[ October 15, 2026 ]
The NY Post reported that Gov. Kathy Hochul was defensive and dismissive while drawing fiery attacks from Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman during Tuesday’s New York gubernatorial debate.
Blakeman slammed Gov. Kathy Hochul Tuesday during their sole face-to-face debate ahead of the November election, tearing into the incumbent over sanctuary policies he said were putting New Yorkers in danger.
New York governor's race is neck-and-neck as Kathy Hochul and Bruce Blakeman set to debate: poll https://t.co/IMCLCuQLKQ pic.twitter.com/owaSPxomMV
— New York Post (@nypost) October 13, 2026
ADVERTISEMENT
While the incumbent looked like “a deer in headlights,” her GOP opponent gave an aggressive showing — repeatedly attacking Hochul over New York’s high energy costs, taxes, and rising antisemitism, Dr. Lillian Glass told The Post.Once the Democrats seized control of New York State, it’s become a one party state – much the way california and other blue state totalitarian ehllholes became.
In a free and fair election, common sense would carry the day—and Blakeman would carry New York.
Hochul’s defensive posture extended to taking long pauses before answering questions, frequently smiling and looking down at the podium, and smiling as Blakeman talked.
“There was also a lot of pause time where she had to take her time to manufacture an answer. Whereas Blakeman just went right to it and had answers right back to her and had accusations that were very, very straightforward towards her,” Glass said, praising the Long Island pol’s swipes.
Kathy Hochul is barely able to get out her opening statement at this debate.
Almost sounds like someone who doesn't want to face the facts on what she's done to New York as governor. pic.twitter.com/sd9MnEEKar
— Andrew Kolvet (@AndrewKolvet) October 13, 2026
ADVERTISEMENT
Bruce Blakeman Hammers Kathy Hochul Over Antisemitism, Mamdani During New York Gubernatorial Debate
avatar
by Corey WalkerRepublican challenger Bruce Blakeman faces off against Democratic incumbent Governor Kathy Hochul, not pictured, in the only scheduled debate ahead of the November New York gubernatorial election, at the Spectrum News NY1 studios, in New York, US, Oct. 13, 2026. Photo: Anna Connors/Pool via REUTERS
New York Republican candidate Bruce Blakeman accused Democratic incumbent Gov. Kathy Hochul of failing to protect Jewish New Yorkers from rising antisemitism and forging a political alliance with New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani despite his alleged antisemitic behavior during Tuesday’s gubernatorial debate.
Blakeman, the Jewish Nassau County executive challenging Hochul in November, called Mamdani an antisemite and argued that the mayor’s rhetoric and policies have contributed to an increasingly hostile climate for Jewish residents. He also faulted Hochul for maintaining a political relationship with Mamdani despite their differences over Israel and antisemitism.
During the debate, Blakeman was questioned over reports circulated in the New York Times that he said during a private meeting on Sunday with Hassidic Jewish leaders that Mamdani would fail to protect them if there were violent riots or sexual assaults targeting women. According to the reports, he said, “If there is rioting here, if they’re burning down the yeshivas and your shuls, and burning down your house and raping your women.”
Blakeman also took Hochul to task for what he described as her inadequate response to anti-Israel protests on the Columbia University campus in the wake of Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, massacre across southern Israel. He argued that she was too weak and facilitated a “lawless” environment.
“They are the professional protesters that took over Columbia University, that blocked our bridges and our roadways, and the lawlessness that took place while Kathy Hochul wouldn’t protect Jewish students,” he said.
ADVERTISEMENTThe confrontation came as concerns about antisemitism, anti-Israel demonstrations, and the political direction of New York’s Democratic leadership have become prominent issues in the governor’s race.
Asked during the debate to clarify whom he meant, Blakeman pointed to what he described as professional protesters who had occupied Columbia University and blocked bridges and roadways during demonstrations following Hamas’s Oct. 7 atrocities, amid the ensuing war in Gaza.
He accused Hochul of failing to adequately protect Jewish students amid campus protests and invoked the 1991 Crown Heights riots, criticizing the response of then-Mayor David Dinkins to the violence.
“I’m talking about political leaders getting involved in law enforcement when they shouldn’t be, what happened under David Dinkins when he waited three days before he stopped the rioting in Crown Heights,” Blakeman said.
During the 1991 riots, Black New Yorkers targeted and attacked Jewish residences and businesses for three days. The riots, which were sparked by a fatal car crash involving a Hasidic Jew and two young black children, were largely motivated by an unfounded belief that Jewish New Yorkers received preferential treatment from city services.
Blakeman’s comments drew a sharp response from Hochul, who argued that his warnings reflected a lack of confidence in law enforcement.
Blakeman also targeted Mamdani over his approach to antisemitism and Israel, pointing to the mayor’s decision to rescind the city’s use of the widely adopted International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA)’s working definition of antisemitism on his first day in office.
Beyond traditional antisemitic acts associated with the medieval period and Nazi Germany, the definition provides contemporary examples of antisemitism found in public life, media, education, workplaces, and religious settings — including Holocaust denial and modern forms targeting Israel, such as demonizing the Jewish state and denying its right to exist. Critics argue that the definition can treat legitimate criticism of Israel as antisemitism.
Mamdani, a far-left democratic socialist and anti-Zionist, is an avid supporter of boycotting all Israeli-tied entities who has been widely accused of promoting antisemitic rhetoric. He has repeatedly accused Israel of “apartheid” and “genocide”; refused to recognize the country’s right to exist as a Jewish state; and refused to explicitly condemn the phrase “globalize the intifada,” which has been associated with calls for violence against Jews and Israelis worldwide.
Recently, Mamdani promoted outrage when he accused Israel of orchestrating an “ongoing genocide” in Gaza in a statement commemorating the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas’s Oct. 7 massacre — an attack that many experts have described as an act of genocide against Jews and Israelis.
Hochul — who describes herself as an ally of Israel — and Mamdani have developed a political alliance despite their ideological differences. Blakeman seeks to refashion that relationship into a millstone around Hochul’s neck as she seeks to retain office in the deep blue state of New York.
The governor has defended her record on Jewish communal safety, while Blakeman has sought to appeal to voters concerned about antisemitism and the direction of the Democratic Party.
However, although Hochul maintains an edge in the overall edge in the contest, polling indicates that Jews in New York are moving away from the Democratic Party. CNN polling revealed on Wednesday showed that Democrats command a 13-point edge in the Jewish vote, a sharp decline from the 49-point and 40-point advantage they enjoyed in both 2022 and 2018, respectively.
Meanwhile, Blakeman is performing better in the polls than past Republican gubernatorial nominees in New York. In one striking Pollfinity survey released on Tuesday, Hochul leads Blakeman by a margin of 47 percent to 44 percent.
Other polling has shown the incumbent ahead by about 10 points.
An Oct. 8 poll from Emerson College and PIX 11 showed Hochul ahead of Blakeman by 12 points, 52 percent to 40 percent.
Days earlier, a Siena University poll in late September found the candidates within 9 points of one another, with Hochul leading 50 percent to 40 percent.
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Please contribute here.
or
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.
ADVERTISEMENTQuick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding.Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.
Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.
Follow Pamela Geller on Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.
Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.
Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the ... symbol to the right of the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
