WATCH Ocasio-Cortez Tries To Grill Former ICE Director. He Wrecks Her

196

Bravo! It’s about time that this self-promoting air-head be put in her place.

Ocasio-Cortez Tries To Grill Former ICE Director. He Wrecks Her.

By Ryan Saavedra, Daily Caller, July 12, 2019:

Story continues below advertisement

Former ICE Director Thomas Homan rendered socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez utterly speechless on Friday during a congressional hearing after the 29-year-old former bartender tried to grill him about immigration-related policies.

https://www.facebook.com/SeanHannity/videos/2306097582945692/?t=1

 

“It says the official recommendation, there were three different options presented, the third included the option for family separation,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “This initiative would pursue prosecution of all amenable adults including those presenting with a family unit.

“Mr. Homan, your name is on this, is this correct?” Ocasio-Cortez asked.

“Yes, I signed that memo,” Homan replied.

“So, you are the author of the family separation policy?” Ocasio-Cortez asked.

“I’m not the author of this memo,” Homan replied.

“You’re not the author, but you signed the memo?” Ocasio-Cortez pressed.

“Yes, a zero tolerance memo,” Homan responded.

“So, you provided the official recommendation to Secretary Neilson on families for the United States to pursue family separation?” Ocasio-Cortez asked.

“I gave Secretary Nielson numerous recommendations on how to secure the border and save lives,” Homan responded.

 

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
196 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rocinante44
Rocinante44
4 years ago

let’s all consider how utterly stupid, worthless, and lawless the voters of this wench’s district are. make me president, i’ll put a barbed wire fence around her district, and turn it into a prison camp where all democrats are sent by cattle car

Bill
Bill
4 years ago
Reply to  Rocinante44

Snake Plissken in ‘Escape From NY’.

Maranatha
Maranatha
4 years ago

comment image

-Mom,…Its zeparetion or separation?
-It’s separation.
-OK. I go to the House now.

beansandrice
beansandrice
4 years ago

I’m ashamed that she appears to be the same sex as me. Not only is she wrong, shes dangerous.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  beansandrice

Stupidity knows no race, ethnic group, national origin, or sex.

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago

You state “Stupidity knows no race, ethnic group, national origin, or sex.”
And you are the classic example of that this idea is correct.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

Point of fact, that was referencing you, little one, as you continue to HUMILIATE yourself.

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago

Extinction

thesafesurfer
thesafesurfer
4 years ago

Hear! Hear!

santashandler
santashandler
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

Get any upvotes lately, sport? Oh, that’s right, you have a PhD. Cheers!

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

Why would I want upvotes?
If upvotes are your measure of success then you must have a very boring unsuccessful life. I have much better measures of success.

santashandler
santashandler
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

Nah, you wouldn’t want upvotes, you’ve got a PhD! Now, what I want to know is, does that PhD give you any extra privileges in the institution? You know, does the psych nurse let you stay up late after the other patients have gone to bed? Do you get extra food at chow time? Does the staff trust you enough to let you do big-boy tasks, like take out the garbage? We already know, they give you extra computer time. Cheers!

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

Is that the best you have got? Do you really think you are going to annoy me with your little girl drivel?
Grow up little girl and join the real world.
Totally pathetic.

santashandler
santashandler
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

Yes, just as I thought. Your condition is worsening. Does it have anything to do with the head psych nurse telling you that they’ve extended your stay at the institution? Cheer up, sport, another 15 years or so will go by quickly. Just whatever you do, dont go around in a white lab coat, impersonating a doctor, like last time. They really dont dig on that too much.

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

Extinction

santashandler
santashandler
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

????????????Is that the “safe” word you must use at the institution when you’re mad?

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

Extinction

santashandler
santashandler
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

Wow. Its situation critical for you now. Please get off the keyboard and tell the psych nurse to triple the doses on your meds. You might start behaving bizarrely but, cant be much worse than this garbage your posting here on this forum. Cheers!!

