[ April 19, 2024 ]
Ha! Desperate times call for desperate narratives.
Politico Reporter Questions Legality Of Posting Footage Of Pelosi At Salon Due To CA Being ‘Two-Party Consent’ State
By: Michael Cantrell, Flag and Cross, September 2, 2020:
Not long after security footage was reported on by various media outlets showing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi violating coronavirus lockdown rules to visit a hair salon, a reporter for Politico put on her shiny white armor and attempted to ride to her rescue, questioning whether or not posting that footage was legal due to California being a “two-party consent” state.
Story continues below advertisementHere’s more on this from The Daily Wire:
“Have to ask upon seeing this: Is it legal in CA – a “two party consent” state – to videotape someone in a private home or business without their consent?” Marinucci asked while linking to a Fox News report about Pelosi’s salon visit.
Attorneys quickly pointed out that it is legal to post security camera footage.
Had Marinucci been correct, it would have meant California businesses wouldn’t be allow to even install security cameras without posting some sort of statement suggesting that by entering the store, customers consent to be taped.
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Please contribute here.
or
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.
Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding.Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.
Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.
Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.
Follow Pamela Geller on Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.
Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.
Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.
If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.
15 Comments
3 years ago
A call to reporters to leave California. If this is reality for reporters in California than why even try to report. It’s called self defeatism when one Party holds total control over what will or will not be reported. President Nixon could have decided not to discuss the 18 minute gap in Secretary Woods tape simply because he didn’t care too based on this logic. You simpleton reporters think the Public is going to fall for this kind of moronic logic that passes for law in California la la land.? The rest of the country is to real to let this stuff pass.
3 years ago
Lock Downs For Thee But NOT For Me , Just another Demon☭rat Hypocrite, move along nothing to see here.
3 years ago
“Have to ask upon seeing this: Is it legal in CA – a “two party consent”
state – to videotape someone in a private home or business without
their consent?”
This shows her left wing ignorance.
3 years ago
Reply to
anonQ
Right.
This would mean that all police body cameras, police car dash cameras, and every other type of camera aimed at the public is illegal. Obviously the ‘Two-Party Consent’ rule needs revision.
3 years ago
Reply to
anonQ
The nutbags will try to twist/mis-construe everything that does’nt work for them..Complete lack of ANY moral/ethical responsibilty
3 years ago
“Have to ask upon seeing this: Is it legal in CA – a “two party consent”
state – to videotape someone in a private home or business without
their consent?”
This shows her left wing ignorance.
3 years ago
Politico Reporter Questions Legality Of Posting Footage Of Pelosi At Salon Due To CA Being ‘Two-Party Consent’ State
She was in a public place where anyone could come in….see her going and coming….and she was breaking the law that she herself promoted and wanted enforced on others…..
The Reporter needs to get up on the law….which is for ALL.
3 years ago
3 years ago
More than half of California would vote for Pelosi regardless of her criminal activity. It is psychological conditioning causing Borderline Personality Disorder. (AKA TDS)
3 years ago
The CCTV secuifty Cameras are in place to redord anyone committing a crime on the premises.
Pelosi committed a crime and the Cameras recorded it. Nothing illegal about the cameras and the evidence. Criminals typically say when caught that they were “set up”. So pelosi’s response is to be expected. Alcoholic Criminal usually do what is expected.
3 years ago
What an idiot. Pelosi was in a public place of business. Pelosi is a public figure and therefor has less rights to privacy than an ordinary citizen. This idiot reporter needs to look at USSC decisions to this regard.
3 years ago
Naturally this Politico reporter is only concerned that the truth was exposed. It’s amazing to watch these people twist under their own evil imaginings.
3 years ago
A person who is breaking the rules has no expectation of privacy especially when cameras are in plain view. If that were not the case then criminals who are caught on camera killing, beating or robbing someone could claim that they did not give consent and therefore such evidence must be omitted at trial. Pelosi is a criminal crone
3 years ago
Its called ” security ” for a reason – You think criminals want to be on video tape?
