[ April 24, 2024 ]
What a coward. He’s unworthy of the robe let alone ‘Chief Justice.”
Watch! Team Trump must be allowed to have a fair hearing at the SCOTUS.
What's worse? Roberts being a politician or Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett all being sheep and going along with it? It only takes 4 to vote to hear it. https://t.co/t42urvrQqy
— Femme🇺🇸 (@RealBasedMAGA) December 17, 2020
Story continues below advertisement
[VIDEO] Rep Says SCOTUS Staffer Overheard Roberts “Yelling” About TX Case “I Don’t Give a F**k About Bush v Gore…”
By Wayne Dupree, December 17, 2020
Rep. Matt Patrick, a Texas Congressman from District 32 just shared some shocking news
He took to C-Span, where he told a disturbing story about the recent Texas case that went before the SCOTUS.
As you know, the justices refused to hear the case, with only Alito and Thomas dissenting.
But Rep. Patrick said it was a lot more dramatic than just your usual “no” vote.
Rep Patrick says he spoke to a SCOTUS staffer who claims to have overheard a “screaming match” take place in the room where the justices gather to discuss cases.
The staffer said the always-quiet room erupted in shouting, and this staffer says they overheard Justice Roberts say, “I don’t give a f**k about Bush v Gore, at that time we didn’t have riots.”
You can watch the video below:
What's worse? Roberts being a politician or Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett all being sheep and going along with it? It only takes 4 to vote to hear it. https://t.co/t42urvrQqy
— Femme🇺🇸 (@RealBasedMAGA) December 17, 2020
After news broke of this disturbing story, Lin Wood shared this tweet about a supposed phone call between Roberts and one of the liberal justices.
“In discussing @realDonaldTrump in phone conversation in 8/19, Justice John Roberts stated that he would make sure “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.” Roberts engaged in phone conversations with Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to work to get Trump voted out.”
In discussing @realDonaldTrump in phone conversation in 8/19, Justice John Roberts stated that he would make sure “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.”
Roberts engaged in phone conversations with Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to work to get Trump voted out.
— Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 17, 2020
Mr. Wood did not cite any source for that information.
However, it’s not a secret that John Roberts is a liberal wearing a “conservative” robe…this guy has screwed us over so many times that I’ve lost track…
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Please contribute here.
or
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.
Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding.Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.
Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.
Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.
Follow Pamela Geller on Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.
Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.
Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.
If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.
97 Comments
3 years ago
Bush Chief Justice Pollyanna John Roberts votes for MOB RULE.
3 years ago
Reply to
Chris Wolf
Yes he did. Should there be a civil war, he will be in the White House Bunker with Pedophile Joe.
3 years ago
Reply to
Michael Goldman
Yep right before the secret service lets the mob in and both their heads end up on a pike.
3 years ago
justice roberts went to pedo island with jeffery epstien
3 years ago
Reply to
joe shmoe
If it can be proven that SCOTUS Chief Justice John Roberts was involved with and/or was a participant in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking enterprise, he would be removed from the bench and disbarred.
If he turned State’s Evidence to avoid spending substantial time in a federal prison, his life expectancy would probably be < 24 hours. What evidence can you provide to support your assertion?
3 years ago
Reply to
Daniel FX Dravot
…I know one person who could prove that….and she’s in custody right now…..cut a deal with Maxwell…..and you’ll get your proof.
3 years ago
Reply to
ladywarrior
Justice Roberts is not an honest jurist. If he won’t resign the House needs to impeach him. Roberts is worse than having another lame brained liberal on the court.
3 years ago
Reply to
Daniel FX Dravot
The “WHISTLEBLOWER” would probably receive an ARKANCIDE TREATMENT if they went out without protection.
3 years ago
Reply to
joe shmoe
so, ah, um, the redwood retreat is out of fashion? please help me get up to speed…I’m a gonna have to update my luggage, mental note bohemian out, but don’t go to jeff’s island either, did I say that out loud?
3 years ago
Reply to
joe shmoe
so, ah, um, the redwood retreat is out of fashion? please help me get up to speed…I’m a gonna have to update my luggage
3 years ago
Reply to
joe shmoe
It’s possible he is blackmailed, but it is not a requirement for a turncoat.
