Non-Muslim Judge Lectures Islamic Jihadi About Islam

32

There is never any shortage of useful idiots, and Australian Justice Peter Johnson has just joined the long line. Australia’s 9 News reported Friday that Bourhan Hraichie, a hardline and unrepentant Islamic jihadist who plotted to kill cops and carved an Islamic State slogan on another prisoner’s forehead, “cheered as he was sentenced in the NSW Supreme Court. He interjected at various points, including when Justice Peter Johnson said his beliefs were based on a ‘distorted understanding of Islam.’”

Here was Peter Johnson, a non-Muslim, telling a man who had dedicated his life to understanding Islamic teachings properly and living them out scrupulously that he was getting Islam all wrong, terribly wrong. And why? Not because he knows of some Islamic texts or principles that Hraichie is ignoring, but because the implications of the possibility that Hraichie might be applying Islamic texts as they were intended to be applied is too terrible for him to contemplate.

Peter Johnson is the latest in a long line of judges who have lectured Islamic jihadis about how they’re misunderstanding their peaceful, cuddly religion. Peter Johnson, of course, doesn’t know the first foggiest thing about Islam, but he thinks he does, because many people he trusts and respects have assured him that it’s a Religion of Peace, and he has also been taught that the only people who think otherwise are racist, bigoted “Islamophobes.” Bourhan Hraichie is no racist, bigoted “Islamophobe,” but clearly the poor lamb has been improperly instructed in his religion. If only Peter Johnson had been there in the mosque to teach him the true Islam.

The most notorious case of a non-Muslim judge censuring a jihadi for transgressing the tenets of a religion the judge knows nothing about came back in 2013, when two Muslims, Mujaahid Abu Hamza and Ismail ibn Abdullah, aka Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale, killed British soldier Lee Rigby in broad daylight on a London street, and explained why they did it: “We are forced by the Qur’an, in Sura At-Tawba [the Qur’an’s ninth chapter, which contains its clearest commands to wage jihad against unbelievers], through many ayah [verses] in the Qu’ran, we must fight them as they fight us. An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.”

Story continues below advertisement

In response, Justice Nigel Sweeney told them: “You each converted to Islam some years ago. Thereafter you were radicalised and each became an extremist, espousing views which, as has been said elsewhere, are a betrayal of Islam.” This enraged them, and they began a fight in the courtroom. It would have been interesting to have seen Mufti Sweeney explain what exactly was a betrayal of Islam in their actions, but he didn’t, because he couldn’t.

The Qur’an says, “Fight in the way of Allah those who fight you but do not transgress. Indeed. Allah does not like transgressors” (2:190). That “do not transgress” has often been interpreted by Islamic scholars as meaning, do not begin hostilities. I.e., this verse is a foundation for defensive jihad. But in this case, as the killer himself made clear, he believed that the soldier was fighting Muslims in Islamic lands — Iraq and Afghanistan. So the soldier was already fighting Muslims, and the killer would have thought that he was not “transgressing” by therefore fighting “in the way of Allah those who fight you” — i.e., the Muslims.

And how is one to fight them? “And kill them wherever you overtake them and expel them from wherever they have expelled you, and fitnah is worse than killing. And do not fight them at al-Masjid al- Haram until they fight you there. But if they fight you, then kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers” (2:191). “Kill them wherever you overtake them” — even on, say, a street in Woolwich.

Until authorities all over the free world come to grips with the fact that there is ample Islamic justification for such murders, and stop playing games with their Let’s Play Pretend version of Islam, there will be many more such killings.

As for Johnson and Sweeney, Bob Dylan characterized them most precisely: “False hearted judges dyin’ in the webs that they spin/Only a matter of time til night comes steppin’ in.” Indeed, and it will come steppin’ in thanks to Johnson, Sweeney, and the multitude of other authorities all over the West who hold the same assumptions.

 Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch and a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. He is author of the New York Times bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) and The Truth About Muhammad. His new book is The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS. Follow him on Twitter here. Like him on Facebook here.

 

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
32 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
MAS
MAS
4 years ago

What arrogance from these judges! They’re supposed to be able to do research to come to informed decisions but are too busy imposing their ill informed personal opinions. Maybe they could stop pontificating and just follow our written laws, too much to ask I suppose..,

Hussars2018
Hussars2018
4 years ago
Reply to  MAS

It’s hilarious. The Infidel judge tells the Jihadist that he is political incorrect.He refuses to see reality when the club if reality is swung at his head.

“Is this a digger I see before me? No! That is politically incorrect. In fact it is a wet noodle, even though it seems to have cut my chest open ….. Hmmm.”

Hans Wellington
Hans Wellington
4 years ago
Reply to  MAS

Just look at that guy in dressed in drag, doesn’t that say anything ??

R. Arandas
R. Arandas
4 years ago
Reply to  MAS

The blind cannot lead the blind!

taxpayer22
taxpayer22
4 years ago

There is no moderate Islam. Islam is Islam . -Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

Michael Garfinkel
Michael Garfinkel
4 years ago
Reply to  taxpayer22

The adults in the room “get” Islam.

That includes communist China, first and foremost, and the countries of the former Soviet bloc.

Russia, of course, also gets it. Italy and Greece as well.

We can only hope that the soft, feminized West wakes up in time, but for Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, Denmark, Norway and Sweden, the jury is out.

Sweden, in particular, looks finished already.

MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
4 years ago

The PRC are right bastards. They enabled the muslum genocide of upwards of 2.5 million Hindus in Bangladesh in the 1970’s when they threatened direct military action against India unless they withdrew their military forces from Bangladesh. Then there’s the fact they’re building a gigantic international port of call in Pakistain w/financing from Soddy Barbaria. Communists are no less totalitarians than f’ing muslums.

Michael Garfinkel
Michael Garfinkel
4 years ago

You are correct, but this is beside the point – they understand the Islamic threat, and they are minimizing it.

MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
4 years ago

Yes they’re minimizing it in the PRC, but facilitating its spread outside of the PRC.

Michael Garfinkel
Michael Garfinkel
4 years ago

China regards her primary concern as – China.

Also, I doubt that the Islamic threat is being “facilitated,” and I suspect there is no evidence to support such an assertion.

MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
4 years ago

Um by enabling the genocide of 2.5 million Hindus in Bangladesh the PRC definitively WAS enabling the islamic threat. If the f’ing PRC interferes w/the rights of Hindus to defend themselves against the f’ing muslums again I hope India employs a nuclear strike against the f’ing ChiCom pigs.

ninetyninepct
ninetyninepct
4 years ago
Reply to  taxpayer22

There is no moderate Islam. There is no violent Islam. There is just Islam.

Michelle
Michelle
4 years ago

It is these same idiots who are destroying the west. Obviously none of them make any attempt to listen to or read the koranic hatred that pours out of al Jazeera or almost every mosque in the world. But then perhaps they do and this ignoring of proven fact is deliberate as ordered by the masters of the universe.

Michael Copeland
Michael Copeland
4 years ago

See “The Lamentable Shortcomings of Some English Judges and Senior Lawyers” at Gates of Vienna:
https://gatesofvienna.net/2019/06/the-lamentable-shortcomings-of-some-english-judges-and-senior-lawyers/

Liatris Spicata
Liatris Spicata
4 years ago

I can only wonder about the future of nations lead by people of such colossal ignorance. And in his case, I suspect it is ignorance, coupled with a determined desire not to learn. After all, if he did, he might feel the need to act differently, perhaps even at the risk of his standing in society.

By the way, my opinion of this judge is in marked contrast to my estimation of Obama and his ilk- they are aware, and they welcome the change in America that Moslems bring.

