RNC files emergency request with Supreme Court over requirements for mail-in ballots

73

The Democrats want election chaos. Mail-in voting has proven to be just that.

The Republican National Committee has asked the Supreme Court to intervene in a case involving relaxing some signature and witness requirements for mail-in ballots.

Republicans File Emergency Request With Supreme Court Over Vote-By-Mail Ruling

The DCP, August 12, 2020:

Story continues below advertisement

Once again, Democrats are pulling out all of the stops before November’s crucial election.

Several Democrats are pushing for an immediate transition away from traditional in-person voting to a vote-by-mail system in all 50 states ahead of the 2020 election amid the coronavirus.

And Republicans just did something about it.

According to Fox News, the Republican National Committee has officially asked the Supreme Court to make an emergency ruling regarding a case involving relaxing signature and witness requirements for mail-in voting.

Republican leaders believe that Democrats are purposely trying to make mail-in voting harder for rural Americans and want the Supreme Court to intervene.

The case involves Rhode Island vote-by-mail requirements.

The RNC is requesting that state officials allow voters to vote by mail without requiring the documents to be signed and witnessed by a notary.

Republicans assert that the requirement for a notary discriminates against people who live in the country because they won’t have access to as many notorious before election time.

RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel says that Democrats are purposely trying to create problems ahead of the November election, and is asking the Supreme Court to help Americans stick with the systems that have worked in the past.

“This is all coming from the Democrats. The president is saying, ‘Keep the systems in place that have worked,’” McDaniel said.

Back in June, President Donald Trump sounded off on voting by mail.

During a radio interview, the president told conservative host Michael Savage that vote-by-mail could allow Democrats to cheat in the upcoming elections.

“We’re suing, and we’re filing another big lawsuit, I think, on Friday, and I think we have a good case,” Trump said.

Trump suggested that Democrats may try to swing the election by failing to send conservatives vote-by-mail ballots.

Trump said: “[California Democratic] Gov. Newsom announced that he’s sending out millions and millions of mail-in ballots. You say, ‘Who are they sending these to?’ Maybe people who are, let’s say, in a Republican district, and maybe those ballots, don’t get sent there. This is the craziest thing. This will be a rigged election if they are allowed to do it.”

Trump continued: “I think that’s one of the biggest risks I have. And the biggest risk, frankly, that the Republican Party has is mail-in ballots. It’s a very big risk.”

One issue many have with nationwide vote-by-mail is that it could potentially allow millions of inactive and possibly illegal votes to occur, which could have a huge effect on the outcome of the election.

This could be a disaster, according to at least one expert.

Government Accountability Insititute research director Eric Eggers says the Democrats’ plan for nationwide mail-in voting would send ballots to 24 million inaccurate and flawed voter registrations.

Eggers said nationwide mail-in voting would be wide open to fraud and abuse.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
73 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago

The RNC is requesting that state officials allow voters to vote by mail without requiring the documents to be signed and witnessed by a notary.

Republicans assert that the requirement for a notary discriminates against people who live in the country because they won’t have access to as many notorious before election time.

This doesn’t solve the problem of natiowide mail in voting. This is about rural voters in Rhode Island removing requirements already in place. The GOP is fighting that. It’s alttle weird…..Rhode Island is not a must win state.

What someone should do is in their state file lawsuits against their state for heading off mail in voting being mandatory. They would have the right to pursue that as a citizen of their state.

GeneP54
GeneP54
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

I’m afraid this might set a precedent that we don’t really want.

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago

It is a STATE issue. People from the state should stand up and reject it!

The United States SupremeCourt quickly rejected the GOP.

SCOTUS: Rhode Island Mail-in Voters Don’t Need Witnesses
BB 8/13/20

WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday left in place an agreement that allows Rhode Island residents to vote by mail through November’s general election without getting signatures from two witnesses or a notary.

