David Marcus, yet again, hits it out of the park.
The U.S. Supreme Court Should Act On Pennsylvania’s Vote Count
By David Marcus The Federalist, November 5, 2020:
The United States Constitution could not be clearer that state legislatures, not courts, make the laws that regulate how elections are held in each state. That’s not happening right now in the battleground state of Pennsylvania, one of a handful of states that elect state Supreme Court justices in partisan elections.
Earlier this year in Pennsylvania, the Democrat-dominated state Supreme Court ruled that ballots could be counted up to three days after Election Day, even if it could not be shown that they had arrived by November 3, as required by state law.
Earlier this year the United States Supreme Court rejected an action brought by the Pennsylvania Republican Party to block the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s actions. The court rejected it with a 4-4 vote, but did not rule on the merits of the case, which are still very much at issue. In addition, the court at the time did not include newly-minted Justice Amy Coney Barrett.
One can understand why the U.S. Supreme Court would want to avoid invalidating a state court ruling on an election before the election is held. In other words, to take a wait-and-see approach, but now we have waited and what we see is an incredibly tight race in Pennsylvania that could well decide the presidency. The merits of the case really matter, which is why the Pennsylvania GOP and the Trump campaign have joined in a new lawsuit meant to block ballots without postmarks, or those received after Election Day.
This time around, SCOTUS must restore the rule of law by rejecting the blatant political maneuvering of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. The state’s high court not only rewrote a law passed by the state legislature, it invited all kinds of corruption on the part of vote-counters in charge of determining what ballots are accepted.
The counters are supposed to be segregating the ballots received after Election Day, in case they are invalidated by a Supreme Court ruling. But GOP officials are alleging they are being locked out of oversight of the count, so no one can say with any certainty whether the proper ballots are being segregated.
Adding to the possibility of corruption is that in Philadelphia, which almost certainly has the largest number of late mail-in votes, officials can see the statewide results and they have a pretty good idea of how many extra votes Biden needs to win the state, which Trump now narrowly leads.
The overtly politically nature of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which is not only controlled by Democrats but heavily tied into the state party machine, is further reason why the U.S. Supreme Court should tamp down this obvious judicial activism.
The law as written could not have been clearer: votes received after Election Day should not be counted. This is in no sense disenfranchisement, it is rather the normal functioning of the state legislature’s right to set election laws. Meanwhile, voters in the Keystone state had plenty of time to get their ballots in. Frankly, if a voter waited until the last minute and the ballot didn’t arrive on time, that is on them.
The U.S. Supreme Court must not punt on this vital issue this time around. With so much potentially hanging on the result in Pennsylvania, the nation’s highest court should make clear that legislatures write voting laws, not courts. Pennsylvania has a Republican-controlled legislature but a Democratic mayor in Philadelphia, a Democratic governor, secretary of the commonwealth, attorney general, and yes, state Supreme Court. The U.S. Supreme Court needs to act this time, to protect the rule of law and the integrity of the presidential election from this blatantly unconstitutional abuse of power in Pennsylvania.
Have a tip we should know? Your anonymity is NEVER compromised. Email firstname.lastname@example.org
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Please contribute here.
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.