Hamas-CAIR fights sharia bill in Michigan

How can anyone oppose a law that seeks to prevent foreign laws from
undermining fundamental constitutional liberties?

Lady Macbeth media are on a jihad to scrub the sharia (USA Today column: "Sharia doesn't pose a threat to freedom")

"Muslim rights group" — perverted language of the fatally absurd. CAIR is the arm of the Muslim Brotherhood in America, and is working furiously to impose the brutal and racist sharia with an end goal of "eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house."

Muslim rights group urges bill in Michigan Legislature be stopped "Detroit Free Press"

A Muslim rights group has urged Gov. Rick Snyder to veto legislation
designed to block the use of Islamic law in the state, should the bill
reach his desk.

A House bill to bar use of "foreign laws that
would impair constitutional rights" was on Tuesday's House agenda. Rep.
Dave Agema, R-Grandville, sponsored the bill, which doesn't specifically
mention the Islamic legal code sharia. However, the bill's supporters
have said they are concerned about the use of sharia spreading.

[…] The
Council on American-Islamic Relations issued a statement criticizing
what it called an "anti-Islam bill" and urged that it be rejected.

The
group said it "is calling on all people of conscience to urge Gov.
Snyder to veto the biased bill, which is among those that seek to impose
government-sanctioned discrimination on followers of a minority faith."

At least 20 states have considered similar measures, and Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback signed one into law in May.

"It's
our hope that this bill doesn't make it all the way to the governor,"
Dawud Walid, executive director of the council's Michigan chapter, said.
"But if it does, we sincerely hope that he will veto this bigoted
bill."

Here is an excerpt of the testimony I gave to the Alaska legislature in support of foreign law prohibition:

How can anyone oppose a law that seeks to prevent foreign laws from
undermining fundamental constitutional liberties? We all accept that
state and federal const’l rights to a jury trial in CIVIL cases can be
waived almost by default (thus two parties agreeing to be bound by
German or French law where there is no jury trial right in a civil
matter) would not be affected by the bill since the jury trial right is
per the law waived by default.

But there is no jurisprudence in the federal system and none in any
state that would allow a party to waive Equal Protection—that is, could
an african american agree to be discriminated against by the state?
Absolutely not, so why would we allow a party to “waive” an equal
protection claim in court where the state’s police power is being used
to enforce an offensive foreign law?

We now have groups that has ever come to this country with a
ready-made model of society and government they believe to be superior
to what we have here and are working to institute it.

For example, Islamic law contravenes American freedoms in numerous particulars.

We have seen sharia law in New Jersey. Back in July 2010, a Muslim
husband raped his wife, and the judge determined that no sexual assault
occurred because Islam forbids wives to refuse sex on demand from their
husbands. Luckily, the appellate court overturned this decision, and a
Sharia ruling by an American court was not allowed to stand—this time.
But there have been over a hundred cases of Sharia jurisprudence in the
US, and Jeffery Mittman of the ACLU has testified that “all
have been overturned by a higher courts, therefore there is no problem
since the American constitutional system worked.” Of course, this begs
the question of why should this have happened in the first place.
Secondly, it is simply not true that all cases have been overturned. In
fact, there are cases in CAL and MD in which trial courts were
overturned by appellate courts, the latter of which turned the blind eye
to the threat from shariah.

There are also ongoing initiatives to compel businesses to adopt
Sharia norms. In March 2007, Target stores in Minneapolis shifted Muslim
cashiers who refused to check out pork products to other jobs in the stores.[1]
The J. B. Swift meat packing plant in Greeley, Colorado in September
2008 fired Muslim workers who turned violent and walked off their jobs when denied special break periods to end the Ramadan fast at the appointed time.[2] The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, however, sided with the Muslim workers and forced Swift to reinstate them.[3] Ultimately, Swift added footbaths and bidets to its plant for the Muslim workers.[4]
Cab drivers in the Minneapolis airport several years ago tried to
stipulate that they wouldn’t carry passengers who had alcohol with them –
passengers had to conform to Sharia law or not get a cab.