The high court rejected an effort by the Republican National Committee and the Republican Party of Rhode Island to put the agreement on hold, noting that “no state official has expressed opposition.”
….
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/08/13/scotus-rhode-island-mail-in-voters-dont-need-witnesses/

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago

Kanye will hurt Trump more than Biden.
He’s unstable and can’t possibly win in the general and may very well serve as aTrump protest vote. It’s ridiculous that Kanye is running. He’s only on a few state ballots.

Jared Kushner Confirms Meeting with ‘Friend’ Kanye West During 2020 Campaign
By Charlies Spiering
8/13/20

In an interview with Forbes magazine,
West distanced himself from his previous support of Trump.

“I am taking the red hat off, with this interview,” he said, referring to his previous decision to publicly wear the Trump campaign’s Make America Great Again hat.

West also urged President Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden to drop out of the 2020 race, saying he was in the race to win.

“For the other candidates, I just gracefully suggest y’all bow out—Trump and Biden, gracefully bow out,” he said.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/08/13/jared-kushner-confirms-meeting-friend-kanye-west-2020-campaign/

Bill
Bill
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

People know Kanye is unstable. They also know he’s not on all the ballots nationwide.

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago
Reply to  Bill

So is Biden and people are cheering him on!
Scary times….Kanye is wasting his time and taking votes from Trump.

Anthony Silvio
Anthony Silvio
3 years ago

comment image

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
3 years ago
Reply to  Anthony Silvio

Kamala Harris Doesn’t Qualify for Vice Presidency
”Her father was (and is) a Jamaican national, her mother was from India, and neither was a naturalized U.S. citizen at the time of Harris’ birth in 1964. That, according to these commentators, makes her not a “natural born citizen”—and therefore ineligible for the office of the president and, hence, ineligible for the office of the vice president.”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/08/big-legal-expert-claims-kamala-harris-doesnt-qualify-vice-presidency-replaced/

French Taunter
French Taunter
3 years ago
Reply to  DemocracyRules

Democrats don’t care.
Barry Sotero is the proof.

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
3 years ago
Reply to  French Taunter

SCOTUS was weak back then. Obama never was a citizen of the USA, but Pamela Geller and others fought tooth an nail to get him disqualified. There is also a citizenship statute that Harris is violating.

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago
Reply to  DemocracyRules

Through his mother, Obama does have citizenship. His grandmother filed the wrong paperwork in Hawaii when she took over custody and enrolled him in school.

Kamala was born in the U.S.. She wasn’t an anchor baby. Her parents came here legally. If you can prove that is wrong, I’d be delighted. The only problem is Biden would replace her with another lefty.

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Anthony Fauci: No Reason Why We Shouldn’t Be Able To Vote In Person
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/aug/13/anthony-fauci-no-reason-why-we-shouldnt-be-able-vo/
The epidemic is essentially over. And the 2020 January to July inclusive mortality, all causes, is less than the 2019 January to July inclusive mortality, all causes [CDC data].

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago
Reply to  DemocracyRules

It is up to the Governors. Fauci is all over the place on this. You can’ t believe or trust anything he says. Facts have never mattered to him. You know what he is.

I am going to play devils advocate. If I was a DEM governor, I’d require mail in voting because, wink wink, I’d care about a flare up and risking your health. If they can allow over the top violence and still call it “peaceful” protesting, initially blame it on Floyd, then Trump and not it’s reparations with no push back from Governors, who are now defunding police, why wouldn’t they be all in for mail in voting? The more chaos the better for them.

Trump’s biggest enemy is mail in voting, social media censoring him, Google, youtube etc. msm lying all the time RINOS and Never Trumpers. They do sway elections. Trump isn’t able to do rallies either….

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Felix: Yes, but these new data are compelling [CDC]:
The 2020 January to July inclusive mortality, all causes = 1,662,833
The 2018 January to July inclusive mortality, all causes = 1,679,697

So basically, mortality varies a lot year to year, and the 2020 mortality is not much different than previous years. In fact it’s less than 2018(!)
For sure, there was big blip from April to June, but monthly mortality is pretty normal now, and some months have been below normal, so it pretty much evens out between the years. So an in-person election seems very safe.

