[ April 19, 2024 ]
Congressman says fellow Democrats in Trump districts ‘quietly, privately’ fear impeachment
Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.
Related:
Story continues below advertisement
- President Trump’s Support Among Orthodox Jews Has Risen from 54% to 89%
- Public Turns Against Impeachment:
- Poll: President Donald Trump Beating 2020 Democrats in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin
- Polls Show 34 Percent of Black Likely Voters Approve of Donald Trump
- President Trump’s “impeachment” OPPOSED by more independents: poll
- President Trump expanding base with poor, urban, blacks, Latinos, impeachment critics
Under-siege Dems in Trump districts keep impeachment decision close to the vest
Vulnerable moderate Democrats call for censure instead of impeachment
Will the voices of moderate Democrats be heard or squashed by the extreme left? Fox News contributor Charles Hurt weighs in.WASHINGTON — An all but inevitable House floor vote to impeach President Trump is poised to come down to a few dozen moderate Democrats who, under heavy and sustained pressure from both sides of the debate, are staying steadfastly mum on their decision.
“I will not operate on anyone’s timeline,” said freshman Rep. Max Rose, D-N.Y., who is a prime target of GOP efforts to either kill impeachment or at least encourage Democratic defections. “I will not operate on pressure from anyone.”
DEMS PLOW AHEAD WITH IMPEACHMENT ARTICLES AS INITIAL VOTE LOOMS
Rose is among the 31 House Democrats from districts where Trump won in 2016. Those swing districts were critical to Democrats’ winning control of the House last year, and now those members are needed by the party leadership if Trump is to become the third president ever impeached.
Rose announced he was against impeachment in the wake of the Russia report from Special Counsel Robert Mueller, but then supported the inquiry over Trump’s request for Ukraine to investigate Democrats. Whether he and other swing-district Democrats would extend that support to impeachment itself remains unclear, and may continue to be right up until the floor vote.
“We have to give this the level of thought and analysis and judicious consideration that it is deserving of,” Rose told reporters Tuesday.
Fellow freshman Rep. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich., also hasn’t said how she’ll vote. Slotkin, who penned an op-ed with six other freshman Democrats to help launch the impeachment inquiry, said her constituents expect her to make an objective decision.
“I’m not waking up in the morning looking for a golden poll,” she said Wednesday.
The House is expected to vote next week on two articles of impeachment against Trump for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. Democrats narrowly crafted the charges against Trump to focus on his pressure on Ukraine to investigate political rival Joe Biden and his son, Hunter. In a July 25 phone call with the Ukrainian president, Trump asked for investigations that could have influenced his 2020 reelection chances while the White House had a freeze on nearly $400 million in aid. Trump and his allies deny any quid pro quo tied to aid, and insist the discussions with Ukraine were “perfect.”
A few Trump-district Democrats have been outspoken in their support of impeachment, including Reps. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York and Conor Lamb of Pennsylvania. Rep. Tom Malinowski, D-N.J., said he speaks regularly to other swing-district Democrats and believes most will be joining him in voting for impeachment — even if they’ve stayed quiet.
“Not all of them have come out publicly. I think many of them would prefer to announce any decision in their districts,” Malinowski said.
“I think it’s the right way to go,” he said of the narrowly crafted articles. “It’s very easy for all of us … to point to what President Trump did in extorting a foreign country to help him in the next election as symbolic of what he did in inviting a foreign country (Russia) to help him in 2016. So it’s a great opportunity to talk about the full range of his abuses of power.”
The House has 233 Democrats, 197 Republicans and one independent. If all members are present and voting, Democrats would need 216 votes for impeachment and could afford about 17 defectors, assuming all Republicans will side with Trump.
Already two Democrats voted against launching the initial inquiry – Jeff Van Drew of New Jersey and Collin Peterson of Minnesota, while independent Rep. Justin Amash joined with Democrats to secure 232 votes on Halloween to kick off impeachment proceedings.
Republicans are smelling blood. Right-leaning groups continue to target moderate Democrats and inundate them with advertising.
