Supreme Court rules 5-4 AGAINST California Church That Challenged Newsom’s Unconstitutional Limits on In-Person Services

49

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts joined liberal justices in the majority.

John Roberts is a disgrace.

Supreme Court Rejects Church Challenge to California’s Limits on In-Person Services During the Pandemic

The late-night, 5-4 decision allows the state to enforce some restrictions on religious gatherings

Story continues below advertisement

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts joined liberal justices in the majority.

WASHINGTON—The Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision rejected a California church’s request to set aside public-health orders capping attendance at services, issuing opinions shortly before midnight Friday.

The decision revealed sharp differences between Chief Justice John Roberts, who joined liberal justices in the majority, and other conservatives over the response to Covid-19.

The South Bay United Pentecostal Church, in Chula Vista, Calif., contended that the caps, to 25% of capacity or a maximum of 100 persons, discriminate against religion because some secular businesses, such as supermarkets, factories and restaurants, weren’t held to similar limits. With many Christian clergy determined to hold Pentecost services on Sunday, the church’s brief warned that enforcing such public-health orders held the “potential for widespread civil unrest.” The brief quoted President Trump’s statement last week that “I will override the governors” if they fail to lift limits on in-person religious services.

State and county officials countered that their orders placed fewer restrictions on in-person religious services than other mass-audience activities, such as concerts, sporting events and theatrical performances, which currently may not be held at all. “Labor in manufacturing facilities, warehouses, and offices does not typically involve large numbers of people singing or reading aloud together in the same place, in close proximity to one another, for an extended duration,” the state’s brief said, “which increases the danger that infected individuals will project respiratory droplets that contain the virus.”

Lower courts rejected the church’s challenge to the public-health orders, and in an opinion issued alongside the midnight order, Chief Justice Roberts appeared incredulous that the charge of religious discrimination could be entertained.

Gov. Gavin Newsom’s executive order “aims to limit the spread of Covid-19, a novel severe acute respiratory illness that has killed thousands of people in California and more than 100,000 nationwide. At this time, there is no known cure, no effective treatment, and no vaccine,” Chief Justice Roberts wrote, noting that asymptomatic carriers “may unwittingly infect others.”

While churches faced fewer restrictions than other gatherings, the order “exempts or treats more leniently only dissimilar activities, such as operating grocery stores, banks, and laundromats, in which people neither congregate in large groups nor remain in close proximity for extended periods,” the chief justice wrote.

“The precise question of when restrictions on particular social activities should be lifted during the pandemic is a dynamic and fact-intensive matter subject to reasonable disagreement,” he wrote, but the Constitution principally assigns such judgments “to the politically accountable officials of the States.”

Absent clear infringement of constitutional rights, state officials “should not be subject to second-guessing by an ‘unelected federal judiciary,’ which lacks the background, competence, and expertise to assess public health and is not accountable to the people,” he wrote.

In the California case, “the notion that it is ‘indisputably clear’ that the Government’s limitations are unconstitutional seems quite improbable,” he wrote.

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan joined him in the majority, but issued no statements.

Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh dissented.

Justice Kavanaugh, joined by Justices Thomas and Gorsuch, issued an opinion rejecting California’s distinction between in-person religious services and retail businesses.

“California undoubtedly has a compelling interest in combating the spread of Covid-19 and protecting the health of its citizens,” he wrote, but it failed to justify the attendance limits for in-person religious services when a “litany of other secular businesses…are not subject to an occupancy cap.”

“Assuming all of the same precautions are taken, why can someone safely walk down a grocery store aisle but not a pew? And why can someone safely interact with a brave deliverywoman but not with a stoic minister?” he wrote. Unless the state imposed the same occupancy limits across the board, Justice Kavanaugh argued, the public-health order violated the First Amendment right to free exercise of religion.

Otherwise, he said, “the Church would suffer irreparable harm from not being able to hold services on Pentecost Sunday in a way that comparable secular businesses and persons can conduct their activities.”

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
49 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
caschmid@centurytel.net
3 years ago

Fear not. Take this to God in prayer. We are free and answer to a higher authority. And jury nullification trumps the SCOTUS.