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

Extinction

thesafesurfer
thesafesurfer
4 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

….you have completeliy defeated Studentviro……when he starts posting “extinction” he is waving a white flag of unconditional surrender……LOL!

santashandler
santashandler
4 years ago
Reply to  thesafesurfer

One surrender at a time:)

santashandler
santashandler
4 years ago
Reply to  thesafesurfer

One surrendered at a time:)

thesafesurfer
thesafesurfer
4 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

….posting “extinction” is how studentviro surrenders unconditionally…..

thesafesurfer
thesafesurfer
4 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

EXACTLY!

thesafesurfer
thesafesurfer
4 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

….this nutjob claims he is a 70-year old tenured professor who works exclusively with graduate students……studentviro is the cuckoo in the clock……LOL!

santashandler
santashandler
4 years ago
Reply to  thesafesurfer

The “students” are a mix of his fellow mental patients and imaginary friends.

thesafesurfer
thesafesurfer
4 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

…..the guy has been delusional for years…..he says he is seventy……I ask him questions that someone from my generation would know and he always bumbles them…..LOL!

santashandler
santashandler
4 years ago
Reply to  thesafesurfer

What a surprise…..:)

santashandler
santashandler
4 years ago
Reply to  beansandrice

Bingo!

0349 JAT
0349 JAT
4 years ago

He almost made her cry.
She is as dumb as a stump.
She is as sharp as a marble.
Other than that she is completely useless.

beansandrice
beansandrice
4 years ago
Reply to  0349 JAT

Yeah, and hopefully not the first female president. Nauseous thinking about that….

Suresh
Suresh
4 years ago
Reply to  0349 JAT

Agree. If Trump is smart enough , he should pass E.O to ban all terror/crime/illegal/drug linked persons from coming to America and those who advocate for them should lose their assets/citizenship and deported/jailed as terror agents.

Unless this is done there will be never ending cases . And America will become like canada/EU

Like this Left/Liberal Loons Run Country has been turned into ISIS/jihadi base https://tinyurl.com/y74v5327

But corrupt MSM will not talk about it

Ban Islam
Ban Islam
4 years ago

Nice to see this traitorous dingbat get schooled by someone who understands this issue extremely well. Cortez wants to flood America with Mexican drug cartels and ISIS terrorists.

Airhead is exactly right, these bleeding heart Libtards are the useful idiots of fascists. It’s because of fools like her that Europe is overrun with millions of migrant criminals/invaders from the mideast and africa today, don’t let the same happen to the US.

Rick Gouveia
Rick Gouveia
4 years ago
Reply to  Ban Islam

Hillary Clinton protesting in NY to allow child soldiers from Honduras to invade USA; recap: Hillary Clinton’s email to Hume Abedin over Honduras: “I will be sacrificing a chicken in the backyard to Moloch”. Honduras might also be hosting nuclear missiles against the USA.. http://www.theamericanmirror.com/not-going-away-hillary-joins-ny-immigration-protest/?fbclid=IwAR0jRBk2NPH5w2SHRSGvMCpMHeYBKsmO18GgkOCvfW9Tpx7rOxpO7zsffh8

movingwaters
movingwaters
4 years ago
Reply to  Ban Islam

It is already happening in the US. One would have thought that Americans would have chosen to find and partake of real news sites rather than the MSM, and make note of what happened to Europe. But the American sheeple have been brainwashed for many decades to believe it does no good to raise their voices. The Progressive Communist movement in America has been in place for over 100 years infiltrating education, law, entertainment, etc., with their operatives and ideas until they had the power to take over and destroy this country. And the sheeple do nothing.

dad1927
dad1927
4 years ago
Reply to  Ban Islam

comment image 8 MILLION FROM ONE COUNTRY ALONE

Navy_Vet
Navy_Vet
4 years ago

comment image

SeveredSeclusiveIdiom
SeveredSeclusiveIdiom
4 years ago
Reply to  Navy_Vet

Do you speak about Switzerland and the way in which immigrants come to drown in a bowl?
So they have decided to teach them how to swim faster

Very strange story, I guess people in this country have managed to find proper asylum for migrants

French http://www.fdesouche.com/1236567-suisse-des-cours-de-natation-donnes-aux-migrants-pour-eviter-la-noyade

