News Ticker >
[ December 14, 2019 ]

Democrat Congressman Leaving Party Over Impeachment, Becoming Republican

[ December 14, 2019 ]

Hacked!

[ December 14, 2019 ]

In Paris suburbs, a man screaming “Allahu Akbar” and armed with a knife died after...

[ December 14, 2019 ]

Obama never abused his power- I mean, no more than 15 times

[ December 14, 2019 ]

FREE SPEECH BATTLE: Panel Looks Likely to Overturn Detroit’s Ban on AFDI’s Religious Liberty Ads

[ December 14, 2019 ]

FBI: Univ of New Mexico Muslim student from Saudi Arabia had KILL LIST

[ December 14, 2019 ]

Warren Campaign Touted Endorsement From Antisemitic Politician Who Called Cory Booker ‘AIPAC Puppet’: Report

[ December 14, 2019 ]

Born in 1823? You can still vote in Detroit, according to a lawsuit

[ December 14, 2019 ]

Corbyn’s bloodbath defeat in UK election sends ‘catastrophic warning’ to 2020 Dems

[ December 14, 2019 ]

New Poll Numbers Show Florida Republican Governor Ron DeSantis Is Insanely Popular

New York Times Scrubs “Terror” from Islamic Jihad Story

8

Subjugated tools. Who made that editorial decision? And why? Jew-hatred. Anyone who slaughters Jews can’t be a terrorist, but a hero, according to the New York Times.

New York Times Scrubs “Terror” from Islamic Jihad Story

By: Gilead Ini, November 12, 2019 (thanks to Religion of Peace):

Abu Bakr al Baghdadi was a “terrorist” who led a “terrorist group” that committed “acts of terror” before ultimately losing his life during a U.S. “counterterrorism action,” the New York Times reported in numerous stories following the ISIS leader’s death in late October.

Those are all accurate, precise terms to describe the head of an organization that’s clearly guilty of targeting civilians with violence for political aims.

But now, two weeks later, after Israel’s military killed senior Palestinian Islamic Jihad leader Baha Abu al-Ata, the T-word is nowhere to be found in the New York Times report about the incident. More puzzling is that the first versions of the article, published in the early morning hours of November 12 after the terrorist was killed, did accurately note Islamic Jihad’s terror designation — but that information was later scrubbed from the story.

Why?

Like ISIS, Islamic Jihad is indeed designated globally as a terrorist group, including by the European Union, United States, Canada, Japan, and others.

Like al-Baghdadi, Abu al-Ata is a senior leader of an organization responsible for countless attacks targeting civilians, including mass casualty bombings of Israeli restaurants, markets, buses, and shopping malls. In one of many such attacks, an Islamic Jihad suicide bomber walked into a crowded falafel stand in April 2006 and detonated his explosives, killing 11 people including an American teenager who succumbed to his wounds on Mother’s Day.

The fact that Islamic Jihad is “listed as a terrorist organization by many countries,” as the overnight versions of the Times article had initially explained, is obviously relevant to readers hoping to fully understand why Israeli might view Abu al-Ata as a military target. But sometime between 9:30 and 10:15 this morning, an editorial decision was made to remove the passage explaining Islamic Jihad’s classification as a terrorist organization, and to replace this description with vague, watered-down language that mitigates the nature of the terrorist group, portraying it as one that merely takes “a harder line toward Israel” than Hamas.

Who made that editorial decision? And why?

After a 2014 terror attack on Jews praying in a Jerusalem synagogue, the New York Times likewise decided to cut from its story Secretary of State John Kerry’s impassioned condemnation of Palestinian incitement, which he said was directly responsible for the slaughter. You can read about that here.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute to our ground-breaking work here.


Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Contribute Monthly - Choose One

Have a tip we should know? Your anonymity is NEVER compromised. Email tips@thegellerreport.com

Pin It on Pinterest