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago

There pathetically flawed Supreme Court Justices have NO INFLUENCE on my beliefs. They can rule over the sheeple. It’s best to answer to a higher Authority.

Thomas Faddis
Thomas Faddis
3 years ago

They’re blackmailing Justice roberts.

TomSJr
TomSJr
3 years ago
Reply to  Thomas Faddis

It doesn’t matter. Roberts HAS FREE WILL, which means, HE HAS A CHOICE and he chose to side with the pathetic liberals and THAT IS ON HIM. GOD WILL REPAY.

TomSJr
TomSJr
3 years ago

JOHN ROBERTS:
A PATHETIC UNRIGHTEOUS HUMAN BEING.

May GOD have mercy on his dark soul.

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago
Reply to  TomSJr

I’d rather see mercy on other souls…
Be glad I am not God!

Andrew
Andrew
3 years ago

John Roberts has made his pact with Satan.

Patriotic American
Patriotic American
3 years ago
Reply to  Andrew

It says something that Kavanaugh, in his dissent, has stayed the course on this, after what they tried to do to him. Gorsuch too. (Notice I’m ONLY mentioning those who were nominated and confirmed during Trump’s Presidency – so far we’ve no worries on Justices Thomas or Alito.) Imagine if Hillary had been President when such SCOTUS vacancies took place. We’d’ve had more Sotomayors, Kagans and Ginsburgs and that California church would have been REALLY screwed. (So would have Jack Phillips, but that’s another issue.)

LightTexas
LightTexas
3 years ago

There must be pictures of him with Epstein’s flock

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago
Reply to  LightTexas

Wouldn’t surprise me!

LibertyBelle
LibertyBelle
3 years ago
Reply to  LightTexas

That’s why they had to kill Epstein.

LightTexas
LightTexas
3 years ago
Reply to  LibertyBelle

LOL

taxpayer22
taxpayer22
3 years ago

Roberts has been compromised (owned) by the Deep State since (at least) the Obama Care ruling. .

John Roberts may have done an illegal adoption of his kids from Ireland, the Deep State have owned him since they discovered that.

Patriotic American
Patriotic American
3 years ago
Reply to  taxpayer22

Obviously the Left and the Deep State have something on him, to have such power and control over him.

I wouldn’t put it past this cabal to take down Bill Cosby in the way they did, in retaliation for his 2004 “pound cake” speech – doing exactly as they’d done with other Blacks who’ve “wandered off the plantation” in order to totally kneecap them. (Herman Cain can attest to this, I’m sure.)

taxpayer22
taxpayer22
3 years ago

The media and other lefties knew that Cosby was drugging and raping women for decades.

Cosby got a pass until he departed the leftie , progressive plantation with his pound cake speech.

White Democrats get really upset if their Blacks try to escape the slave plantation.

Dem-Smasher
Dem-Smasher
3 years ago
Reply to  taxpayer22

Bingo! This is why none of the major players involved in Obamagate will go to prison…

Obama had Brennan spy on and obtain blackmail on anyone who could expose their crimes, sedition and corruption.

In 2014, even The New York Times was compelled to report that Brennan had hacked into the computers of the members on the Senate Intelligence Committee… Brennan lied and vigorously denied it until he was confronted with the evidence showing he had. Only then did he offer a fake apology.

Brennan incurred absolutely zero punishment for his treason because those senators are afraid of any compromising information he might have obtained on each of them as a result of his illegal spy gathering mission.

It is also why Justices Roberts voted in favor of Obama Care… They hacked his computer as well and blackmailed him over the legality of his adopted son. –Big League Politics

They also hacked the computers of reporters Sharyl Attkisson and James Rosen… Anyone who might expose their crimes and corruption…

And if they don’t have blackmail on a particular person who might expose them, they will just make it up just like they did with General Flynn…

Flynn was supposed to be the example they set up to show that if You cross them, they will bankrupt you and destroy your reputation”.