Lilly
Lilly
4 years ago

Long hours job in the office , coping with all of the stressful work load. The promotion and appreciation you always wanted. A family gateway you always desires for. So, you have the possible opportunity to achieve everything and more. An on-line work which give you everything you always wanted. Flexibility to get the job done from anywhere , the salary you always wanted and a precious time which you can dedicate with your loved one , You will able to do everything. Therefore, work in the direction of your dream. An online opportunity which makes achieve all your aspirations. Do the job few hrs regularly and make good income , nearly $28000 a week. This opportunity genuinely excellent. So get set go and explore >>> feeslymph.klammert.de

Jackie Puppet
Jackie Puppet
4 years ago

He also bitchslapped my embarrassment of a Congressman, Chuy Garcia, who replaced Louise Gutierrez. Both are despicable!

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/07/your-comments-are-disgusting-former-border-patrol-chief-tom-homan-explodes-at-hearing-goes-off-on-unhinged-democrat-video/

santashandler
santashandler
4 years ago

Shes going to get “wrecked” like this a lot more, if she decides to continue to play with the adults that are way out of her league. What’s worse, is that this horse faced dolt doesnt even realize how stupid she is. Trump should arrange to have her office relocated to the south pole.

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

Sonny, her league is magnitudes above an uneducated dolt like you.

santashandler
santashandler
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

Man, that is comical. Did you develop these delusions before you were admitted to the mental institution, or after you started taking an experimental drug? Maybe it’s best you just stick to the electro-shock therapy. Usually works best for your low caliber types.

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

See, more schoolboy type remarks that merely show your lack of intelligence and your inability to have a rational discussion.

santashandler
santashandler
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

Rational? Stating that ‘Occasional-Cortex” has any intellect at all, is not rational. In fact, it shows how deluded you are by defending such a despicable person.

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

All humans have an intellect no matter who they are, therefore your statement is moot.
I wasn’t aware I defended anyone.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

Poor little stuey. She HUMILIATES herself, once again. Little one, moot is defined as subject to debate, dispute, or uncertainty. Therefore, his statement is subject to debate … So, instead of HUMILIATING yourself, counter the statement, little one.

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago

So, so controllable. When I want him gone, then I make him gone.. When I want him back to have fun with him I just bring him back. So, so controllable.

Now back on extinction you go my little slave.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

Standard reply from a bigoted racist Nazi scum.
Your racism screams out, condoning slavery.
Nazi scum.

Do you now know the definition of “moot” which you totally misused, little one? Obviously, the degrees that you purchased from K-Mart didn’t include a little vocabulary manual along with it.

Poor little Nazi scum.

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago

Extinction

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

“moot”

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago

Extinction

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

“moot”

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago

Extinction.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

“moot”.

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago

Extinction

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

Says the little girl with an exceedingly low level of education. She’s such a poor little dear.

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago

Extinction

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

“moot”.

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago

Extinction

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

“moot”

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago

Extinction

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

“moot”

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago

Extinction.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

“moot”.

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago

Extinction

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

“moot”

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago

Extinction

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

“moot”

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago

Extinction.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

“moot”.

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago

Extinction

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
4 years ago

Hi Achmed … I think I upvoted all of your replies to stuey in the last 5 days (and I wonder how many will be un-voted by Disqus btw) … frankly I don’t see how you have the patience for someone this deluded. I salute you sir with my ^^^upvotes.

You and yours have an excellent weekend and week ahead!

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

May you have a relaxing and enjoyable weekend. Stuey, the “doctor” that misuses everyday words, not knowing their definition, needs all of the help that he/she/it can get. On this round, since she misused “moot”, after giving her the definition of it, I felt that repetition might aid in her/his/its learning experience.

santashandler
santashandler
4 years ago

But how can she learn ANYTHING, if she is constantly on psych meds, or is on her way to the next electro-shock therapy session?

