[ April 19, 2024 ]
The Democrat Party of destruction rejected a bill from Senator Tim Scott that would have improved the lives of Black Americans. Now the loathsome Democrats are about to submit an anti-police bill that will further endanger the lives of Black Americans. This is the very embodiment of the plantation Democrat Party. Keep the Black voter in perpetual distress and reliant on government intervention. That is how the Democrats maintain their stranglehold on the Black vote. It is these kinds of plantation laws that make Democrat controlled cities the most dangerous cities in America. By far. Blexit!
Democratic members of Congress are fighting a rearguard action through their dangerous Jerry Nadler-Nancy Pelosi anti-policing bill.
I will be voting NO later today.
— Rep Andy Biggs (@RepAndyBiggsAZ) June 25, 2020
Democrats’ anti-police bill will cripple local police and empower criminals
Story continues below advertisementBy Washington Examiner, June 25, 2020
It may not be a plank in the official Democratic Party platform, but it’s clear that Democrats and their supporters want to eliminate state and local police. The radical left, which now controls the Democratic Party, is making a frontal assault on the police with their calls to defund and dismantle police departments. Democratic members of Congress are fighting a rearguard action through their dangerous Jerry Nadler-Nancy Pelosi anti-policing bill.
During the hearing on the Nadler-Pelosi monstrosity, Democrats rejected every amendment offered by Republicans, even when Democrats agreed with the substance of the amendment.
Included in the Nadler-Pelosi bill was a provision that limited the sentence of a person convicted of lynching to 10 years. The Democrats doggedly fought to defeat an amendment offered by Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas that would have made lynching punishable by life imprisonment or death-penalty eligible. Nadler argued that the death penalty was barbarous. But then, so is lynching.
In an effort to ameliorate Nadler’s concerns, Gohmert proposed a change that would maximize the penalty for lynching to life in prison. Nadler and the Democrats rejected this, apparently content with the bill’s maximum of 10 years punishment for lynching.
The heart of the anti-police bill is an effort to eliminate all legal protections police officers have. Since Democrats are also attempting to bring all police power to the national government, their bill is also chock full of tactical mandates on local police departments.
A court-made rule gives police officers limited, qualified immunity for their acts. Because of language in a Supreme Court ruling, there is a need to reform immunity provisions, while protecting police. Many Democrats seemed to acknowledge the need to give some protection for officers who do not intentionally or recklessly harm a citizen but were unwilling to accept any Republican attempts to reform the immunity laws. Democrats preferred a total elimination of all legal protection to our police officers.
If the Democrat bill becomes law, here is what will happen.All police officers will be personally liable for any decision they make and for any accident they cause. Currently, officers receive internal discipline, and in cases where an officer is alleged to have committed a crime, such as the George Floyd case, the officer is subject to the civil authorities. Victims have a claim on the department in all cases.
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Please contribute here.
or
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.
Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding.Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.
Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.
Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.
Follow Pamela Geller on Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.
Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.
Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.
If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.
30 Comments
3 years ago
And that’s the thing: Democrats MEAN to run interference for violent criminals, gangs like MS-13, pedophiles, rapists, and other such reprobates.
3 years ago
Reply to
Patriotic American
That’s their base. “Where is your spark of divinity” asks Pelois of Trump.
The insanity intensifies….
3 years ago
Reply to
CharlieSeattle
That they are Communist Party USA in all but name goes without saying – though you just said it.
3 years ago
Can someone explain a ten year maximum for lynching? Are they trying to protect the kkk?
3 years ago
Reply to
Achmed Mohandjob
“Democrats’ anti-police bill will cripple local police and empower criminals”
Because most criminals are Democrats. And 26% of prison inmates are illegals. That’s why Democrats want to give criminals the vote.
3 years ago
Reply to
DemocracyRules
I am still attempting to grasp a ten year penalty for lynching. Is that for blm members that lynch police, or does it apply to all lynchings?
3 years ago
Police will rightfully resign in droves if the DEM version is allowed.
They will have NO authority and be open to endless lawsuits.
Who needs that?
3 years ago
The problems in America will only be fixed by eliminating all democrat socialists/communists, it won’t be pretty and will make the civil war look like a picnic.
3 years ago
Reply to
old white guy
There is a better tool than the Insurrection Act. Trump must declare Martial Law
…and arrest the “Deep State” members entrenched in the DOJ/CIA/FBI/DNC/CAIR/SPLC/ Leftist Academia and all those in the MSM, Fa☭ebook, Twitter, Go☭☭le, ☭NN, AB☭, NB☭,☭BS, MSNB☭,☭NB☭, NPR, WaP0S, HuffP0S, MEDIA MALPRACTI☭E and THE NY SLIMES.
Time to get serious Trump! Stop screwing around with weak half measures!