Drew the Infidel
Drew the Infidel
3 years ago
Reply to  DemocracyRules

Agreed. As an election judge here in Texas, an absentee ballot and a mail-in ballot are NOT the same thing. To request an absentee ballot, you still have to submit positive ID and be a registered voter in that particular jurisdiction.

Mail-in ballots have been mailed to corpses and family pets and are thus totally nebulous and inaccurate.

CindyLouTerror
CindyLouTerror
3 years ago

So now my dog votes!

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
3 years ago
Reply to  CindyLouTerror

Only if your dog is a registered member of the Democrat Party.

santashandler
santashandler
3 years ago

Was “Sam” the dog (the overlord of killer David Berkowitz), a registered demoncrat?

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
3 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

No, santashandler, Sam was FAR too intelligent to be a Democrat Party member. Sam was an Independent.

santashandler
santashandler
3 years ago

Good observation again, Mohandjob! I see that now 🙂

MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
3 years ago

What about cats? Don’t they have the right to vote?! Canine supremacist!

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
3 years ago

Almost all cats are registered Democrat Party members. They’re a shoe-in for receiving a ballot. Dogs have to be screened.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
3 years ago
Reply to  DemocracyRules

” And the 2020 January to July inclusive mortality, all causes, is less than the 2019 January to July inclusive mortality, all causes [CDC data].”

That is solely due to the fact the Covid-19 is a cure for cancer, heart disease, pneumonia, suicide, murder and automobile accidents.

Unfortunately, Covid-19 is not a cure for gun violence. That is why Camel and joey bidet want mandatory “buy backs”.

At which point, when there is a bill gates vaccine, we will all live forever.

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago
Reply to  DemocracyRules

And they lost!

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Well yes, but you don’t know the whole story. Please see my longer reply to you about ‘natural born citizen’. It took a while to write!

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
3 years ago
Reply to  French Taunter

It is SCOTUS who must be satisfied.

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago
Reply to  DemocracyRules

Do you really think the Supreme Court, if it went there would NOT side with Kamala? If they can define gender by feelings rather than by science….how do you think they would decide this? They like to legislate rather than interpret, in case you haven’t noticed.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

You can thank Trump appointees for that.

Laddyboy
Laddyboy
3 years ago
Reply to  French Taunter

And here I heard that BARRY (sotero/0bama/the off-spring of frank marshal davis) PARKS was a nephew of Rosa Parks.

Cauc-Asian Patriot
Cauc-Asian Patriot
3 years ago
Reply to  French Taunter

AMEN! COMPLETELY CORRECT!

Drew the Infidel
Drew the Infidel
3 years ago
Reply to  French Taunter

The Halfrican.

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago
Reply to  DemocracyRules

It really doesn’t matter. Kamala was born on U.S. soil.

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Not qualified by the Constitution definition of “natural born citizen”.

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago
Reply to  DemocracyRules

Could you be more specific? Where does it say in the Constitution that she is not a natural born citizen? Each time an attempt to challange a candidate born on U.S. soil or a territory has failed.

Kamala Harris was born on U.S. soil. If you like consider her an acchor baby even though her parents were here legally as citizens.
Anchor babies have U.S. citizenship when born on our soil. That should be challenged with these “birthing tours”…..

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Hey Felix: OK, well I admit that the issue is controversial, but here is the logic. First, consider Obama, who was disloyal to the USA, and he was more loyal to Iran, China and the Muslim Brotherhood. That is exactly what the Framers feared, and especially a President who would proclaim his loyalty to Britain, and as Commander in Chief, he could return the USA to the British Crown. This is all well articulated in the Framer’s correspondence.