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

You are correct, santashandler. It’s all wasted effort.

santashandler
santashandler
4 years ago

I guess my ‘second grade’ edumacation observation skills are paying off…….;)

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

You have proven yourself VASTLY superior in education, knowledge and intellect to our little stooey. Keep addressing it, as each time it replies … it HUMILIATES itself … .the poor little thing.

santashandler
santashandler
4 years ago

Thank you, Mohandjob. Though I think you have an edge on me.
And I most certainly will point out stooey’s stupidity, though it will keep me very busy;)

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago

I know the definition of words little one. you need an education.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

Then why do you misuse them all of the time. “moot”. TOO funny. Little stooey is SO much fun to laugh AT, as she HUMILIATES herself time, after time, after time.

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago

Extinction.

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
4 years ago

For the record – and for those keeping stats –

Disqus deleted about 60 upvotes I gave Achmed out of about a hundred.

I have absolutely no doubt something is fishy in Disqus …

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

That’s somewhat curious.

teachersaide
teachersaide
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

I have tried to put in my comments, Sites that give the information that I believe to be true. Other commenters are “GIVE us the site, or you’re a liar.”. Well, in last month DISQUS has refused to permit that information to be made PUBLIC! Those comments with sites given, are “under review”, and NEVER come out of “review”. Just so somebody besides me knows this.

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
4 years ago
Reply to  teachersaide

Yes – it’s fishy isn’t it? …

john tucci
john tucci
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

Hi Dan, tried to reply at “Around the table” Told that I have been banned there, don’t know why?

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
4 years ago
Reply to  john tucci

Wow … everyone’s going paranoid and banning everybody everywhere … I have no idea what gives.

You and yours hang in there. Evil loves to torment the innocent, but it will be vanquished in the end.

God bless.

john tucci
john tucci
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

Well Dan, I don’t mind being banned if I did something wrong BUT it is hard to cop it on the chin when I was banned by mistake when using “manny” as my name because it turned out that there was another “manny” that was causing problems which caused me to be banned, then to make it worse Firebred egged JonathanA on to ban me, that is when I reverted to my original name “johntucci”and Firebred said sorry to me but alas it was too late. The second ban from “around the table” is a mystery. Plenty of other channels to post on, so no big deal, not my loss.

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
4 years ago
Reply to  john tucci

Well that does explain this situation, but it’s also sad that we’re all getting so trigger happy.

I can understand banning troublemakers. Had a troll a few months back – our total repartee was nearly a hundred posts – mostly the troll posting insults – and me defending the turf with my usual attempt at a low energy, simple to understand, relatively tactful, but firm response.

That sort needs to be banned if we want conversation. One would think trolls would understand that at some point they could just agree to disagree, and see if the regulars let it go, but most trolls cannot do that.

Still, regulars everywhere are tiring. I can see and I certainly feel it myself. One of the reasons for my exhaustion is the sheer force of demonic lunacy. I’ve got a troll now I’ve been working for a few days – and all he’s got are insults and egotism – a real loony. Like all trolls, he’s fond of making demands, but he’s short on proof.

Everyone fighting the Left needs to take a deep breath and step back. Cool heads make better fighters than hot ones.

Sorry about being banned.

You and yours have an excellent weekend!

john tucci
john tucci
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

Thank you for your input Dan, and you and yours have a great weekend, I normally do not post much on the weekend, I am in Australia so if you are in the USA, I am one day ahead, cheers.

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
4 years ago
Reply to  john tucci

😉

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

You wouldn’t be referring to stewie, would you Dan Knight? When some blithering idiot’s education level is so low that they do not know the definition of a one syllable word, it’s simply hilarious. “moot”

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
4 years ago

Yes … 😉 He was incensed by my upvoting your responses to his juvenile ‘one word’ strategy. He admits in his posts he uses it to bully his targets.

He only lasted 9 rounds before he blocked me. My psychological profile of him may be amateurish, but it was certainly close enough to have him bouncing off the walls. …

The dirty secret … is that I had to develop these skills to deal with all the bipolar women and OCD men in my life. I think I can count the number of sane people in our family on one hand (okay – I’m an optimist!) … I found them very useful as a pro-bono attorney.

On one hand, I felt bad about playing with him … but on the other hand anyone who hates America as much as he does – he hates God and the 2A, loves Islam, abortion, and open borders – bigots like that need to be worked over.

It’s like the joke about the mule who understands English … the old farmer has to hit him with a 2×4 to get his attention.