“Six ways to Sunday…”

We just also learned that John Brennan suppressed Intel saying Russia actually wanted Hillary Clinton to Win, not Trump– Fox News

John Brennan
Obama’s CIA Director, voted for the Communist (CPUSA) Presidential candidate Gus Hall in 1976 during the Cold War. Brennan told an audience that he voted for the Communist Party presidential candidate not because he was young and stupid, but because he was “unhappy with the system” and saw the “need for change”… “Hope and Change” ring a bell? Gus Hall was a Four-time CPUSA presidential candidate and U.S. Communist Party boss. He did time in Leavenworth for ‘Conspiring and Teaching the Overthrow of the U.S. Government by Force or Violence. Sounds a lot like Antifa… John Brennan is a Communist subversive. President Trump ordered Brennan’s security clearance be revoked, however, Deep State bureaucrats continue to ignore Trump’s order.

Jim
Jim
3 years ago
Reply to  Dem-Smasher

You can’t fire or impeach Supreme Court “Justices”, so I doubt they have anything over him that would matter. They are there for life. Roberts was always a lefty leaner. When RINOs select a candidate, you can be sure they picked a Fifty Columnist.

Jim
Jim
3 years ago
Reply to  Jim

correction: Fifth Columnist

Dem-Smasher
Dem-Smasher
3 years ago
Reply to  Jim

Who said anything about firing him?

They can take his son away or possibly throw Roberts in jail for fraud if the adoption of his son wasn’t legal.

LibertyBelle
LibertyBelle
3 years ago
Reply to  Jim

I believe a SCJ can be removed if found guilty of a real crime, just not for his rulings.

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago
Reply to  taxpayer22

I am convinced Roberts is also a closet homosexual. I posted a brief background on him and how his relationship with the Bush’s. Between a suspected illegal adoption of his two kids from Ireland and being a pro bono gay rights ADVOCATE, he is compromised. He’s married and for whatever reason may not want to come out as a bisexual or a homosexual. Kagan and Sotomayor are both lesbains.

1986 – 1989 Roberts entered private law practice in Washington, D.C., as an associate at the law firm Hogan & Hartson (now Hogan Lovells), worked in the field of corporate law. As part of Hogan & Hartson’s pro bono practice, he worked behind the scenes for gay rights advocates, reviewing filings and preparing arguments for the 1996 Supreme Court case Romer v. Evans, which was described in 2005 as “the movement’s most important legal victory”. (totally for same sex marriage)

A Supreme Court mystery: Has Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. embraced the court’s same-sex marriage decision that he so passionately protested two years ago?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/a-supreme-court-mystery-has-roberts-embraced-same-sex-marriage-ruling/2017/07/16/33cd522a-68d1-11e7-8eb5-cbccc2e7bfbf_story.html

LibertyBelle
LibertyBelle
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Thanks for the info. It certainly sounds like a creditable answer to the mystery of John Roberts

Mark Steiner
Mark Steiner
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Another brick in the wall of the judgment of God against the United States.

June 26, 2015 and gay marriage. The day America died, according to one evangelical leader. According to this watchman, it is the day America crossed its point of no return.

Judgment will increase against America, and this nation will not be able to assist Israel by the time of the Gog-Magog invasion in Ezekiel 38. America will either be third world of out of business – totally and totalitarianly … God is not mocked.

tituspullo
tituspullo
3 years ago

this is the work of satan. it is impossible to interpret the 1st amendment this way unless you are evil. words no longer mean anything, the deep state is just making shiite up as they go

joe shmoe
joe shmoe
3 years ago

need to defy this, do not comply

dingo
dingo
3 years ago

The Dems/Libs/Left,Global hive mind called “the Collective”, AKA the Democratic Party.
THE BORG
The FEW that co-opt the Weak,Lost,Cowards, Unethical, the Fragmented Social Misfits.
Why,as I realize this is a fictional analogy,I get the Distinct feeling,that these People(?) claim it
as a reality.
These PPL(?),have to be stopped
THEY are not only Hateful, they are Hatefully Insane.
as for me,..Patrick Henry, comes to mind.

mackykam
mackykam
3 years ago

the new Plessy vs. Ferguson.

Jim
Jim
3 years ago

The much vaunted “Seperation of Church” means nothing to 5 Supreme Court “Justices”. No surprise here. This is what you get with Leftys.

patd
patd
3 years ago
Reply to  Jim

This ruling is total BS but there is no such thing as “separation of church.”. The Constitution only states that Congress shall not make no law respecting an establishment of religion. But this ruling violates the 1st by preventing the people from practicing their religion and peacefully assembling. We will never see anything about the criminals that assemble and destroy public and private property though. The Constitution has been nothing but a piece of paper since the ubumer years.

