GOP Sen. Ted Cruz said that Senate Republicans have the votes to confirm President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee

I’m with Cruz
Sooooo,
Lets take the, Supreme Corpse, to the Supreme Court
and Take a Look at the Constitution

Cruz is looking for face time again…
MItch Mc Connell confirmed that days ago!

‘Those Are The Only Rules’:
Trump Campaign Releases Statement On Supreme Court Vacancy
By Eric A. Blair
Published September 20, 2020 at 1:30pm

“When there’s a Supreme Court vacancy, the President selects a nominee and the Senate provides advice and consent. That’s what the Constitution says and those are the only rules,” Tim Murtaugh, Trump 2020 communications director, said in a statement.

“There has been an open seat on the Supreme Court in a presidential election year 29 times in American history, and in every single case the president has nominated a candidate. Voters elected Donald J. Trump president in 2016 and gave Republicans an expanded majority in 2018, so the people already have spoken. The President has placed two well-qualified justices on the court so far and he is about to select a third,” he wrote.

“Americans can see the names on his list of potential nominees, while Joe Biden is hiding his list of people he would consider if he were president. Biden knows that he is an empty vessel for the radical left and that’s why he’s refusing to be honest with the American people about who he would want on the court. But make no mistake about this: The President has been clear that he will nominate a woman to fill that seat and the Senate should vote to confirm her,” Murtaugh wrote.

According to “Undercover Huber,” 61 Supreme Court Justice picks have been nominated and confirmed since 1900 — and 70% of them were confirmed within 46 days — the exact number of days left until Election Day.
…
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/09/rules-trump-campaign-releases-statement-supreme-court-vacancy/

they damn well better have.

What a partisan narcissistic till her death!
She was divisive till the bitter end.

Flashback:
In 2016, Ginsburg said Senate should hold SCOTUS confirmation hearing during election year
Ginsburg remarked in 2016 that ‘nothing in the Constitution’ precludes 11th hour nomination.
By Charles Creitz | Fox News 9/20/20
…
But in 2016, when a lame-duck President Obama tabbed Merrick Garland to replace the late conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, Democratic leaders had no problem with the move. And neither did Ginsburg.

“There’s nothing in the Constitution that says the president stops being the president in his last year,” Ginsburg said in a 2016 New York Times interview in which she called for Garland to receive a confirmation vote in the Senate.

As for whether the Senate should take up a vote on Garland, Ginsburg said at the time, “That’s their job.”
…
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/flashback-in-2016-ginsburg-senate-election-year-vacancy

——————————————————————————————————————————————
2016 interview –

Ruth Bader Ginsburg, No Fan of Donald Trump, Critiques Latest Term – 2016
By Adam Liptak
July 10, 2016

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg of the Supreme Court in May. In an interview in her chambers on Friday, she chastised the Senate for refusing to act on President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee,
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg of the Supreme Court in May. In an interview in her chambers on Friday, she chastised the Senate for refusing to act on President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee.
…
WASHINGTON — Unless they have a book to sell, Supreme Court justices rarely give interviews. Even then, they diligently avoid political topics. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg takes a different approach.

These days, she is making no secret of what she thinks of a certain presidential candidate.

“I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president,” she said. “For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.”

It reminded her of something her husband, Martin D. Ginsburg, a prominent tax lawyer who died in 2010, would have said.

“‘Now it’s time for us to move to New Zealand,’” Justice Ginsburg said, smiling ruefully.

In an interview in her chambers on Friday, Justice Ginsburg took stock of a tumultuous term and chastised the Senate for refusing to act on President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee.

Her colleagues have said nothing in public about the presidential campaign or about Mr. Obama’s stalled nomination of Judge Merrick B. Garland to the Supreme Court. But Justice Ginsburg was characteristically forthright, offering an unequivocal endorsement of Judge Garland.

“I think he is about as well qualified as any nominee to this court,” she said. “Super bright and very nice, very easy to deal with. And super prepared. He would be a great colleague.”

Asked if the Senate had an obligation to assess Judge Garland’s qualifications, her answer was immediate.

“That’s their job,” she said. “There’s nothing in the Constitution that says the president stops being president in his last year.”

The court has been short-handed since Justice Antonin Scalia died in February, and Justice Ginsburg said it will probably remain that way through most or all of its next term, which starts in October. Even in “the best case,” in which Judge Garland was confirmed in the lame-duck session of Congress after the presidential election on Nov. 8, she said, he will have missed most of the term’s arguments and so could not vote in those cases.

Justice Ginsburg, 83, said she would not leave her job “as long as I can do it full steam.” But she assessed what is at stake in the presidential election with the precision of an actuary, saying that Justices Anthony M. Kennedy and Stephen G. Breyer are no longer young.

“Kennedy is about to turn 80,” she said. “Breyer is going to turn 78.”

For the time being and under the circumstances, she said, the Supreme Court is doing what it can. She praised Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.

“He had a hard job,” Justice Ginsburg said. “I think he did it quite well.”
…
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/11/us/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-no-fan-of-donald-trump-critiques-latest-term.html?referringSource=articleShare

I read that Trump has decided to nominate Biden for the Supreme Court. This means Democrats will assail Biden with claim of sexual impropriety and racism as per playbook. The Senate will reject the nomination as they hear the Democrat evidence. Biden has to withdraw from Presidential race.
Barret is then nominated two days before election and walks in.
The man is a genius.
I think I read it in the Babylon something or other.

The commiecrats are worried about Trump taking action on the Supreme Court as is his Constitutional duty?

Obhammud said it best, “Elections have consequences”.

Senator Collins and Murkowski are Democ-Rats in Republi-Can’t clothing = someone with position + guts needs to get in their faces and call the “vixens in the henhouse” out for being outright traitors…!

Providing Romney doesn’t back stab them like McCain did.

I’m praying the Senate gets it done QUICKLY!!