Looking forward to similar prosecution of faux Dr. Ford.
Kavanaugh Accuser Referred For Prosecution For Lying About Allegations
The man who made the false allegations faces a 10-year sentence.
As noted by Breitbart, the man is not only facing up to 10 years in prison for lying to Congress, his apparent loathing of President Donald Trump, and the connections related to it, may explain why he made the false accusations.
In a letter to the FBI and Department of Justice, Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley wrote that the accuser, whose name was redacted, should be investigated for “potential violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 and 1505, for materially false statements [he] made to the Committee as part of its investigation of allegations against Judge Kavanaugh.”
Story continues below advertisement“The Committee is grateful to citizens who come forward with relevant information in good faith, even if they are not one hundred percent sure about what they know,” Grassley wrote.
“But when individuals provide fabricated allegations to the Committee, diverting Committee resources during time-sensitive investigations, it materially impedes our work. Such acts are not only unfair; they are potentially illegal,” he added.
Late last month, a Rhode Island man called Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse‘s office and accused Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting his friend. Soon after Senate investigators probed the allegations, the man in question appears to have admitted via Twitter that he “made a mistake.”
A man named “Jeffrey Catalan” revealed on Twitter late on Wednesday that he was the “witness” who called Whitehouse’s office and claimed that Kavanaugh and Mark Judge, a high school friend of Kavanaugh, assaulted his friend while intoxicated on a boat.
Catalan’s name was redacted in the Committee’s transcripts, but he appears to have outed himself on Twitter. A cursory overview of his supposed Twitter account shows he loathes Trump and wanted the Pentagon to save the nation from “the parasite that occupies the White House.”
So, the man called a Democratic Senator and alleged that Kavanaugh and friend Mark Judge drunkenly assaulted one of his friends. Soon after the Committee reached out and investigated his claim, he immediately recanted and admitted to, essentially, lying.
It’s unclear why he lied and made such a disgustingly false claim, but it appears the Senate is not going to let him get away with it. Lying to Congress is a felony, and the man would spend up to 10 years in prison for his false accusations against Kavanaugh, if proven guilty.
But more importantly, this is just one of many shoddy allegations that has been brought forward against Kavanaugh in recent weeks.
The saga began last month with Christine Blasey Ford, who alleges Kavanaugh groped her at a high school party around 1982. There are no witnesses corroborate the tale and Kavanaugh has vehemently denied any wrongdoing, attending the supposed party, or ever even knowing Ford.
A second accuser, Deborah Ramirez, claims Kavanaugh exposed himself to her at a party in 1983. A third accuser, Julie Swetnick, came forward on Wednesday and accused Kavanaugh of taking part in “gang rapes” at parties in the early 1980s.
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Please contribute here.
or
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.
Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.
Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.
Follow Pamela Geller on Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.
Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.
Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.
If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.
One down several more to go!
LOCK UP FEINSTEIN !!
I’m hoping it’s not the deep-state or rogue FBI agents (like Peter Strozk ) who are investigating the Kav situation.
If they investigate Kav, they need to investigate Christine Ford’s medical records, text messages, social media accounts.
The committee’s big mistake was “outing” how they found out he was lying. They should have left that information out of it.
PROSECUTE him.
We have to STOP FALSE ALLEGATIONS!
Agree. why perjury law and defamation cases are not filed/used against these scumbags ? It only encourages them.
Crooks and pro-jihadi criminals all around.
CNN and MSM canonises Mc Cain while Egyptian media expose him for being Leading supporter of Muslim Brotherhood in America and Middle east https://tinyurl.com/y9hk3dpk
Its absurd and farcical how MSM Lies and brainwashes American citizens
People need to read and think for themselves. Rich conservatives need to buy news venues so we have balance.
They only file charges against people like Flynn these days for
lying. It must be expected for demonrats to lie.
if you did that frankenstein would go down
And Clapper and Brennan walk away???
Will FORD be referred soon for LYING?
“HIS apparent loathing of President Donald Trump, and the connections related to it, may explain why he made the false accusations.”
Just substitute the word “HIS” with “Ford”, “Ramirez”, “Avenatti the creepy”, or Diane Slime-Stein.”
It is kind of pitiful. In the old days they groomed Anita Hill’s falsehoods to a professional sheen but even then only 26% of American women back then believed her. Women are ‘smarter’ now and believe anything they want to believe.
Only 26% of American women believed her. But through the years Hollywood and CNN/MSNBC have perpetuated the myth that she’s a victim and a hero.
She lied about the “phone logs” in Congress, something the FAKE media never highlights.
the threat of jail is needed to deter false accusers.
Christine Ford’s Lie Detector test was RIGGED to have only 2 questions on it. Not one question mentioned Kav’s name. Not a damn single one! But FAKE NEWS media made me believe that the test was “independent”.