To avoid an Obama type debacle the Framers used specific legal wording, to describe the President as someone who was born of two US citizen parents, and born on ‘jus solis’, the legal soil of the USA. That would ensure USA patriotism, and that’s the legal meaning of ‘Natural Born Citizen’. Neither Obama’s mother’s nor father’s identity is certain, nor is his birth place certain. All we know for sure is that the claimed father, Obama Sr., was never a US citizen. Therefore, Obama is not a natural born citizen. Pamela Geller, myself, Dr. Orly Taitz, and others have examined and reviewed this in great detail over years, following several court challenges to Obama’s eligibility.

John McCain just squeaked by on ‘jus solis’ because he was born off naval base in Panama. Usually, US mil bases are considered US soil, and since the off-base hospital was vital, Judges would probably have let that go. But it was never contested. Ted Cruz was contested, because he was born in Canada, and ‘jus solis’ only refers to embassies, mil bases, and USA soil proper. But Cruz lost the nomination, so the issue was moot.

Kamala Harris was born on ‘jus solis’, but neither parent was a US citizen, so she is slam-dunk disqualified. Not all US citizens are “natural born citizens”, and if the Harris candidacy proceeds, expect a fight over that. Harris is like Obama: disloyal to the USA and its Constitution, and therefore, she embodies the very things the Framers feared.

In Obama’s days, Pamela Geller’s ‘Atlas Shrugs’ website was full of these discussions, and Pamela helped start the birth certificate controversy. I helped a bit, and Dr. Orly Taitz is also a lawyer, and she fought several hard court cases against Obama’s citizenship, and lost, but she laid down legal precedent on how to fight these cases. So now you are up to speed, without having to dig through 18th century legal textbooks. And I don’t expect you to agree with me, but at least you know where I am coming from.

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago
Reply to  DemocracyRules

My question is where in the Constitution is Kamala not a natural born citizen?

I must apologize in advance ….I am not in a very patient mood tonight…… I already know what your speculation is….and some of what you state is questionable about Obama and Kamala. You are insisting they don’t have legal U.S. citizenship where facts seem to state otherwise. We don’t need to regurgitate all that… and disagree ad nauseam. Forget about Obama. BTW, I am up to speed…. and still have the same question for you.

Where does it say in the Constitution that Kamala is not a legal U.S. citizen? Every time your approach has been used against Rubio, McCain and even Ted Cruz, your theory hasn’t worked. So where is the evidence Kamala’s parents were not citizens? Kamala was born on U.S. soil or can you prove otherwise? Even if her parents were “nationals” as you would like to believe, then she would be an anchor baby and still have U.S. citizenship. I don’t see any issue here, just wishful thinking and lots of speculation on your part.

I am wondering more and more if Biden will pull this off. If he does, our country is finished and and it will be in record time.

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Well if you did not want to read my explanation, then you should not have asked. You may be grumpy, but I’m not, and I try to be very patient.

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago
Reply to  DemocracyRules

I’m not grumpy so don’t put condescending words in my mouth. I am impatient and have read your explanation. There is no citizen issue with Kamala no matter how you would like to imagine there is.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Hi, felix1999. She’s a legal citizen. Any naturalized citizen is a “legal citizen”.

Anyone born on U.S. soil is considered a U.S. citizen. That is what qualifies Camel Harris as a “legal citizen”.

However, there is a difference between “natural born” and “legal”.

DemocracyRules definition is quite good. Re-read it.

Hope all is well with you and yours.

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
3 years ago

Well Ach, I guess the discussion here represents this controversy in a nutshell. People disagree on the meaning of ‘natural born citizen.’. The same things happened over Obama, McCain, and Cruz. So I will leave well enough alone on this topic.

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Hey Felix: OK, well I admit that the issue is controversial, but here is the logic. First, consider Obama, who was disloyal to the USA, and he was more loyal to Iran, China and the Muslim Brotherhood. That is exactly what the Framers feared, and especially a President who would proclaim his loyalty to Britain, and as Commander in Chief, he could return the USA to the British Crown. This is all well articulated in the Framer’s correspondence.

