Islamic World Rewrites History, Denies the Holocaust and Rehabilitates Hitler

As I continue to research the Muslim world’s role in the Holocaust and their leadership’s partnership with Hitler (Rasem Khallidi, The Mufti of Jerusalem, his Turkestan, Caucasian, Azerbijan, Bosnian quislings, Rashid Ali Kailani), the documents are more damning than imagined. The partnership of the Muslim world with Hitler and the Axis is shocking. Expect the Islamic world to ratchet up their holocaust denial and
take the line that “Hitler was just defending himself from the evvvvvvvil Joos.” Let the Muslim spin begin.

The Muslim Mufti’s Role in Extermination of the Jews

Holocaust Mufti Demanded Slaughter of 400,000 Jews ….and got it

ADVERTISEMENT

When, with the beginning of the war, [the Mufti al-Husseini’s] position in Syria, a French mandate,
became ‘insecure,’ he escaped to Iraq. There he worked hard and succeeded in bringing Iraq into the war against the Allies, thedeclaration of war having been made on May 2, 1941. At that time the Nazis’ entered Greece and Egypt.

When the revolt was crushed (mainly by the Jewish volunteers from Palestine), the ex-Mufti escaped to Iran and hid himself in the Japanese Embassy there. From Teheran he escaped to Italy, where his arrival was announced by the Fascist radio as a “great and happy
event;” in November, 1941, he arrived in Berlin and was received by Hitler. In 1942 the ex-Mufti organized the Arab Legion that fought the American invasion in Africa

On Dec. 29, 1942 the ex-Mufti sent a telegram of congratulations to Emperor Hirohito, assuring the latter that the Arabs were “praying for the final victory of Japanese arms.”

By the end of 1943 the ex-Mufti had organized Bosnian “Black Legions” to fight the Allies. He also bears a heavy responsibility for the annihilation of European Jewry, according to Nazi testimony given at Nuremberg. He visited the gas chambers; he wrote to the Cabinet Ministers of Hungary and Romania asking them to send the Jews from their countries to the concentration camps in Poland.

Thus according to the Charter of the International Tribunal at Nuremberg, the ex-Mufti is a criminal on all these counts, for crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. (NY Post 1948)

ADVERTISEMENT

Watch the video (hat tip Rut)

They are spinning. It was in “ideological clash” – sound familiar?

Hitler’s German intelligence
agency managed to expose the ideological clash between the ideology
of the Jewish belief, and the ideology of the Nazi belief. Ideology,
in this case, is tantamount to belief.

[…]

Therefore, the German
Jews began to conspire against Hitler’s policies. The German security
agencies informed Hitler of the domestic actions of the Jews, which
were in opposition to his Nazi philosophy and theories. Things ended
in a clash, which had several phases.

As the leading role the Islamic world played in the Holocaust comes out of the shadows and into the fore, and decent peoples recoil in repulsion, it is necessary for Islamic media, “scholars” and asshats-in-residence to rewrite history — as Islam has done so exceedingly and singularly well all throughout history. What people has stolen every idea and invention in history and has had the audacity to call it their own? What other people have conquered nations, enslaved their people, co-opted their culture and their art and then called the art theirs?

Back in 1986, historian Robert Wistrich wrote in his book Hitler’s Apocalyse:

Ever since 1933 the Third Reich had also aroused considerable enthusiasm among Arab [Muslim] leaders who were impressed by its nationalist fervor, its militarism and opposition to the Versailles post-war settlement. The German consulate in Beirut and the Baghdad Embassy received many admiring letters from Syrian and Iraqi citizens, expressing their approval of Hitler and support for the German Reich. The Ministry of Propaganda was told, for example, by one of its sources that throughout the Middle East, ‘all of the inhabitants with the exception of the Jews are following events in the new Germany with great sympathy and enthusiasm.”

Click below for Islamic video and transcript:

Title of Video: Egyptian Researcher Sa’id Okasha Challenges Antisemitic Myths on Al-Faraeen TV
	Clip #2374 Broadcast: January 29, 2010

Here’s a partial transcript:

The following are
excerpts from a TV program on the Holocaust and antisemitism and a studio
debate with Sa’id Okasha of the Al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic
Studies. The footage and debate aired on Al-Faraeen TV on January 29,
2010.