Clearly, you do not understand how a polygraph examination works. I do know. I voluntarily took one when I was accused of “inappropriate contact” with a female student. (Didn’t matter– the leftist administration saw this as a way to get rid of a conservative at the top of the pay scale.) Two questions are asked. The first one is to set a baseline and I was instructed to lie. That took some doing since I don’t customarily lie. Anyhow, the examiner finally got readings on pulse, galvanic skin response, etc. Then he asked me if ANY of the allegations against me were true. (He had previously read the file trumped up by LAUSD.) I anwered “NO.” He consulted his instruments and that was that. He said the results corrobrated my answer. Of course the LAUSD “officials” ignored the test. They grandly waved it off and sniffed, “Those tests don’t mean anything. Anyone can beat them.” Then they added, “Besides, we have our OWN standards.”
I believe you where telling the truth. But that is REGARDLESS of the polygraph you took. Once there was a guy who said he was abducted by Aliens and passed a polygraph test.
sfdklj
See my answer above. You simply don’t know what you are talking about.
Actually he is partially correct. At least in my case, i answered truthfully when taking a lie detector test in Salinas ca, and the result indicated I was not being truthful. My feelings of guilt over the injuries i inflicted on a guy in a fight probably were the cause of that result. Regardless the other party refused to take a lie detector test and the SPD detectives dropped the case.
Polygraph tests are based on the questions being covered. The examiner will have a summary of the matter being investigated. He will ask a question based on what he knows from the summary. In the event other material outside of what has informed him is linked to the matter by the subject of the examination — you, in other words — then the results will likely indicate lying. For example, if the brawl you were in caused three people to go to a hospital, and a forth merely slinked off to some corner and nursed his wounds, but the examiner asked somethng like, “The police report said that three people were injured in your fight. Is that true?” But you, knowing that you demolished some other slug, answered “yes,” then, sure, your pulse rate, etc., would indicate that you were lying. So understand clearly: there is a HUGE difference between validating the METHOD and correctly posing the question. There is a saying that might be appropriate here: “It is impossible to make something fool-proof since fools are so creative.” I’m not calling you or your examiner fools. Rather, even if one believes they have all bases covered, there may still be room for something to slip by. And that does not invalidate the method.
There’s a lot of layering and postulate in that reply to a simple statement of fact. The Q presented was “Who swung first”, that was it. All parameters were developed as is proper prior to actual questioning. Based on that result I will never, and warn others as well to never, submit to another lie detector test. That’s it, this isn’t a, “teaching moment” but you seem to enjoy playing professor.
Yeh, it is a “teaching moment” and I was a teacher. Still have my credentials despite the LAUSD trying to get them taken away from me. So did the other guy swing first? What happened before that? Were you sitting quietly and some loud-mouthed jerk came up and without provocation targeted you? Or was there something that you did or said that prompted him to go off?
Wow. Well i was a paramedic and roofer, among other things. Now disabled and retired. Don’t see any relevance in your rant. I do “see” a guy whose APPARENT (to be clear), level of agitation might benefit from some intervention and encourage you to seek that out. LAUSD could certainly twist a fellow up. Good luck and adios’.
rant
rant/Submit
verb
1.
speak or shout at length in a wild, impassioned way.
“she was still ranting on about the unfairness of it all”
synonyms: fulminate, go on, hold forth, vociferate, sound off, spout, pontificate, bluster, declaim; More
Call it anything you like. I’m done.
LOL!. Appears to be a fairly accurate marker. Glad to hear it.
And you know all about it, I presume? I’d appreciate not receiving more comments from you. I don’t “suffer fools.”
Then quit reading your remarks.
No conscience, liberals can pass them easily.
Yes. Lie detectors are unreliable BUT the media made their viewers think that Christine Ford “believed her own lies”. and that the polygraph supposedly proves she believed them.
The polygraph probably helped fool Chuck Grassley and even other conservatives.
EXCEPT the polygraph was rigged. It’s the biggest piece of evidence that their was an attempt to SYSTEMATICALLY deceive people with “so-called science” and “credentials”.
First, polygraphs are not admissible in Court….second I knew a guy who knew how to beat it ….he just put a tack in his shoe, each question they asked him he would prick himself with the tack….thereby making each answer he gave had the same response which made it look like he was telling the truth…..
Ford is a blithering idiot..a useful idiot for Feinstein….who herself is so politically dirty (along with her cohorts) she should be in Federal prison.
There is no telling how many Chinese who were spying for us and now dead because for almost 20 years she had a Chinese spy working in her home, her office, and driving her around….where is her prosecution?
Fake news doesn’t make me believe anything and hasn’t for a long long time…..way back before odamit was elected they turned me off.
Great, long overdue.
Give him the max with no chance of parole or sentence reduction fro good behavior.
FORD needs to be referred for prosecution for lying.
Her credentials don’t seem to be accurate. I hope FORD is also being investigated further.
Rachel Mitchell Memorandum and Analysis of Christine Blasey-Ford Testimony…
Posted on October 1, 2018 by sundance
Formal nine page report by Rachel Mitchell, Nominations Investigative Counsel
https://www.scribd.com/embeds/389884130/content#from_embed?campaign=SkimbitLtd&ad_group=725X700959X0d7d6d97ea59c7e782e6b1d7d62a8a2c&keyword=660149026&source=hp_affiliate&medium=affiliate
I hope others do!
