American ISIS Fighter Can Meet With Lawyer, Judge Says

60

“On December 19, 2013, President Obama nominated Chutkan to serve as a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, to a new seat created pursuant to 104 Stat. 5089, on July 1, 2013. Her husband Peter Arno Krauthamer, a judge to the bench in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, was nominated by President Barack Obama on July 11, 2011.”

That says it all. There has never been anything like the Obama administration in American history: a den of traitors and saboteurs, all working against American interests at every turn. Americans will suffering the ill effects of that traitorous administration for years to come, despite all that President Trump has done in the last year to undo the damage. Did Nazi soldiers get to meet with the ACLU when they were taken prisoner? This ruling is ridiculous, and based on the false premise that jihad terror is criminal activity, when what it really is is war, separate battles in a long war.

“American ISIS Fighter Can Meet With Lawyer, Judge Says,” by Kevin Daley, Daily Caller News Foundation, December 24, 2017 (thanks to Todd):

Story continues below advertisement

The U.S. military must allow an unnamed U.S. citizen held in Iraq as an enemy combatant access to legal counsel, a federal judge in Washington, D.C., ruled Friday.

The combatant has been held in Iraq since September on suspicion of fighting for the Islamic State. Judge Tanya Chutkan found the ACLU can meet with the prisoner to determine if he wishes to retain a lawyer.

“Ordering the government to allow the ACLU access to this American is an essential protection of his constitutional rights and a major victory for the rule of law against unchecked executive power,” ACLU attorney Jonathan Hafetz said in a statement.

The controversy was occasioned in September when a Syrian militia captured the individual in ISIS-held territory. He was transferred to the U.S. armed forces, who immediately classified him as an enemy combatant. Held at an undisclosed location in Iraq, the detainee has not been permitted access to a lawyer or to his family, though the Red Cross has met with him on several occasions.

The ACLU filed a habeas corpus petition on the prisoner’s behalf on Oct. 5.

The government argued the ACLU has no standing to intervene in the case, and that the detainee has no right to counsel while the administration determines how to dispose of his case. In rebuttal, the ACLU said they can represent the detainee under “next friend standing.”

Next friend standing is granted when a third party wishes to proceed on someone else’s behalf. The “next friend” must demonstrate that they are dedicated to the real party’s best interest and that the real party cannot proceed on their own due to some incapacitation.

The court agreed the ACLU satisfied these requirements, and ordered the military to allow them access to the detainee. Friday’s order only allows the ACLU to determine if the detainee wishes to retain the organization as his legal counsel. If he rejects their offer, they will not be permitted further access….

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
60 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Robinske2
Robinske2
6 years ago

Instead of classifying this traitor as an enemy combatant, he should be tried by treason and if found guilty be given the death penalty. Of course, being this person was “An American”, he’d have a lawyer.

JinStL
JinStL
6 years ago
Reply to  Robinske2

There’s still time.

PS. It’s not the military’s job to press charges of treason against an US citizen. That’s a federal prosecutor’s job.

Achmed Mohammedan
Achmed Mohammedan
6 years ago
Reply to  JinStL

Merry Christmas, JinStL. I beg to differ, US Uniform Code of Military Justice, 906a. ARTICLE 106a states otherwise.

JinStL
JinStL
6 years ago

The cited section starts with, “Any person subject to this chapter…” That is members of the military, not any US citizen.

Achmed Mohammedan
Achmed Mohammedan
6 years ago
Reply to  JinStL

If you are conversant with the UCMJ, you will find that provisions for spies, et al, are covered under the subject of “Unlawful Combatants” and would full under said purview.

Voytek Gagalka
Voytek Gagalka
6 years ago

Proper (legal) DECLARATION OF WAR is needed to counter all those ridiculous nonsensical obstacles presented by “judges.” Only the US Congress can do that and the President should propose and pursue that. War against jihad. Obviously jihadis must be recognized as enemies. Not “terrorists.” Not “evil-doers”: Islamic jihad! With such declaration of war it would be quite simple to round them all, treat them as ENEMY combatants, deport or execute after fast tracking verdicts by military tribunals. Stop playing “games.” ACT!

aemoreira1981
aemoreira1981
6 years ago
Reply to  Voytek Gagalka

You still have the problem of US citizenship by the captured person. Did you not read the article? You can’t treat a US citizen as an enemy combatant.

Achmed Mohammedan
Achmed Mohammedan
6 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

Where would one be able to find that, either in the Constitution of the United States of America, or in any codified legislation. Moreover, when did US courts have jurisdiction in another sovereign nation?

aemoreira1981
aemoreira1981
6 years ago

When one is under the UCMJ.

Achmed Mohammedan
Achmed Mohammedan
6 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

Please reference the constitution or codified legislation .. not just “under the UCMJ”. Doesn’t quite cut it.

aemoreira1981
aemoreira1981
6 years ago

The Bill of Rights. There is no exception for under the UCMJ.

