“Canaanite god”? Suggesting one of the pagan idol gods of stone or metal? The Power Israel looked to, when led by godly men, was Adonai, known by other sacred Names, describing aspects of His eternal Nature and Divine Power.

Who are you to charge the Creator G. with “murder”, or sanctioning “slaugher”!

You further disgracefully charge the Word of the OT with cruelty, in your ignorance. Accusing Him of blood-guilt!

Just as point of fact, the Life-Giver has a right to take the life of what He has created. Men do not.

You lost me with “‘Satan’ is charged with murdering only 10 people.

Mock-on. The day is not far off, when you along with all the other scoffers, will recognize that the God of the Bible does provably exist — Including by Science. Notwithstanding “science falsely so called”.

Are you on a crusade?

Obviously, Mr. Amzallag does not accept the Scriptures as the Word of the Living God. And it seems, he makes the mistake other Bible skeptics, and secular opponents make, inverting who influenced who. Such as over the Flood account. Of course, it wasn’t that a Global Flood catastrophically occurred, and thus naturally left deep impressions on the generations born of Noah and his sons and wives. But myth of one of the heathen nations around Israel, which influenced them.

The impact and influence of the Kingdom of Israel, then Empire under David and Solomon, on surrounding nations, like the early Greeks (possibly influencing their later mythology — from Aegean sea area, came the coastal Philistines), I think is not fully realized or appreciated.

If spectacular events recorded in the Bible did occur, just as written, the “news” reports would have been sensational! “The god or gods of the land,, at times intervened on behalf of mortal men!” Or some such impression, from later accounts.

And about other neighboring—and related people (Edom, Moab, and Median)—supposedly worshiping El. Christians speak of the “Almighty”. No other non-Christian religion today, holds some concept of an “almighty” god? Or a “Creator”? But where that is the case, that does not mean they worship the Christian God. Nor does it mean the Christian concept derives from heathen belief.

Because peoples bordering the Tribes of Israel, came to recognize the God of the Hebrews, does not necessarily mean they worshiped Him as their supreme god. — Or that Israel adopted a pagan concept from them. — Though, no doubt, some few among neighboring nations did. Especially aware of what the Hebrew God did for His people. And how He brought them out of former superpower, Empire Egypt, with a Mighty Hand.

You take one of the Biblical Names, and try mightily to pagan-trivialize it. Or claim Israel adopted a pagan Canaanite god.

Again, be careful about accusing others of being indoctrinated. And portraying what you refuse to objectively examine as “mythology”, based on “assumption, presumptions, and suppositions and propaganda” (and Biblical skeptics, whose words you take as, forgive the pun, Gospel truth). You well describe the pseudo-science of Evolution. The atheist’s religion.

As for the canon Bible:

https://www.blueletterbible.org/faq/canon.cfm

Your anti-biblical bias shuts your mind to any other possibility, over the one name El, that you claim derives from pagan mythology. Say the Hebrew does match “Almighty” or “Creator”. Would evidence of that one name among the pagans PROVE that the Israelite’s were influenced by the heathen nations (which, by the way, THEY WERE, in times of backsliding unfaithfulness), and adopted a Canaanite pagan god’s name?

You appear to heavily spin your whole assertion on that one name.

You WANT to believe that to reinforce your secular religion, and continue secure in it. As the “mountain of evidence” is more virtual CGI illusion.

Read what I submitted, and find the answer you don’t want to recognize.

I’ve been taught, that the King James Bible in English is the most accurate in that language. (And though the order and number of books is different than original Hebrew and Greek, the text is the same.)

Initially, you seemed on crusade. Now do you play role of Inquisitor!

Don’t demand I answer you, like a smug arrogant prosecutor!

I’m done on this narrowing thread.

Any pattern I represent is that of respect for evidence.
There is no historical or scientific evidence that confirms the mythology of any of the millions of fictional gods, goddesses and god-men among which the previously Canaanite god “Yahweh” and the Roman’s god-man “Jesus” are nothing unique or original and of which no scientific or historical evidence exists.

