President Trump signs order to stop illegal aliens from being counted in redrawing of voting districts

31

“This is all part of a broader left-wing effort to erode the rights of Americans citizens, and I will not stand for it,” Trump said.

Thank Gd for President Trump.

Trump signs order to prevent illegal immigrants from being counted in redrawing of voting districts

It comes as part of an ongoing push by the Trump administration to make sure that illegal immigrants are not included in the census

Story continues below advertisement

‘By Adam Shaw, John Roberts | Fox News July 20,  2020:

Trump moves to exclude undocumented immigrants from census

President Trump on Tuesday signed an executive order to prevent illegal immigrants from being counted for the purposes of re-drawing congressional districts after the 2020 census — reheating a fiery debate from last year on if illegal immigrants should be counted in the census.
placeholder

“There used to be a time when you could proudly declare, ‘I am a citizen of the United States.’ But now, the radical left is trying to erase the existence of this concept and conceal the number of illegal aliens in our country,” Trump said in a statement accompanying the apportionment memorandum on “Ensuring American Citizens Receive Proper Representation in Congress.”

“This is all part of a broader left-wing effort to erode the rights of Americans citizens, and I will not stand for it,” he said.

The order says that for the purposes of reapportionment, “it is the policy of the United States to exclude from the apportionment base aliens who are not in a lawful immigration status…to the maximum extent feasible and consistent with the discretion delegated to the executive branch.”

Census counts are used to determine the allocation of seats in the House of Representatives, the number of electors in the Electoral College and hundreds of billion dollars of federal spending. However, it is not clear how the administration would determine who was in the country illegally since the census currently does not either include a citizenship question, or the additional question about legal immigration status.

“Today’s action to exclude illegal aliens from the apportionment base reflects a better understanding of the Constitution and is consistent with the principles of our representative democracy,” Trump said. “My Administration will not support giving congressional representation to aliens who enter or remain in the country unlawfully, because doing so would create perverse incentives and undermine our system of government. Just as we do not give political power to people who are here temporarily, we should not give political power to people who should not be here at all.”

The order, giving justification, says that the Constitution “does not specifically define which persons must be included in the apportionment base.”

“Although the Constitution requires the ‘persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed,’ to be enumerated in the census, that requirement has never been understood to include in the apportionment base every individual physically present within a State’s boundaries at the time of the census,” the order says.

“Instead, the term ‘persons in each State’ has been interpreted to mean that only the ‘inhabitants’ of each State should be included,” it says. “Determining which persons should be considered ‘inhabitants’ for the purpose of apportionment requires the exercise of judgment.”

It then says that that discretion “delegated to the executive branch to determine who qualifies as an ‘inhabitant includes authority to exclude from the apportionment base aliens who are not in a lawful immigration status.”

The order cites estimates that “one state” (apparently referring to California) has more than 2.2. illegal immigrants, six percent of its population. It argues that, as a result, including illegal immigrants in the population for apportionment could result in the allocation of two or three more congressional seats than if they were not included.

It comes as part of an ongoing push by the Trump administration to make sure that illegal immigrants are not included in the census. The order will likely be subjected to a legal challenge from immigrant activist groups and others, with Democrats saying on Tuesday that they would oppose the order.

“The Census is a pillar of our democracy, enshrined by our Founders to ensure that all people who live in the United States, regardless of citizenship, are equally counted and represented. Yet, by seeking to exclude undocumented immigrants from being counted in the 2020 Census, the President is violating the Constitution and the rule of law,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said in a statement.

“The Constitution is clear: it requires an ‘actual Enumeration’ of the ‘whole numbers of persons’ for the population count and congressional apportionment. There is no ambiguity about its command,” she said. “Trump’s unlawful effort is designed to again inject fear and distrust into vulnerable and traditionally undercounted communities, while sowing chaos with the Census.”

The Supreme Court last year blocked a citizenship question from being included in the census and sent the question back to the lower courts after concluding the Trump administration’s reasoning for including such a question was insufficient. It had been opposed from Democrats and immigrant groups on the basis that it could discourage immigrants from responding.
Can an executive order on the census citizenship question hold up in court?Video

Trump later signed an executive order to get an accurate count of citizens and non-citizens present in the country.

Attorney General Bill Barr said at the time that the information collected via the executive order could be useful in determining the makeup of the Electoral College and congressional apportionment.

“That information will be used for countless purposes. For example, there is a current dispute over whether illegal aliens can be included for apportionment purposes. … We will be studying this issue,” Barr said.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
31 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
jerry snaper
jerry snaper
3 years ago

WTF ? Sanity from our President! President Trump is doing a great job of swimming in the sea of traitors that are in the government..

