Civil war ……..
The Texas lawsuit alleges that election officials in the four states made voting protocol changes that were contrary to election laws set by the state legislatures, in violation of the Constitution.
Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.
Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.
Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.
AG Brnovich Leads 20-State Amicus Brief Supporting Kentucky AG’s Defense of State Laws in Federal Court
By Katie Connor, Prescott News, December 9, 2020
Attorney General Mark Brnovich announced that Arizona led a 20-state amicus brief urging the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) to reverse a decision by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals that prevented the Kentucky Attorney General from intervening to defend a state law after the state official named declined to continue defending the law through the appellate process.
“Arizonans know first-hand how elected officials can fail to respect the law,” said General Brnovich. “Attorneys General have a duty to ensure state laws receive a faithful defense regardless of the inaction of other government officials.”
The matter of strategic capitulation in litigation is not reserved to Kentucky. The Arizona Attorney General’s Office, for example, has had to intervene in several important elections cases over the past year after the Arizona Secretary of State failed to defend challenged laws. One such prominent case, Brnovich v DNC, is now before SCOTUS.
The issue of whether an Attorney General can intervene in federal court to continue the defense of a challenged state law is an important component of our democratic system of governance. Public officials are not empowered to repeal duly enacted state laws unilaterally. Federal courts must permit Attorneys General to continue the defense of state law when others will not. This rule respects the voters’ ability to elect legislators separately from executive officials and preserves the checks balances within the state’s legislative process.
In the Kentucky case, the Attorney General defended the state law on behalf of the Cabinet for Health and Family Services (CHFS). The Secretary of CHFS is appointed by the Governor. When the CHFS chose not to seek further review of a Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decision, the Kentucky Attorney General moved to intervene in the case and continue defending the law. However, the Sixth Circuit did not allow the Kentucky Attorney General to intervene. The Kentucky Attorney General is asking SCOTUS to consider whether a state attorney general should be allowed to intervene to defend a state law, after a federal court of appeals invalidates it and no other state official will defend it.
Attorney General Brnovich was joined in the brief by Attorneys General representing the following states: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia.
Copy of Amicus Brief.
Have a tip we should know? Your anonymity is NEVER compromised. Email email@example.com
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Please contribute here.
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.