Narrator: The
Nazi party brandished the banner of the masters, while the European
Jews also brandished the banner of the masters, due to their mistaken
belief that they were Semites. This confusion was either inadvertent
or deliberate. The bottom line is that they wholeheartedly believed
that they were the Semite masters, and that the German Nazi party, with
its social ideology, shattered their right to believe in this.

Thus, an internal conflict
broke out between the German Jews and the Nazis, who represented over
80 percent of all Germans and German speakers. Hitler’s German intelligence
agency managed to expose the ideological clash between the ideology
of the Jewish belief, and the ideology of the Nazi belief. Ideology,
in this case, is tantamount to belief.

The flames raged, in
a racial conflict, the goal of which was to make them masters and owners
of the entire world. The conflict was between the pure Aryan race, and
homogeneous Aryans who believed they were Semites.

Therefore, the German
Jews began to conspire against Hitler’s policies. The German security
agencies informed Hitler of the domestic actions of the Jews, which
were in opposition to his Nazi philosophy and theories. Things ended
in a clash, which had several phases.

[…]

Their German citizenship
was revoked, and they were no longer recognized as Germans or Aryans.
The Jews, for their part, tried as much as they could to balance the
persecution that erupted like a volcano against them in Germany. They
escalated their conspiracies and accepted help from abroad against Hitler.

[…]

Hitler and some of his
aides realized that the German Jews were becoming a big headache, so
Hitler took his famous measures of arresting them everywhere – in
Germany and among its German-speaking allies. He began sentencing them
to be burnt, after rounding them up in camps.

Many Germans had fled
abroad before the long arm of Hitler could reach them. Hitler began
to invade Europe and to arrest whoever he could. He sent these people
to the camps of the Jews, to await their turn to enter the Holocaust.
With every victory of Hitler, many Jews fled the places conquered.

No one can deny that
the Jews were one of the main reasons for the defeat of Hitler in World
War II, after he had come very close to conquering the world. The Jews
managed to reach some of Hitler’s advisors indirectly, and to present
them with ideas that made them enthusiastic about the prospect of a
German invasion into Russia when it was snowing heavily. On the other
hand, they helped Hitler feel intoxicated by his victories, and encouraged
him to send his forces to North Africa in a time of great heat.

[…]

Hitler was defeated after
having burnt a not insignificant number of people who adhered to Judaism
in Europe. We acknowledge that there was, indeed, a holocaust of the
Jews in some camps, but we completely disagree with the figures, presented
by the Jewish organizations and by Israel, regarding the number of European
Jews who were burnt. Any observer can see that it was the Jews who provoked
Hitler, and urged him to take these measures.

[…]

The Jews committed a
grave error that harmed them. They did not take everything into consideration
when they tried to sever the Nazis from their racial beliefs. The Jews
used conspiratorial means and political ploys, stemming from one of
their precepts of faith: Necessity allows forbidden things.

[…]

The Jewish organizations
and Israel claim that about 3 million Jews were burnt in the Holocaust,
but we say that the figure did not exceed 150,000. Others say that the
figure did not exceed 30,000. We condemn what happened to the Jews from
1933 to the end of World War II, but this does not mean that the Jews
can extort the Germans this way. Germany should not continue to pay
for Hitler’s mistake until Judgment Day.

[…]

TV host: In your
view, how many Jews were burnt in Europe?

Sa’id Okasha: Look,
I have reservations about raising this issue. I don’t understand why
the Arab world cares so much about the number of Holocaust victims.

TV host: Maybe
it is because of the false claims made by the Jews about this.

[…]

Sa’id Okasha: If
the Nazis had killed 30,000 people – like the figure in your report
– just because they were Jews – would it not have been a crime?
It is a crime against humanity.

TV host: Yes.

Sa’id Okasha: Whenever
you kill a person because his religion is different than yours, it is
a crime against humanity.

TV host: But let’s
talk about the figures…

Sa’id Okasha: Let
me finish. You are asking about the figure.

TV host: This
figure is important to us because the Jews say it is 3 million.

Sa’id Okasha: No,
the Jews say 6 million, not 3 million. There were many mistakes in your
report. The Jews say 6 million, not 3 million.