You confirm this with each of your evidence devoid diatribes of denial.

“The canonized Bible, as King James written, universally recognized, mostly”.
Really?? It’s a revered example of poetic Shakespeare inspired literature but ever fewer educated folk accept it as anything other than human authored literature.

Once again the evidence confounds your recycled lies:
?w=960&ssl=1

Once again you refer to “the” bible (singular). Have you not realised yet that there are many diverse and very different NT bibles that date back to the oldest prototype, late 4th century fabricated “Codex Sinaiticus” that is significantly different from the early 17th century published “King James version” and other more recent editions of the much altered, edited, amended, added to and deleted from exaggerated,endlessly re-re-re-re-re-written and obviously much modified and interpolated editions of bibles that we know today?

I had and keep a very open mind concerning actual tangible authentic and credible evidence and follow the evidence before coming to a conclusion that can also be modified by the discovery of new evidence. It is this process that revealed the complex human origin of the bibles we know today.

You appear to have a closed and locked mind concerning the evidence that condemns all versions of bibles as the obvious work men? The key to a locked mind is within so I cannot help you to find it and discover what is true and what is false.
?w=960&ssl=1

Your pathetic diatribes of nonsense and denial are getting more and more ridiculous.
Here’s the original of the famous cartoon you degrade and plagiarise:

You write: “Man (of woman) becomes a mere animal, without moral compass or guiding North Star by which to navigate through life.”

Male and female of our very recently evolved and still evolving species of ape are “mere” animals being neither of the two other categories of substances (mineral or vegetable). However and with the exception of a tiny number of mutants we call “psychopaths” and “sociopaths”, we are far from lacking in morality. We have an evolved instinct we call the “human conscience” that is part of the package of evolutionary tools for the successful survival of any species. We have also outlawed the biblical barbarity of religionists laws here in the developed world and have replaced them systematically with less harmful and more egalitarian civil secular laws that we all agree to within the educated, free, secular democracies we have also developed to replace the vile totalitarianism of religionist theocratic tyranny.

For those who have not already read the wisdom of one of the greatest mind in history, Enjoy:

“It seems to me that the idea of a personal God is an anthropological concept which I cannot take seriously. I also cannot imagine some will or goal outside the human sphere…. Science has been charged with undermining morality, but the charge is unjust. A man’s ethical behaviour should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death.“

– Albert Einstein, “Religion and Science,” New York Times Magazine, November 9, 1930.

You (and a fortunately declining number of others) who claim that you are only curtailed from your evil character, lawless instincts and immoral nature by the content of one version of human authored book – do indeed reveal yourself as being in a “poor way” as examples of humanity.

Yes, your ignorance based belief in primitive mythology and the lies of wacko creationists is clear.

Reality is a mystery to you so your affliction appears incurable.

You have my sympathy but earn no respect for you stubborn ignorance and childish egotism.

Again you flaunt your ignorance, arrogance and gullibility, son.

You never engaged in evidence based discussion of your myths and fantasies so running away from further humiliation and disgrace is your best decision yet..

Your capitulation is accepted!

You can run away from further ridicule, but your lies and the truth will catch up with you..

Best wishes for a speedy recovery.

Meanwhile here is a little reading list of the actual science that supports past, current and ongoing evolution.