A leading spender in the effort, American Action Network, launched an $8.5 million TV impeachment ad blitz targeting Democratic members including Jared Golden of Maine, Susie Lee of Nevada, Slotkin of Michigan, Xochitl Torres Small of New Mexico, Anthony Brindisi of New York, Kendra Horn of Oklahoma, Joe Cunningham of South Carolina and Elaine Luria of Virginia.
“Impeachment is going to be a political death sentence for every vulnerable Democrat — no matter how they vote,” NRCC spokesman Michael McAdams told Fox News. “Either they are going to alienate the independent voters they need or alienate their Democratic Trump-hating base, which they also need to win.”
Rep. Abigail Spanberger, D-Va., got an earful at a recent town hall in her district, when some voters shouted at her for saying the allegations against Trump are “incredibly, incredibly serious.”
“It’s a lie. It’s all a lie,” one man shouted at the freshman pol.
Help is on the way for these Democrats — namely from one very rich Democrat. Billionaire Michael Bloomberg announced this week he’d spend $10 million to protect vulnerable Democrats under attack from the GOP. The White House hopeful already spent $100 million to help Democrats win the majority and his latest donation was cheered by Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
Long Island Rep. Tom Suozzi, a member of the bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus that seeks centrist legislation, also declined to say whether he’s supporting the articles of impeachment.
“I have no comment on that right now,” said Suozzi, who is facing a progressive challenger in a district that is considered safely Democratic.
A fellow Problem Solvers caucus ally Rep. Josh Gottheimer, D-N.J., didn’t say how he’d vote on impeachment after failing in his long-shot effort to censure Trump instead.
Politico reported that Gottheimer on Monday tried to revive an idea of censuring Trump instead of filing articles of impeachment along with about 10 other vulnerable Democrats. Others seeking a lighter option were Reps. Kurt Schrader of Oregon, Anthony Brindisi of New York and Ben McAdams of Utah.
“I need to see all the facts. I’m not going to prejudge anything until we get every bit of information in and then I’ll make a decision,” Gottheimer said Wednesday.
Pelosi claimed Thursday she’s not pressuring moderate Democrats for votes.
“We are not whipping something like this. … People need to come to their own conclusions,” Pelosi said.
Pressed again by reporters she said: “I’m not asking anyone what their vote is. This is a vote that people will have to come to their own conclusion on and the facts are clear — irrefutable,” she said.
“The fact is that we take an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States … this has nothing to do with my concern about votes. People will vote the way they vote.”
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Please contribute here.
or
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.
Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding.Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.
Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.
Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.
Follow Pamela Geller on Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.
Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.
Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.
If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.
8 Comments
4 years ago
this whole sideshow is “common purpose” on steroids
4 years ago
So most of the ignorant libturd dumocraps have had actual claims of crimes that they are accused of and the Houses do nothing but they keep fabricating BS about Trump and want to impeach or censure him for what??? Can’t fix STUPID with the ignorant libturds but they do love their liars and criminals!!!!
4 years ago
Looks like some Dems are leaving the leaking ship. They want to keep their job and position and impeachment looks like a political loser.
4 years ago
Reply to
stephen5970
Yes, but if they are re-elected because they won’t side with Nancy, they will after they get elected because Nancy and her evil collaborators will keep this anti-Trump parade going well into his next 5 years as President.
DEMOCRATS HAVE SO MUCH HATRED FOR TRUMP AND HIS SUPPORTERS, THEY WON’T STOP NO MATTER WHAT THE SENATE DOES. These are very demonic evil people.
4 years ago
The neo-Bolsheviks will primary the neo-Mensheviks who do not vote for impeachment. That;’s the real threat,and it comes from the very source that organized a coup against Trump and is continuing to foment a civil war which they appear to desperately want.
4 years ago
VOTE THEM OUT BECAUSE THEY ARE DEMOCRATS, folks.
IF they won’t tell you if they will side with Nancy, 99% chance is they will side with her.
ALL Democrats are like MUSLIMS. They lie and deceive to get elected.