TV host: This
is the first time I hear this figure.

Sa’id Okasha: This
is the figure discussed in all the literature…

TV host: We have
conducted research, and so on…

Sa’id Okasha: In
all the literature… In the Auschwitz camp alone, four million people
died.

TV host: Before
we move on… You’ve said something important. Based on all the research
we have conducted, and on all the documented information we have gathered
– we concluded that the Jews say the figure is 3 million.

[…]

We mentioned three figures:
3 million, 150,000, and 30,000.

Sa’id Okasha: On
what did you base this report? I don’t understand. Where did you get
this figure of 3 million? I don’t get it. Nor do I understand where
you got the figure 30,000.

TV host: And you,
where did you get the figure of 6 million?

Sa’id Okasha: That’s
what the Israeli websites say. Is there any Israeli website that says
3 million?

TV host: Al-Faraeen
TV says this.

[…]

Caller (Ahmad from
Cairo): The figure of the victims of this massacre is extremely
exaggerated…

TV host: Man,
do me a favor – you say the figures of 3 million, 150,000, or 30,000
are exaggerated, but Mr. Sa’id says that we got the figures wrong and
that it is 6 million.

Ahmad: A massacre
of 6 million?! This is really exaggerated. The number of Jews in the
whole world at the time was no more than 2 million.

TV host: Yes.

Sa’id Okasha:
Where did you get this figure?

[…]

TV host: A few
days ago, it was Holocaust Memorial Day, and the Jews try, as much as
they can, to exploit this holocaust, to exploit this event, in order
to gain the sympathy of the world.

[…]

They say that they are
oppressed people. They say: We have suffered a big holocaust, and we
want…

Sa’id Okasha:
Mr. Ahmad, I’d like to tell you something, with your permission…

>TV host: Mr. Sa’id,
please, I am talking with Ahmad now…

Sa’id Okasha:
Go ahead.

TV host: Why are
we focusing on the Jews? Because the Jews exploit this Holocaust, and
they present figures that are definitely not true – regardless of
what the real figure is – because their figure is much larger than
the number of people annihilated. We want to present things in their
natural proportions.

[…]

Sa’id Okasha:
Hitler committed a real crime against humanity, by targeting a large
number of races, including the Jews. There were also the Gypsies, the
Slavs, and the handicapped…

TV host: Our report
said that…

Sa’id Okasha:
Let me finish what I have to say.

TV host: Mr. Sa’id…

Sa’id Okasha:
I cannot complete a single sentence…

TV host: Mr. Sa’id,
we didn’t invite you here to cause trouble for us, live on TV.

Sa’id Okasha:
I don’t want to cause trouble, I just want to explain to the viewers…

TV host: Calm
down a little.

Sa’id Okasha:
By God, I am calm, but I cannot complete what I want to say.

TV host: Drink
some water.

Sa’id Okasha:
No, thank you.

TV host: Calm
your nerves.

Sa’id Okasha:
I am calm. You are asking a question, but you don’t want to hear the
answer. Did you bring me here so you could talk, or so I could talk?

[…]

We shouldn’t be arguing
with [the Jews] whether the Holocaust did or didn’t take place, or
about whether there were 6 million victims or 30,000 victims. This is
a losing battle, which is not based on facts. Nothing that was said
in the report was based on [facts]. What archive or document said that
the number of victims was 30,000?

TV host: And what
document do you have to prove that the number is 6 million?

Sa’id Okasha: We
have the Soviet, the German, and the English archives. Researchers and
historians use documents. They don’t invent figures according to their
mood. I didn’t know…

TV host: You can
rest assured, Mr. Sa’id, that we have documents as well.

[…]

Sa’id Okasha: The
report focused on the notion of a Jewish conspiracy, and it said things
that are categorically false. What was said about The Protocols of
the Elders of Zion…

TV host: Yes.

Sa’id Okasha: This
document is a forgery…

TV host: The
Protocols are the reason that the Jewish organizations are suing
us.

[…]

Please, let’s forget
about The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. I’ll kiss your hand
if you stay away from this subject, because this has caused a real crisis
for us.

Sa’id Okasha:
This document is a forgery.