GENERAL BIOLOGY:
AAAS Science NetLinks is a guide to standards-based Internet experiences for students.
BiosciEdNet.org provides a searchable database of resources from BEN Collaborative partner organizations such as AIBS, Ecological Society of America, American Society for Microbiology, and Botanical Society of America.
BioQUEST Curriculum Consortium promotes curriculum innovation by serving a national role as a networking resource for individuals to share, distribute, and enhance cooperation among on-going and future biology education development projects.
Biological Sciences Curriculum Study develops and supports the implementation of innovative science education curriculum for students in kindergarten through college.
National Academies’ Subject Hub for Education provides numerous resources and publications on the latest research in teaching and learning.
National Science Teachers Association,a professional society for science teachers, provides professional development opportunities and teaching resources.
National Association of Biology Teachers, a professional society for biology educators, offers an annual professional development conference and monthly publication.
NATURE OF SCIENCE:
Evolution and the Nature of Science Institute. The Institute provides lessons designed to improve the teaching of evolution by incorporating evolutionary thinking in the context of a more complete understanding of modern scientific thinking.
Learn History and Nature of Science. Describes a series of articles published in NSTA journals which focus on how to teach the history and nature of science.
PBS Evolution: What is the nature of science? This online lesson accompanying the PBS series explores how the scientific process helps develop our understanding of the natural world.
Symposium on the nature of science. Beyond Creationism: A reporter’s eye view of the world in collision (video). J. Madeleine Nash, Senior Correspondent, TIME Magazine.
Teaching about Evolution and the Nature of Science 1998 book from National Academies Press.
Understanding Science. An accessible and free web-based resource that accurately communicates what science is and how it really works, includes an interactive representation of the process of science.
EVOLUTION:
Evolution and the Fossil Record. 2001. From the American Geological Institute and the Paleontological Society.
The Evolution Project. PBS website, television series, and teaching resources.
Evolution Resources from the National Academies. All of the Academies resources for learning and teaching evolution, including books, reports, definitions, legal issues, and upcoming events.
Science, Evolution, and Creationism. This 2008 book, published by the National Academies Press, explains the methods of science, examines the scientific evidence in support of biological evolution, and evaluates alternative perspectives.
The Society for the Study of Evolution. A comprehensive listing of general resources, evolution societies, and teaching resources.
“Teaching about Evolution: Old Controversy, New Challenges” (PDF, 100k) A 2001 article written by Rodger Bybee, Biological Sciences Curriculum Study, recipient of the 2001 AIBS Education Award. Published by AIBS in BioScience, April 2001.
Understanding Evolution. From the University of California, Museum of Paleontology, a one-stop source for information on evolution, with teaching resources.

Feel free to get educated whenever you get humiliated enough by revealing your profound ignorance on the subject of 4,000,000,000 years + of the past, current and ongoing evolution of life on Earth.

Graphs and dioramas can be pleasing to the eye, but how much SCIENCE underpins their artistic fanciful lines?

Also, they can be quite deceptive and misleading. How much detail is fact-based truth, how much guess-work colors falsehoods? Tenuous evolution mythologies, born of preferred worldview, reinforced with circular-reasoning, and backed-up by confirmation bias conjecture? Interpretations read through preferred origin-lens?

False knowledge darkens minds to truth, and an infinitely greater luminous reality, eclipsed by modern creation fable, cast in shadow of a fraudulent “science”.

Slander on, its all you have left.

Your confidence in material religion must be somewhat shaken. That’s when the personal attacks fly fast and hot.

Repeat your own lies enough times, and maybe you’ll convince yourself.

The laughter of a blind fool, deluded in his own pride.

Per-usual, you have the order reversed: Shakespeare was inspired by the Bible, among other things. As far as who accepts the Scriptures for what they claim to be, in the West anyway, those not thoroughly indoctrinated into the Evolutionary hypothesis, taught as established fact. And its “mountain of [illusory] evidence”.

But “the EVOLUTIONARY scientists say…!”

What they want to believe, as they cleverly (or not so cleverly) reason around reality.

The lies are in Evolution textbooks, yearly darkening young impressionable minds in public schools. Where an irrational myth is taught as “science”!

Your personal insults are wearing on me!

WHERE did I say King James Bible? “Shakespeare was inspired by the Bible,” That’s “BIBLE”, which, for your information, has been extant for about for at least 1,600 years. (Although suppressed in Medieval darkness for centuries.)

