Boris Admits ‘Really Very Few’ Islamists Can Be Rehabilitated, ‘We Need to Be Frank About That’

46

Like we’ve been saying for years.

Boris Admits ‘Really Very Few’ Islamists Can Be Rehabilitated, ‘We Need to Be Frank About That’

By Jack Montgomery, Breitbart, February 4, 2020;

Prime Minister Boris Johnson has admitted that “really very few” Islamists can be successfully rehabilitated, and says it’s time to emphasise “the custodial option” to protect the public.

The Tory leader was speaking after Sudesh Amman stabbed multiple people in Streatham, London, just days after he received automatic early release from a short prison sentence for terror offences.

Story continues below advertisement

Amman was the second radical Islamic terrorist who struck while out on automatic early release in a row, with London Bridge killer Usman Khan having also been a freed terror convict.

“I’m going to level with you,” Johnson began, in response to a journalist who asked him if the public could be sure that terror convicts were coming out of prison less dangerous than when they went in.

“I think, looking at the problems we have with re-educating and reclaiming and rehabilitating people who succumb to Islamism, it’s very, very hard, and very tough, and it can happen, but the instances of success are really very few,” he confessed.

“[W]e need to be frank about that, and we need to think about how we handle that in our criminal justice system.”

Elaborating on the point in response to another journalist, Johnson underlinged the fact that “Deradicalising people is a very, very difficult thing to do… [there is] a big psychological barrier people find it hard to get back over — and that’s why I stress the importance of the custodial option.”

The Prime Minister wants to end automatic early release for “serious” terrorists and violent and/or sexual offenders — but that will not arrest the very substantial pool of existing terror convicts who are already counting down the time until they set free.

He indicated that his administration is going “to take action to ensure that people, irrespective of the law that we’re bringing in, [to ensure that] people in the current stream do not qualify automatically for early release” retroactively — a move than is not prohibited by the British constitution, but which would likely have to be passed “notwithstanding the Human Rights Act” of 1998, and with the possibility of terrorists appealing to the European Court of Human Rights.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
46 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
4 years ago

“islamist” because when you can’t identify your enemy you’ve already lost.

TD
TD
4 years ago

“The Prime Minister wants to end automatic early release for “serious” terrorists and violent and/or sexual offenders”

“Catch and Release” UK style.

Glad Mr. Johnson is trying to address it.

MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
4 years ago
Reply to  TD

BoJo talks the talk, but does he walk the walk?

CharlieSeattle
CharlieSeattle
4 years ago

Not yet. The western EU leaders are complicit cowards.

MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
4 years ago
Reply to  CharlieSeattle

I have to admit he’s said more truthful things about muslums than any PM since Winston Churchill, but what has he done might be less important than what he could/can do about it.

eassa
eassa
4 years ago

“We took the liberty to make some inquiries concerning the Grounds of their pretensions to make war upon a Nation who had done them no Injury, and observed that we considered all mankind as our Friends who had done us no wrong, nor had given us any provocation. The Ambassador answered us that it was founded on the laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them whenever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every musselman (muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to paradise.”
~ Thomas Jefferson

Nothing has changed about islam since the time of Jefferson, and before, with the exception that islam is growing in power because national leaders refuse to declare islam to be an enemy of their nations and peoples. It is death to any culture to allow muslims into the nations.

Dennis
Dennis
4 years ago
Reply to  eassa

Well said. This article is limited to catch and release. I believe the concept should be catch and return to their country of origin. All of Europe is dealing with the same problem as quoted by Thomas Jefferson. These believers cannot avoid the underlying mandate of Islam: domination, subjugation and violence towards non-believers. That is the principal we are facing. Our leaders need to acknowledge that factor and adopt a program to remove those radical actors from their nations, while closing their borders to those believers who cannot assimilate and accept the indigenous societies.

eassa
eassa
4 years ago
Reply to  Dennis

Amen!

eassa
eassa
4 years ago
Reply to  Dennis

Amen!

created4el
created4el
4 years ago
Reply to  Dennis

Until our leaders acknowledge the reality that Islam is first and foremost a political ideology that is not compatible with western culture, we will continue to “struggle” with Islam. That is until the western idiots are fully subjugated and under sharia in which case the struggle won’t just be a few bad Muslims but how to pay their masters the jizya.

CharlieSeattle
CharlieSeattle
4 years ago
Reply to  eassa

Trump is dangerously naive and oblivious to the clearly stated threat of islam.

caliroxanne
caliroxanne
4 years ago
Reply to  CharlieSeattle

I guess we need to be grateful that we don’t have Hillary, but yes, Trump is indeed oblivious. Check out

http://loganswarning.com

Logan gets it!

felix1999
felix1999
4 years ago
Reply to  caliroxanne

Until someone steps up, that has clout, Trump is forced to call them “radical”. Calling out Islam has to start with US. He has to be careful on this because we DO have freedom of religion. Islam is considered a religion.