Michael Copeland
Michael Copeland
4 years ago

These judges do not realise that in the Caliphate they are helping to usher in they will not be needed.

Francis
Francis
4 years ago

Leftists are so full of themselves as to think their miserable lives will be spared if they help the world fall to islam.

Kathy Brown, Esq.
Kathy Brown, Esq.
4 years ago
Reply to  Francis

“The alligator will eat me last” school of thought…

Francis
Francis
4 years ago

It’s the religion of pieces. Know islam, no peace. No islam, know peace.

Francis
Francis
4 years ago

He’s just as useless as the Kiwi dingbat Jacinda Ardern.

Tamara Hussey-Mecklenburg
Tamara Hussey-Mecklenburg
4 years ago

Islam is a psychopathic, totalitarian belief system.

The judge is a bad person to be judging anybody’s action if he’s got this wrong.

Ziggy46
Ziggy46
4 years ago

This judge typifies Britain’s judiciary’s ignorance of Islam. His pontificating to this Jihadi, likely, encouraged him to continue on his mission, murdering, maiming or raping as many non-Muslims possible. The judge’s spewing such nonsense, and ignorant rhetoric that Islam is the religion of peace validates that Britain’s judiciary is flaccid and ignorant. One certainty is, it plays into the hands of Islam’s barbarous and nihilistic tenets.

Nor is it purely Britain’s judiciary that is guilty of sticking one’s head up one’s favorite orifice; it is, unfortunately, occurring in every Western nation.

MISS VEGAS
MISS VEGAS
4 years ago

And why do those judges still wear those wigs? Seems silly & outdated just like Islam is.

What is going on with all of these Liberal Judges in the Westernized Countries!? It is like they have all lost their minds at the same time. Very suspicious.

Kathy Brown, Esq.
Kathy Brown, Esq.
4 years ago
Reply to  MISS VEGAS

Totally agree but not about the wigs please!

I studied Law in England and at the Inns of Court we got a serious kick out of the wig-thang. Esp. with the lady jurists!

They all have to wear them “if called to the Bar” and between-times carry them in these see-through plastic cases. Then they look totally extreme esp. on Black female lawyers.

I wish I’d gotten my picture taken with one of those wigs on my head. Somehow I never thought to ask anyone at the time.

patd
patd
4 years ago

The doctrine of islam is not and never will be a religion of peace!!!!

Dennis Durkop
Dennis Durkop
4 years ago

One will find that the word cult is not part of a Muslims English vocabulary, because it is the truth of course, that they refuse to confront! One should always confront a Muslim head on stating that Islam is a political ideology hiding behind a violent religious cult! Pure and simple!

Murielle
Murielle
4 years ago

Obviously he suffers from severe mental illness based on his distorted socialization and belief system. The judge, I mean!

Alleged-Comment
Alleged-Comment
4 years ago

The judge is a terrific example of what lieberalism does to your mind. You become BLIND to what is right and wrong. Morals become relative meaning you interpret the way you see it and it usually is WRONG.
comment image

Hans Wellington
Hans Wellington
4 years ago

I wonder why this poor fellow is pulling such a long face ??

John Acord
John Acord
4 years ago

Liberalism is institutionalized hubris and ALWAYS leads to disaster.

John Acord
John Acord
4 years ago

Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer, and many others are fighting 24/7 to help people understand the true teachings and history of Islam. This is a mission of existential importance to our survival and Islam’s supporters, aiders and abetters, paid acolytes and sycophants are determined to silence them. Imagine if this judge understood the truth about Islam, he would have condemned this jihadist for being Muslim and not falsely as a Muslim who had lost his way. Once people realize that Islam is totally incompatible with western civilization I am confident they will join the fight to push it out of our society. We need to do whatever is possible to aid this fight for truth by recruiting others, dispersing information, and when possible helping out with the financial burden.

R. Arandas
R. Arandas
4 years ago

Can the blind lead the blind?

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!