TV host: The Jews
are accusing us of anti-Semitism because we discussed The Protocols.
We are entering…

Sa’id Okasha:
Between you and me – anyone who talks about The Protocols is
indeed an anti-Semite.

TV host: Fine,
but let me finish.

Sa’id Okasha:
Go ahead.

TV host: Because
of The Protocols, we are facing a court case with the Jewish
organizations – just because we discussed this issue.

Sa’id Okasha:
So this was a mistake?

TV host: Exactly.

Sa’id Okasha:
So from now on, you need to be more careful.

TV host: The report
said that we are willing to reveal the facts, but these people should
come and sit with us.

Sa’id Okasha:
Who should come and sit with you?

TV host: I made
myself clear.

Sa’id Okasha:
Look…

TV host: I made
myself clear, we need to stop this digression.

Sa’id Okasha:
All the researchers of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion confirm
that this is a forged document, composed by Russian intelligence, in
order to persecute the Jews for racist and anti-Semitic reasons.

TV host: That’s
your opinion.

Sa’id Okasha:
Whoever says this is an anti-Semite, I’m sad to say.

TV host: That’s
your opinion.

Sa’id Okasha:
Fine. It’s not a matter of opinion. Who can prove that The Protocols
are real? This book is circulated in the market, but the historians…

TV host: Dear
sir, this is your own opinion, but if this is really the case, why didn’t
the Russians commit a holocaust against the Jews?!

[…]

Sa’id Okasha:
Your report said that the Jews convinced Hitler to invade Russia. They
didn’t. From the beginning, Hitler had a comprehensive plan to take
over Europe. Not the whole world, just Europe.

TV host: This
was not the only thing that we said in the report.

[…]

Sa’id Okasha:
It is very easy to say that the Jews conspire, but where is the proof?

TV host: We know
that this is what Hitler said.

Sa’id Okasha:
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion and the myth about the matza
of blood, which claimed that the Jews were making matza from the blood
of Christians or Muslims… These myths existed, but they were not true.
Scientific research has shown that these were all myths. It is possible
to invent a myth in order to malign a certain people or group. Israel
invented myths about us Arabs as well.

TV host: What
are we making this show for? For that reason exactly.

Sa’id Okasha:
They said that the Arabs said they wanted to throw the Jews into the
sea. It has not been proven that any Arab leader ever said this. It
didn’t happen.

TV host: Abd Al-Nasser
said this, Mr. Sa’id.

Sa’id Okasha:
No, he didn’t.

TV host: Abd Al-Nasser
said: “I will throw Israel into the river.” Word for word.

[…]

Mr. Sa’id, I will give
you – as a personal gift from me to you – the speech by the late
leader Abd Al-Nasser, in which he said this sentence.

Sa’id Okasha:
Israel and the Jews are the ones who spread these claims, but it’s
wrong.

TV host: By the
way, he said: “Israel and whoever is behind Israel.”

Sa’id Okasha:
No, he never said this.

[…]

TV host: He also
said that Israel is the 52nd state [of the US].

Sa’id Okasha:
Look, saying “the 52nd state” is not the same as talking about throwing
the Jews into the sea. It has never been proven that any Arab leader…

TV host: Let me
tell you something so we won’t argue too much about Abd Al-Nasser.
I am Iraqi…

Sa’id Okasha:
I recognize your accent.

TV host: They
used to make us memorize the speeches of Gamal Abd Al-Nasser.

Sa’id Okasha:
When did Abd Al-Nasser say this?

TV host: Look,
he made this speech in 1967. More or less.

[…]

Sa’id Okasha:
Israel spreads these claims in order to garner sympathy. Why should
I accept this? It’s one myth against another myth.

TV host: I’m
telling you, I’m Iraqi. Iraqi! I was taught this in Baghdad. You think
Saddam Hussein would teach us things that Israel says?!

Sa’id Okasha:
Saddam Hussein did not know anything. He was completely clueless. He
said things to excite the masses, but this sentence was never said.

TV host: Once
again, that’s your own opinion.

[…]

Sa’id Okasha:
The big problem of the Arabs is that they portray the Jews as geniuses.
It is as if the Arabs support the myth that the Jews are the Chosen
People. The Jews are not such geniuses that they could rules the world,
and successfully conspire against everybody else.