Encouraging illegal Aliens to remain in the US is a crime, Supreme court rules

29

The Supreme Court unanimously upheld a federal statute that forbids encouraging illegal aliens to remain in the U.S. unlawfully.

The Supreme Court justices voided an earlier decision by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which had ruled that a federal anti-harboring statute was unconstitutional on the grounds that it violated the First Amendment by restricting free speech. The ruling by the nation’s highest court Thursday upholds the law.

The Supreme Court not only vacated the appeals court’s decision, but also criticized the judges for “drastically” straying from judicial norms.

Liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (May she lives until 120 but resign now from the Supreme court) wrote the high court’s opinion.

Story continues below advertisement

“The appeals panel departed so drastically from the principle of party presentation as to constitute an abuse of discretion,” Ginsburg wrote, that “a court is not hidebound by the precise arguments of counsel, but the Ninth Circuit’s radical transformation of this case goes well beyond the pale.”

This conservative decision is about a court battle that lasted roughly 10 years. The case is now to be sent back to the Ninth Circuit “for reconsideration … bearing a fair resemblance to the case shaped by parties.”

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
29 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
tituspullo
tituspullo
3 years ago

translation: the 9th circus was told in a 9-0 decision that they are a joke

spfoam1
spfoam1
3 years ago

I watch traitors die fat and happy of old age. The traitors sing and dance as if they are trying to make us happy while they murder and rob and betray us. In this particular case, it has been 10 years of ruin and betrayal before it goes back to square one, and no one has been held accountable for anything.

ladywarrior
ladywarrior
3 years ago
Reply to  spfoam1

That’s why it is up to us to hold them “accountable” in the next election…..if we don’t do it….who will?

TD
TD
3 years ago

“Liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (May she live until 120 but resign now from the Supreme court)”

Well said Geller Report.
we don’t wish our political opponents physical harm (we’re not Bill Maher).
But yes, she should resign. she can barely stay awake during hearings.

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago
Reply to  TD

She needs to step down. ONE sane ruling doesn’t makeup for ALL her other lefty anti-American rulings. You won’t catch me praising the sleepy old witch.
comment image

Sam Houston
Sam Houston
3 years ago
Reply to  TD

If she won’t step down of her own volition, may Death take her. We can’t expect anyone in Congress to step up to impeach her.

ladywarrior
ladywarrior
3 years ago
Reply to  Sam Houston

Wellllll…..maybe, just maybe…they will find a way to pickle and preserve her…like the women in “Death Becomes Her.”?
Hey, don’t laugh. It’s working for PUkelosi.

anonQ
anonQ
3 years ago

“Sent back to the Ninth Circuit “for reconsideration?” It’s an obvious no brainer that encouraging illegals to stay here is illegal. It encourages law braking. I wonder if this will ever have a final decision in my life time. The system has turned into a dog and pony show.

comment image

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago
Reply to  anonQ

She is so partisan that when a REPUBLICAN is President, she refuses to attend the SOTU and if it is a DEM, she comes and sleeps. She is totally UNFIT for the job. She is a narcissistic liberal. Don’t be fooled by a curve ball.

She HATES President Trump and all he stands for.

The New York Times in recent interviews. “I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president,” she had said in the Times interview published Monday.

“He is a faker,” she said of the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, going point by point, as if presenting a legal brief. “He has no consistency about him. He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego. … How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns? The press seems to be very gentle with him on that.”

BTW, Trump did what was LAWFULLY required by ALL Presidential candidates but she wants Trump out too!
https://www.cnn.com/2016/07/12/politics/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-faker/index.html

http://i.huffpost.com/gen/2699342/images/n-RUTH-BADER-GINSBURG-STATE-OF-THE-UNION-628×314.jpg

comment image

anonQ
anonQ
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

I know she’s totally left.

ladywarrior
ladywarrior
3 years ago
Reply to  anonQ

….she passed “left” in her rear view mirror years ago…..she is a total Marxist/Totalitarian…..and I’m pretty sure she’s she’s kept alive like the women in “DEATH BECOMES HER”…..

ladywarrior
ladywarrior
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

We have a supreme that is THE LIVING DEAD.
I can’t imagine her living through a second term of President Trump….in fact, I’m praying and counting on it.

