This is the last part of the long interview of documentary film maker Pierre Rehov out of a total of 4 episodes. Thanks to Helene Keller Lindt for the English translation.
Geller Report: Pierre Rehov, Nazism was an esoteric anti-Christian and anti-Jewish organization that grew thanks to the lever of anti-French and anti-Western revanchism. Without making an exaggerated parallel, do you see common points between the rise of Hitlerism between 1918 and 1933 and the evolution of anti-Jewish sentiment since the Durban conference in 2000, up to the BLM, and the enslavement of Western societies that the so-called sons of the colonized would like to destroy?
PR- The only parallel I can draw today is the rise of Islamism with the complicity of extreme left-wing movements, which see in this conquest a welcome revenge of the “oppressed by colonialism” without realizing that the values they claim to defend are the opposite of those contained in militant Islam.
The extreme left has missed everything. The countries that have indulged in Marxism are all examples of failure, absolutism, anemic economics, and have only been able to survive as a system through the terror imposed on their populations. Having failed to transform society in the name of an ideology contrary to human nature, Marxists and other Trotskyists, Leninists and Maoists, hid behind the defense of the peoples who were victims of colonialism in Africa and the Middle East.
But here these peoples, several generations after their liberation, are still locked in failure, plagued with the corruption of their leaders and their revolutions only lead to the advent of more and more obscurantist systems. It was therefore necessary to find the absolute victim, the one who had not yet managed to prove himself because he was still under the yoke of Western oppression. With the rebirth of Israel, the cradle of the Jewish people, history has given them a gift of choice. The Palestinian people. We saw the first results at the very beginning of the Intifada unleashed by Arafat with the Durban conference which quickly became an anti-Zionist convention, during which in the name of anti-racism it was fashionable to cry “death to the Jews”.
This observation is valid for an extreme fringe of environmentalists, for the most virulent feminist activists and for the gay community, which reproaches Israel for putting forward its liberalism towards sexual minorities (Tel Aviv and Jerusalem host every year one of the biggest pride parades) to mask a pseudo genocide against the Arabs of Palestine. The fact that homosexuals are tortured, beaten to death or thrown from buildings on Islamic soil is much less disturbing to them than the existence of the Jewish state alone in less than 1% of the Middle East.
The origin of this virulent anti-Semitism associated with a fight for the hegemony of a politico-religious ideology is complex and deserves to be approached in a factual way, which is impossible through an essentially reductive summary. If I tell you that Nazism had a great role to play in the birth of Arab nationalism in Palestine, and that this same nationalism, which died before it culminated in Jordan’s conquest of Judea Samaria and Gaza in 1948, was resurrected in 1964 under pressure from the Soviet Union to save President Nasser’s rampant pan-Arabism, that sounds like a political slogan. However, these are verifiable and historical facts, to which I have devoted a documentary. (“The Origins of the Palestinian Cause”).
But the anti-Semitic hatred engraved in Islamic thought goes back to Mohammed, when, after being initiated into monotheism by Jews and Christians, he wanted to convert the tribes that had convinced him of the existence of a single God to his new religion, a plagiarism of the previous ones. Their refusal led to massacres proudly recounted in the Hadiths, and a phrase has survived until today “khaybar khaybar ya yahud jaish muhammad saya’ud” which means “Khaybar Khaybar, O Jew, the army of Mohammed will return”.
Khaybar was a famous battlefield, where Mohammed and his henchmen massacred almost all the Jews, converted their children to Islam and enslaved their wives and daughters. This simple phrase is written into the Palestinian ethos, knowing that the leaders of the PLO, Fatah and Hamas, while claiming the opposite for the former, will never accept a negotiated peace but only a victory by force of arms leading to the destruction of Israel. Hence the never-ending conflict in the Middle East in the context of a rewriting of history financed by petrodollars and driven by the fear of terrorism, with the complicity of the United Nations, which is dependent on its Arab majority and automatic Third Worldism, and that of a Europe thirsty for oil and paralyzed by the fear of terrorism.
To sum up, you have two parallel movements launched to conquer the world. Islamism and Marxism. Their advent necessarily involves the destruction of the West, its culture, its wealth and its history. Once again, the Jews are the scapegoats.