You and yours have an excellent weekend Achmed!

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

Thanks for the weekend well wishes, Dan Knight. May the Lord bless and keep you and yours.
I have serious reservations about accepting someone’s claim of holding a doctorate, when their vocabulary is as limited as many that make that claim. Moreover, did you notice how he/she/it butchered syntax? I’ve yet to meet a tenured professor, even in the scientific fields, that could not write. Publish or perish being what it used to be.
I’m not familiar with the English speaking mule joke. Pray tell it in it’s completion.
Again, best to you and yours.

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
4 years ago

😉 … yeah, but it’s a University of Liverpool, phd in environmental contamination, 1977 on top of a BSME, and a BS and MS in environmental sciences degrees in the 70s … That’s the STEM equivalent of a degree in witchcraft …

Not sayin’ they’re real degrees, but if they are real … it ain’t rocket science!

Thank you again Achmed! God bless.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

First, I must inform you how much I enjoyed your repartee with stewey. Although, some of the comments did not fall within the true definition (quick/short). You truly had little stewey humiliating her/him/it self. I was laughing so hard that tears came to my eyes.
Actually, a BSME is a good starting point. If “ME” is followed by “PE” you’re an actual engineer. Without the stamp … You ain’t no engineer. Think about Willy Nye … He FAILED the PE exam three times. Too stupid to be an engineer, he wound up being an expert in global climate. Some times, it just don’t pay to be smart.
Now, get to the good part … The mule joke …
May the Lord bless and keep you and yours.

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
4 years ago

Thank you for the kind words. You’re the 4th person to go out of their way to offer positive feedback on my exchange with this nasty little troll. And I do appreciate it – especially after dealing with a troll.

BSME: Good catch. Once again, you show how sharp you are. Not many of us would have caught that abbreviation at all or understood it’s meaning. (Just b/w us girls, I passed my PE on the first try, but don’t tell anyone. I hate relying on stale laurels.)

I suspect Stewey turned to Env. Sci. either b/c he was not the sharpest tool in the shed, or b/c he had mental issues that attracted him to the Eco-religion … or both.

Thank for the blessings, and the same to you and yours!

teachersaide
teachersaide
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

I’ve had Disqus “hold for review” comments I’ve put on this site, that list the SITES where I found information. They never see the light of day. Invariably, it’s been a view point that the Liberals do not agree with. Facts really make them cranky.

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
4 years ago
Reply to  teachersaide

That’s a fact … 😉

You and yours have an excellent weekend TA!

santashandler
santashandler
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

WTF?

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
4 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

Heck if I know … but it’s been happening for sometime. YOaC explained that they’ve launched an upvote bot to target “fake” upvotes, but that’s beyond my understanding.

But if you upvote a friend often – and with many upvotes – some or all may be erased subject to some arcane algorithm in the Disqus ..

Call it the ghost in the machine.

santashandler
santashandler
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

I’ve noticed upvotes disappear as well, come to think of it. It’s the new socialist plan. Redistribute the upvotes, so that those who don’t deserve it, can have some too.

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
4 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

😉 … Thanks I needed that! …

Give a conservative lemons, and you’ll get lemonade …

santashandler
santashandler
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

Excellent….as always!

Iamstilllearning
Iamstilllearning
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

Yep, something is fishy indeed. I sometimes have to go back several times, to get my up-votes to stick…and sometimes they’ll stick for a time, but when I scroll back down, days later- poof they’re gone again. Especially on certain accounts. Recently, it has been especially bad on Pia’s account and several of our Greek friends’…Firebred and many others have been iffy too. Not sure if I catch all those that aren’t sticking.

Some days it seems as if we’re unwitting participants in a twisted psychological experiment.

We know the “likes” were developed for manipulation via dopamine. I’d be happy as a clam if they did away with the ‘votes’ altogether, but that’ll never happen- as we also know the platforms use them as “transactions”, aka data to be sold as they see fit (and with zero transparency, natch).

Lesson: the gimmicks designed to hook us into giving away our time, attention, thoughts, information- are not for us or our benefit.

