In a recent op-ed in the anti-Israel New York Times, Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield blamed Israeli government policy for the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinians. They claimed that the Israeli government “perpetuates an illegal occupation,” and that this “occupation” is a “barrier to peace and violates the basic human rights of the Palestinian people who live under the occupation.” This is complete crap, of course.
Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.
Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.
Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.
— Atlas Shrugs (@atlasshrugs) July 30, 2021
It’s impossible for Jewicidal stooges like Cohen and Greenfield, surrogates for Bernie Sanders’ anti-Jewish presidential campaign, to blame Islamic terrorism, or to blame “Palestinian leadership” who have rejected numerous peace offers by the Israelis, or to blame the violent antisemitism that is taught and glorified in “Palestinian” schools, for this decades long conflict.
Furthermore, Cohen and Greenfield claim they support Israel. Why don’t they condemn Ben & Jerry’s board chairperson Anuradha Mittal, who is an advocate for the BDS Movement, and who has published defenses of Hamas and Hezbollah. As for the “basic human rights” of the Palestinian people; what about the human rights of political opponents, women, Christians, and LGBT individuals who are often brutally supressed in the territory controlled by the Palestinian Authority and Hamas. Shame on Cohen and Greenfield.
Ben and Jerry’s support for the Jewish people and Israel runs so deep they partner with bigots like Linda Sarsour 🙄.
— StopAntisemitism.org (@StopAntisemites) July 28, 2021
Exposing the anti-Israel agenda of Ben & Jerry's Board chairperson, Anuradha Mittal, who has promoted the hateful BDS campaign and implied #Israel's existence is a "catastrophe". (1/2)#ShameOnBenAndJerrys #ShameOnMittal@Unilever @BenAndJerrys @alanjope @ConnyBraams @Mittaloak pic.twitter.com/qLY14vkmpD
— StandWithUs (@StandWithUs) July 29, 2021
Ben and Jerry say they ‘support Israel,’ reject its ‘illegal occupation’
In NY Times op-ed, founders of ice cream giant say decision to boycott settlements one of the most important in firm’s 43-year history, dismiss accusations of antisemitism
The Jewish founders of Ben & Jerry’s spoke out Wednesday in defense of the ice cream maker’s move to boycott Israeli settlements in the West Bank, calling it “one of the most important decisions the company has made in its 43-year history.”
Bennett Cohen and Jerry Greenfield, who sold the company decades ago and maintain no control over its operations, wrote in a New York Times op-ed that they support Israel but oppose its “illegal occupation” of the West Bank.
They maintained that the decision taken by their former company is “not a rejection of Israel. It is a rejection of Israeli policy, which perpetuates an illegal occupation that is a barrier to peace and violates the basic human rights of the Palestinian people who live under the occupation.”
Israeli leaders have raged against the firm and its corporate owner for the July 19 decision to cut ties with its Israeli manufacturer and distributor and end sales over the Green Line from the end of 2022, terming it antisemitic and a form of terrorism. It is not clear whether Ben and Jerry’s products will continue to be available in Israel from after that date.
Cohen and Greenfield called it praiseworthy for a company espousing progressive values to make the decision that Ben & Jerry’s did, noting that the settlement boycott was part of a long line of stances to that end.
“Even though it undoubtedly knew that the response would be swift and powerful, Ben & Jerry’s took the step to align its business and operations with its progressive values,” they wrote, adding that the boycott should be seen “not as anti-Israel, but as part of a long history of being pro-peace.”
They defended the company, which is a Vermont-based subsidiary of Unilever, against accusations of antisemitism, and also noted that it had not specifically endorsed the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement targeting Israel.
“That we support the company’s decision is not a contradiction nor is it anti-Semitic,” they wrote. “In fact, we believe this act can and should be seen as advancing the concepts of justice and human rights, core tenets of Judaism. As Jewish supporters of the State of Israel, we fundamentally reject the notion that it is anti-Semitic to question the policies of the State of Israel.”
“The decision to halt sales outside Israel’s democratic borders is not a boycott of Israel. The Ben & Jerry’s statement did not endorse the BDS movement,” they wrote.
Israeli officials have lashed out at Ben & Jerry’s, with Foreign Minister Yair Lapid saying the ice cream company “caved to antisemitism” and President Isaac Herzog referring to the boycott as a “form of terrorism.”
Israel’s Ambassador to the US Gilad Erdan reached out to governors of over 30 US states where anti-BDS legislation has been passed in recent years, urging them to sanction Ben & Jerry’s and its parent company Unilever as dictated by those laws. A handful of states have already answered the call and are looking into the matter.
A report Tuesday detailed plans for a campaign by Israel’s diplomatic corps to stir popular sentiment in the US and elsewhere against Ben & Jerry’s and Unilever. A cable sent to Israeli missions in North America and Europe instructs diplomats to work with Jewish, pro-Israel and evangelical groups to foment demonstrations outside of Ben & Jerry’s and Unilever offices, Walla news reported.
Diplomats were also told to solicit shows of public protest against Unilever and Ben & Jerry’s, such as statements, op-eds or direct contacts with “key corporate figures.” The protests would then be amplified by the diplomats, in order to ratchet up pressure on the companies to reverse the decision.
“We need to take advantage of the 18 months remaining until the decision goes into effect in order to change it,” the cable read, according to the report, which was also carried by US news site Axios. “The goal is to activate consumer, press, social media and political pressure for the long-term on the Unilever multinational and Ben & Jerry’s in order to lead to a dialogue with the company.”
Have a tip we should know? Your anonymity is NEVER compromised. Email email@example.com
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Please contribute here.
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.