Quite a nerve to accuse one of lies, when Evolution was promoted with acknowledged LIES! And threaded with modern myth. Not absent its own legends of spontaneous—and unsupportable—life generation, like old mythology of life emerging from ancient waters, of “primitive” Earth. (Although fluid mythology does have a tenuous basis in oceanic fact.)

And lets not overlook the ugly fairy tale of the brutish ape, transformed into intelligent creator man. (Quibble about terminology, but that’s the basic picture.) Beautiful Eve, eclipsed by repulsive Lucy (or latest manufactured anthropoid mother of Homo sapiens, derived from bone fragments).

What an utterly insulting tale it is!

Maybe we should all include a framed-image of anthropoid ape-like creature among our mantle shelf of family gallery pictures?

Artist illustrated, of course.

Changing the glory of the Eternal Creator, visible in what He has made, into a mindless grunting monkey-like creature!

I’ve had just had about enough of your faithful assertions of “EVIDENCE”, mountainous or otherwise.

Its beginning to sound like an ingrained expression of material faith.

Why should I care what Catholic Popes have accepted? You just don’t get it… ( Hint, I don’t worship men. )

Yes, if one dares to oppose your secular religion of high priest Darwin, he/she is (leaving out the string of epithets) gullible, ignorant, uneducated, indoctrinated, …

You may reveal yourself, and totalitarian-leaning, intolerant mentality: “Fortunately the […] ridiculous mythology of creationism and creationism-lite ‘intelligent design’ has been outlawed from educational facilities even in the most backward regions of the babble belt of America.

One reason society is dramatically unraveling. (If we descend from animals, why not behave like wild beasts?)

Your superior condescending arrogance offends me! But its not unfamiliar with Evolution fake-science proponents.

Insulting as ever, “babble belt”?! I’d far rather live among those decent, god-fearing conservative people of the Bible Belt, than among the liberal secularists and atheists, or compromised “Christians” of the hard-Left infiltrated coasts, and inland cities! (There not doing to well, lately, if you have not noticed.)

Among other words I’d caution you about using, as zealous advocate of Evolution, is “propaganda”.

Documentaries are full of it, supported by false artistic evidence and ample animation — generated by a lot of imagination.

Your cartoon is not far off, minus the absence of real-world SCIENCE, which is the description and explanation of CREATION. And ORIGINS, or “beginnings”. That one Book illuminates true foundation of Science, the Science which fills vast computer archives, and gives weight to Library shelves. And where Scripture touches on Science, its revealed spot-on accurate! One line-of-proof of exceptional, transcendent Authorship.

Mock on.

“No internal European “crusading” military actions against “heretical” Christians?”
I am not sure where this came from but No. The INQUISITIONS by brutal christians against so called “heretics” came later.

“Waves of Inquisition, Medieval myth?!”
No! Evidence supported fact:
“The Inquisition has its origins in the early organized persecution of non-Catholic Christian religions in Europe. In 1184 Pope Lucius III sent bishops to southern France to track down heretics called Catharists. These efforts continued into the 14th Century.”
– https://www.history.com/topics/religion/inquisition#:~:text=The%20Inquisition%20has%20its%20origins,continued%20into%20the%2014th%20Century.

Your other meander appears to be meaningless in the face of historical facts and theutter, total and complete absence of a single shred of historical evidence supporting the mythology and tales of the legendary but historically invisible “Jesus”.

You still appear not to realise that failed diversion into meaningless side issues, quoting mythology and quoting propaganda regarding that mythology can never validate, vindicate, excuse or authenticate the mythology?