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago

Another unConstitutional ruling.
An earlier one was Roe vs Wade.
comment image?w=380&ssl=1

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago

Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel A. Alito Jr., Neil M. Gorsuch, and Brett M. Kavanaugh voted against it.

In his dissent, Kavanaugh argued that “comparable secular businesses” such as supermarkets, stores, hair salons, and marijuana dispensaries were not subject to the same restrictions as churches.

“The church and its congregants simply want to be treated equally to comparable secular businesses,” Kavanaugh wrote. “California already trusts its residents and any number of businesses to adhere to proper social distancing and hygiene practices.”

The case was brought to the Supreme Court by the South Bay United Pentecostal Church in Chula Vista, Ca

President Trump last week demanded that all religious services be considered “essential services” during the coronavirus pandemic, just as liquor stores and grocery stores are.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/05/29/chief-justice-john-roberts-sides-with-liberal-justices-as-supreme-court-rules-in-favor-of-restrictions-on-religious-services/

Roberts was put on the bench by establishment globalist GWB in 2005 and both HATE Trump! Someone has something on Roberts. He knows better than this. Roberts in particular is doing all possible to make Trump impotent.

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago

He’s the swing vote. He knows better than to rule like this.

Who knew H.W. Bush and GWB were closet LBGTQ+ advocates? I strongly suspect that Justice Roberts is also a homosexual. He appears to be coming out more and more as this has become more acceptable. They tell advocate one thing in public and in private do the opposite. H.W.Bush, GWB and Justice Roberts all hate Trump too! he swamp sticks together when it comes to Trump! Look at a bried history of the Bush’s and Roberts.

Justice Roberts –
Education:
1960 – 1968 Notre Dame Catholic Elementary School

1969-1973 graduated from La Lumiere School,
* small affluent academically rigorous Roman Catholic boarding school in La Porte, Indiana
* Captain of the footbal team
* Regional champion in wrestling,
* Participated in choir and drama
* Co-edited the school newspaper
* Served on the athletic council and executive committee of the student council.
* Roberts graduated first in his class
* First student in school history to go to Harvard

1976 graduated from Harvard University majoring in History
* A.B. summa cum laude and membership in Phi Beta Kappa

1979 graduated from Harvard Law School
* J.D. magna cum laude

1986 – 1989 Roberts entered private law practice in Washington, D.C., as an associate at the law firm Hogan & Hartson (now Hogan Lovells), worked in the field of corporate law. As part of Hogan & Hartson’s pro bono practice, he worked behind the scenes for gay rights advocates, reviewing filings and preparing arguments for the 1996 Supreme Court case Romer v. Evans, which was described in 2005 as “the movement’s most important legal victory”. (totally for same sex marriage)

1989 – 1992 Roberts served President George H. W. Bush as Principal Deputy Solicitor General
1990 – wrote brief stating Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided and should be overturned
Co-authored brief arguing in favor of clergy-led prayer at public school graduations.
1992 Bush nominated Roberts to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit,
No Senate vote held for confirmation, nomination expired
1993 Bush defeated and returned to returned to Hogan & Hartson as a partner

1996 Married Jane Sullivan and later adopted two children from Ireland

2003 – President George W. Bush nominated Roberts for a position on the U.S. Court of Appeals. and confirmed

2005 – present President George Bush nominated Roberts to the U.S. Supreme Court as Chief Justice to replace deceased Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and confirmed by voice vote.