3 years ago
Reply to
joe shmoe
I keep hearing that…but never any evidence….I can’t stand the traitorous Roberts…..but that’s a charge I’d have to see proof before believing it.
3 years ago
Reply to
ladywarrior
All there is is a flight manifest of an Epstein owned plane showing a John Roberts traveling from Palm Beach International (PBI) to Tetersborough (TEB). That’s where the rumor starts, who is the John Roberts that was on that flight.
3 years ago
Reply to
joe shmoe
Is it? Do you know how many John Roberts are in our country?
What they need to do is make a deal with Maxwell…get her to talk. But if the Left takes over in the White House….nobody’s going to be talking because they want the Bush Cabal pal, Roberts, still in there.
If President Trump gets in…and Maxwell says it was the Justice Roberts….then they will quietly ask him to leave ….”due to family members”…or his health.
3 years ago
Reply to
Robert Kahlcke
i have no problem believing the self called elite are totally stupid. their ego`s are so inflated by their own sense of self importance,they think all they have to do is lie and keep lying. “you have no proof”,they say. When the proof is right in front of all to see.
3 years ago
Words heard through a wall. Prove it Skippy. Fake news. If all you’ve got is hearsay, no wonder every case is thrown out.
3 years ago
Reply to
FishsticksForMe
You are a moron as nothing but false hearsay has been used by you ignorant libturds to assault Trump everyday for 4 years so go F.Y.S!!!!
3 years ago
Reply to
FishsticksForMe
This is coming from the person who still believes in RussiaGate
3 years ago
Reply to
FishsticksForMe
Well get the staffer who heard it to testify. Then it’s no longer hearsay- it’s evidence, fishy.
3 years ago
Well, that changes everything. Isn’t there a secret, “Except in case of riot” clause in the constitution? There isn’t? Then Roberts has no business calling himself a Supreme Court Justice.
3 years ago
Back from Lolita Island.
3 years ago
Robert is the Alpha, Kavanaugh and Gorsuch are Betas.
This is shameful!!!
3 years ago
Reply to
mati261000
Where is tough Amy Barrette?
Was she only tough to get the job?
Now she can put her feet up and deflect making decisions with the cover of the other ones.
3 years ago
Reply to
felix1999
She is the new kid on the Court. Most likely she didn´t want to
rock the boat. She missed a great chance though.
3 years ago
What the h*ll??? WHO NEED COWARDS FOR JUSTICES???
3 years ago
So he is worried about the criminals acting like criminals instead of the rule of LAW like what we are paying him to follow!!!!! There needs to be a mechanism to get rid of treasonous POS morons when they are in positions of power!!!!!
3 years ago
Reply to
patd
There is. For judges it’s called impeachment. Unfortunately, not gonna happen.
3 years ago
Have we learned nothing from the appeasement of the NAZIs?. Good God, is Robert’s now the Chamberlain of “Peace in our Time” fame?
3 years ago
No business being a Justice. We need a way to remove this traitor.
3 years ago
Hey, SC Roberts: WE can start rioting, too. Idiot. Our democracy is at stake, and he’s worried about some leftist rioting. It’s only in leftist cities, anyway.
3 years ago
A jellyfish has more of a spine than justice Roberts. He should resign as he is a total disgrace to the court.
3 years ago
Roberts was quick to replace RBG as the leftist hack.
3 years ago
Reply to
Bill
Gorsuch, Kavenaugh and Barrette aren’t much better. Scared social liberals. Trump really went to bat for them and they won’t do their dam jobs!
3 years ago
Reply to
felix1999
Of those three, I find Barrett to be the biggest disappointment. I don’t think she is a social liberal, but she clearly lacks the backbone the job requires. Mob rule is taking over the country and there are too few with courage to resist.
3 years ago
3 years ago
I am a lawyer, a member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of the United States, a fervent Trump supporter and I firmly believe that the results of the election were the product of manipulation and fraud.
That said, I don’t buy this story for a moment. Roberts is NOT a liberal. He is a never-Trumper of the Bush tribe. His fundamental legal analysis can be boiled down to a simple two-prong analysis in every case: “a) Will a win benefit Trump? b) If yes, vote the other way (even if you have to overrule one of your own earlier opinions).”