Keep up this great work in attracting attention to the garbage of religionism.
?w=474&h=312

It is the confused and contradictory writings of the mostly anonymous human authors and forgers of the diverse and very significantly different, confused and contradictory, historically inaccurate and historically unsupported content of the many different versions of “New Testaments” that have appeared since the first prototype was cobbled together in the late 4th century that are lacking in validation – so your suggestion to put aside all the many different generations of writers of the many different versions of “New Testaments” may be wise but as that is the topic of our discussion and the fraudulent nature of those writings is already evidenced – your wish to ignore all that condemns the writings of those many different generations of authors appears disingenuous? However:

You recycle the sad nonsense that Flavius Josephus, Pliny (the Younger) and Tacitus offer any evidence in support of the existence of a mortal human magician and celebrity preacher named by authors long after the time in which their fiction is set as “Jesus”?
Before you started to recycle that long discredited propaganda please note that the texts merely attributed to Tacitus, Josephus, Pliny etc you should check when the oldest / first known examples of this apparent forgery and discover that all the texts were written by anonymous scribes many centuries after the deaths of those to whom they are merely attributed.

You appear to have misunderstood the meaning of: “actual and tangible authentic and original, first century originated historical evidence of the existence of “Jesus” together with the location in which this (apparently mythical and imaginary) evidence is conserved and available for evaluation.”

You reference the same old evidence devoid propaganda that fails to meet the specification of “actual and tangible authentic and original, first century originated historical evidence of the existence of “Jesus”..”

Taking just a few of the items offered by you and others in lieu of actual authentic and original evidence:

“he is mentioned by Jewish and Roman historians”
This is a lie as there is no mention of “Jesus” that originates from within the whole of the 1st century.

“The first Christian writings to talk about Jesus are the epistles of St Paul, and scholars agree that the earliest of these letters were written within 25 years of Jesus’s death at the very latest..”
This is a lie since the oldest individual texts merely attributed to “Paul” are from the 11th century or later. There are no two that are identical and nothing that validates or authenticates any of them. Also note that the oldest prototype bibles date from the late 4th century and are known as “Codex Siniaticus” and “Codex Vaticanus”. Both of these two primitive NT prototypes differ considerably from each other and the most complete (Codex Sinaiticus – available on line since 2008) differs from the 1611 KJV bible in more than 14,800 ways including the omission of two whole books that appear in Sinaiticus but are omitted from the KLV and all other more recently written NT bibles.

Some have recycled: ” As far as we know, the first author outside the church to mention Jesus is the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus, who wrote a history of Judaism around AD93. He has two references to Jesus. One of these is controversial because it is thought to be corrupted by Christian scribes (probably turning Josephus’s negative account into a more positive one), but the other is not suspicious – a reference to James, the brother of “Jesus, the so-called Christ”.”
There is not one single word in existence that was actually written by Flavius Josephus. The earliest text that is merely attributed to him was actually written by a christian scribe (forger!) at least ten centuries after the death of Josephus.

Some also recycle: “Roman politicians Pliny and Tacitus, who held some of the highest offices of state at the beginning of the second century AD. From Tacitus we learn that Jesus was executed while Pontius Pilate was the Roman prefect in charge of Judaea (AD26-36) and Tiberius was emperor (AD14-37) – reports that fit with the timeframe of the gospels. Pliny contributes the information that, where he was governor in northern Turkey, Christians worshipped Christ as a god. Neither of them liked Christians – Pliny writes of their “pig-headed obstinacy” and Tacitus calls their religion a destructive superstition.”
Again: There is not one single word in existence that was written by Pliny or Tacitus. In fact the oldest, fragment of a text merely attributed to Pliny is a hitherto unnoticed fragment of great significance not only to palaeographers, but to all students of the classics. It consists of six leaves of an early sixth-century manuscript of the Letters written by an anonymous scribe and merely attributed to the younger Pliny.
Tacitus? The first 6 books of the Annales survive in a single manuscript, now in the Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana in Florence, where it is MS. plut. 68.1. Since this is the library of the Medici prince, Lorenzo the Magnificent, it is naturally called the Codex Mediceus, or M for short. This MS was written around 850AD in Germany.

It is fascinating that otherwise apparently intelligent folk still buy into the myths, legends, lies and so easily revealed propaganda?

