With all this carnage in the cause of Islam, the UK is weighing legislation to institutionalize the definition of Islamophobia in racial rather than religious term. No jokes:
“Islamophobia is rooted in racism and is a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness.”
Soeren Kern explains:
- …..t would effectively shield Islam from scrutiny and valid criticism.
- “We have here a clash between two very different ways of viewing a society: broadly individualism and collectivism…. In a collectivist society the aim is for the rulers to determine how individuals should behave … those in power lay down a detailed code and threaten punishment for non-compliance. And they do not welcome criticism as a device for mutual learning and holding power to account.” — David Green, The Spectator.
- “We are concerned that allegations of Islamophobia will be, indeed already are being, used to effectively shield Islamic beliefs and even extremists from criticism, and that formalizing this definition will result in it being employed effectively as something of a backdoor blasphemy law.” — Open letter signed by 40 British academics, writers and public officials to Home Secretary Sajid Javid.
Days after the British government rejected its preferred official definition of Islamophobia, the Muslim Council of Britain, the biggest Islamic organization in Britain, called for the ruling Conservative Party to be officially investigated for Islamophobia.
Writing for The Spectator, David Green, the founder and chief executive of Civitas, a non-partisan public policy think tank based in London, warned:
“If this definition becomes law, no one would be sure which forms of words could land them in court. It is precisely such uncertainty that makes the difference between a police state and a free society. Historically the term ‘rule of law’ was used to describe the political system in which everyone knew when the law could be used against them and when they were free to act as each believed best. As John Locke put it, in England there was a ‘standing rule to live by, common to every one of that society’ which meant ‘a liberty to follow my own will in all things, where the rule prescribes not; and not to be subject to the inconstant, uncertain, unknown, arbitrary will of another’….
“Using words with the intention of stirring up racial hatred is not protected [under British law] and — no doubt for this reason — the APPG definition claims that criticizing Islam is a form of racism. But race and religion are very different….
“We have here a clash between two very different ways of viewing a society: broadly individualism and collectivism. Individualism sees the primary aim of the state as being to facilitate development of our personal qualities….
“In a collectivist society the aim is for the rulers to determine how individuals should behave … those in power lay down a detailed code and threaten punishment for non-compliance. And they do not welcome criticism as a device for mutual learning and holding power to account.
“We have encountered these authoritarian ideas throughout the history of Europe and thought we had advanced beyond them…. The APPG definition is an attempt to recreate the atmosphere of the past….
“There is wide public support for freedom of speech and it is unlikely to be officially ended by an act of parliament, but it can be chipped away bit by bit. Giving official recognition to the APPG definition of Islamophobia will be a giant step towards an arbitrary police state.”
Senior British police officials have cautioned that the proposed definition of Islamophobia could cause confusion among police officers and hamper the fight against Islamic terrorism. In a letter to Prime Minister Theresa May that was leaked to The Times, Martin Hewitt, chairman of the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC), wrote that the AAPPG’s definition risked exacerbating tensions with the Muslim community and could undermine counterterrorist policing powers and tactics:
“We are concerned that the definition is too broad as currently drafted, could cause confusion for officers enforcing it and could be used to challenge legitimate free speech on the historical and theological actions of Islamic states.
“There is also a risk it could also undermine counterterrorism powers, which seek to tackle extremism or prevent terrorism.”
‘This is how you gut an infidel’: Jokes at London Bridge terrorist’s barbecue three weeks before attack revealed
- Terrorist Khuram Butt hosted a barbecue to celebrate the birth of his son
- One guest said ‘this is how you gut a Kuffar’ while skewering meat on a barbecue
- The jibe was witnessed by Butt’s brother Saad, who worked against extremists
- The comment was made at the inquest of London Bridge terror attack victims
Giving evidence at an Old Bailey inquest Mr Butt said the family was only moderately religious going up.
‘We would still fast and do all the regular things, but in terms of praying five times a day – no,’ he said.
The court heard that as a teenager Khuram Butt was ‘the life and soul of the party’, having multiple relationships and smoking cannabis.
Mr Butt first noticed a change in his brother’s demeanour shortly after their father’s death.
‘I started noticing a positive difference in him.
‘He gave up his parties, girlfriends and cannabis around that time.
‘I noticed a visible difference from what he was wearing before,’ he said.
Mr Butt described beginning to realise the extent of his brother’s religiousness when he attended his wedding.