To avoid an Obama type debacle the Framers used specific legal wording, to describe the President as someone who was born of two US citizen parents, and born on ‘jus solis’, the legal soil of the USA. That would ensure USA patriotism, and that’s the legal meaning of ‘Natural Born Citizen’. Neither Obama’s mother’s nor father’s identity is certain, nor is his birth place certain. All we know for sure is that the claimed father, Obama Sr., was never a US citizen. Therefore, Obama is not a natural born citizen. Pamela Geller, myself, Dr. Orly Taitz, and others have examined and reviewed this in great detail over years, following several court challenges to Obama’s eligibility.

John McCain just squeaked by on ‘jus solis’ because he was born off naval base in Panama. Usually, US mil bases are considered US soil, and since the off-base hospital was vital, Judges would probably have let that go. But it was never contested. Ted Cruz was contested, because he was born in Canada, and ‘jus solis’ only refers to embassies, mil bases, and USA soil proper. But Cruz lost the nomination, so the issue was moot.

Kamala Harris was born on ‘jus solis’, but neither parent was a US citizen, so she is slam-dunk disqualified. Not all US citizens are “natural born citizens”, and if the Harris candidacy proceeds, expect a fight over that. Harris is like Obama: disloyal to the USA and its Constitution, and therefore, she embodies the very things the Framers feared.

In Obama’s days, Pamela Geller’s ‘Atlas Shrugs’ website was full of these discussions, and Pamela helped start the birth certificate controversy. I helped a bit, and Dr. Orly Taitz is also a lawyer, and she fought several hard court cases against Obama’s citizenship, and lost, but she laid down legal precedent on how to fight these cases. So now you are up to speed, without having to dig through 18th century legal textbooks. And I don’t expect you to agree with me, but at least you know where I am coming from.

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Hey Felix: OK, well I admit that the issue is controversial, but here is the logic. First, consider Obama, who was disloyal to the USA, and he was more loyal to Iran, China and the Muslim Brotherhood. That is exactly what the Framers feared, and especially a President who would proclaim his loyalty to Britain, and as Commander in Chief, he could return the USA to the British Crown. This is all well articulated in the Framer’s correspondence.

To avoid an Obama type debacle the Framers used specific legal wording, to describe the President as someone who was born of two US citizen parents, and born on ‘jus solis’, the legal soil of the USA. That would ensure USA patriotism, and that’s the legal meaning of ‘Natural Born Citizen’. Neither Obama’s mother’s nor father’s identity is certain, nor is his birth place certain. All we know for sure is that the claimed father, Obama Sr., was never a US citizen. Therefore, Obama is not a natural born citizen. Pamela Geller, myself, Dr. Orly Taitz, and others have examined and reviewed this in great detail over years, following several court challenges to Obama’s eligibility.

John McCain just squeaked by on ‘jus solis’ because he was born off naval base in Panama. Usually, US mil bases are considered US soil, and since the off-base hospital was vital, Judges would probably have let that go. But it was never contested. Ted Cruz was contested, because he was born in Canada, and ‘jus solis’ only refers to embassies, mil bases, and USA soil proper. But Cruz lost the nomination, so the issue was moot.

Kamala Harris was born on ‘jus solis’, but neither parent was a US citizen, so she is slam-dunk disqualified. Not all US citizens are “natural born citizens”, and if the Harris candidacy proceeds, expect a fight over that. Harris is like Obama: disloyal to the USA and its Constitution, and therefore, she embodies the very things the Framers feared.

In Obama’s days, Pamela Geller’s ‘Atlas Shrugs’ website was full of these discussions, and Pamela helped start the birth certificate controversy. I helped a bit, and Dr. Orly Taitz is also a lawyer, and she fought several hard court cases against Obama’s citizenship, and lost, but she laid down legal precedent on how to fight these cases. So now you are up to speed, without having to dig through 18th century legal textbooks. And I don’t expect you to agree with me, but at least you know where I am coming from.

