Major German Paper: Pfizer Fabricated Clinical Trials to Cover Up Deaths

They knew. They know. And the Biden regime gave them liability protection.

More on the Covid ‘vaccine’ here….’

Horowitz: Major German paper reveals Pfizer fabricated clinical trials to cover up deaths

By: Daniel Horowitz, Conservative Brief, February 21, 2023:

Story continues below advertisement

According to new provisional data from the Scottish government, there were 7,314 deaths registered in January 2023, an increase of 17.7% compared to the average of 6,212. For the second week of January, there were more deaths in Scotland than ever before, including during the peak of the pandemic. Concurrently, there were 4,159 births registered in January 2023, a decrease of 6.8% compared to the average of 4,463. In other words, between a dearth of births and a plethora of deaths, there were roughly 1,400 fewer souls, the equivalent of roughly 86,000 in the United States. This is long after COVID. Why is there zero concern?

What on earth will it take to pull these death shots from the market?

Die Welt, a paper based in the home country of Pfizer partner BioNTech, revealed last week in a long expose what many of us have long known. All those sudden deaths, heart attacks, and strokes we’ve been witnessing over the past two years were indeed observed during the Pfizer clinical trial that supposedly showed the shots to be 100% safe and effective. The company simply covered up the severe adverse events by kicking those participants out of the trial and/or suggesting without evidence that the deaths had nothing to do with the experiment.

Remember, the CDC announced a few weeks ago that it had finally study a potential association between the COVID shots and strokes. Well, it turns out the agency had the opportunity to study it already in 2020 before a single human being outside the trial was injected. “Patient no. 11621327” was more than a mere number. He was a human being found dead from a stroke in his apartment just three days after the second dose. Typically, with a novel product in trial, any death – even one not so sudden – makes the product suspect until it is proven innocent. Yet in this case, Pfizer simply dismissed the death as not related to the vaccine, just as the company did with Patient #11521497, who died 20 days later from cardiac arrest.

The article also provides more details on the Buenos Aires trial site, the largest one in the world, in which attorney Augusto Roux was severely injured with pericarditis and liver damage. Instead of being recorded as a severe adverse event, he was marked as having had COVID (even though he tested negative) and was summarily removed from the trial. Roux was on my podcast last July and told me Pfizer refused to help treat his injury because officials felt it had nothing to do with the vaccine, and insurance also refused to pay for treatment because the insurance company blamed it on him willingly joining the trial.

Die Welt reports that on Aug. 31, 2020, 53 of those in the trial in Buenos Aires were unblinded and removed from the trial against the protocol, which calls for this only “in emergencies” (unless this was indeed an emergency!). By the end of the second dose, a further 200 individuals were removed from the trial, meaning that overall, more than 250 of the original 1231 participants were terminated, thereby making the entirety of the data from the largest trial site irrelevant to use in the final trial results.

Overall, 21 participants in Pfizer’s phase 3 trial died, as compared to 17 in the control group before they were unblinded, which should have been a red flag before the shot ever took off. Pfizer claimed there was no evidence anyone died from the vaccine, but after it’s been revealed that a number of people in the trial suffered heart ailments and strokes, the company’s defense holds no water. Yet here we are, over two years later, and the shots are still on the market, promoted like manna from heaven, and even mandated in most hospitals and universities, including in red states. How is this not the top public policy issue of our day?

Consider the following from a public policy standpoint. Pfizer gets the government to pony up billions in taxpayer dollars for the shots, several billion more to promote, advertise, distribute, and mandate them on every human being alive – all while absolving Pfizer of liability. So how do we know the shots are safe? Who gets to monitor the clinical trial? The very manufacturer that was absolved of liability by the government! The Die Welt article even mentions that Pfizer pushed through a liability waiver on its contract not just for negligence, but also for “fraud or bad faith on the part of Pfizer itself.”

Pfizer responded to the Die Welt reporter by asserting that, “Regulatory authorities around the world have approved our Covid-19 vaccine. These approvals are based on a robust and independent assessment of the scientific data on quality, safety, and efficacy, including the phase 3 clinical trial.” Sure, authorities guaranteed the company endless funding, marketing, mandates, and indemnity so that Pfizer would have no incentive to even release the true results of its trial, much less make the product better.

How can this continue to go on after all we know?

Keep reading….

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

• $25.00 here
• $50.00 here
• $75.00 here
• $100.00 here
• $250.00 here

5 1 vote

Article Rating

9 Comments

Oldest

Newest Most Voted

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

T D

1 year ago

OFF-TOPIC:

https://www.foxnews.com/world/russian-internal-strategy-document-details-kremlins-plans-take-control-belarus-report

It was never just about Ukraine. It’s about Poland, Belarus, Moldova and Putin’s plan to rebuild his version of the Soviet Union. CHINA also has plans; Taiwan is just the first piece.

Last edited 1 year ago by T D

0

T D

1 year ago

Reply to  T D

***This message was not brought to you by PFIZER or the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.***

We now return to the regular Geller Report discussions.

4

PanamaPat

1 year ago

Reply to  T D

I assure you that Belarus is already firmly in the Russian orbit and is satrapy of the Kremlin. The Integration Of the Federation and Belarus has been well known for decades. Nothing new here, sort of like Puerto Rico and the US.

0

T D

1 year ago

Reply to  PanamaPat

Belarus declared independence in 1991.

Mr. Putin brought back the Soviet National Anthem in his first term in office 20+ years ago.

0

T D

1 year ago

Reply to  PanamaPat

https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2023/02/17/russias-planned-coup-in-moldova-reminds-us-why-ukraine-must-win-this-war-a80257

If it’s not Ukraine, it’s something else with the Russians.

Last edited 1 year ago by T D

0

Snowedin

1 year ago

The clinical trials started as soon as the Franken Shot of poison was injected into the arms of the people who were willing and wanting to get jabbed. But it seems that Big Pharma was not collecting the data or concerned about the effects it had on the victims.

3

poptoy1949

1 year ago

BASTERDS

3

PanamaPat

1 year ago

There is NO indemnity against fraud.where are the class action lawyers. This Is a lot bigger than Big Tobacco and Bug Pharma has alot more money.

4

Ranger Partners

1 year ago

PFIZER SMOKING GUN STATEMENT IN COURT: “We did not defraud the government; we delivered the fraud the government ordered.” Pfizer motion to dismiss in Brook Jackson False Claims Act lawsuit. This surprisingly eloquent lawyer’s weasel admission, under penalty of perjury, says it all.

UPDATE Q4-22 EXCESS DEATH (from Ed Dowd, Wall Street bean counter) GROUP LIFE INSURANCE CLAIMS % INCREASES:
OCT…..NOV…..DEC
13……..21……..43…..AGE 0-44
4……….16……..35…..AGE 45-64
As if this 10-Sigma (standard deviations) wasn’t enough, Dowd said early indications are Q1-23 is much worse!

It doesn’t get more “Nazi” than coerced medical experimentation without full & free informed consent…

0