News Ticker >
[ August 22, 2019 ]

“Palestinian” Terror Group Hamas Attacks Israel With Rockets from Gaza Strip

[ August 22, 2019 ]

US Lawmaker Blasts Wall that Prevented Suicide Bombings

[ August 22, 2019 ]

‘Holy Islamic burial pyramid’ isn’t. It’s ‘actually ancient Greek boxer’s tomb’

[ August 22, 2019 ]

Al Qaeda jihadi fails to get conviction overturned for plot to BLOW UP THE NYC...

[ August 22, 2019 ]

Arrest made in shooting of Jewish man outside Miami synagogue

[ August 22, 2019 ]

Muslim Monster: Young Turks’ Hasan Piker Says ‘America Deserved 9/11’, Mocks Veteran’s War Injury: ‘Brave...

[ August 22, 2019 ]

‘On My Knees’: Beastly Bette Midler Attacks Melania Trump with Poem About President’s Penis

[ August 21, 2019 ]

Israel Launches Satellite over Africa to Give the Continent Internet Access

[ August 21, 2019 ]

Democrat Ilhan Omar: Israel Is NOT an Ally and is NOT a “Democracy”

[ August 21, 2019 ]

Watch: Muslim Arab tries to strangle Israeli worker at Allenby Crossing

Non-Muslim Judge Lectures Islamic Jihadi About Islam

33

There is never any shortage of useful idiots, and Australian Justice Peter Johnson has just joined the long line. Australia’s 9 News reported Friday that Bourhan Hraichie, a hardline and unrepentant Islamic jihadist who plotted to kill cops and carved an Islamic State slogan on another prisoner’s forehead, “cheered as he was sentenced in the NSW Supreme Court. He interjected at various points, including when Justice Peter Johnson said his beliefs were based on a ‘distorted understanding of Islam.’”

Here was Peter Johnson, a non-Muslim, telling a man who had dedicated his life to understanding Islamic teachings properly and living them out scrupulously that he was getting Islam all wrong, terribly wrong. And why? Not because he knows of some Islamic texts or principles that Hraichie is ignoring, but because the implications of the possibility that Hraichie might be applying Islamic texts as they were intended to be applied is too terrible for him to contemplate.

Peter Johnson is the latest in a long line of judges who have lectured Islamic jihadis about how they’re misunderstanding their peaceful, cuddly religion. Peter Johnson, of course, doesn’t know the first foggiest thing about Islam, but he thinks he does, because many people he trusts and respects have assured him that it’s a Religion of Peace, and he has also been taught that the only people who think otherwise are racist, bigoted “Islamophobes.” Bourhan Hraichie is no racist, bigoted “Islamophobe,” but clearly the poor lamb has been improperly instructed in his religion. If only Peter Johnson had been there in the mosque to teach him the true Islam.

The most notorious case of a non-Muslim judge censuring a jihadi for transgressing the tenets of a religion the judge knows nothing about came back in 2013, when two Muslims, Mujaahid Abu Hamza and Ismail ibn Abdullah, aka Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale, killed British soldier Lee Rigby in broad daylight on a London street, and explained why they did it: “We are forced by the Qur’an, in Sura At-Tawba [the Qur’an’s ninth chapter, which contains its clearest commands to wage jihad against unbelievers], through many ayah [verses] in the Qu’ran, we must fight them as they fight us. An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.”

In response, Justice Nigel Sweeney told them: “You each converted to Islam some years ago. Thereafter you were radicalised and each became an extremist, espousing views which, as has been said elsewhere, are a betrayal of Islam.” This enraged them, and they began a fight in the courtroom. It would have been interesting to have seen Mufti Sweeney explain what exactly was a betrayal of Islam in their actions, but he didn’t, because he couldn’t.

The Qur’an says, “Fight in the way of Allah those who fight you but do not transgress. Indeed. Allah does not like transgressors” (2:190). That “do not transgress” has often been interpreted by Islamic scholars as meaning, do not begin hostilities. I.e., this verse is a foundation for defensive jihad. But in this case, as the killer himself made clear, he believed that the soldier was fighting Muslims in Islamic lands — Iraq and Afghanistan. So the soldier was already fighting Muslims, and the killer would have thought that he was not “transgressing” by therefore fighting “in the way of Allah those who fight you” — i.e., the Muslims.

And how is one to fight them? “And kill them wherever you overtake them and expel them from wherever they have expelled you, and fitnah is worse than killing. And do not fight them at al-Masjid al- Haram until they fight you there. But if they fight you, then kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers” (2:191). “Kill them wherever you overtake them” — even on, say, a street in Woolwich.

Until authorities all over the free world come to grips with the fact that there is ample Islamic justification for such murders, and stop playing games with their Let’s Play Pretend version of Islam, there will be many more such killings.

As for Johnson and Sweeney, Bob Dylan characterized them most precisely: “False hearted judges dyin’ in the webs that they spin/Only a matter of time til night comes steppin’ in.” Indeed, and it will come steppin’ in thanks to Johnson, Sweeney, and the multitude of other authorities all over the West who hold the same assumptions.

 Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch and a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. He is author of the New York Times bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) and The Truth About Muhammad. His new book is The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS. Follow him on Twitter here. Like him on Facebook here.

 

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute to our ground-breaking work here.


Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Contribute Monthly - Choose One

Have a tip we should know? Your anonymity is NEVER compromised. Email tips@thegellerreport.com

Pin It on Pinterest