Well it’s good that you have finally come around to recognising the blood soaked barbarity of christianity from the brutal and murderous imposition of the then heretical new 4th century founded Roman religion they called “christianity” that was imposed with the command “convert or die” through long Dark Ages of terror, torture, persecution and obstruction to the 9 genocidal crusades and on to 300 years of terror and torture of the inquisition during which ever more sophisticated instruments of torture were developed to prolong and intensify the agony of tghe victims of “the church”.

Your non argument is exposed as unfounded by the fact that the oldest prototype bibles were written in Greek by western Roman Christians in the late 4th century and all the diverse and very different versions in circulation today are all products of the ersatz Roman religion or breakaway sub sects from that entirely western religion.

There is no historical trace of Messiah claimant named Yeshua/Jesus or of a 1st century messianic cult of anyone of that name.
The actual historical Messiah claimants and messianic cults have been denied by western christianity and contemporary followers of the successors of the 4th century originated Roman religion that survives in much modified form today.

Your bible has nothing to do with any first or second century historical non Jesus based eastern messianic cults.

You demand ridicule due to the ridiculous nature of your ignorant denial.
You accept no evidence and present no evidence.
Your mythology is ridiculous and your failure to defend that mythology has been established by every one of your entries throughout this thread.

I am doing my best to remedy at least some small part of your profound ignorance and stubborn gullibility. You will however, need to open that infantile and locked mind of yours and do a little intellectual work yourself if you are actually capable of that undertaking?

The rest of your diatribe of denial and ridiculous conspiracy theories are already debunked bunkum – as you well know!

Please do not think that you can proceed with this obfuscation, blanket facile denial and demonstration of your affliction with cognitive dissonance, profound ignorance and the Dunning-Kruger effect.

You have already demonstrated these failings and afflictions beyond all and any doubt, you , stupid, stupid failure.

I doubt that you will even be sensible enough to actually run away from all that confuses and confounds you, but if you do at least have that much sense, you will be no loss to any further evidence based discussion since you have failed to offer any evidence at all.
?w=474&h=312

The wise men with their intellect and knowledge say there are millions of gods and goddesses and they are all the nonexistent product of human imagination.

Your sad diatribe of denial and recycled garbage is familiar but ridiculous.

You consistently fail to validate, justify, defend or excuse the ridiculous religious fantasies you espouse and demonstrate no wisdom in your continual denial of all evidence based knowledge.

As you write: “An aspect of wisdom, is to recognise (spelling error corrected) and acknowledge true reality.”

Why do you fail to enact the wisdom you also espouse by actually recognising the reality that is all that is evidenced within the entirely natural universe we have no observed and measured in so much detail?

Your ignorance, gullibility and egotism has long been recognised.

So many millions of fake gods and goddesses and not a shred of evidence, or need, for any of them…

Your ignorance has already been established as a fact as securely as evolution has already been established as a fact beyond all doubt.

The problem you (and other wacko creationists) have is that there is an ever growing mountain of evidence of and for evolution but no evidence of the existence of any of the millions of undetected and undetectable gods, goddesses and god-men or of any of the bizarre and unsupported creation mythology of the gods that was invented by men.

Dawkinsian to the end.

“Mary Beatrice Midgley [1919 – 2018], was a British philosopher. A senior lecturer in philosophy at Newcastle University, she was known for her work on science, ethics and animal rights.”

“It influences not just our thought, but our feelings and actions too, in a way which goes far beyond its official function as a biological theory.”

Insightful.

From deluded ignoramus, the voice speaks.

“Darwin proposed that creatures like us who, by their nature, are riven by strong emotional conflicts, and who have also the intelligence to be aware of those conflicts, absolutely need to develop a morality because they need a priority system by which to resolve them. The need for morality is a corollary of conflicts plus intellect:

‘Man, from the activity of his mental faculties, cannot avoid reflection. . . . Any animal whatever, endowed with well-marked social instincts, would inevitably acquire a moral sense or conscience as soon as its intellectual powers had become as well-developed, or anything like as well-developed as in man.’ – Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man

That (he said) is why we have within us the rudiments of such a priority system and why we have also an intense need to develop those rudiments. We try to shape our moralities in accordance with our deepest wishes so that we can in some degree harmonize our muddled and conflict-ridden emotional constitution, thus finding ourselves a way of life that suits it so far as is possible.

