Binger is pointing the gun around the courtroom with his finger on the trigger. I guess he's never had any firearms training. But of course he's qualified to prosecute this case. #KyleRittenhousepic.twitter.com/68fMvGdLfB
That "crowd full of heroes" was the same crowd I saw just moments before attacking the very courthouse this trial is taking place at, along with attacking the police and National Guardsmen. https://t.co/iqPpc8L1Df
It’s shocking what happens to the US justice system when these type of ambitious activist Democrats are installed as prosecutors, and selectively apply the law.
Richards: Binger is either lying, he’s misrepresenting or he wasn’t prepared when he started this trial. He says there’s no proof that Rosenbaum and Ziminski knew each other but they were together that night in pictures wreaking havoc in this city.
Rittenhouse dropped the fire extinguisher because Joseph Zaminski was advancing on him with a gun. It is dishonest and despicable for Binger to omit this fact.
BREAKING: Rittenhouse prosecutor falsely claims ‘You lose the right to self-defense when you’re the one who brought the gun’
“You lose the right to self-defense when you’re the one who brought the gun, when you’re the one creating the danger, when you’re the one provoking other people,” Binger said.
In his closing arguments in the Kyle Rittenhouse case on Monday, Assistant District Attorney confirmed what many believe about the case, which is that it is intended by the state to be a referendum on the second amendment, the right to keep and bear arms.He claimed that Rittenhouse lost his right to self-defense because he was “the one who brought the gun.” Binger claimed that Rosenbaum never threatened Rittenhouse’s life because there was “no video” of it, despite eye-witness testimony to the contrary.Binger made the case that the melee was a “fist fight,” and that Rosenbaum should not have had a gun at all.“So we’re just guessing but let’s assume for a minute, yeah, Joseph Rosenbaum is chasing after the defendant because he wants to do some physical harm,” Binger began. “He’s an unarmed man. This is a bar fight. This is a fist fight. This is a fight that maybe many of you have been involved in. Two people hand-to-hand, were throwing punches, were pushing or shoving, or whatever.”“But what you don’t do,” Binger continued, “is you don’t bring it down to a fistfight.” The altercation happened in a parking lot during a riot.“The defendant wants you to believe is that because he’s the one who brought the gun he gets to kill,” Binger continued. So I want you to contrast this to different scenarios. One scenario where there’s two guys who are throwing punches at one another, like a bar fight. I think we’d all read, you can’t kill someone.”“You can’t punch the guy and crack them to the ground and then get on and strangle the life out of them. That’s murder,” binger said of his bar fight scenario.“So what’s the difference here?” Binger asked, not noting that the difference was that Rittenhouse and Rosenbaum were not in a bar, drinking and fighting, but in a parking lot during a riot.“The only difference is that he brought a gun,” Binger said.“He brought his AR 15 That’s why he’s got to come up with this cockamamie theory,” Binger said of Rittenhouse’s self-defense claim, “that Joseph Rosenbaum was not only going to take the gun, but take it in and turn it on the defendant. And the defendant actually told you that he thought Joseph Rosenbaum was going to take that gun and not only kill him, but kill other people, which is really ironic, considering the defendant is the one that killed people in this case and the only one. But putting that aside, they have to convince you that Joseph Rosenbaum was going to take that gun and use it on the defendant because they know you can’t claim defense against an unarmed man like this.”“You lose the right to self-defense when you’re the one who brought the gun, when you’re the one creating the danger, when you’re the one provoking other people,” Binger said.
Binger just introduced a scene from Roadhouse as part of his argument why Kyle Rittenhouse is guilty
Binger: “You lose the right to self-defense when you’re the one who brought the gun. When you’re the one creating the danger.” pic.twitter.com/C1nhsx1CK6
>Smaller Woman gets attacked by unarmed but stronger man.
>Smaller Woman pulls gun out and shoots man.
>Binger Logic Indicates smaller woman doesn’t have a claim to self defense for producing gun instead of going fisticuffs.
I hope you’re paying attention.
— Deus Flex Machina- flexyoursuccess.com (@ReturnOfTheFleX) November 15, 2021
Binger attempted to show in his closing arguments that Joseph Rosenbaum, who was the first man Rittenhouse shot that night during the riots in Kenosha, was not a threat to Rittenhouse. Rosenbaum was shot four times as he reportedly advanced on Rittenhouse in the Car Source lot. The first shot hit his pelvis, the second his hand, a third grazed his temple, and a fourth went through his back. The medical examiner, Dr. Kelley, testified last week that the shot to Rosenbaum’s hand could likely have been sustained as he was reaching for Rittenhouse’s weapon.
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you
and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding.Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently
banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds.
They are disappearing us. But we are here.
Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival.
Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.
Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.
Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.
If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.
It is the conflict of our age, yet no one dares talk about it. The true story of the Islamic Supremacist war on free speech as told by those on the front lines fighting for our First Amendment rights,
.
Pamela Geller tells her own story of how she became one of the world's foremost activists for the freedom of speech,
individual rights, and equality of rights for all. "It's my story, it's what happens when someone fights for freedom in America today,"
Geller explained.
Today Islamic supremacists are demanding more accommodation of Islamic principles
and practices than ever, and daily growing more aggressive in eroding our freedoms – with politically
correct public officials only too happy..
Popular conservative blogger Pamela Geller and New York Times bestselling author
Robert Spencer sound a wake-up call for Americans to stop the Obama administration from limiting our
hard-won...
The Ground Zero Mosque: The Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks is a groundbreaking documentary on the controversy
over the planned Islamic supremacist mega-mosque at Ground Zero.
Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.
recent Comments