Cauc-Asian Patriot
Cauc-Asian Patriot
3 years ago
Reply to  DemocracyRules

UNFORTUNATELY THE OBAMA WAS THE CHANGE THAT MATTERED OF THAT IDEA! IT SUCKS!

CreoleGumbo
CreoleGumbo
3 years ago
Reply to  DemocracyRules

What else is new?
Obama got away with it, so why should this stop Harris?

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
3 years ago
Reply to  Anthony Silvio

Kamala Harris Doesn’t Qualify for Vice Presidency
”Her father was (and is) a Jamaican national, her mother was from India, and neither was a naturalized U.S. citizen at the time of Harris’ birth in 1964. That, according to these commentators, makes her not a “natural born citizen”—and therefore ineligible for the office of the president and, hence, ineligible for the office of the vice president.”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/08/big-legal-expert-claims-kamala-harris-doesnt-qualify-vice-presidency-replaced/

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
3 years ago
Reply to  Anthony Silvio

Kamala Harris Doesn’t Qualify for Vice Presidency
”Her father was (and is) a Jamaican national, her mother was from India, and neither was a naturalized U.S. citizen at the time of Harris’ birth in 1964. That, according to these commentators, makes her not a “natural born citizen”—and therefore ineligible for the office of the president and, hence, ineligible for the office of the vice president.”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/08/big-legal-expert-claims-kamala-harris-doesnt-qualify-vice-presidency-replaced/

Cauc-Asian Patriot
Cauc-Asian Patriot
3 years ago
Reply to  Anthony Silvio

IT IS A MYTH OF THEIRS’ THAT WORKS!

knightsstrength
knightsstrength
3 years ago

If one likes a crash course in US politics, watch the Invisible Critic, even a strange way but Interesting

This Episode is about the troubles we have with fake medfia and so much more that happened to Andrew Jackson

Episode 8: Forbidden History // Andrew Jackson vs “The Bank”
https://www.bitchute.com/video/MYluNMF9i4SU/

Episodes
https://realhistorychannel.org/invisible-critic-videos

Not keen on this, atleast no peace with Palestine, if one knows the Bible

BREAKING: Trump Announces ‘Historic Peace Agreement’ Between Israel, UAE
President Trump, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel, and Sheikh
Mohammed Bin Zayed—Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme
Commander of the United Arab Emirates—spoke this morning and agreed to
the full normalization of relations between Israel and the UAE, Brooke
Singman reports for Fox News.

“Everybody said this would be impossible,” President Trump said from the
Oval Office. “This is a truly historic moment. Not since the
Israel-Jordan peace treaty was signed more than 25 years ago has so much
progress been made towards peace in the Middle East.”

Seven Brothers
Seven Brothers
3 years ago

If the courts allow mail in voting just like they did for Rhode Island the Demorats will win by FRAUD for sure!

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago
Reply to  Seven Brothers

Yup! I am preoccuppied with that.

Why aren’t CITIZENS who have legal standing in their states objecting to it?
Trump can’t over rule state rights. Going after Rhode Island, imo, was waste of time. The Supreme Court was clear, people form RHODE ISLAND were not objecting to it and they were the ones that had to object to it and relax the rules.

French Taunter
French Taunter
3 years ago

Every Walmart has an average of 7,500-10,000 customers a day,
But somehow having America vote in person where the average precinct
has fewer than 400 voters is magically deadly. Fraud is not only planned,
it is the only chance The Garbage Party has to unseat DJT. Democrats are traitors.

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
3 years ago
Reply to  French Taunter

Excellent point.

TARDRE
TARDRE
3 years ago
Reply to  French Taunter

It’s all by design. I mean look at Joe. He is drooling out of both sides of his mouth. Been in politics for 40 plus years. Most corrupt administration ever, used his office for monetary gain. Is a racist and fondler of little children.

He couldn’t win against a dead fish. Yet here he is.

It’s all about the next theft. I believe it will be a record turnout unlike what the nation has ever seen. So much so that more people will have voted than could possibly be legal.