His reignited religious fervour was so extreme he insisted his new wife Zahra was hidden from view behind a screen.
‘He was extreme in everything he did. With the parties, he had multiple girlfriends, sex with random individuals,’ said Mr Butt.
‘Now that he is starting practicing Islam he wanted to do it fully, to impress God.’
Alarms bells went off in February 2015, when Butt announced to his family his intention to move to Syria.
The terrorist’s brother, Saad Butt was giving evidence at an inquest into the eight victims of the attack in June 2017
Butt committed the attacks along with Racid Redouane, left, and Youssef Zaghba, right
He bought a one way ticket to Turkey and was eventually planning to move to the Islamic State stronghold.
‘From my understanding, he wanted to fight the armed forces with ISIS,’ said Mr Butt.
‘His cover story was that he wanted to settle in a majority muslim country.’
The family was ‘shocked and appalled’ at the decision, and threatened to disown him in order to change his mind.
Mr Butt, who had worked for the anti-extremism organisation Young Muslim Advisory Group until 2012, was asked why he didn’t report his brother to the authorities.
‘I felt very capable of monitoring him.
‘I felt confident, because of my background, I could keep an eye on him,’ he said.
Mr Butt continued meeting with his brother on a weekly basis, and was eventually reassured he planned to settle in the UK.
Despite their frequent meetings and his attempts to challenge his brother’s views Mr Butt said he was largely ignorant of his more extreme associations.
‘I was meeting him, but I am not MI5, I am not police,’ he said.
Jonathan Hough QC, for the coroner, told him: ‘Did it occur to you it might be a good idea to call the authorities that could, perhaps, involve the sort of people you describe?’
In his attempts to sway his brother away from the path to radicalisation, Mr Butt also strongly discouraged him from his plans to take a second wife in 2015.
‘We were quite shocked, that with a lovely wife and mother he had and with a child, he was thinking about aecond wife,’ he said.
‘We reinforced to him that Jihad was also to be home with your wife and child.’
Mr Butt was questioned on why he failed to alert authorities to his brother’s extremist views
The documentary The Jihadi Next Door, which featured Khuram Butt and highlighted his extremism aired in 2016, but his brother claimed to be unaware of it.
Mr Butt said he was devastated after the tragic death of his three-year old daughter.
Mr Hough said: ‘Some might think it surprising that your brother appeared in a national television program associating with extremists and you were not told about it by the rest of the family.’
‘My daughter died because of third degree burns and I think that as far as the family was concerned that was the least of my worries,’ he replied.
Overtime, Butt became increasingly bold in his expression of ant-Western and islamist views.
He posted inflammatory messages in a Whatsapp group both brothers were in.
‘Allah has promised the believers victory’, read one.
‘That is a message that suggests he doesn’t like the country he is living in,’ said Mr Hough.
Mr Butt described feeling relieved when his brother told him he was being looked at by MI5 under the pretext of a fraud investigation.
He believed that now that somebody was monitoring his brother the situation was under control.
On the 14 May, Khuram Butt hosted a barbecue in front of his estate to celebrate the birth of his second child.
A lot of men his brother only knew from the Whatsapp groups were there, wearing traditional muslim garb.
‘One of those that were doing the barbecue stuck a skewer in the meat and said ‘This is how you gut a kuffar’, that means a non-Muslim,’ said Mr Butt.
Asked whether he told his brother everything afterwards, Mr Butt said the only thing they spoke about was a whole in the fencing that could be a safety hazard for Butt’s young son.
On the day of the attack, the family had been up late to break their fast and did not notice Butt missing.
But his brother became concerned after Butt’s wife called him the next morning to tell him he had not come home.
After asking his brother’s friends if they’d seen him, he called the police to report him missing.
‘Were you later contacted by a friend of Khuram’s asking you to check the images of the attackers online?, asked Mr Hough.
‘This friend thought one of the attackers was Khuram?’
‘Yes,’ replied Mr Butt, his voice breaking.
The inquest continues.
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Please contribute here.
or
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.
Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.
Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.
Follow Pamela Geller on Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.
Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.
Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.
If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.
so shitslamophobia is a “thought crime”?
You must not criticize your rulers. If you do you will be punished. It is their country now, not yours. Your white rulers imported them for use as storm troopers to aid in creating a tyranny, now achieved. You voted for this, you were passive and submissive to your teachers, your preachers, your media, your entertainers and your nobles. You are not allowed to complain. Commence your studies for conversion.
drop the crack pipe and step away from the little girl
….or little boy.