Achmed Mohammedan
Achmed Mohammedan
6 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

OK, aemoreira1981, where within the entirety of the Bill of Rights, does it give US courts jurisdiction over a foreign sovereign nation and a US military force, holding a prisoner, under the authority given by said foreign sovereign entity?

Midniterider
Midniterider
6 years ago

I keep a copy handy and can find NOTHING in that respect.Not one word concerning it…

Voytek Gagalka
Voytek Gagalka
6 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

I did read it. There’s nothing there saying that an US citizen cannot be (or become) enemy combatant. In proper sane universe it should be obvious that if you fight your own country, you essentially abandon your citizenship. Bloody ACLU lawyers and self-important lefty “judges”! BTW, shyster lawyers would gladly represent even the devil: they have no moral standards besides making money “dirty” way.

harbidoll
harbidoll
6 years ago
Reply to  Voytek Gagalka

the term “shyster” blew your whole case. Not too smart.

Voytek Gagalka
Voytek Gagalka
6 years ago
Reply to  harbidoll

“Not too smart” but true, unfortunately, in way too many “cases.” Why are you such a defender of dishonest lawyers? Are you the member of the “bar association”?

harbidoll
harbidoll
6 years ago
Reply to  Voytek Gagalka

everyone badmouths lawyers till they need 1

harbidoll
harbidoll
6 years ago
Reply to  Voytek Gagalka

everyone badmouths lawyers till they need 1

TomD
TomD
6 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

“You can’t treat a US citizen as an enemy combatant.”
Yes you can. Look at the Torito case from WW2. Torito was born in the U.S. His family returned to Italy, he was drafted, later captured, and brought to the U.S. as a POW. He sued for release as a U.S. citizen. The courts held his citizenship did not matter, he was a POW, and he was returned to Italy after the war. The Supreme Court refused to hear his case and affirmed the lower courts.

Much of the court decisions since 9/11 have been intended to overturn the WW2 precedents like Torito, for no good reason other than to keep our judges in good standing with their European counterparts during their summer vacations.

Jim
Jim
6 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

Ever heard of treason / sedition ?

aemoreira1981
aemoreira1981
6 years ago
Reply to  Jim

What about it?

Jim
Jim
6 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

REALLY ?

TomD
TomD
6 years ago
Reply to  Voytek Gagalka

“Proper (legal) DECLARATION OF WAR is needed to counter all those ridiculous nonsensical obstacles presented by “judges.””

Not true. The U.S. Supreme Court held in the 1801 ruling Talbot v. Seeman that the Congressional authorization for naval action against France in the Quasi-War was “an imperfect declaration of war” but was still just as legal as a full declaration. That precedent has held true for every ‘undeclared’ war since then that has had Congressional authorization.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago

This will not end well, the Canadian result of a murdering terrorist meeting with a Canadian government paid for tribe of lawyers, resulted in the murderer getting 10 1/2 million dollars for inconvenience as a result of being captured.

aemoreira1981
aemoreira1981
6 years ago

Legally, there is nothing wrong with this decision. Key here is that the unnamed person is a US citizen and being held by the US military, as a citizen, he can’t be denied his Constitutional rights by any division of the US government. The majority may not be happy, but only a change to the Constitution can effect a different outcome. Trump will obviously appeal the decision, but I don’t see any basis for reversal.

Achmed Mohammedan
Achmed Mohammedan
6 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

The US Uniform Military Code of Justice, says otherwise, aemoreiara1981.

aemoreira1981
aemoreira1981
6 years ago

Such cannot override the Constitution. The USA is a country of a Constitution.

Achmed Mohammedan
Achmed Mohammedan
6 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

Then, aemoreira1981, please be so kind as to address my earlier question, where in the Constitution of the United States of America, does it give our courts authority over another sovereign nation?

aemoreira1981
aemoreira1981
6 years ago

If those countries turn their prisoners over to the US military, and the person in question is a US citizen, US jurisdiction now applies.

Achmed Mohammedan
Achmed Mohammedan
6 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

I have NO idea where you get your information, but that is not true. Look at the cases where a US serviceman raped some young girl, in Okinawa or the Republic of Korea. They are still bound by the laws of Japan and Korea and must be turned over to the local nation’s authority when requested. There have been great diplomatic upheavals when the US Army would spirit someone out of the nation. TOO funny. Simply hilarious!

JWM
JWM
6 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

You are incorrect ,as in wrong. The guy should have been shot where he was.

SNOWDIN
SNOWDIN
6 years ago

Any US citizen caught fighting with an enemy combatant group should be shot on sight. No Recourse. They are Treasonous Traitors and no longer citizens.