In November 2008, a federal judge ordered Gold’n Plump, Inc., a
chicken processing plant, to pay $365,000 to Somali Muslim workers for
firing them for walking off the job to pray, and for making new hires sign a form acknowledging that they may have to handle pork on the job.[5] And in February 2010, a group of Muslims in Colorado sued Wal-Mart, claiming that they were fired in order to provide jobs for local non-Muslims, and that they had been denied prayer breaks while on the job.[6]
Mind you, it is not necessary for a Muslim to pray at a certain time if
necessity makes it impossible to do so. These actions are merely devices in which to impose Islam on non-believers. Prayer is not absolutely required on a strict schedule, and Muslim prayers are commonly “made up” after work or school. This is true even in Muslim countries, i.e., Iran.

The irony is that the ACLU would oppose a law that seeks to prevent
foreign laws from undermining fundamental constitutional liberties. 

The idea  “presented by Muslim Brotherhood groups that ‘Sharia Law’
is not actually ‘law’, but religious traditions that provide guidance to
Muslims regarding the exercise of their faith” or that ‘Sharia Law’
differs depending on the country in which the individual Muslim resides
is patently false. For example, in the Oklahoma case against the foreign
law prohibition, the plaintiff stated that marrying more than one wife
is permissible in Islam but in the United States, where that is illegal,
Muslims do not marry more than one wife because Sharia in the United
States mandates Muslims to abide by the law of the land and respect the
law of their land.”

And yet in August 2007, when asked how common polygamy was among
Muslims in the United States, unindicted co-conspirator CAIR’s Ibrahim
Hooper said that a “minority” of Muslims here were polygamous, and
added: “Islamic scholars would differ on whether one could do so while
living in the United States.”^[7]
He didn’t say anything about Muslims in the U.S. being given pause by
the fact that the practice remains illegal in the United States. Iman
Aly Hindy, has stated this about the relationship between Islamic law
and American law: “This is in our religion and nobody can force us to do
anything against our religion. If the laws of the country conflict with
Islamic law, if one goes against the other, then I am going to follow
Islamic law, simple as that.”^[8]

Apparently many Muslims in America as well as Canada think the same
way. A May 2008 estimate found between 50,000 and 100,000 Muslims living
in polygamous arrangements in the U.S., in defiance of American law.^[9]
This shows that we need to stand against Sharia or Muslims will
continue to defy American law and instead live according to Shariua
dictates.

 Legal expert David Yerushalmi, a pioneering legal authority in the
drafting of such state laws, points out that “the global jihad
leadership against which we have aligned most of our military and
intelligence resources since 9/11 informs us in Arabic, Pashtu, Urdu,
Persian, and even in English that the global jihad against the West is
fundamentally directed and determined by Islamic law, or sharia. The
jihad leaders further tell us that their ultimate goal, in addition to
that of the ‘defensive jihad’ incumbent on every Muslim to rid the
Islamic world of an occupying infidel presence is the implementation of
sharia law as the law of the land in any place Muslims step foot.”

“Surveys in the Muslim world consistently evidence that somewhere
between 50% to 70% of the global Muslim community desires to create a
unified Caliphate for all Muslims and to order that political hegemony
according to a strict al Qaeda-like sharia.”

The separation of mosque and state is essential to preserving
American freedom and our way of life. Yet the Islamic supremacists have
made real inroads. We have seen over the last few years the encroachment
of Islam on the secular marketplace. Muslims have demanded, and
received, special accommodation in public schools, in the workplace, in
our government, and in privately owned businesses.

One only needs to look at the disintegration of Europe and the
establishment all over that continent of enclaves in which Sharia is
enforced and the law of the land disregarded, to glimpse a bleak future
made possible by “good intentions” and the failure of multiculturalism.
In those areas of Europe, women and non-Muslims suffer institutionalized
discrimination, and there is no freedom of speech or freedom of
conscience.

It is time to stand up for American rule of law and individual rights for all.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