The Supreme Court justices have not met together in a conference room since March, 2020 for COVID reasons. They are meeting virtually. Therefore, it would have been impossible for anyone to overhear a heated argument in the conference room.
My personal view is that the situation is actually much worse and that the justices are terrified that if they voted to overturn the “election” or even just accepted a case to look into it, they or their families would be in serious physical danger from the left-wing mob who have shown no hesitation in using violence for political objectives. This is how the judiciary operates in places like Mexico where judges know that the only reward for voting for justice in certain cases is a body bag.
Consider the following:
1.The standing argument on which they dismissed the case was utter nonsense. It was cowardice. The Supreme Court has ORIGINAL JURISDICTION to hear disputes between the States. It was part of the deal the States made when the Constitution was ratified. When a state files a claim against another state, they have standing. It doesn’t mean that the Court has to ultimately rule in their favor, but it had a Constitutional obligation to at least hear the case. What if a state changed their election rules at the last minute to prohibit black people from voting in an election affecting federal office. You really believe that the court would have dismissed such a claim on standing grounds?
2. With respect to Pennsylvania, the U. S. Supreme Court, through Justice Alito, issued an order that Pennsylvania segregate the ballots that were received after election day and to count them separately pending further review. Pennsylvania executive officials raised the proverbial middle finger to the Supreme Court and ignored the order. By bailing on the Texas case, the Supreme Court allowed Pennsylvania to ignore a Supreme Court order with impunity.
That sounds like a very scared court to me.
3 years ago
Reply to
clearsighted
Nice comment. Thank you. We need- and this blog deserves- more thoughtful comments such as yours.
Could Roberts have been in the room on a conference call?
3 years ago
Reply to
Liatris Spicata
Quote from Lenora Thompson’s site (I don’t know if any of this is true or not)…”The source of the intel is an unnamed clerk in the Supreme Court of the United States who heard-what-he-heard last Friday when the Justices retired to deliberate on whether or not to take Texas’ case against the embattled states so obviously riddled with election fraud.
Usually deliberations are quiet and professional, sometimes conducted telephonically. But given the gravity of the situation, the Justices chose to deliberate face-to-face on Friday.”
3 years ago
Reply to
clearsighted
They all have 24/7 Secret Service protection and live in protected communities.
They are probably scared social liberals.
3 years ago
Reply to
clearsighted
I didn’t know whether or not the SCOTUS justices were provided official security. I think they should be. Their impotence from living in fear of the mob puts all of us in danger. This sadly illustrates how much America has deteriorated in the 20 years since the Bush v. Gore decision.
3 years ago
Reply to
John from NY
One slight correction; “America has deteriorated in the 20 years since the Bush v. Gore decision.”
Here is the correction: “America has deteriorated in since the Ronald Reagan Presidency.
3 years ago
Reply to
Laddyboy
I was thinking of how much mob rule has been taking over America in recent years and also the contrast between then-Chief Justice Rehnquist and Roberts. But I agree with you. I think Reagan foresaw the emerging tyranny:
“Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We
didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought
for, protected and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will
spend our sunset years telling our children and our children’s children
what it was once like in the United States where men were free.”
3 years ago
Reply to
clearsighted
If the US 2020 election results maps (of real votes) showed a substantial amount of blue some fear of massive blue retaliation would make sense to me. But the maps of the election outcome are nearly almost entirely red. So what fear of the insignificant amount of blue would cause supposed constitutionalists turning their back on decades of their own experience voting for constitutional causes would explain this? Maybe somebody has a gun to the guy’s head now that makes sense to me. Otherwise I don’t see the logic in a “greater good” argument from Roberts unless he was just saying it “out loud for others to hear” and quivering inside. There’s not enough blue in the USA to either justify Biden’s win or the worry of “mass” riots. The irony in this those same blue counties, aren’t they the ones defunding their police force?
3 years ago
Reply to
meofcourse58
Retaliation does not need to be massive. Steve Scalise, Abraham Lincoln, William McKinley and JFK were all assassinated by lone gunmen.