I’d like to know how many think tanks/consultants/behavioral scientists/alphabet agencies/corporations are accessing and studying our data, and for what purposes. It’s not just advertising, that much is certain.

Anyway…how ’bout that Cortez knucklehead- the one sans cortex? That’s what we’re supposed to be chatting about, right? 😉

Hope you’re having a good week, Dan. Btw- great job translating the ding-a-ling…can’t recall his name. Outstanding patience you have. And a great sense of humor, to boot. 🙂

brazos
brazos
4 years ago

I am having the same problems…

Iamstilllearning
Iamstilllearning
4 years ago
Reply to  brazos

Muy interesante…

Why am I not surprised? 😉

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
4 years ago

Great points/questions … and thank you for the kind words … much appreciated.

Who is data mining us … the data miners are Legion … and yet not many at all … if you get my drift.

The S&M Tech companies sell our data, but they also ruthlessly control access to our data.

If you think about it, those with access to our data are almost certainly not those we would authorize to access our data if we had a choice.

Advertisers excepted – as much as we complain about advertisers, we do use their products. My beef with advertising is when I get ads from Left-wing Mega-corps, but I don’t get ads from small, patriotic businesses I do use.

You and yours have a wonderful weekend Iam!

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
4 years ago

Thank you – we’ve had a great weekend – and I hope you and yours enjoyed your weekend too.

I just figured – if you had the patience to put up with “it” – ^^^upvoting you was the least I could do … ;-))

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

Thank you. Weekend wasn’t exactly a “good time was had by all” one. Just some maintenance issue. I hate it when that happens.

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
4 years ago

Hope the next week goes better!

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

Thanks, but it’s starting out the same as the week past ended.

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
4 years ago

Sorry to hear that ;-( …

Will put you on the prayer list …

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

It’s no big deal, Dan Knight. Just some maintenance issues at some properties. I’m so lazy that snaking a vanity sink drain seems like a “task”. I love hard work. Why, I can spend all day watching people work hard.

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
4 years ago

;-))

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

Wow, you must feel for the first time in your life you have accomplished something. how brave of you.

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

Projection stuey … you’re telling us you feel you have not done anything with your life – that you feel insignificant …

It’s because you’re on the wrong side. Leftism is a Hate-based ideology. Everything else is just a sugar coating. Get over it, and switch sides. You’ll feel better. You’ll have self-respect. And you won’t need social media confirmation to satisfy your urgent desire to accomplish something.

God love ‘ya.

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

Nah! You are 100% wrong. I have achieved plenty in my life, more than you I’m guessing.
Absolutely no projection going on here. However, it appears from your funny little attempt at psychological analysis you neither understand nor comprehend your own prattle.
As for self respect,of which I have plenty, if I joined you it would all go.
Have a great day, I will.

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

Stu, please… you’re making me laugh … ;-))

Nah! You are 100% wrong.

Translation: I’m right. I’ve hit a bullseye.

I have achieved plenty in my life,

Translation: You’re insecure. You’re uncertain if you have.

more than you I’m guessing.

Translation: It’s a very sensitive point. Likely due to your childhood. And you’re still immature – no matter your age.

Free hint: Mature people are not worried about doing more than others unless they are in a direct and fair competition. e.g. An athlete making an assessment of his competitors.

This is true in real life, but it’s even more important in an on-line forum where the only true competition is based on facts and results.

Absolutely
no projection going on here.

Translation: Hopeless denial.

Free hint: If it’s not applicable, you should drop it.

Free concession: My first post was a guess.

Unfortunately, you’ve confirmed that my guess was right.

However, it appears from your funny little
attempt at psychological analysis you neither understand nor comprehend
your own prattle.

Too many syllables Stu. It betrays conceit.

As for self respect,of which I have plenty,

Translation: Not. I’d bet you’re seriously hurting because …

you have not yet had an opportunity to accept responsibility for your faults, stop blaming yourself for what’s not your fault, and learned the wisdom to know the difference.

if I joined you it would all go.

Nonsense. Joining the good guys will give you benefits you cannot buy and rewards greater than fame or fortune.

One of the things you will earn by being a good guy is self-respect.

Have a great day, I will.

