What are the British Government’s criteria for “acceptable behavior” and “conducive to the public good”?


Screen Shot 2013-12-03 at 5.33.17 PM

Above screenshot from exclusion disclosure documents

The British government explicitly stated that I was banned from the UK because my presence was “not conducive to the public good” and that I represented a “threat to security of or society.”

What are the criteria?

Mona Eltahawy is scheduled to speak in the UK here at a women’s conference sponsored by two sharia-compliant media orgs, Reuters and the NY Times. Mona Eltahawy was a stooge for the Islamic supremacists who staged a coup against Mubarak. She supported them until she was sexually attacked in a mass assault by a mob of those supporters and “freedom lovers” in Tahrir Square. She called her attackers beasts, and yet she went ballistic when my ad referred to similar supremacists as savages.

Eltahawy’s lawyer is Hamas’s lawyer. Yes, the designated terrorist group Hamas.

Watch the video below. Mona Eltahawy was arrested after attacking a complete stranger. Now I ask you — is this acceptable behavior and conducive to the public good?

Mona attacks people in the subway.

Is that conducive to the public good?

Mona was arrested for destroying public property and assaulting a fellow human being.

Is that conducive to the public good?

I have never physically attacked anyway in public or private.

I have never been arrested.

I have never destroyed public property.

I have never called for violence or incited others to physically attack anyone.

An unhinged, clearly unbalanced woman attacks a complete stranger because of an ad — and I am the one banned? What’s wrong with this picture?

Quick note: Tech giants are snuffing us out. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense permenently banned us. Facebook, Twitter, Google search et al have shadowbanned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. Help us fight. Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW more than ever. Share our posts on social and with your email contacts.

Screen Shot 2013-12-03 at 5.44.22 PM

Above screenshot from the Home Secretary’s letter to Faith Matters, the Islamic supremacist group that demanded my exclusion.

How is that consistent, Home Secretary?

Who do you think would be a threat to the “security of society”?

Cyrus Vance, Jr., will be speaking at the same conference at which Mona Eltahawy is speaking. Someone ought to warn him — she could snap at any time.

Here is what was included in the basis for my exclusion. Look at these bloody cowards.

The “subject” below is Pamela Geller. The complete docs are on scribd here: part one and part two.

Screen Shot 2013-12-03 at 5.40.30 PM


Have a tip we should know? Your anonymity is NEVER compromised. Email tips@thegellerreport.com

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.


Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Pin It on Pinterest