Maricopa County Election Judge Is Threatened by Supervisors After Speaking Out About Tabulation Errors

“As long as I count the votes, what are you going to do about it?” – Boss Tweed

Maricopa County Election Judge Is Threatened by Supervisors After Speaking Out About Tabulation Errors – Ballots Counted Is Based on Check-Ins NOT Scanning and Reading Through Tabulator

By Jordan Conradson, Gateway Pundit, 11, 2022:

A Maricopa County Election judge spoke out about what she witnessed at the polls on Tuesday with tabulators not working and inaccurate ballot reporting, and her supervisors threatened her with termination.

Story continues below advertisement

The Gateway Pundit reported on this serious issue in Maricopa County’s General Election on Tuesday. Due to the incompetence of Maricopa County and Katie Hobbs, tabulators were down, printers ran out of ink, and long, long lines kept voters waiting to cast their ballots.

Maricopa County recently admitted in a new statement that 70 out of 223 or over 30% of voting centers were impacted by this election day debacle after previously claiming that only about 20% were affected.

Voters were told to deposit their ballots into “box 3” or “door 3” to be tabulated at the Elections Department in downtown Phoneix later. The County claims that only 17,000 votes were affected and dropped in “box 3.”

Not only were voters disenfranchised by long wait times or tabulation errors, but many may not have voted at all, or their ballots were reported as “received and counted” without actually being counted.

Michelle Swinick spoke out on this issue, and she was threatened with termination from the polls.

As The Gateway Pundit reported on Tuesday, another poll worker was terminated, citing “disinformation” for telling voters they don’t know what will happen to the ballots and would wait for the machines to be back online before dropping a ballot in “box 3.”

Uncover DC reported,

Election judge Michele Swinick has come forward to report what she experienced in Maricopa County on Election Day. She worked Election Day as a judge at the Islamic Voting Center in Scottsdale, AZ. She reports that the center is heavily Republican, with “no party” designated voters as the second most populous demographic, followed by very few democrat voters, evidenced by the fact that she checked in very few of them on Election Day. She reports she spent the entire day checking in voters.

Swinick says that the tabulators all worked “perfectly” during the test the night before the election. The problem with scanning began immediately with the first ballots. Voters scanned their ballots between 4 and 12 times with very minimal success. Poll workers estimated about 1 in 10 ballots were being read for the first three hours of voting.

Keep reading….

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

• $25.00 here
• $50.00 here
• $75.00 here
• $100.00 here
• $250.00 here

5 1 vote

Article Rating

12 Comments

Oldest

Newest Most Voted

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

dunce

1 year ago

Only 20% not working!!! 1% should be considered high failure rates.

6

Adam Selene

1 year ago

Reply to  dunce

It seems that if elevator cables had a 20% failure rate, that alone would be considered catastrophic. Why are such poor standards applied to the voting process?

2

Snowedin

1 year ago

There was definitely massive voter fraud in Arizona again. They have finally succeeded in turning Arizona into a Blue State.

7

jerry snaper

1 year ago

Even where there is no apparent fraud, cheating happens. The machines are programmed to work normally but distort the votes only during certain hours to avoid detection. So easy to program vote switching to give a democrat edge. Hillary was right. They will win by Dominion.

5

Jesse Brogan

1 year ago

Electiosn should not be certified until the count matches those who voted, and at least a sample recount verifies the result statistically. DJT was right to demand a do-over. There is no basis for accepting what they have except for claiming equality of errors.

3

Glen

1 year ago

Just another Democratic steal. How much did that effect kayaks who was leading but lost according to the count. Shenanigans again. A week to count votes only leads to fraud. Hobbs us Secretary if state but did not recuse herself.

4

o a

1 year ago

We have been down this path multiple times before and in spite of all the exposure ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ever gets done about it. We are all just told that it would not have made a difference anyway. The real rule is clearly Go AHEAD AND RIG THE ELECTION. MORE POWER TO YA!

4

Counterstrike

1 year ago

Since the advent of electronic voting machines countries around the world have been captured by Communists, and Globalists, all certified by the propaganda ministry. We have joined them in hell.

4

Robert L. Kahlcke

1 year ago

Reply to  Counterstrike

The Democrat Communist Criminal,Terrorist Organization, has reached The Geller Report.

2

D

Keith1941

1 year ago

After the 2020 election, nothing was done to ensure fair and honest elections. And I was fool enough to think maybe it would be better this time.

4

Snowedin

1 year ago

Reply to  Keith1941

Many have no faith or trust in the election process.

2

Owen Morgan

1 year ago

It’s not as if the supposed winner in the governor’s race in Arizona was in any way situated to influence how the election was conducted, was i…?

Oh, hang on.

0