Oregon Bans Christians From Adopting Children

This from the villains who “abort” full term babies and encourage the sexual mutilation of children.

The Oregon Department of Human Services has ruled that prospective adopting parents must “respect, accept and support the race, spiritual beliefs, sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression, disabilities, national origin, cultural identities, immigration status and socioeconomic status of a child or young adult in the care or custody of the Department.”

Wow. Oregon just denied a woman from being able to adopt…because she’s Christian.

They’re worried she wouldn’t be willing to accept and sexually mutilate the child if they wanted to be “trans” in the future.

Dept of Human Services
Phone: 503 -945-5600https://t.co/Ufaslp6igr

— Mindy Robinson 🇺🇸 (@iheartmindy) April 4, 2023

Oregon Bans Christians From Adopting Children

By: Todd Starnes, April 7, 2023:

The state of Oregon refused to let a Christian mother of five adopt a child because of her religious beliefs, according to a federal lawsuit filed by Alliance Defending Freedom.

Completing this poll entitles you to our news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Jessica Bates began the process of applying to become certified to adopt a child from Oregon’s foster care system one year ago.

The Oregon Department of Human Services, the agency responsible for the delivery and administration of the state’s child welfare programs, denied her application because individuals seeking to adopt must agree to “respect, accept, and support … the sexual orientation, gender identity, [and] gender expression” of any child the department could place in an applicant’s home, and Bates could not agree to this because of her faith.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Oregon’s policy amounts to an ideological litmus test: people who hold secular or ‘progressive’ views on sexual orientation and gender identity are eligible to participate in child welfare programs, while people of faith with religiously informed views are disqualified because they don’t agree with the state’s orthodoxy,” said ADF Senior Counsel Jonathan Scruggs. “The government can’t exclude certain communities of faith from foster care and adoption services because the state doesn’t like their particular religious beliefs.”

Bates alerted ODHS that she will happily love and accept any child, but she could not say or do something that goes against her Christian faith.

ODHS’s policy, however, excludes her and others who hold traditional religious beliefs about human nature and sexuality by requiring parents to use a child’s preferred pronouns, take a child to affirming events like Pride parades, or facilitate a child’s access to dangerous pharmaceutical interventions like puberty blockers and hormone shots if the child so requests.

“Oregon’s policy makes a sweeping claim that all persons who hold certain religious beliefs—beliefs held by millions of Americans from diverse religious faiths—are categorically unfit to care for children,” said ADF Legal Counsel Johannes Widmalm-Delphonse. “That’s simply not true. Oregon is putting its political agenda above the needs of countless children who would be happy to grow up in a loving, Christian home like Jessica’s. We urge the court to remind the state of its constitutional and moral obligations and reaffirm Jessica’s First Amendment right to live out her faith without being penalized by the government.”