News Ticker >
[ December 5, 2019 ]

Authoritarianism: Democrat Candidates Pledge Social Media Free Speech Crackdown #Nazis

[ December 5, 2019 ]

Dem Impeachment Witness Noah Feldman Penned Fawning Defense of Brutal Shariah Law

[ December 5, 2019 ]

In its continuing war against the American people, Pelosi vows to continue impeachment farce/coup #KilltheCoup

[ December 5, 2019 ]

House Parades Anti-Trump “Witnesses” Before Judiciary Committee #ImpeachmentHearings

[ December 5, 2019 ]

Our Man at NATO: Trump Suddenly Finds Success

[ December 4, 2019 ]

Police NOT investigating attack on Jewish children in London as hate crime

[ December 4, 2019 ]

While Iran shoots protesters, Europe schemes to enrich the murderers

[ December 4, 2019 ]

SCHIFF SHOW: Phone Records Show SCHIFF SPIED on Giuliani, Rep. Devin Nunes, and a ‘Hill’...

[ December 4, 2019 ]

Chinese defector spills Communist Party, military secrets

[ December 4, 2019 ]

New York Muslim gets 40 years for scouting sites for Islamic terrorist attacks in NYC

‘Feminism Panel’ in Pakistan Includes No Women

7

Ha! Gotta love that sharia. Right, ladies? The feminists sure do.

Outrage in Pakistan after feminism panel includes no women

By Riaz Sohail, BBC Urdu, Karachi, 22 November 2019 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

The Arts Council of Pakistan has been forced to backtrack after it emerged that a discussion on feminism it is hosting was to have an all-male panel.

An outcry on social media resulted in two women guests being added, and Friday’s event in Karachi was renamed.

The original title, Feminism: The Other Perspective, drew derision and has now been recast as Understanding Feminism.

Organisers say male decision-makers were to share views on feminism, but many critics questioned the very idea.

In overwhelmingly patriarchal Pakistan, having an all-male panel discuss feminism didn’t seem the obvious way to tackle gender inequality.

The only woman included in the original line-up was discussion host Uzma al-Karim, whose name was put at the bottom of the promotional literature.

After sustained criticism on social media, two women speakers were added to the panel – feminist Mehtab Akbar Rashdi and journalist Quatrina Hosain – and Uzma al-Karim’s name was made more prominent in the amended literature.

But that didn’t persuade everyone.

Many criticised the men who’d agreed to take part, accusing them of using feminism to further their own interests.

The writer of this article and others acknowledged there was no reason why men shouldn’t give their views on feminism – it just seemed wrong to invite a panel that included no women at all.

One woman, Erum Haider, tweeted : “The men I know who are feminists would be embarrassed to be on this panel.”

Discussion host Uzma al-Karim told BBC Urdu: “Our purpose was to get men having decision-making powers in major media houses and those with a following to talk about their understanding of feminism.

“We wanted to register their perception because they were in a position to influence public opinion. And that’s why we called it ‘the other perspective’.”

One of the men taking part in the discussion, human rights activist Jibran Nasir, said he’d found the original title misleading.

“I was informed the panel is about men talking to other men about rethinking masculinity and why as men we need feminism. It wasn’t to explain feminism or talk about women issues as men,” he tweeted.
Presentational white space

There was also humour. Comedian Shahzad Ghias Shaikh weighed in, inviting people to “join him in teaching the world about women’s lives”.
Presentational white space

Jibran Nasir declined to comment when asked by the BBC whether he was told clearly what was to be debated, and whether he had been told by the Arts Council there were to be no women on the panel.

“It’s not such a big issue,” he said. “People had raised some objections, following which the management made some changes, and I’m only a guest at the event.”

Nida Kirmani, professor of social sciences at Lahore University of Management Sciences, says the issue of men debating feminism is justified – but the Arts Council failed to clarify the concept and that’s why there was such a big reaction on social media.

“I think this reaction was also caused by the fact that we are getting sick of seeing male panellists endlessly debating frivolous issues on electronic media,” she said.

“Rarely do we see a woman protagonist, and this seems normal to most people.”

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute to our ground-breaking work here.


Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Contribute Monthly - Choose One

Have a tip we should know? Your anonymity is NEVER compromised. Email tips@thegellerreport.com

Pin It on Pinterest