Martial Law and Domestic Disorder.
President Washing- ton himself took command of state militia called into federal service to quell the Whiskey Rebellion, but there were not too many occasions subsequently in which federal troops or state militia called into federal service were required.260 Since World War II, however, the President, by virtue of his own powers and the authority vested in him by Congress,261 has used federal troops on a number of occasions, five of them involving resistance to desegregation decrees in the South.262 In 1957, Governor Faubus employed the Arkansas National Guard to resist court-ordered desegregation in Little Rock, and President Eisenhower dispatched federal soldiers and brought the Guard under federal authority.263 In 1962, President Kennedy dispatched federal troops to Oxford, Mississippi, when federal marshals were unable to control with rioting that broke out upon the admission of an African American student to the University of Mississippi.264 In June and September of 1964, President Johnson sent troops into Alabama to enforce court decrees opening schools to blacks.265 And, in 1965, the President used federal troops and federalized local Guardsmen to protect participants in a civil rights march.
The President justified his action on the ground that there was a substantial likelihood of domestic violence because state authorities were refusing to protect the marchers.266
………sound familiar?
3 years ago
Reply to
CharlieSeattle
Former and current military men, most disturbingly, are not wholly behind the President. Disloyalty among their ranks has perilously undermined Trump’s option to initiate the Insurrectionist Act.
Fearful thought, but would the military revolt in such event, influenced by men like General Mattis, and Deep State corrupted Pentagon?
3 years ago
Reply to
CharlieSeattle
Former and current military men, most disturbingly, are not wholly behind the President. Disloyalty among their ranks has perilously undermined Trump’s option to initiate the Insurrectionist Act.
Fearful thought, but would the military revolt in such event, influenced by men like General Mattis, and Deep State corrupted Pentagon?
3 years ago
Reply to
CharlieSeattle
Sounds great BUT the DEMS in Congress will say he over reacted and go for impeachment. Guaranteed.
I think why Trump backed off is because he doesn’t have support for it. We only have a three seat lead over the DEMS in the Senate. The House will easy vote for Trump impeachment. How about the Senate? Look how many didn’t want to fund the wall? Mitch and Kevin McCarthy are OKAY with removing on renaming our military bases so they don’t offend our enemies. When those two and FOR that why be against it? The Gop is not on Trump’s side. Wouldn’t you rather have Trump over Biden?
I remind you look at WHO in he GOP didn’t want to fund the BORDER WALL – Sen. Susan Collins, Sen. Mitt Romney, Sen. Lisa Murkowski and Sen. Susan Collins could easily vote for Trump to be impeached. Sen. Mike Lee is frustrated in not giving out more white collar foreign VISAS and citizenship for foreign people. He wants no cap and unlimited VISAS!
Trump is walking a fine line within his party. It stinks to high heaven in the swamp! It’s maddening how the GOPe BETRAYS us. Self preservation is more important to them than you or me. They stay in power because the opposition (DEMS) are more openly worse. and that’s how they stay in power. We do need more uncorrupt good people to step up and replace the GOPe and we don’t have allot of time left to do that.
Here are the 10 Senate ‘RINOs’ who voted with Dems to thwart Trump’s border funding
October 18, 2019 | Vivek Saxena |
Sen. Roy Blunt
Sen. Susan Collins
Sen. Mike Lee
Sen. Lisa Murkowski
Sen. Rand Paul
Sen. Rob Portman
Sen. Mitt Romney
Sen. Marco Rubio
Sen. Pat Toomey
Sen. Roger Wicker
3 years ago
Reply to
CharlieSeattle
I think continuing insurrection would require invoking and the use of both.
3 years ago
Reply to
old white guy
The drum-beat tempo of the Democrat-Media complex, the seditious band banging away on harsh diabolical theme, land of America with bitter notes of racial hatred, hell-bent to amplify and inflame. An absolute menace, the evil and corrupt Democrat Party, and its subversive-propaganda engine.
As Mr. Levin has said, This coming election is a choice between “Liberty and Tyranny”. A decision between standing tall and securing freedom, or kneeling down in abject surrender to the raging Radical Left mob.
Terrible warning in the toppled statures of metal. Once they lie fallen without a fight, history broken, living people in time may very well fall next. — Civil war!
3 years ago
The Democrats are traitors! The e/GOP is complicit! The Democrats are traitors! The e/GOP is complicit! The Democrats are traitors! The e/GOP is complicit! The Democrats are traitors! The e/GOP is complicit! The Democrats are traitors! The e/GOP is complicit! The Democrats are traitors! The e/GOP is complicit! The Democrats are traitors! The e/GOP is complicit! The Democrats are traitors! The e/GOP is complicit! The Democrats are traitors! The e/GOP is complicit! The Democrats are traitors! The e/GOP is complicit! The Democrats are traitors! The e/GOP is complicit! The Democrats are traitors! The e/GOP is complicit!