A vote for a democrat is a vote for islamic slavery under sharia!

Liberalism_IS_INSANITY
Liberalism_IS_INSANITY
3 years ago
Reply to  jerry snaper

A VOTE FOR A DEMOCRAT IS A VOTE FOR INSANITY. In other words, allowing the insane to run the asylum.

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
3 years ago

The Left Calls For Racial Quotas In The Name Of Progress – And Why That Never Works
https://freedomsjournalinstitute.org/uncategorized/urban-legend-goldwater-against-civil-rights/
Because once you abandon the ‘born equal’ idea, you are in immediate logical quicksand. And you drown. If someone is ‘born worse’, then what? How much do you push them up? And in what way? Immediately, no one will agree on HOW to ‘push them up’. Goldwater opposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act for similar reasons. It sounds ‘nice’ to force ‘equality’ on people, but how does one do it? There are no logical guidelines, just some mushy ideas about ‘being nice’. The black economist Thomas Sowell argues that affirmative action has never worked, and he is right. The only logical way to create equal opportunity is to stop pushing some people down.
For example, women started the climb to equality when we stopped pushing them down. It was never a good idea to push them up above men, or push then onto pedestals, or any of that bunk.
“Affirmative Action around the World” – Thomas Sowell
https://www.hoover.org/research/affirmative-action-around-world

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
3 years ago
Reply to  DemocracyRules

RE 1964 Civil Rights Act:
Of note, “The Republican Party was not so badly split as the Democrats by the civil rights issue. Only one Republican senator participated in the filibuster against the bill. In fact, since 1933, Republicans had a more positive record on civil rights than the Democrats. In the
twenty-six major civil rights votes since 1933, a majority of Democrats opposed civil rights legislation in over 80 % of the votes. By contrast, the Republican majority favored civil rights in over 96 % of the votes.”
https://freedomsjournalinstitute.org/uncategorized/urban-legend-goldwater-against-civil-rights/

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
3 years ago
Reply to  DemocracyRules

Pushing Blacks UP Eventually Just Pushed Them Down:
“Many would argue that the advent of [Lyndon Johnson’s] Great Society initiates the decline of the Black family. What Blacks gained from Civil Rights legislation was lost by government largess. They lost individual liberty and fidelity. They became more dependent on government programs; and less dependent on their own ability to improve themselves by the work of their own hands, and the sweat of their brow.”
https://freedomsjournalinstitute.org/uncategorized/urban-legend-goldwater-against-civil-rights/

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago
Reply to  DemocracyRules

It destroyed their family and replaced dad with the government. It held them down. They basically told them they were good for nothing and look to government for your paycheck. Others that ignored that fared better in life.

Later, they didn’t gain anything when standards were lowered for them, based on skin color became the main qualification over merit. Now when you have a medical person or someone else trying to help you with something, you have to wonder, are they capable or only in that position because of their skin color?

Diversity quotas are alive, well and thriving while while whites and Asians are excluded more and more simply because of their skin color. Muslims get a pass simply because of their religion while Christians are discriminated against simply because of their religion. I think Jews were once discriminated against too in medical schools because the left thought there were too many of them and they earned it based on merit.

What is so scary about MERIT? Isn’t it about soft bigotry? They are assuming a non white or Asian person, can’t compete unless they are elevated only because of their skin color, religion or ethnicity? They are creating a scary world out there…

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Felix: Yes good points. Harvard even has a card system for admissions. Being black draws the black card, worth several points, the Muslim card is worth several, females are worth some, Jewish is only a few, white males get nothing, etc. Then the admissions board adds up the cards to get a points total. Crazy, stupid and illogical, that fixes nothing.

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago
Reply to  DemocracyRules

Asians did take Harvard or Yale to court, forget which one and they were punished but they continued to do it anyway. It’s crazy out there.

Now they want to force these racist inequality courses on college/university students in core courses and as a requirment to graduation!

I get the College Fix
https://www.thecollegefix.com/ among others and it keeps me up to date on lefty shenanigans.

My last one was born late in life. In the fall she starts her Senior year – thank God! Totally paid through a Merit Trustee Scholarship. She has so far avoided the liberal crap courses at her university.