These systems are, therefore, something far deeper than mere social contracts made for convenience. They are not optional. They are a profound attempt — though of course usually an unsuccessful one — to shape our conflict-ridden life in a way that gives priority to the things that we care about most.

If this is right, then we are creatures whose evolved nature absolutely requires that we develop a morality. We need it in order to find our way in the world. The idea that we could live without any distinction between right and wrong is as strange as the idea that we — being creatures subject to gravitation — could live without any idea of up and down. That at least is Darwin’s idea and it seems to me to be one that deserves attention.

“Wickedness: An Open Debate,” The Philosopher’s Magazine, No. 14, Spring 2001”
― Mary Midgley

“Evolution is a fact.” — And all us simpletons are supposed to except that expression of devotion, declaration of faith?

…”Scientific theories are based on lines of evidence […] and have been tested in many ways.” Yes, of course!

Really, by objective open-minded investigators? Like the Global Warming experts who “prove” anthropogenic Climate Change.

We poor dunces, have to be condescendingly lectured to about the elevated “science” of established Evolution. The self-convinced oracles of belief tell us, Don’t let your pointy-little heads be confused by the “deniers” of our naturalistic religion.

Manufactured secular religion, left exposed, fractured and broken by able Creationists. Hated for exposing its sand foundation. And all the slight-of-hand in its imposing Hall of Life History.

Name-calling and forms of intimidation: “Therefore, saying, ‘evolution is a theory’, highlights your ignorance of science”.

So, a unprovable thing generated the incredible Universe! An improbable chain of happy circumstance, spontaneously sparked biological—reproductive—life. Okay. Dear boys and girls, World-life Biosphere arose to populate the Darwin stick Tree. One based on “mountain of evidence”, never forget! Though a million unseen ghosts in the fossil record.

To question is ignorance. Got it.

Material atheist hypotheses of Evolution tells us so, because its backed-up by the false god of “science”! Man made, like all the other “millions of gods”, idols all, broken and buried.

And that is were elevated Evolution will wind up.

Your effort to humiliate me by verbal abuse, is revealing of your sorry state of mind. I’ve had just about enough of your name-calling!

This discourse is terminated.

I am not advocating for broken pagan idols or hand-fashioned heathen gods of superstition, but poorly defending the Judaeo-Christian God of Heaven, that you in your anti-spiritual bias and material blindness, refuse to entertain or acknowledge, so steeped in your atheist dogma of pseudo-“science”.

And your mind is darkened in material dogma, motivated by biased hostility through your ignorance (and I don’t care how many decrees you may have), and driven you to the edge of blasphemy.

You are lair. Your atheist followers may cheer you on, but your folly misleads you to a very bad place.

Amply demonstrated, you show yourself an ignorant fool. In your wanton blindness, you condemn yourself. Maybe you are just hopelessly deceived.

Whatever the case, spew your offensive and blasphemous slanders somewhere else! I have had enough of them.

Don’t misrepresent what I embrace or reject!

I reject your skewed, false-“science” orthodoxy. And its alleged “evidence”. A lot of which has been systematically picked-apart and dismantled. Or exposed as blatant falsehood.

I must and do accept true data-based Science. (Though I don’t always understand just how aspects thereof fit into Biblical revelation.)

One “asked by Lee Strobel [‘American Christian author and a former investigative journalist’] in ‘The Case for a Creator'” for a list of examples “of how he believes science points toward theism”. Mr. Stephen Meyer (‘American scientist, college professor and author’) responded with the following:

The Big Bang.

Anthropic Fine Tuning

Origin of Life

Evidence of Design

Cambrian Explosion

Human Consciousness.