2013 George H.W. Bush first ex President to serve as a witness a same sex marriage
In public was against it.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/george-hw-bush-gay-wedding_n_3991292

2013 George W. Bush offered to perform the ceremony but had a scheduling conflict Just nine years before that ceremony, opposition to same-sex marriage was a central part of Bush’s reelection strategy. https://reason.com/2015/05/26/that-time-george-w-bush-offered-to-offic/
https://reason.com/2015/05/26/that-time-george-w-bush-offered-to-offic/

Other information from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Roberts#LGBT_rights
comment image

LibertyBelle
LibertyBelle
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Wow! John Roberts whole life is a lie. And let us not ever forget we got both Bushies because the people voted for the lesser of two evils. I was very active in the party until I came to understand the GOP will not support conservatives. The only reason we have Trump is he was rich enough to fund his own campaign.

patd
patd
3 years ago

Why is it that only muslim’s rights are protected when dealing with a religion even though islam is a doctrine? And what LAW does the SCOTUS site that supports this BS? Time to get the libturds out of our leadership and courts!

drdByte
drdByte
3 years ago

Roberts is afraid of being the next Anthony Scalia.

Sgtsnuffy
Sgtsnuffy
3 years ago

THIS IS THE DAY THAT OUR OWN SUPREME COURT RULED THAT THE LAW OF THE LAND, OUR CONSTITUTION AND BILL OF RIGHTS ARE NOW AND FOREVER MORE NULL AND VOID. THANK YOU JUSTICE ROBERTS FOR POUNDING ANOTHER NAIL INTO OUR REPUBLICS COFFIN . WITH THE SUPREME COURT NOW ON THE SIDE OF TYRANNICAL DEMOCRAT GOVERNORS AND MAYORS WE WILL HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO FIGHT BACK WITH EVERYTHING AT OUR DISPOSAL FROM VOTING TO OUTRIGHT REVOLUTION OR CIVIL WAR TO SAVE THE REPUBLIC. GOD BLESS OUR NATION AND IT’S PEOPLE AND MAY ALL THOSE WHO SEEK OUR DESTRUCTION BURN IN HELL.

Tagfu 222
Tagfu 222
3 years ago

I hope they are enforcing the laws about large gatherings during the riots. They certainly don’t seem to be enforcing the laws against arson and vandalism.

LibertyBelle
LibertyBelle
3 years ago
Reply to  Tagfu 222

LOL

Andrew
Andrew
3 years ago

Freedom of religion in America was official killed on Friday , it’s always on a Friday see the gospel accounts of Good Friday for the details.

crazymind99
crazymind99
3 years ago
Reply to  Andrew

Just as in the cases of the second amendment giving states the right to limits rounds in magazines. Over time 1 round will be the law in NY. Government will limit church attendance to Friday 6-6:30 AM and upheld by Roberts.

CARRENO  BARTOX
CARRENO BARTOX
3 years ago

To set a fox to keep the geese…
That’s Johnny

Mohammed_Goldberg
Mohammed_Goldberg
3 years ago

Not hard to see which justices on the supreme court serve Satan.

Quantumphase
Quantumphase
3 years ago

I’ll “render unto Ceasar what is Ceasar’s”; but, I will NOT disobey God to please knee knockers and the collective.
“As for me and my house, We will serve the Lord”.
Open up churches, synagogues, temples, mosques, etc. The plandemic has gone far enough!

Zmartmoney
Zmartmoney
3 years ago

I’m thinking that the “brain aneurysm” Roberts had is remotely controlled and he knows it.

crazymind99
crazymind99
3 years ago

You have the right to free speech…. but… leave it up to local officials to determine what is appropriate during the fake Covid-19 pandemic. Roberts is a not determining intent of the US Constitution , he is intent on just stopping Trump from properly interpreting the US Constitution. Roberts re- wrote Obamacare and made Obamacare his own law. WTF.

MrLogical
MrLogical
3 years ago

It’s now been proven beyond any possible doubt: John Roberts has NEVER bothered to read the Constitution. He must have skipped 8th grade Civics.

Worst. Supreme. Court. Justice. Ever.
.

patriot156
patriot156
3 years ago

OR is this where the whore is hated by the beast? The whore taught all these years that Romans 13 meant for us to obey Govt. when it didn’t say that at all. The word power in Romans 13 was translated from Exousia and means liberty not power. Power in the list of words that Exousia could mean is like 4 or 5 down Liberty is the first.

exousia

1) power of choice, liberty of doing as one pleases

1a) leave or permission

patriot156
patriot156
3 years ago

either way the first is gone!

patriot156
patriot156
3 years ago

1st is gone time for the second?

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!