Just imagine the Jubilation on our side if President Trump gets to replace her. I feel very sorry for the poor soul who accepts the nomination from Trump…they need to have b&alls of steel.

volksnut
volksnut
3 years ago
Reply to  anonQ

For consideration – thats pretty damned good – consider what ? How they can continue to weasel out of it? To just ignore it ? Still i am amazed the SC was unanimous in something the liberal nutbags that infest the 9th circuits general landmass have held so dear for so long – i would not have thought some of the resident SC BSC liberal judges on the bench would’ve ruled in favor with this – Illegal workers destroy wages – you think the employers that take advantage give a rats ass?

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago

Hey bleeding hearts, here’s how they see it!
P.S. they also LAUGH at you too!
We shouldn’t want ANYONE here that has broken our laws.
Look how appreciative these DREAMERS are!
DEPORT THEM ALL!

comment image

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago

Let’s not forget Justice Ginsberg’s LOATHING of our Constitution.

Justice Ginsburg: ‘I Would Not Look to the US Constitution’
Mike Kelsey / February 08, 2012

Ruth Bader Ginsburg told an Egyptian TV station that she would not recommend the U.S. Constitution as model for Egypt’s new government.

The problem, you see, is that the U.S. Constitution is “a rather old constitution.” Ginsburg suggested that Egyptians should look instead to the Constitution of South Africa or perhaps the European Convention on Human Rights. All these are “much more recent than the U.S. Constitution.”

Of course, the real reason progressives swoon over South Africa’s constitution is that it goes far beyond merely establishing a framework for government and guarantees progressive policies—for example, by requiring legislation that prevents pollution and ecological degradation. In other words, the left’s real discontent with the U.S. Constitution is that it does not require Americans to adopt a progressive government and expansive welfare state that provides for every “right” social scientists can justify.

https://www.dailysignal.com/2012/02/08/justice-ginsburg-i-would-not-look-to-the-u-s-constitution/

Sam Houston
Sam Houston
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

The Constitution of South Africa where European Africans have no Rights.

ladywarrior
ladywarrior
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Didn’t she have to swear to loyalty to the US Constitution? So she lied?!
I’m shocked, I tell you…..SHOCKED! Sarc/

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago

Maybe the word ILLEGAL woke her up?
Being ILLEGAL is a crime and giving them cover is a crime.
comment image

ladywarrior
ladywarrior
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Does this mean Newsome can’t hand out taxpayer money to illegals for “virus” relief?

Sam Houston
Sam Houston
3 years ago

If the Decision has been made by SCOTUS, then why the need to send it back to the Lower Courts?

stephen5970
stephen5970
3 years ago

The most shocking thing about this is that Ginsburg voted to vacate. The second shocking thing about this is that the Supreme Court sent this back to the Ninth Circuit Court, which will find another reason to uphold its decision. And the back again to the Supreme Court to again vacate the judgement.

Round and round it goes, and nobody knows when it will stop.

Thurston Howell III
Thurston Howell III
3 years ago

This is BS – look at piglosi’s newest “covid” bill – handouts to ILLEGAL ALIENS and allowing employment of ILLEGAL ALIENS while we have 34 million out of work.

Vile bitch – no other words to describe her.

patd
patd
3 years ago

Finally!!!!!

Roma Mikhasev
Roma Mikhasev
3 years ago

YES

John Acord
John Acord
3 years ago

The latest round of stimulus or HEROES ACT includes $1.2 Trillion for the states and cities. I pray all aid to states and cities providing sanctuary to illegals is withheld until they comply with federal law. With 35 million Americans out of work it is imperative we use this opportunity to remove illegals and replace them with American workers on all levels. These illegals are a burden on the taxpayers and cost each and every one of them up to $50,000 a year including education of their children and lost wages to American workers.

ladywarrior
ladywarrior
3 years ago
Reply to  John Acord

…more than that if you count the law enforcement costs and the schooling of their kids…I did my research. Since President Reagan was tricked into signing the first Amnesty by the Democrats…..the costs have been in the TRILLIONS…and climbing.

Imagine what that money would have done for our kids in education, our military in capabilities….imagine how less costly our medical would have been…..many people don’t know that the illegals get free medical care…..ergo the medical community astronomically raising their costs so they can recoup more from the tax payers.

ladywarrior
ladywarrior
3 years ago

So I guess Newsome’s plan to give taxpayer money to illegals in California to help them through the virus….is dead?
Sure, and Santa Claus lives in Santa Barbara in the off season.

VTS
VTS
3 years ago

It is the first time in my life when I did not get embarrassed while reading Justice Ginsburg’s opinion.

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!