3 years ago
Reply to
clearsighted
Well, except in our government today there is a widespread amount of boldness rebelling against anything to do with getting the evidence heard that I can’t figure. For instance the county under subpoena to do the audit and won’t. There’s just too many instances of non-compliance government employees who won’t do their job to think all of them are being held hostage to lone gunman. I’m not saying it’s impossible. But it’s uncanny from the top on down their are so many people acting boldly to thwart the evidence from being heard. It’s like they are all being “mastered” by somebody it’s that uncanny.
3 years ago
Reply to
clearsighted
ALL JUSTICES and JUDGES ARE LIVING UNDER THREATS.
That’s neither new nor surprising.
On the other hand they have a good life – ALL of them.
The ones who can’t stand threats shouldn’t become judges, but give up and open a riskless shop – like selling honey, or a restaurant.
3 years ago
Reply to
clearsighted
Then if they’re scaredy cats they shouldn’t have accepted the nominations. Also, what they could have done in this particular situation is heard the case, make a recommendation to Congress and let them decide. Either that or render a verdict but keep it anonymous, for 25 years or so.
3 years ago
Reply to
clearsighted
“My personal view is that the situation is actually much worse and that the justices are terrified that if they voted to overturn the ‘election’ or even just accepted a case to look into it, they or their families would be in serious physical danger from the left-wing mob who have shown no hesitation in using violence for political objectives. This is how the judiciary operates in places like Mexico where judges know that the only reward for voting for justice in certain cases is a body bag.”
I am not a lawyer, but I agree with your assessment. 2020 will be remembered for COVID and the rise of BLM (Burning, Looting and Murder) mob rule. These anarchists and their apologist allies are holding America hostage.
3 years ago
Reply to
clearsighted
we must never take the law into our own hands. BUT, that presupposes that there is law to take into our own hands. What recourse is there when the highest Court will not follow the law ? Seriously, what`s next ? The court makes it clear , what they think of our well being and safety. And to think I and so many others risked our lives for the freedom of people like them. And those who lost their lives for that freedom. Well, I would address the Supreme Court in this manner. You have rendered yourselves irrelevant. A functioning septic system, is of more value & use than you. May your bowels be uncontrollable.May incontinence plague your spouse`s. I wish the soda in your mixed drinks would be flat. All your hair to fall out,nail fungus,boils on your a&&`s,and warts on your noses. Have a nice day.
3 years ago
If fear and terror are to be the motivation of Roberts, then we should get a piece of the action and show them what real fear means.
3 years ago
Roberts may have been a conservative once, but he is now damaged goods, putty in the hands of Clapper and Brennan, the two Chinese activists.
3 years ago
So Roberts, the Satanic moron, will pander to the intimidation of the rioters and NOT do the right thing. What a slimy sleeze that makes him out to be.
3 years ago
I wonder at what point Roberts decided to set aside his official duties as Chief Justice to the U.S. and to sell out. I hope it was worth it for him, because he sold his soul in exchange.
3 years ago
POS Communist Treasonous TRAITOR!!!!!!! KICK the SLIME OFF the court!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
3 years ago
I’m having a hard time believing this. It’s got a little bit of stuff I can believe based on what I’m told, but the dialog seems fictional.
3 years ago
Apparently Tom Fitton has a recording….Of Roberts and Breyer
3 years ago
Even if this is not literally true, figuratively it is. This fear affects all of us through Blm riots and Antifa viloence.
A country living under fear will sooner or later lose its democracy.
Time to organize a party and fight back.
3 years ago
Roberts oversees the FISA court. All the abuse happened under his watch. He gave consent to all the illegal spying on the Trump campaign.
He needs to be publicly executed. He is a dirty, villainous traitor. He is a communist globalist and pervert.
3 years ago
Read this article and see the picture of John Roberts at Epstein’s pedophile island with Bill Clinton: https://richardsonpost.com/howellwoltz/19453/roberts-scotus-are-compromised/
3 years ago
The courts “silence” is deafening
3 years ago
Roberts says if they study the case and give a verdict of election fraud…there will be rioting?!!
Where has he been? There has been rioting by the Left since the election process began…BLM, Antifa…and others. Does he not own a television?