There are tons of offensive stuff going on and it never gets reported on! For example –

FIX FEATURES Original, Student Reported
ACTIVISM BIAS RACIAL ISSUES

HIGHER EDUCATION RACIAL ISSUES
BLM activists demand mandatory class on institutional racism at Western Michigan University
MATT LAMB – ASSISTANT EDITOR
JULY 22, 2020

Activists: Faculty should create a reading list that includes more transgender people of color, too

https://www.thecollegefix.com/blm-activists-demand-mandatory-class-on-institutional-racism-at-western-michigan-university/

Some students are fighting back!

FREE SPEECH LEGAL RACIAL ISSUES
Princeton president walks back threat to investigate professor for not using his speech ‘responsibly’
GREG PIPER – ASSOCIATE EDITOR
JULY 21, 2020
He fanned the flames before affirming professor ‘can be answered but not censored or sanctioned.’

https://www.thecollegefix.com/princeton-president-walks-back-threat-to-investigate-professor-for-not-using-his-speech-responsibly/
This President is a total ahole.

This one is really eye opening! It’s shocking from an educational viewpoint…

Rutgers English Department to deemphasize traditional grammar ‘in solidarity with Black Lives Matter’
ALEX FRANK – TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
JULY 20, 2020

Under a so-called critical grammar pedagogy, “This approach challenges the familiar dogma that writing instruction should limit emphasis on grammar/sentence-level issues so as to not put students from multilingual, non-standard ‘academic’ English backgrounds at a disadvantage,” the email states.

“Instead, it encourages students to develop a critical awareness of the variety of choices available to them w/ regard to micro-level issues in order to empower them and equip them to push against biases based on ‘written’ accents.”

MORE: Prof says grading, good grammar are examples of white supremacy

MORE: Scholars defend Ebonics, slang, improper grammar

https://www.thecollegefix.com/rutgers-english-department-to-deemphasize-traditional-grammar-in-solidarity-with-black-lives-matter/

It just goes on and on and on.

ed
ed
3 years ago
Reply to  DemocracyRules

And Fake Indian Professors at Harvard make out the best of all, drawing over $300,000 a year for teaching just one class.

Dave Jensen
Dave Jensen
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

It hasn’t done much for the white families either.

Andrea
Andrea
3 years ago
Reply to  Dave Jensen

I got rid of my job after doing work for the same business enterprise for a long time, I needed dependable profits, I was not checking out for the “get rich quick” home kits you find all around the internet. Those are often pyramid plans or stuff where you are required to sell to your buddies and members of the family. Just a few months back I landed up on a fantastic online job prospect. Vver the internet I acquire almost 8,000-9,000 Dollars every 4 weeks This is more than enough to quite easily substitute my prior work net earnings, especially thinking of I only do the work almost 20 hours a week from a home office. I typically wanted a legitimate process to generate profits for me personally and my family. The most important part of doing business from the internet is that I am usually home with the the children, I save a bunch of money. Truly, it is very simple than you could feel. I obtained the manuals package and thus within 30 days I started out making money online over 4,000 bucks on a monthly basis. The guidelines are extremely simple, you don’t have to be a computer whiz, but you must understand how to use the net. If you can fill up forms and also surf internet sites, you can actually do it effortlessly, You don’t even have to sell off anything and no one needs to purchase anything. It is really as easy as being on Youtube or twitter.Here’s the only way to start –> http://bburl.net/b3

MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
3 years ago
Reply to  Andrea

Yeah right “Andrea”. Isn’t your real name Abdullah?

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago
Reply to  Andrea

Scammer be gone!
Blocked and flagged.

Laddyboy
Laddyboy
3 years ago
Reply to  Andrea

MONITORS: REMOVE THIS ADVERTISING!!!!!!!!!!!!

Laddyboy
Laddyboy
3 years ago
Reply to  DemocracyRules

As the Black woman with 13 children, many from different sperm donners, SCREAMED —– SOMEONE MUST PAY for these children.
I as an American state: YOU helped bring them into the world — YOU SUPPORT THEM along with the sperm donners!

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
3 years ago

The Left Calls For Racial Quotas In The Name Of Progress – And Why That Never Works
https://freedomsjournalinstitute.org/uncategorized/urban-legend-goldwater-against-civil-rights/
Because once you abandon the ‘born equal’ idea, you are in immediate logical quicksand. And you drown. If someone is ‘born worse’, then what? How much do you push them up? And in what way? Immediately, no one will agree on HOW to ‘push them up’. Goldwater opposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act for similar reasons. It sounds ‘nice’ to force ‘equality’ on people, but how does one do it? There are no logical guidelines, just some mushy ideas about ‘being nice’. The black economist Thomas Sowell argues that affirmative action has never worked, and he is right. The only logical way to create equal opportunity is to stop pushing some people down.
For example, women started the climb to equality when we stopped pushing them down. It was never a good idea to push them up above men, or push then onto pedestals, or any of that bunk.
“Affirmative Action around the World” – Thomas Sowell
https://www.hoover.org/research/affirmative-action-around-world

anonQ
anonQ
3 years ago

The corrupt dems are foiled again! Extra congressional seats was a part of the broader dem strategy to further give themselves an unfair advantage. Looks like Trump is back to winning again. Now the dems are going to further clog up the courts challenging this.

