The “Anti-Islam” Jihadi

The latest news reports are describing the Saudi terrorist who mowed down scores of Christmas market goers at “anti-Islam.” Absurd on its face. Why would he attack a Christmas festival and not a Muslim one?

This is one crazy psy-op for sure. Of course the sharia compliant media is embracing this. When it’s jihad, the media is shtoom. Islamic terror is almost always euphemistically referred to as ‘mental illness.’ Either this guy actually was nuts or or some high level psy-op shit to smear the movement.

Despite claims made by the German press, Taleb Al Abdulmohsen is not an ex-Muslim atheist, nor is he a fan of the AfD or Elon Musk. While he may have spread this misinformation himself, it aligns with the practice of Taqqiye, an Islamic doctrine that permits lying and deception… pic.twitter.com/tU2tRS51Lr

— Maral Salmassi (@MaralSalmassi) December 21, 2024

The terrorist who ran over Christians with his car in a Christmas market in Germany last night and killed over 11 people was pro-Hamas.

I'm not surprised. pic.twitter.com/STs4ffwICB

— Vivid.🇮🇱 (@VividProwess) December 21, 2024

Don't let the media fool you.
If Al Abdul was primarily anti-muslim he would have driven into a muslim street festival.
There were massive demonstrations by syrian islamists celebrating Al Kaida the past weeks.

Abdul did nothing. He waited until it was 4 days before Christmas… pic.twitter.com/ANVCnOoZDc

— Martin Sellner (@Martin_Sellner) December 21, 2024

The man who was arrested for the most recent terrorist attack on a Christmas market- this time in Magdeburg, Germany- is allegedly Saudi national Taleb Al Abdulmohsen. I’ve known him for years (online only) and he never seemed stable to me. He obsessively went after an ExMuslim…

— Yasmine Mohammed 🦋 ياسمين محمد (@YasMohammedxx) December 21, 2024

Taleb Al Abdulmohsen is not an atheist. He is a Shia extremist. Just because a Muslim self identifies as an Atheist or claims to have converted to Christianity – recent case in the UK – it doesn't mean it's truth.

This is Taqiyya.

— Mahyar Tousi (@MahyarTousi) December 21, 2024

The best analysis I have seen to date comes from Islamic scholar Robert Spencer:

Some of my own considerations:

1. Vehicular jihad is a well-established practice going back years. ISIS has called for it. It is not a common practice among any other criminal or terrorist sector.

2. Saudi Arabia, where the Magdeburg perpetrator is from, is a hotbed of jihad activity.

3. Islam has doctrines calling for warfare against unbelievers. See Qur’an 8:39, 9:5, 9:29, etc. etc.

4. Islam has doctrines calling for deception under certain circumstances. See here: https://jihadwatch.org/2022/06/niger-40-ex-jihadis-complete-deradicalization-course-swear-on-quran-they-wont-do-any-more-violence…

5. Jihad groups have been calling for attacks on German Christmas Markets.

6. Several jihad plots against Christmas Markets have already been foiled.

ADVERTISEMENT

7. Muslims recently marched through a German Christmas market screaming “Allahu akbar” and “There is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his prophet.”

8. It seems that the perp has been claiming to be an ex-Muslim — and a Zionist! — and has contacted several anti-jihad media figures, asking them to interview him. This leads to several possibilities.

a. That he was a sincere ex-Muslim and Zionist, and decided to attack a target of jihadis in a manner in which jihadis often attack, for no clear reason.

b. He was lying, in preparation for his jihad attack.

c. He was a genuine ex-Muslim, but in a moment of personal crisis returned to Islam, and realized that he had to do a great deed to outweigh his apostasy on Allah’s big judgment scales (Qur’an 21:47). Muhammad teaches that no deed is greater than jihad, so he went for a jihad attack.

d. Or alternatively, he just snapped, has some psychotic episode, etc. In that case it’s noteworthy that his desire to seek “revenge” led him to emulate a common practice of the warriors of the religion he professed to have left.

Of those three possibilities, the first one is the least likely. Why? Because if he was an ex-Muslim who went mad, he would be much more likely to have targeted Muslims, rather than choosing a favored target of the very jihadis he despised. The establishment media will be insisting that he is an ex-Muslim and never consider the possibility of deception or a return to Islam. That’s because they don’t know about those possibilities and because they always do whatever they can to distance Islam from the violence done in its name and in accord with its teachings. But their claims in this case are quite flimsy.