Cornell Librarian Demands Removal Of Dewey Decimal System Because It’s RACIST, Says LIBRARIES Be Held Accountable For ‘Fraught History of Being Complicit in Racism’

The criminally insane are in charge. The Democrats have destroyed every great, respected institution in America.

Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow me on Gettr. I am there, click here. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Cornell University librarian demands LIBRARIES be held accountable for their ‘fraught history of being complicit in racism’

  • Cornell University Librarian Reanna Esmail says libraries are often ‘complicit in racism’
  • Esmail, who works at the Ivy League college’s Olin Library, spoke at a virtual event on confronting anti-Asian racism
  • The librarian also highlighted the Dewey Decimal System, which is used to classify books by giving a different numbered section to different subjects
  • English, French and Greek languages have multiple Dewey sections apiece – but East and Southeast Asia languages are given just one

By Christopher Eberhart For Dailymail.Com, 10 May 2021

A librarian at Cornell University has claimed libraries are ‘fraught with racism’ – and highlighted their book classification system as evidence of this bigotry.

Reanna Esmail, an outreach and engagement librarian at Cornell’s Olin Library, spoke during a discussion last Friday aimed at combatting anti-Asian racism.

She said: ‘As a librarian, I see the ways in which my profession has the capacity to confront bias and misinformation in ways we approach and teach information and digital literacy.

‘Libraries are predominantly white fields, and Cornell is no exception in this regard. Libraries themselves also have a fraught history of being complicit in racism, and in some cases, upholding and disseminating racist ideas.’

Esmail made the comment during a virtual school event on Confronting Anti-Asian Racism on Friday. The librarian said she believes libraries should be held accountable for reinforcing white supremacy, even if it’s inadvertent, The Cornell Daily Sun reported.

Esmail used the example of the the Dewey Decimal System to illustrate her point.

Reanna Esmail, an outreach and engagement librarian at Cornell’s Olin Library, said libraries have a ‘fraught history of being complicit in racism, and in some cases, upholding and disseminating racist ideas’
Libraries, like those on Cornell University campus, pictured, have a history rooted in racism starting with the creator of the Dewey Decimal Classification

Esmail made her remarks during a virtual discussion on stopping anti-Asian American hatred. Cornell’s quad is pictured, with its Olin Library just to the right of the large tree

Protesters take to the streets of Washington DC to demonstrate against Anti-Asian racism in Washington DC on March 21, with libraries now in the spotlight

The system, also known as DDC, was devised my American librarian Melvil Dewey in 1876. It is used to classify books by assigning them all into 10 broad sections. They are then further subdivided further within these individual sections. Decimal points are then used to subdivide sections further – 974 is used for New England, with 974.1 then given to Maine, 974.2 used for New Hampshire, and so on.

Esmail accused the DDC of using ‘outdated’ language to refer to Asian people. She did not elaborate further, but the system gives individual sections to many western nationalities, then refers to Thai people as ‘Tai,’ and puts them into the same ‘miscellaneous’ section as people from Vietnam.

Similarly, the entire continent of Africa appears under a single section in the ‘people’ category of the DDC, which also includes people from Cuba, the Dominican Republic and Puerto Rico.

DDC has faced similar criticism for the uneven focus on languages.

Jane Behre, a library research scientist explained her issue with the DDC in a June 2020 post on hacklibraryschool.com.

English, German, and Greek each have eight individual numbered sections dedicated to them, while French, Italian, Spanish and Latin have seven sections dedicated to each language.

These split those languages into topics as varied as etymology, grammar, dictionaries and historic variations.

But nine ‘other languages,’ including those of east and southeast Asia, as well as African languages, have just one classification code each.

The number 495 is given to classify books on Languages on East and Southeast Asia – their only mention in the system. And the number 496 is the only one dedicated to African languages, despite the continent being home to 54 countries, and an estimated 2,000 languages.

‘Western European languages have highly specific classifications, while the majority of non-white and non-western European languages are all lumped together; even if they span an entire continent,’ Behre wrote.

‘A similar pattern exists when looking at the Library of Congress classifications for languages,’ she said.

Similar criticisms have been made over the Dewey System’s representation of religion, with 89 sections devoted to Christianity, but just one assigned to Islam, and another for Judaism.
Groups are standing up to racism, which is forcing many institutions, including libraries, to look inward

Homosexuality initially appeared in the DDC in the sections numbered 132 and 159.9 – devoted to mental derangements and abnormal psychology.

It has since been moved to section 306.7, which covers sexual relations. The classification system was also branded sexist, after previously putting its section on women close to its ‘etiquette’ section.

The surprisingly controversial numerical system used to arrange library books

American Academic and Librarian Melvil Dewey first invented the Dewey Decimal Classification, also known as the Dewey Decimal System, in 1873.

It was first publicly used in the US three years later.

Dewey’s invention is intended to help a library user or librarian find and organize books quickly and logically.

The DDC assigns all knowledge into 10 basic groups, with each group assigned 100 numbers.

They are 000–099, general works; 100–199, philosophy and psychology; 200–299, religion; 300–399, social sciences; 400–499, language; 500–599, natural sciences and mathematics; 600–699, technology; 700–799, the arts; 800–899, literature and rhetoric; and 900–999, history, biography, and geography.

These 10 main groups are in turn subdivided again and again to provide more specific subject groups within their range of assigned numbers.

For example, the history of Europe is placed in the 940s, and can be divided again with using single digits, or decimal points, as the subject becomes more specialized.

This sees the history of England found under the number 942, and the history of the Stuarts at 942.06.

The DDC has been revised multiple times to keep up with changing societal attitudes.

Homosexuality has been moved out of the ‘mental derangements’ section and into the ‘sexual relations’ section, while the section on women no longer sits close to etiquette, as the two subjects are no longer considered linked.

Source: Britannica.com 

Have a tip we should know? Your anonymity is NEVER compromised. Email tips@thegellerreport.com

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.


Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Pin It on Pinterest