Thank you Stu, you too. God love ‘ya

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

Translation of all your last post. The ramblings of a fool that are not worth reading.
God loves no one for it does not exist.

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

Hi Stu,

Translation of all your last post. The ramblings of a fool that are not worth reading.

Why so uptight? ;-)) You’re wound so tight, Stu, you could run a cable car by just unwinding.

God loves no one for it does not exist.

God loves you anyway.

Have a great week, Stu!

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

You really must enjoy being wrong, you do it so often.
I’m more relaxed than you can ever imagine.
Also, it is impossible to be loved by something that does not exist.
I don’t need a fantasy super deity to have a good life.

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

Hi Stu,

You really must enjoy being wrong, you do it so often.

😉 This says more about you than me.

I’m more relaxed than you can ever imagine.

Then let it go. If you were relaxed, Stu, you’d let it go. But you’re telegraphing your insecurities and psychological drama all over this thread.

Also, it is impossible to be loved by something that does not exist.

Sure … everything came from nothing. That takes a lot of faith, Stu.

I don’t need a fantasy super deity to have a good life.

More psychological issues: In this case, selfishness and self-centered.

Translation: You don’t want to be accountable for how you spend your life. You don’t want to have an duties to those who made your life possible. You don’t want any responsibilities to those who will be affected by your decisions.

Have a great week, Stu. And God loves ‘ya, or He would not have created ‘ya.

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

More amateur psychological mumbo jumbo. Nothing but garbage.

You say, “You don’t want to be accountable for how you spend your life. You don’t want to have an duties to those who made your life possible. You don’t want any responsibilities to those who will be affected by your decisions.”

1) Knowing there is no such thing as some fantasy super deity has nothing to do with how one spends ones life.
You religious types are all the same thinking you are the only ones who have a moral code to live by. What you fail to grasp is, if you look at sociological history you will find, your religion was born out of a moral code not a moral code out of religion.

2) You say “You don’t want to have an duties to those who made your life possible.”
Those who made my life possible were my parents. They were able to do that because of evolution for which there is a mountain of verifiable evidence. That does not take what you term faith to understand for the facts are right there.
For you there is not one single solitary piece of verifiable evidence that your supposed super deity, or any other super deity does, or ever did exist. Through all the 1000’s of years people have been relying on some sort of phantom super deity, no matter what form it takes, none of it has ever been positively, verifiably shown to exist.
I will take solid verifiable facts any day over the vague hope that some super duper being is responsible for everything.

3) You say’ ” You don’t want any responsibilities to those who will be affected by your decisions.”
What has taking responsibility for those around you got to do with believing in some fairy tale? I have always taken responsibility for those around me, as much as you have, if not more, and the evidence is there to prove it. You need a false reason to take responsibility for your actions i.e., you don’t want to suffer retribution from some super deity, which would indicate if that belief was proven false, which it is, there would be no other reason for you to take responsibility. You would feel free to run rampant over everyone.
I don’t need that reason. I do it because it is the correct thing to do, nothing more.

You appear to think you are so clever with your pseudo psychological babble, which incidentally is a load of made up twaddle, which anyone who has any training in the area will tell you. You also appear to get some sort of perverted satisfaction out of, what you believes is, goading me with your religious ranting. Your exception of my reaction is totally false. It also shows that you have a double standard in your life. You profess, by implication, you follow some sort of moral code laid out by your super deity, yet you have no problem breaking that code if you feel (falsely) you can make someone you disagree with uncomfortable. That is hypocrisy at its best and further supports the fact that no such entity exists, for if it truly did exist you would not be a hypocrite but would live in fear of the consequences of your actions as meted out by your fantasy god.

you are the one with the psychological problems, not me.

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

Hi Stu,

you are the one with the psychological problems, not me.

😉 LOL.

You appear to think you are so clever with your pseudo psychological babble, which incidentally is a load of made up twaddle, which anyone who has any training in the area will tell you.

If I was wrong, you would not be so upset. 😉

You also appear to get some sort of perverted satisfaction out of, what you believes is, goading me with your religious ranting.

I didn’t goad you. I just said ‘God love ‘ya.’