I am hoping your reply is sadistic sarcasm.
I’d rather die fighting them than be under their thumb.
Islam’s ideology is hell on earth.
I am hoping your reply is sadistic sarcasm.
I’d rather die fighting int than be under their thumb.
Islam’s ideology is hell on earth.
‘This is how you gut an infidel’
Say, wouldn’t you gut a Moslem the same way?
Really makes a feller think, don’t it? Hey, just askin’.
I’m not afraid of islam, but I do know that all of the muslims are ignorant parasitic feral animal criminals that need lead poisoning and a pig’s carcass to go visit their 72 virgin goats with. Funny how they never attack where those of us are armed 24/7.
….because by their very nature they are miserable primitive cowards and are only strong in packs with preferably women and children in front of them..
These DUMB people!
Islam is not a “race” and as others here know it is an ideology with the intention of taking over the west.
Ban Islam and deport Muslims and stragglers are easily dealt with.
The APPG definition doesn’t rely on Islam being a race. They claim that Muslims are “racialised” as per the bogus concept of “cultural racism”. It is important to understand this in order to counter it. Details here:
https://ecawblog.wordpress.com/2019/04/29/parliamentarians-duped-over-islamophobia-part-3/
Khuram Butt? Is that what they call him? DAMN, the jokes write themselves. Is he related to Bertha, Bertha Butt, one of the Butt sisters?
Everywhere you have muslims in numbers you get death and destruction. Moderates are the grass that hide the snakes. This ideology is not compatible with any other and not itself.
Under the Nazi in Germany any criticism of Hitler and the Nazi party would lead to instant arrest or being taken into ‘protective’ custody. The first occupants of the concentration camps were Germans who spoke their mind
The Muslims almost succeeded in taking over Europe in the Middle ages. If they had, all of what we regard as our culture the art, the music, the drama and literature would not exist today.
Just looking at the faces of the killers how can anyone permit this primate filth to enter the country??? Strict animal quarantine laws should apply.
This proposed law criminalizing criticism of Islam indicates a rising fear by the rulers of the native British reaction to the Islamization of their nation. No law, no tyranny can halt this perfectly natural revulsion rising in the throats of the British people. The rulers are in a panic, and they think a law will stop the anger. It will only accelerate it. I think the deluge is near.
Islamophobia, the thought crime of our present.
It’s the new antisemitism.
It is important to understand exactly what the “type of racism” referred to in the APPG definition of Islamophobia is, in order to counter it.
It is a bogus sociological concept called “cultural racism”. Details here:
https://ecawblog.wordpress.com/2019/04/29/parliamentarians-duped-over-islamophobia-part-3/
It is so sad to read about the people killed by these fanatical pigs. The were young, talented and all were destined for happy, productive lives. They were killed by animals who would never make any impact on lives except to kill. Why do we let them into our countries?
Religious freedom. The problem with violent religious nuts is that they aren’t violent, until they are.
Islamophobia is the new antisemitism. It’s gotten really bad in Germany, with the growing popularity of right wing ideology there (again). Neonazis have been attacking both Jews and Muslims. America has also seen a rise in neo-nazi groups, also attacking Jews and Muslims.
yep kahn you’re doing one hell of a job as the mayor of London. you turned it into a ME jihadist craphole is no time flat. so we in america will be showing our kids how to destroy jihadists and it won’t be by skewering them either. we have a simpler approach to the problem.
Hitchens didn’t originate this quote, it was someone else and I don’t respect him any less for that fact.
Once a raghead actually tried to pull his taqiyya and posted an alternate definition of the words.
Bitch slapped him back into the 9th Century.
Islam, The Cult of Pedophiles and murderers.
And you know what? Not one of these victims were armed with a gun which would have prevented this. Britain won’t allow their “subjects” to be armed but they allow fruitcake moo-moo’s to immigrate.
Please try and Gut this infidel….
How can Islamaphobia be racist? When Islam is a religion, not a race? Aren’t there muslims of all races in many different countries?
SADIQ KHAN
FAILURE TO LONDON
FAILURE TO ENGLAND
FAILURE TO UK
FAILURE TO ALL
The British people must stand up for themselves, that is all I can say at this point.