Bill
Bill
6 years ago

The ACLU needs to be busted under RICO

Miriam
Miriam
6 years ago
Reply to  Bill

Google is paying 97$ per hour,with weekly payouts.You can also avail this.
On tuesday I got a great New Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $11752 this last four weeks..with-out any doubt it’s the most-comfortable job I have ever done .. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
!da104d:
➽➽
➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleNewNetJobsRoomOpportunities/earn/hourly ★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫:::::!da104lssss

Thomas Faddis
Thomas Faddis
6 years ago

Can just his head meet with the lawyer?!

AlgorithmicAnalystD
AlgorithmicAnalyst
6 years ago

Judge shopping ruined California, now it looks like it is going nationwide.

aemoreira1981
aemoreira1981
6 years ago

What exactly is legally wrong about this decision? I’ll wait. If anything, the Armed Forces should have checked this person’s citizenship before accepting him into their custody.

Jim
Jim
6 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

So, when is your next antifa get together.?

aemoreira1981
aemoreira1981
6 years ago
Reply to  Jim

Ask someone in Antifa. I wouldn’t know.

R. Arandas
R. Arandas
6 years ago

Wow…the West is treating these terrorists with WAY too much humanity and leniency.

TomD
TomD
6 years ago

This guy should be in Gitmo

Patrick Leary
Patrick Leary
6 years ago

“Syrian militia captured the individual in ISIS-held territory. He was transferred to the U.S. armed forces,….”
The Syrian Militia should have “misplaced” him…

Rob Porter
Rob Porter
6 years ago

The first serious error here was taking ISIS fighters prisoner. For their barbarism and savagery they should be shot immediately. Here in Canada the leader of the South African mercenaries who in 2015 Nigeria were hired to deal with Bobo Haram, was seen on tv. A female BBC reporter asked him how the mercenaries had dealt with Boko Haram prisoners. His response? “Oh, we didn’t have that problem” The U.S. military needs to smarten up. No one would be talking to the ACLU. In any event ACLU members should be shot on sight!

Jim
Jim
6 years ago
Reply to  Rob Porter

100% spot on all the way around.
Best, always.

Rob Porter
Rob Porter
6 years ago
Reply to  Jim

The ‘funny’ part (to me) about the method of these South African mercenaries taking no prisoners is this, in South Africa when on occasions farmers want to hunt springbok in numbers they do what these mercenaries did to Boko Haram. They track where the springbok are and then kind of shepherd them into ‘kill blocs’ where farmers are waiting to do a kind of turkey shoot. This is to some extent what the mercenaries did with Boko Haram savages, put trackers on the ground to determine where groups were running, put mercenaries in positions ahead called ‘kill blocks’, used attack helicopters to herd them into the ‘kill blocks’ and then just eliminated every wretched one of these Muslim savages who entered the target area.

Jim
Jim
6 years ago
Reply to  Rob Porter

Sounds like very effective tactics. Too bad we couldn’t do similar to anti-USA assholes here in USA. And you know d-RAT party and rinos are constantly trying to do away with 2nd. amendment.
Disarm the populace is always high on wish list of tyrants.
You take care.

Rob Porter
Rob Porter
6 years ago
Reply to  Jim

Hi Jim, I’d like to see the U.S. military – not least the Green Berets after their fiasco in Niger – bury pride and talk to these mercenaries. They are very good. Most, like myself, are ex-South African Defence Force men who fought the communists in Angola for years. They make the world’s best mercenaries and possess a special does of ruthlessness, which, when fighting Muslim savages is what you need.

Jim
Jim
6 years ago
Reply to  Rob Porter

Good ideas. I am ex-military and have a friend who years ago was in SADF. He was / is a good man. He told me some really interesting things about what he did /saw. Hope he is well and his wife and kids.
I fully believe “rules of engagement” are BS.
Best.

Rob Porter
Rob Porter
6 years ago
Reply to  Jim

The once Obama rule of engagement that you can fire only after the enemy does, was designed to put Muslims at an advantage and evidence of disgusting treachery. In Afghanistan it cost 16 SEALS their life and I think a total of 32 people dead. For that I hope that someday this Obama rat gets blown away.

Jim
Jim
6 years ago
Reply to  Rob Porter

Obola committed fraud to be elected. And he had a LOT of complicit scum in elected offices and medias to pull it off. ALL should be EXECUTED along with that muslim scumbag.
Committed treason AND sedition against MY country MANY times.
The loss of those SEALS and the others in a slow moving helo. HAD to be a set up. ALL who had ANY part in that (leakers etc.)need to be tortured to spill beans on who involved and killed slowly and painfully.
Have little doubt high ranking elected and appointed US office holders involved, among others.
Obola sold out USA to his muslim brethren and a LOT of anti-US scumbag organizations.
What sort of gun laws you got in SA?
These anti-gun numbnuts are REALLY trying anything to 100% do away with ANY rights for legal gun ownership here.
Best..

