Palestinian demonstrations, but from the antisemitic and anti-Israel chants heard at them. “Swastikas and chants like ‘gas the Jews,’ heard here, greatly undermine our sense of security on campus,” the faculty member said.

Oxford University’s Head of Diversity, Professor Tim Soutphommasane, told Ynet and Yedioth Ahronoth that “Oxford should be a place where all its members feel safe and welcome. Based on conversations and exchanges we have had with Jewish students and staff, I recognize that not everyone feels this way currently. We are determined to fix this.”

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

ADVERTISEMENT
Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the ... symbol to the right of the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

 

ADVERTISEMENT
Thanks for sharing!