Bill
Bill
3 years ago

The D’s need to cheat to win. They know this. That’s why they are pushing Cheat-By-Mail.

tedlv
tedlv
3 years ago

“Republicans assert that the requirement for a notary discriminates against people who live in the country because they won’t have access to as many notorious before election time.”

How many “notorious” are there? ????

Ziggy46
Ziggy46
3 years ago

The universe (the 2020 election) is unfolding, as the Democrats have plotted. It is as if Satan has evildoings controlling the destiny of the Constitutional Republic. Until COVID-19, America’s economy boomed; minds were not idle; Trump was on a roll as was the nation. The Republic is nearing collapse underweight of chaos, nurtured and sustained by the faux-Democrats and its legions of radicalized true believers.

The RNC’s emergency request will likely fail because the Democrats have planted, seeded insurgents, moles, within not merely the government but every crack and cranny of influence. The big fix is on chaos rules thanks to the lowlife, bottomfeeding Democrats, the MSM, BLM, ANTIFA, George Soros, etc. The mentioned are but the tip of the proverbial iceberg.

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago
Reply to  Ziggy46

Sometimes I think Trump can overcome them one more time and other times,
I think we are totally screwed. Trump has too many people smiling in his face and stabbing him in the back.

Ziggy46
Ziggy46
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

You are right, Felix, more backstabbers than not. The ongoing treason within the Party and the Democrats to mention only two, keeps me awake at night. I don’t count sheep but the numerous betrayers, albeit, mostly Democrats and its mandarins; the RINOs, too.

Defiant
Defiant
3 years ago

I have every confidence that the SCOTUS will screw us. They often do…

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago
Reply to  Defiant

Yes they do! Same here.

Who ever heard of a Supreme Court Justice arguing with a President in tweets and trying to convince us there are no Obama judges? It’s laughable but that’s what Injustice John Roberts would have you believe, Ginsberg isn’t much better with her comments about Trump and neither are the other two female Obama picks…

Willie
Willie
3 years ago

I hope its a landslide one way or the other because if its a nail-biter and mail-in votes make the difference, its going to be chaos and riots no matter who wins.

Chris Wolf
Chris Wolf
3 years ago

I have received two ballots so far.
That’s 100 percent more than I need to burn because I vote in person, like every American citizen should.
Since LA County spent some billions it doesn’t have any use for on new voting machines, we get handed a legal-size plastic-paper print-out with our party registration in large bold type, easily readable from 10-20 feet, printed across the top.
Then we stand around holding it in our hands for everyone to see while waiting to feed it into the next easily eavesdropped-on touch-screen machine.
It’s brazen corruption of the illegal-immigrant patron Sec of State’s office for the Socialist State of California de Mexico.
The Sec of State is an immigrant and the State Atty is an immigrant and neither of them could care less about the “integrity” of our electoral system.
They think all they have to do is fool the illiterate illegals and illiterate illegals’ Leftist sympathizers, who they see as their only constituents, and who support the corruption, in any case.

geirsmith
geirsmith
3 years ago

Uncertainty surrounds Israel’s West Bank plans after UAE deal

The United Arab Emirates announced Thursday that Israel had agreed to abandon plans to annex parts of the occupied West Bank in exchange for normalised relations. But later statements by Israel underscored that annexation remains “on the table”, throwing the future of the territory into uncertainty.

US President Donald Trump’s original plan in January gave Israel the green light to annex parts of the West Bank, where Jewish settlements are considered illegal under international law.

The Palestinians rejected the plan outright as biased and untenable as did Israel’s Arab neighbours.

For now, Thursday’s deal appears to put annexation on ice. The joint statement released by US President Donald Trump, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and UAE leader Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed al-Nahyan said they had agreed Israel would “suspend declaring sovereignty” over Palestinian West Bank areas.

The statement also announced “the full normalisation of relations between Israel and the United Arab Emirates”.

Sheikh Mohamed underscored in a tweet that during a call with Trump and Netanyahu an agreement was reached “to stop further Israeli annexation of Palestinian territories”.