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago
Reply to  anonQ

Are you part of the anonQ movement? Could you tell us more about it? I hear it is some kind of a weird cult. Is it?

anonQ
anonQ
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

No, and I have no idea about anything in relation to Q. My handle has been anonQ since way before that guy or whoever came on the scene.

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago
Reply to  anonQ

Sorry to bother you about that but there is some kind of an organization out there promoting some odd stuff.

strangequark
strangequark
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

To shed some light on your question: There are four theories out there: 1. QAnon is Trump or 2. Praying Medic or 3. Someone (or several) being paid by South Tampa Firm, Watkinses, with influential dealings in Republican political campaign registration reports etc. and 4. collective group sharing the account by open-source military-intelligence agency.
Look for: “wwg1wga”(where we go 1 we go all); “You are the news now”; “Enjoy the show”; “Calm before the storm (CBTS)”; “Nothing can stop what is coming” FYI: a Bellevue WA police officer used wwg1wga in his post just after defending Bellevue Square when it was attacked by Antifa during the Seattle CHOP occupation. The cop was terminated for his post.

Many of these phrases are repeated in Trump’s messaging……Anon followers have replied to me with them on Gab.

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago
Reply to  strangequark

Thanks!

anonQ
anonQ
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Study your King James Bible.

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago
Reply to  anonQ

Sorry to bother you about that but there is some kind of an organization out there promoting some odd stuff.

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago

Now how will “Justice” Judge Roberts justify out right counting of ILLEGAL ALIENS who are not supposed to be here? Will he dare to intervene even if it is through a snarky tweet?

Years ago illegal aliens were not allowed to be counted in a census. How Roberts could decide that question on citizenship couldn’t be asked when it was asked in the past screams of corruption!

dingo
dingo
3 years ago

With applause, from the… Plantation Party,
They’ve gone from “Proud” to “Pawns”

Liberalism_IS_INSANITY
Liberalism_IS_INSANITY
3 years ago

IF they are ILLEGALS and they cannot vote, then they should NOT be counted in our Census.

stephen5970
stephen5970
3 years ago

Exactly! My question is why the Supreme Court didn’t rule this way?

Laddyboy
Laddyboy
3 years ago

ILLEGAL ALIEN FOREIGN NATIONAL CRIMINALS who INVADED/came into America DO NOT have American Constitutional Law Protection. They only have the right to be treated HUMANLY! I am GLAD these CRIMINAL TRESPASSERS are NOT BEING COUNTED as Americans — WHICH THEY ARE NOT!!!

Jesse
Jesse
3 years ago

Imagine if only one state (i.e. California) opened it’s borders to all of the peoples in Cuba or Venezuela or Iran or Communist China and it quadrupled it’s current “population” numbers with illegals… they could turn that single state into a Communist hell hole quickly… overturn it’s legitimate U.S. laws and norms… gain more US Representatives… gain more people to vote in their U.S. Presidential nominee and ALL of it would upturn the balance of power from the rest of the 49 states to do whatever it wished. The other 49 would be Communist Serfs with NO SUBSTANTIAL REPRESENTATION at all to counter it. THAT’S what could happen IF you counted “all people”, including non-citizens, within our borders.

jerry snaper
jerry snaper
3 years ago

2. Last month, the Senate Budget Committee reports that in fiscal year 2012, between food stamps, housing support, childcare, Medicaid and other benefits, the average U.S. Household below the poverty line received $168.00 a day in government support. What’s the problem with that much support? Well, the average household income in America is just over $50,000, which averages out to $137.13 a day.
To put it another way, being on welfare now pays the equivalent of $30.00 an hour for 40 hour week, while the average job pays $24.00 an hour.

Blacks who consider themselves African should thank GOD that their ancestors had the good fortune to be on a boat to America where they were saved from being sold and killed by the Arab-moslem slave traders. Consider the number of well off black citizens, many millionairs, billionairs, government officials, judges, mayors, police. CEO’s etc,etc. How ungrateful they are for their very lives in America

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!