Should we be afraid for the future of “white Western” societies and how should we react and stop the fanaticism conceived by today’s red-brown-green people?
This is a concern. Western white societies are in the process of cracking up and one day risk being destroyed not by external conquests, but by implosion. Hitler used to say “send me a human rights lawyer, I’ll greet him with a machine gun”. This is a bit like the mechanism of the decay of our societies that we see at work. On the one hand, there are the supporters of “everyone is handsome, everyone is nice”, who find themselves singing scout songs after each terrorist attack, and on the other hand, there are cynical, active and bloodthirsty ideologues, against whom our democracies, as they stand, are no match.
This is, I believe, the first time that entire populations, out of fear of losing their little comforts, and in the name of political correctness that President Truman despised, have taken the side of their adversary and put themselves forward as responsible for a situation of which they are victims.
This, once again, means rewriting history. That of the Algerian war, for example, where FLN terrorists are exonerated for the atrocities they committed, while soldiers of the French contingent and their descendants are forced to make amends to an immigrant population that has fled its country of origin, despite the admirable infrastructure built by France and the oil from the Sahara that De Gaulle was kind enough to abandon.
Whatever a country’s resources, there must be a coherent system, a common popular will, sincere leaders and a sufficient level of education to exploit them in order to share the wealth. The lands of Islam are incapable of producing such leaders, but only authoritarian systems and corrupt governments. Hence the mass exodus of economic migrants to countries that some people conspire against from the moment they arrive, on the assumption that “everything has been taken from them and we owe them everything”.
I do not believe in the “great replacement” as the result of a cabal resembling the “Protocol of the Wise Men of Islam”, but rather as the result of the cowardice of European leaders who live in the guilt of the colonial era and have been convinced that opening the borders to millions of immigrants would ease their conscience while allowing the influx of a necessary labor force. I observe this phenomenon with some disgust, because their philosophy is “we need immigrants to pick up our rubbish and pay for our pensions”. By yielding to their paternalistic tendency to be a bunch of yuppie careerists, they have opened the doors to a real invasion of individuals, many of whom were brought up with the idea that colonization was the source of their misfortune and that everything is their due. The Spaniards, Portuguese and Yugoslavs who were the crucible of immigration until the Glorious Thirty undoubtedly preferred their country of origin to France, but did not arrive in Paris with a vengeful spirit. The two migrations are not comparable, if only in religious and cultural terms.
Wouldn’t the Democrats with their candidate Joe Biden be willing to risk chaos by supporting domestic enemies and taking action against the U.S. (and thus the world) economy just to weaken Donald Trump and win the presidency?
It seems to me I touched on this issue during this interview because that is indeed my feeling. On his own, Joe Biden is unlikely to win. He’s an insignificant character, who has baggage, who has been hiding in his basement since the beginning of the Corona crisis, who is often the subject of squabbles for his “innocent” fondling of little girls, who is unable to fill a hundredth of a stadium during his rare public appearances while President Trump is gathering countless crowds, and whose family, involved in financial scandals, seems as corrupt as the Ayatollahs.
The only way the Democrats can win the elections is by destroying Trump.
They tried everything after spying on his campaign in 2016. The case of collusion with Russia in the 2016 elections turned out to be a fabricated dossier, and revealed a real bucket of crabs in the FBI, CIA, and Justice Department. The Mueller report totally exonerated Trump, while enormous and sometimes unconstitutional pressure tactics were used on witnesses to get the president convicted. There was the case of the porn actress backed by her corrupt lawyer. More recently the Democrats, who have a majority in Congress, launched an impeachment case against Trump for a conversation with the Ukrainian president during which he spoke of the corruption of Biden’s son … I am only quoting the most important attempts, but there are others, and since the Democrats know that they can count on the media, 80% of which are left-wing, they have never hesitated to promote the worst, knowing that their lies and manipulations would be peddled as gospel truth. November 2020 is approaching and the crisis arising from the virus born in China has given them a tremendous opportunity, to which was added the crisis around the death of George Boyle. And as Obama said: one should never miss the opportunity to take advantage of a crisis.
Have a tip we should know? Your anonymity is NEVER compromised. Email email@example.com
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Please contribute here.
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.