But Netanyahu, who had hailed the deal as ushering in a “new era” for the Arab world and Israel, later made clear that he had only agreed to delay annexation
https://www.france24.com/en/20200814-uncertainty-surrounds-israel-s-west-bank-plans-after-uae-deal
First Trump said he’d found a peace deal with ISrael/UAE, UAE said Isreal would stop the annexation.

Then Netanyahu said the Annexation was not stopped.

So my conclusion is that the Apocalypse’s Mid-East Peace is on….and just as the Bible says – there’s conflicting reports so it’s like a fake peace.

There are “3 Days of Darkness”. We’re Friday today. It looks like the Apocalypse is for Sunday.

PK
PK
3 years ago

If the SCOTUS allows mail-in voting to become law of the land, our beautiful country will be a distant memory. It is time to fight for what is right. We cannot fade into the sunset nor go peaceably into the night. This is a Judean/Christian nation built on those irreconcilable truths. Fundamentally change into a socialist/communist nation? No sir, not on my watch. If not for us, do it for our posterity .

Glen Benjamin
Glen Benjamin
3 years ago

The Post Office union backing Biden. So of course the Democrats want universal ballots. Can you imagine a bad system and fraud now controlling votes by Americans.

Cauc-Asian Patriot
Cauc-Asian Patriot
3 years ago

THE democ-RATS KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THEY ARE DOING! FRAUD THAT HELPS THEM AND HURTS THE REPUBLICANS TO WIN THE UPCOMING ELECTION IS WHAT VOTE BY MAIL, ETC IS ALL ABOUT! democ-RATS ARE THE ORIGINAL PARTY OF TREASON WHO CAN’T BE TRUSTED IN ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM! UNDERSTAND THIS, UNDERSTAND EVERYTHING!
VP DEMENTIA DADDY JOE MIGHTY SLOW BRIBE’M/BIDEN’S RUNNING MATE ISN’T A CONCERN FOR ME AS IT ACTUALLY WASN’T THE BEST CHOICE FOR HIS CAMPAIGN BUT THE BOGUS, GEORGE SOROS-IAN GLOBALIST BANKING CLIQUE EFFORT IN BACKING BLACK RAPPER, KANYE WEST FOR PRESIDENT TO TAKE JUST ENOUGH VOTES FROM PRES. TRUMP IS A LEGITIMATE CONCERN! SUPER SUMMER, RIGHTISTS!

Cauc-Asian Patriot
Cauc-Asian Patriot
3 years ago

WAS ABLE TO FIND MY ORIGINAL COMMENT BUT MY COMMENTS ARE BEING PUSHED WAY DOWN! GOOD THING I USE ALL CAPS TO DISTINGUISH THEM!

TARDRE
TARDRE
3 years ago

May the best automated mail in voting machine win.

TARDRE
TARDRE
3 years ago

This election, where mail in votes are allowed…more people that live in that state that are allowed to vote…will vote.

MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
3 years ago

In Californication Repubs don’t need to bother voting — it’s just one less thing for them to worry about. Thanks Dem0rats!

CreoleGumbo
CreoleGumbo
3 years ago

Rest assured that John Roberts will find a way to say that the entire Democrat scheme is OK.
I sure hope there is a Plan B for what will be done if Roberts and the court rules incorrectly on this one.

geirsmith
geirsmith
3 years ago

Tensions linger between Biden and Obama camps throughout 2020 primary campaign: report
“Don’t underestimate Joe’s ability to f–k things up,” one Democrat who spoke to the former president recalled him saying

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-obama-tensions-2020-primary

Michael Goldman
Michael Goldman
3 years ago

I just found out from a friend that the New Jersey ballots are being sent out, and on THE BACK OF THE ENVELOPE that you put your ballot in, there is a serial number AND THEN EITHER A “D” OR AN “R”. That is INSANE. What do we all think will happen to the ballots with the “R” on them? This is FRAUD! The President needs to stop this NOW!

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!