Menendez and Booker are my corrupt Senators.
Both are vile DEMS.
Both of my senators are also CORRUPT, VILE dems. One you may not have heard of, Markey, the other everyone knows….Pocahantas.
…my condolences….
It wouldn’t do any good here, we have merkouski, and she will vote with the demonrats, just like flake did.
My senators are Harris and Feinstein. I am embarrassed that they were elected. They are reason enough to advocate repeal of the 19th amendment. (For all the good and decent women out there, the Dirty Dems have given us a way for you to continue to vote unemcubered: They define “multiple genders” so we will just label the non-crazies, non-feminists (yes, I’m being redundant) as “mental men.” Of course, that gives me the problem of what to do with all the males who don’t actually ACT like men should.)
Unfortunately….my Senator is Jeff Flake….he’s completely lost and stupid once his master -Lying Lame McCain- is gone…..can’t wait to see the jerkward gone.
“It’s unclear why he lied and made such a disgustingly false claim, but
it appears the Senate is not going to let him get away with it.” Of course they are. Because there’s no one left who has any balls to go after these accusers the way they should be. All of them should be facing charges for making false allegations.
Guess he gotta hand back that roll of dollars back to George Soroass.
This commie was also loathing of those “deplorable” (I am proud to be one of them) who voted for Trump and not dusty ovaries. In the meantime, hoping that they send this commie up the river. With that said, it’s of my opinion that Potiphar’s wife (by her appearance) that she is wacko, burned out mentally and most likely was abused by men all of her life but there is no evidence to suggest that the good Judge was one of them.
Considering her background and all the lies she’s told I suspect she’s got real mental problems for decades…..Feinstein and her minions have used her and once Judge Kavanaugh is put on SCOTUS they will toss her aside….
I concur
Catalan. What an as$
Not only has the Senate’s Ms. Mitchell found Ms. Ford’s statements not credible, so has Federal Appeals Court Judge Cleveland. I find the last article “The Practice of Ritual Defamation” descriptive of Democratic tactics:
Read prosecutor Rachel Mitchell’s memo about the Kavanaugh-Ford hearing
https://www.axios.com/brett-kavanaugh-rachel-mitchell-prosecutor-memo-2c3233cc-1d42-416b-af04-02700aa9a711.html
Read Margot Cleveland’s, Appeals Court Judge Eviscerates Blasey-Ford’s Testimony; Lays Out The Case
https://thefederalistpapers.org/opinion/appeals-court-judge-eviscerates-blasey-fords-testimony-lays-case
The Practice of Ritual Defamation
How values, opinions and beliefs are controlled in democratic societies.
Written in the 1990’s
The polygraph is a tool used in this game of defamation.
Sleezeball lawyers are going around selling polygraphs as if they were detailed independent tests. This “polygraph by an ex-FBI agent” thing fooled the Senate Judiciary and journalists.
Rigged with 2 questions and PAID for by the lawyers. and then sold as if they were independent evidence.
Lying leftist bitch.
sooo, what about Ford`s credibility ? All her inconsistencies, just going to be swept under the rug ?
They FEAR confronting a woman on her lies. H ow ridiculous is that?
I have NO FEAR of saying she is a partisan LAIR.
I didn`t read past the headline, but it said that 3 witness` refuted to the FBI, Fords allegations.
I wish I had a way of letting Judge Kavanaugh and his family know how much I admire them for not folding….and for standing up against this “Salem Witch Hunt” mentality that has infected every aspect of our government ……what I don’t understand is why hasn’t anyone really gone after the Dimms who brought all this nasty stuff to our hallowed halls of Congress…..
Let’s look at their high school yearbooks…
If this was reversed, you know damn well the Demo(rats) would be bringing charges.
False accusers must be prosecuted. Why? Because bringing false testimony against people destroys their lives. It destroys their lives. This is not rocket science.
Prosecute false accusers.
I hope this guy reaps what he has sown..
Bring on your he charges ????!
Prosecute them all. Not one story has any corroborating evidence. I almost feel sorry for Blasey Ford. She specifically said she did not want to go public, but DiFi thought it was too good to let go. Her look of surprise when asked why she did not avail herself of the offer of testifying in private said it all. Her handlers never told her about it because they wanted the public spectacle. They will throw her away like yesterdays trash when they are through with her.
They already have done.
People must realise that fabricating stories like that will have extremely unpleasant consequences for the liar.
They MUST do time for helping to ruin a man’t character and pay dearly for it in cash, even if it means selling their home.
Isn’t that what Mike Flynn had to do to fight lies by the FBI? Time the president not only reinstated him but saw that he was not out of pocket.
Not prosecuting these liars just enables more to do the same.
Hey Little Chrissy, it’s time to commit suicide, think about it.
Test all accusers and witnesses for Trump Derangement Syndrome before any further investigating. Otherwise its just a waste of time and resources.