• $25.00 here
• $50.00 here
• $75.00 here
• $100.00 here
• $250.00 here

0 0 votes

Article Rating

10 Comments

Oldest

Newest Most Voted

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

Jackson Pearson

11 years ago

The Qur’an defines good and bad Muslims for us. It says a good Muslim is a Jihadist, a man who leaves his home, sacrificing his wealth and life, fighting in Allah’s Cause. Allah says they will be rewarded with stolen booty if they survive or with a heavenly bordello if they die. Bad Muslims, on the other hand, are peaceful. Allah calls them “hypocrites” because they are unwilling to fight. He even says that peaceful Muslims are “the most vile of creatures” and that hell’s hottest fires await them. If you are a peace-loving Muslim, your god hates you.
The good Muslims, those who read Islam’s scriptures long before 9/11 was planned, funded, staffed, executed, and celebrated the terrorist attacks of 9/11. They proudly told the world what they were going to do— terrorize Americans and Jews into submission. They boldly proclaimed why they were going to do it—for the advancement of Islam. They even told us who they were—good Muslims. But we ignored their announcements. It was as if on the morning of December 7th 1941, nobody noticed the rising sun insignias on the planes bombing Pearl Harbor. The bombers of September 11th 2001 wore insignias too. Theirs was a crescent moon. For those who support the politically-inspired notion that terrorism is not condoned by Islam, that terrorists have corrupted an otherwise peaceful religion, consider this:
The world’s foremost authority on the Qur’an is sheik Abdel Rahman. He was the senior professor of Qur’anic studies at Islam’s most prestigious university, Al-Azhar, in Cairo. Today, the sheik is a convicted terrorist, serving time in an American prison for the ’93 bombing of the World Trade Center. If the Qur’an espouses peace, that’s hard to explain. The conflict between truth and perception doesn’t end there. Rahman’s disciples, an Egyptian sheik and a Saudi terrorist—Osama bin Laden—told a film crew that Islam was their motivation for the second bombing.
The point here is America…WAKE UP, because your country is being invaded and you’re under assault by ISLAM.

0

blinker

11 years ago

CAIR isn’t doing this just to be jerks [of course they already are jerks] they are doing it because they are following the concept of tawhid. In Islamic theology it means the oneness of Allah/Islam. Any country that has a Muslim population no matter how small is bound to strive to bring that country to this “oneness” as they see it.

0

karl anglin

11 years ago

Michigan governor DO NOT BACK DOWN!!!!!!!!!!!!!

0

pdxnag

11 years ago

Muslims in America can never be “citizens” of the US in the absence of total embrace of total Sharia.
Some good fiction writer ought to write a novel depicting a state like Michigan physically expelling the Allahu Akbarring army, against the federal forces under the Osama Administration reinserting the insurgents just as he is doing in Syria. It is war — even if it is slower paced here for now during the “pre-violent” stage. Then make a film of it. How closely would this fiction resemble future reality?
The insurgents in Dearbornistan (if allowed to stay) will in the future agitate to become a new nation that is distinct from the US, and the OIC dominated UN will jump to approve it.
Sharia Insistent Compliant (SIC) Muslims demand only one accommodation; total capitulation. Which itself dictates that total expulsion as the only workable solution. CAIR, as exclusive representative of citizens of the foreign Islamic Ummah, goes out of its way every day to make this point quite clear. (In my opinion, as a mere commenter.)

0

Drew the Infidel

11 years ago

CAIR = Council on American-Islamic Rancor

0

Betty

11 years ago

if the muslims want sharia law let move to a muslim country we dont need or want it in AMERICA.

0

Chris Redfield

11 years ago

Typical Paranoid Republicans make me laugh! 0.8% Muslims in america and you fear that sharia law will conquer us. Idiots!!
Really entire Sharia law cannot be applicable in any countries, even in Saudi.. It seems paranoia struck very deep in republicans after Obama’s Victory.
the most hilarious part is having a speech of Kamal Saleem fake ex-terrorist who claimed that he worked with Yaseer Arafath, Qadhaffi and Sadham Hussaien. No one asked the question why he is not arrested yet for being a terrorist or pretending to be terrorist hater but in reality a sleeper agent.

0

Pazuzu

11 years ago

Moslems are worse than parasites or bacteria, they are a virus infecting and destroying healthy cells and speading the virus.

0

Grouchy

11 years ago

Good testimony Pamela.
I have an idea:
Sharia wallpaper.
People will buy it and put it up as a curiosity – but then they will sit around reading it, and they will find out how barbaric and idiotic Sharia is.

0

Ram0n

11 years ago

Posted by: Betty | Thursday, December 13, 2012 at 04:37 AM
Have you noticed the stilted and artificial construction of language in use by those who would promote Sharia, or Muslim unity, or Islam? They are not native born, nor are they willing to adapt to their host country. They move here and then want to change us and our laws in this land to conform to their Sharia. If Sharia is so good, move back to where you came from, but leave soon and leave the FREEDOM of conscience guaranteed us in the US Constitution intact.

0