David
David
4 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

It would be interesting to have a ruling from SCOTUS on the original intent of that freedom. Was Islam included? Would Jefferson have allowed Islam to take root here? Maybe when he signed the Constitution, but later when he had to fight the Barbary pirates? I bet he would have eradicated it before it could grow.

created4el
created4el
4 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Islam is a political ideology that uses religious rituals to control its members. That makes it not a religion. If you take away the political part of Islam, you have nothing left. Even their 5 daily prayers are a political statement… “thank you God that I’m not like the cursed Jews and the misguided Christians” is an attack against Jews and Christians.

Clem Jackson
Clem Jackson
4 years ago
Reply to  eassa

I could not agree more. I keep asking this question, time and time again. With all this background knowledge and experience of the behaviour of people who follow this repugnant ideology, why have we let so many in to the west, who are slowly by stealth taking the country over and killing us in the process? Why?

CreoleGumbo
CreoleGumbo
4 years ago
Reply to  Clem Jackson

Because they claim Islam is a religion and no one is willing to say “No it is not!”

eassa
eassa
4 years ago
Reply to  Clem Jackson

Clem, this is the ten million dollar question! Why? This question has been on my mind for years now, as it has with so many discerning people.

Perhaps the answer can be found in the Word of God. In Revelation 18 when Yahweh is referring to the Babylonian City/islamic center and their god the text says: “…by you magic spell all nations were led astray.”
~ Revelation 18:23b

The reason is demonic, which is why so many people cannot relate to, and understand, why world leaders are ignoring the extreme danger of islam.

Clem Jackson
Clem Jackson
4 years ago
Reply to  eassa

Yes but another question I have been asking at the same time to see if they understand the difference between right and wrong. I never get an answer from anyone from anne marie walters to robin tilbrook. The question is, if nazism and its dictator is so vehemently villified for the murderous attrocities over a 6 year span and is illegal, then why is the behaviour of mohamed the founder of islam over a 20 year period so acceptable, protected by law and incouraged to proliferate in the western world?

eassa
eassa
4 years ago
Reply to  Clem Jackson

There again, the answer can only be delusion with its cause in the demonic. There are simply powers at work that humanity cannot easily understand.

In the case of islam, the inconsistency between what is rationally right and wrong has been blurred so that national leaders and many of the citizenry (mostly Democrats) are ignoring what is evident and bowing to the destructive weapon of political correctness.

Instinctively many of us realize that national procrastination in the face of danger, and in this case Sharia, will choke the life out of our Constitutional Republic. And yet our political leaders are acting as if they are bewitched!

Political islam and the liberty birthed by the Constitution and Bill of Right are incompatible and we must divorce islam before it is too late! The relationship between our Republic and islam is an adulterous affair.

ed
ed
4 years ago
Reply to  eassa

Excellent comment !!!

Drew the Infidel
Drew the Infidel
4 years ago
Reply to  eassa

Agreed. The Catholics have got it going on because they drink real wine right there in the church house. The difference between us Methodists and other Protestants is that we will at least speak to each other in the liquor store.

But muslimes do not drink at all. That’s why they are pissed off all the time, running around flying airplanes into the side of buildings and sh*t.

1PierreMontagne1
1PierreMontagne1
4 years ago
Reply to  eassa

One thing has changed. The liberals of today are relentless in trying to destroy Jefferson and even removing history about Jefferson from Public schools.

eassa
eassa
4 years ago

Yes, and I would add that the Leftists, especially in regards to education, twist Jefferson’s statements to promote their anti-American agenda.

Pierre, have you read, The JEFFERSON LIES by David Barton? This is a book that should be required reading for everyone! And all hell broke out when the Leftist history revisionists took aim at Barton’s work!

Have good day. 🙂

Halal Bacon
Halal Bacon
4 years ago

and khan would give them gummy bears and a free knife sharpener

Poppey
Poppey
4 years ago

Funny old world. When Boris was mayor of London I seem to remember him speaking to camera {after the latest atrocity by a muslim} that “Islam was a peaceful religion, and preached against violence” or some such balderdash.

Of course that self loading replica of a Pillsbury doughboy Prime Minister Cameron said it first, so like his boss Treedle dum, Tweedle dee had to repeat the deliberate fib..

Well I suppose it’s overdue but welcome that something might be tried that can command the publics respect, but trying anything remotely effective against convicted or potential jihadists as a deterrent, against objections from a unionised prison labour force, legal human rights advocates and other interested parties is like trying to push a blunt stick through a feather pillow – jolly hard going.

The problem in UK is the same everywhere in a functioning democracy and it’s this, when things get so bad the victims demand effective measures, those trying to sort out the mess start by soon realising that they’re bound by the wrists to existing legal bonds of convential thinking.

Unless and until the scale of the inadequecy of our existing legal and sentancing systems and the complicity of the political elites of all main parties in forming the problems in the first place is realised, not much useful can be expected I’m sorry to say.

MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
4 years ago
Reply to  Poppey

As muslums (not islamists, not radical islamists, not moderates) become a larger percentage of the voting electorate things will be getting inevitably worse.