Rob Porter
Rob Porter
6 years ago
Reply to  Jim

The former crew member of a Hercules gunship in the area where the helicopter went down, has testified that Obama’s ‘rules of engagement’ killed those SEALS and helicopter crew. She said that they in the Hercules could see the Taliban running around getting organized, but they were not allowed to fired on the Taliban until the Taliban did so first. Can you imagine U.S. generals agreeing to such disgusting rules of engagement? Yet they did! – and 32 people lost their lives! So the Taliban fired a grenade launcher and it brought down the helicopter.
I’m not longer living in South Africa, but know that whereas gun laws were pretty lenient the ANC is trying to tighten up. The reality that because of the huge amount of crimes of violence that set in during Nelson Mandela’s presidency, people loaded up on guns – and people are not handing them in! A few years back two armed black men walked into a Jo’burg bar and began pistol whipping patrons, so one man pulled out a handgun and in quick order shot both in the head – and dead as a dodo! When the cops arrived everyone laughingly told them that no one had ever before seen the shooter.

Jim
Jim
6 years ago
Reply to  Rob Porter

I can imagine what a cesspool SA experienced during Mandella’s years. How about what Mugabbe in whatever country he was running(Mozambique ?) was advocating?
All right to take “white” farms and kill whites. Etc.
Wherever you and yours are I hope all are /is well always.

Rob Porter
Rob Porter
6 years ago
Reply to  Jim

Thanks, Kim, I’m doing just fine and I hope that you are likewise. The liberal media presented Mandela to the world as a wonderful hero and I will willingly acknowledge that he he carried out the transition smoothly. But after that things began going the dogs in fairly typical black African style of government. Crime and corruption sky-rocketed and the economy began stumbling. Racial discrimination against white people was disgraceful and in many cases they were denied jobs – hence the huge emigration. Suddenly with whites kicked out government services went completely to hell. The value of the Rand currency went to the dogs and has continued to plummet. When many years ago I was at university in Canada, it took round $1.27 to buy 1 Rand. Now there are more than 15 rands to one dollar.

Robert Mugabe who the West so willingly helped into power is a communist who completely ruined what was Rhodesia – that then became Zimbabwe. He had a dispute with a tribe called the N’dabeli who live in Matabeleland, so sent his North Korean-trained 5th Brigade into Matabeleland where they brutally murdered about 22,000 men, women and children. Concerning this the West said nothing. It said nothing when he began murdering white farmers, some of their labourers, and stole their farms. So now Zimbabwe, once under white rule referred to as “the breadbasket of Africa”, is a ruined country and South Africa heading that way. It’s the black African way.

Jim
Jim
6 years ago
Reply to  Rob Porter

Thanks for insights. I for one have not trusted western medias, at all, since Clinton was POTUS.
Medias in US seem much more into trying to “entertain with gossip and the like” than to be objective , truthful, informative or unbiased.
These asswipes try to make a deity out of scumbags, in many walks of life.
Knew Mandella wasn’t quite as “great etc.” as medias portrayed.
That scumbag who ran Zimbabwe (and I bet MANY more like him) needs to be executed and fed to some wild critters I know are plentiful in Africa.
You take care. Best, always.

ninetyninepct
ninetyninepct
6 years ago
Reply to  Rob Porter

Trudeau rewards ISIS terrorist with millions.

Jim
Jim
6 years ago

Hell no. This “isis” asshole and ALL like “it” simply needs and has earned a .45 round in both eyes. Period.
And same goes for obola and MOST if not all, appointees.

pandainc3
pandainc3
6 years ago
Reply to  Jim

Not sure why you’d want to waste a round …

Jim
Jim
6 years ago
Reply to  pandainc3

You are right. ! .45 round in an eye should do the trick.

Robert Kahlcke
Robert Kahlcke
6 years ago

The ACLU are operatives of the Democrat-Communist-Islamic Terrorist Organization.

ninetyninepct
ninetyninepct
6 years ago

This is as stupid as the ignorant Trudeau rewarding Omar Khadr $10.5 million for killing an American soldier and blinding another. Khadr plead guilty but later changed his mind, claiming that he lost some sleep and got his face wet. Trudeau, the Islamism ass kisser, felt sorry for him and rewarded the $10.5 MILLION claiming that he actually saved Canada $70 million or more because he had decided the court would have found Khadr not guilty.

Never mind Trudeau considers himself above the law, he has taken it on himself to simply bypass the Courts and make Legal decisions. Why do we need Laws, Courts or even the Criminal Code of Canada when we have Justin Trudeau?

Americans would be well advised to keep a close eye on Trudeau. He is actively selling significant Canadian businesses to Communist China and is working hard at importing Muslim terrorists. He was recently convicted of accepting bribes from a foreign lobbyist.

He might be pretty but what you see is NOT what you get.

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!