3 years ago
Reply to
CharlieSeattle
There is something you should also know…
There is something else you need to understand. I didn’t know this before this craziness happened. Trump can not go into a state and clean things up UNLESS he is INVITED in to do so by a Mayor, Governor or someone in an official position. Mayor Frey of Minneapolis INVITED Trump in to clean it up and so Trump did with the National Guard. Till then Trump could not go in there. States have a certain amount of sovereignty. For Seattle, Trump would need to be invited in by the Seattle Mayor or Governor to clean it up and it doesn’t look like they are going to do that. Those people are as insane as the rioters!
This could be changed through Congress but they won’t do it. The LIKE what is going on. They WANT this to continue and get worse because it demoralizes the Trump base to see our country destroyed and raises the enthusiasm of their crazy base. Add mail in ballot voter fraud to it and they have the election and win over Trump.
The Constitution allows for Congress to change this but for the above reasons they will not do that. Section 8 of the Constitution applies here:
Section 8 – Powers of Congress
…
To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
…
https://usconstitution.net/const.html
In another reply to you, I mentioned why Trump has to tread cautiously in using the Insurrection Act. Other Presidents have used it but Trump is hated and doesn’t have GOP support on it and needs it. To wing it could be disastrous for him. These are crazy times and I believe they will get worse.
3 years ago
The Dems want to replace the police with their Brown Shirts. We should call them the Black Faces for their black face coverings. They hide who they are. Not proud of themselves.
3 years ago
Actually, the nature of policing in this country is a “red herring” – the definition of which is “something,
especially a clue, that is or is intended to be misleading or distracting.”
Of course, it’s all a diversion from the real issue, which
is the intractable problem of criminality in the black community.
In 2014, blacks accounted for 27.8% of the total amount of
arrests for that year, an obviously disproportionate amount for a population of
13%. The overall level of arrests of black people is higher than might be
expected in almost every category except for driving under the influence of
alcohol.
Black people accounted for most of the arrests for murder
(51.3%), robbery (55.9%) and gambling (58.9%). They were also significantly
above the average in several other categories: weapons crimes (40.7%),
prostitution and commercialized vice (41.8%) and aggravated assault (33.1%).
– FBI, 2014
In September, 2018, the Bureau of Justice released its 2018
survey of criminal victimization: There were 593,598 interracial violent
victimizations (excluding homicides), including white-on-black and
black-on-white attacks – of which 90% were committed by Blacks.
There are many reasons for this criminal
over-representation, and indeed racial resentment, but it must always be noted
that poverty and the absence of a father are widely recognized as contributing
factors to dysfunction:
Unmarried mothers with children under 18 are the most
impoverished demographic in American society, and they are the most common type
of family structure in black communities – with 58% of black children growing
up in homes without a father. – U.S. Census Bureau, 2012
One consequence of these unhappy facts is that “the
concentration of criminal violence in minority communities means that “officers
will be disproportionately confronting armed and often resisting suspects in
those communities, raising officers’ own risk of using lethal force,” writes
Heather MacDonald.
Race has always been the “soft underbelly” of the
American project – and a disaffected black underclass is being skillfully used
by the usual suspects – Marxists, NGO’s, the media, the Academy, and foreign
and domestic enemies both, to undermine this country.
And the issue of policing – the scapegoating of the police,
is merely a cudgel with which to beat this country.
After sixty-years of failure, the efforts to arrest the
decline in the black community have created a powerful sentiment to do away with
the liberal state, and replace it with totalitarianism.
This is an inclination, incidentally, which has been present for more than a century, irrespective of our current
difficulties.
This used to be referred to as Communism.
That’s what’s really going on – and it has nothing to do
with the police.
3 years ago
“Democrats’ anti-police bill will cripple local police and empower criminals”: isn’t that the whole point?
Any leftist/insane idea that comes up they like and latch onto if it means damaging a Republican government. Riots in the streets? Why not make it easier for the rioters, unless its a Democrat government running the country. Note how the riots are virtually only in Democrat’s states.
Screw Law and Order! Handcuff (no pun intended) the police. Make them afraid instead of scare the poor rioters who are acting no better than a 14 year old having a hissy fit telling the parents how THEY want the house to run; just don’t even suggest taking their cell phone away or the screaming will not stop until they want money to go to the mall.
Education, for what now passes for education, has been indoctrinating the youth for the past 50 years to be good leftists and buck “capitalism” and the evil Western society. Don’t question because we know what is best for you because, after all, we “teach”. And now we see the fruits of their passions. Just don’t even think about going after their pensions or letting one go for incompentence.
3 years ago
How many lynchings have there been in the last, say, ten years? Why do dims favor lynchings?