CharlieSeattle
CharlieSeattle
4 years ago

Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond’s book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam:

Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a complete, total, 100% system of life. Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military components.

The religious component is a beard for all of the other components. Islamization begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their religious privileges. When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to Muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of the other components tend to creep in as well..

Here’s how it works: As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. It is a trick.

United States — Muslim 0.6%
Australia — Muslim 1.5%
Canada — Muslim 1.9%
China — Muslim 1.8%
Italy — Muslim 1.5%
Norway — Muslim 1.8%
At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs. This is happening in:

Denmark — Muslim 2%
Germany — Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
Spain — Muslim 4%
Thailand — Muslim 4.6%

All the above pecents from Dr. Peter Hammond’s book are out of date. They are twice shown now.
http://www.ijesd.org/papers/29-D438.pdf

From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

France — Muslim 8.8% to 10%

When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase law lessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris, we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non Muslim action offends Islam, and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam, with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections.

After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues.

At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels.

After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as the senations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim.

You’ve been warned. COPY AND PASS THIS TO EVERYONE WHO IS IGNORANT OF THEIR POTENTIAL DEMISE BY ISLAM.

felix1999
felix1999
4 years ago
Reply to  CharlieSeattle

Excellent !!!!!

MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
4 years ago
Reply to  CharlieSeattle

Thailand is already experiencing an armed, violent muslum insurgency in Southern Thailand — the f’ing muslum vermin there want to form a muslum rump state at Thailand’s expense.
There’s also an armed,violent muslum insurgency in Burma/Myanmar being partly funded by muslum meth sales in Thailand.

ed de fonzo
ed de fonzo
4 years ago

islam believers get what they want by not following the civil laws.

We lose what we have by following the civil law.

IT IS TIME TO BREAK THE CIVIL LAW ……

DO UNTO OTHERS AS THEY DO UNTO YOU

Eddie

felix1999
felix1999
4 years ago

So what are you going to do about that?
May I make a suggestion, Boris?
Castrate them, strip them of their citizenship and then deport them
or just hang them so they can’t ever procreate?
Why feed and house them when someone after you can dream up a reason to release them?

Ban Islam
Ban Islam
4 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

The establishment won’t even think about taking any serious or harsh action against Muslims until they’re forced to by the public or until the Muslims start raping and killing their family members.

When its lowly dregs/commoners and their families getting attacked, they couldn’t care less. I noticed their is an entrenched hierarchy in the UK, more than most nations, probably because they had a monarchy.

DVult
DVult
4 years ago

The custodial option presumably means permanent incarceration like in Gitmo hopefully.

ar05076
ar05076
4 years ago

Rehabilitation is not the answer, annihilation IS ..!

noway2no
noway2no
4 years ago

They don’t want to change. Often the IQ of muslims is so low that they cannot have abstract thought. They see no advantage in the western lifestyle because of zealotry yes, but also due to the inability to compare apples and oranges.

Philip
Philip
4 years ago

Eventually, Big Islam is going to meet Big Media resistance. Once Big Media realizes what they are really going to be expected to live without in order to comply with Islam. Neither side is going to appreciate it however, both sides will deserve what they get.

Jpp
Jpp
4 years ago

Chinese culture is an alternative but … not sure I’ll embrace it

David
David
4 years ago
Reply to  Jpp

China’s been having trouble with the Muslims in their west.

katmanwon
katmanwon
4 years ago

I got a better idea. 1st time shame on me – 2nd time DEATH do we part.
When 1 lives as a predator – 1 dies by land or sea predators – G-d provides remedy.
IFF that is too harsh – then send ALL MOSLEMS back to an Islamic nation.

IFF the MOSLEM grew up in the WEST – then deport them to an Islamic nation as ALL MOSLEMS want SHARIA –

then give them what they want as they are irredeemable, untrustworthy, liars, & single minded.
MOSLEM BE GONE. THEY will NOT be missed. kNOw mORe.

ed
ed
4 years ago

Boris gets it….can/will he do anything about it ??

Gamal
Gamal
4 years ago

The way to rehabilitate Muslims is to not allow the indoctrination to begin with. We have to protect theri children from indoctrination.

Chris Thomas
Chris Thomas
4 years ago
Reply to  Gamal

Very good point my friend

1PierreMontagne1
1PierreMontagne1
4 years ago

Terrorist appealing their continued incarceration.
Incarceration that is infringing upon the exercise of their religious rights
The Islamic right to randomly kill infidels as commanded in the Koran.
No wonder John says they need to rewrite the Constitution.

Mike Kevins
Mike Kevins
4 years ago

As always, the truth is “islamophobic”. At least someody higher up has started talking about it. The early releases would stop cold if the prisoners were being released into the judges’ and politicians’ neighborhoods and were going to school with their daughters.

Hans Wellington
Hans Wellington
4 years ago

No Muslims, unless they have been sterilized to prevent them from breeding, should ever be admitted into any civilized society.

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!