He’s a smarmy crook put in by the Bush Cabal…
He’s worried about rioting? Wait until he sees a Civil War because He failed to act.
3 years ago
Old John had better start worrying more about riots in his own living room.
3 years ago
I have wanted Chief Justice Roberts investigated for corruption and impeached for a very long time. Now it seems that we may be down to two judges that have integrity. Justice Amy Barrett became a huge disappointment right out of the gate. It’s time to invoke the Insurrection Act and start investigating the treason, financial corruption, etc.
3 years ago
Hmm, he is intimidated by threats of civil violence. It affects his floating interpretations of the constitution. I mean, this guy is way too political for a Chief Justice.
3 years ago
Roberts traveled to Pedo Island.
3 years ago
If roberts has his way, he’ll avoid riots and instead will have a (not-so-) civil war.
3 years ago
According to the Constitution …. “judges” only hold their Office during “good Behavior” ….. being booked on an Epstein flight to Pedophile Island is not what I would consider “good behavior” ….. nor is breaching one’s SWORN OATH TO UPHOLD & DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION.
3 years ago
Has there ever been a more spineless, reprehensible Supreme Court justice in our history?
3 years ago
The Riots were instigated by the DNC and Deep State…. as their part of the Coordinated Chinese Wuhan Bio-weapon attack on America. All designed to bring the economy down…. force mail-in ballots to steal the electon. Roberts is a Liberal ‘republican’ Bush Family cartel boy ….. pushing the narrative created for him. ALL of it to remove Trump and thus ( We the People) from office.
3 years ago
What a load of crap. SCOTUS has not met in person since March 2020.
3 years ago
Reply to
IndigoRed
I don’t get this “in person” meeting criteria. Virtual meetings work for most entities!
3 years ago
Reply to
MountainsToValleys
Ah. You missed an important part of the story, then. The anonymous source inside SCOTUS claimed to have seen the justices go into the conference room. The source could not have seen the justices go into the conf. room because they haven’t met in person since March 2020 to go anywhere together on the day in question.
On Dec. 12, HalTurnerRadio.com published an article titled, “Loud Arguments in US Supreme Court Chambers over Texas Lawsuit – COURT INTIMIDATED.” It was supposedly based on a “source deep inside the US Supreme Court.”
(transcription)
“Hal, as you know I am a clerk for one of the Justices on SCOTUS. Today was like nothing we have ever seen. The justices are arguing loudly behind closed doors.
The Justices met in a closed and sealed room, as is standard.
Usually it is very calm, however today we could hear screaming all the way down the hall.
They met in person, because they didn’t trust telephonic meeting as secure.
Chief Justice Roberts was screaming
“Are you going to be responsible for the rioting if we hear this case?” ”
The claim was bolstered by video made on Dec. 14 showing a meeting of Texas electors before they cast their ballots in the 2020 election. The man in the video identified himself as Matt Patrick from Texas’ 32nd district. Patrick states that he doesn’t have a citation for his story saying it was something he read online that morning, giving no additional details about this alleged shouting match. It appears Patrick was merely repeating misinformation published on a conspiracy theory website.
All of this information is freely available online.
3 years ago
Hoka Hey, “Chief” ‘Justice’ Robber : Fiat justitia ruat caelum (“Let justice be done though the heavens fall.” ) !
3 years ago
I wish people would stop with these kind of stories. The SC hasn’t met in person for quite some time now because of the Chinese virus.
3 years ago
It certainly gives rise to question his impartiality and if true he should be removed from the Bench and DISBARRED.
3 years ago
Hey Pamela, i’m pretty sure this is one story that has actually been proven false (for real). I guess 1 out of a million is pretty good for the Allahstream media.
3 years ago
Chief Justice Roberts was so spooked by this revelation that SCOTUS gave Trump a census victory so as to take attention of the Trump Derangement bias of Justice Roberts.
3 years ago
Lost what little respect I had for this guy.
3 years ago
If this staffer really heard this, he needs to come before the Senate. I believe that this really happened, and I think Roberts better be looking over his shoulder for the rest of his life.
3 years ago
If the ballot box becomes useless, the bullet box becomes the inevitable.