It’s an expression like ‘Merry Christmas.’ … It’s your psychological insecurities, which continue to be developed in this latest post that have created our conversation.

And I’m not really “trying” anything. I’m mainly writing for my friends who read me – many of whom are unbelievers themselves. This sows seeds of calm, clear thinking, and promote rational thought. I’m not too concerned about your ‘religion.’ I cannot change it, and it’s up to you.

Your exception of my reaction is totally false. It also shows that you have a double standard in your life. You profess, by implication, you follow some sort of moral code laid out by your super deity, yet you have no problem breaking that code if you feel (falsely) you can make someone you disagree with uncomfortable.

Hmmm … that’s a load.

Well, first Stu, I don’t know what your reaction is. I am reacting to your posts – not to you or necessarily to your beliefs. That I am reacting to you – and will continue – has more to do with the fact that I’m retired, and I enjoy posting on Disqus while watching TV with my brother who has Downs in the evenings after supper.

Moral code: The moral code of the West comes from the Bible. This is a historical fact, and it is separate and independent of whether the God of the Bible is ‘real’ or ‘true.’

Breaking the code: While it is true that the God of the Bible insists upon His followers obeying his moral code, it is also true that the God of the Bible knows that no one can follow the entire code all of the time. This is why the Biblical code also has built-in mechanisms for repentance, atonement, restitution, and reparation – plus the advanced ‘Salvation’ method for curing the remaining failure to live up to the code.

If you had studied the Bible, you would know this. Btw – not all religions are alike, but this inability of mankind to follow moral codes – especially ‘good’ codes – is fairly common.

By making others feel uncomfortable: This is not in the code. On the contrary, my Super Deity of choice is Jesus: And Jesus did not worry about making anyone ‘uncomfortable.’ Jesus told us to warn others of the dangers of sin, to proclaim the Gospel, and to stand for the truth without regard to the applause of others.

If anything, I would be at fault for NOT getting into this. But I’m avoiding it because I don’t think I can help you.

Bonus: The ‘uncomfortable’ measure is a snowflake standard. If someone is supporting or defending something immoral or wrong, they should be made ‘uncomfortable.’ Cops do this as a matter of routine. Lawyers do it too. I’m also old enough to remember when psychologists and psychiatrists were also expected to do it in order to help their patients.

That is hypocrisy at its best

Bonus round two: After insulting me in your prior posts, I believe you’re the one who has earned the mantle of ‘hypocrite.’

Your prior attempts to make me feel uncomfortable may not violate your moral code, but they do mean that you cannot claim that I’m violating any ‘code’ by making you feel uncomfortable. By your logic, I could make you uncomfortable simply by insisting that football is better than soccer, and you could insist that soccer is better than football, but only I would be a ‘hypocrite.’ Sorry, but I reject that “logic.”

If I do not seem uncomfortable – it is only because I refused to take offense at your attempts to make me feel uncomfortable. I already understand that you’re just upset, and I do not hold that against you personally. I’m just responding to your comments.

and further supports the fact that no such entity exists, for if it truly did exist you would not be a hypocrite but would live in fear of the consequences of your actions as meted out by your fantasy god.

Even if we assume your discomfort makes me a hypocrite that would not prove that your religion is true. Nor does it make my religion false.

As we just discussed, though, your discomfort is not dispositive proof of my hypocrisy. And your attempts to make me uncomfortable show that you’re upset – and wound too tight.

1) Knowing there is no such thing as some fantasy super deity has nothing to do with how one spends ones life.

One’s beliefs are directly connected to all of the significant life choices one makes.

You religious types are all the same thinking you are the only ones who have a moral code to live by.

That’s a blanket assertion. We religious types often do say that Atheists have no morals or no moral code. In almost all cases though, we do not mean you have no moral code. We mean your code is immoral.

What you fail to grasp is, if you look at sociological history you will find, your religion was born out of a moral code not a moral code out of religion.

The current moral code of the West is a recent development. It has taken almost 2000 years for the code which we have today to become the global standard of behavior – and it is this standard which the entire global, left-wing establishment seeks to overturn.

To claim that any religion predating today’s Western moral code arose out of some ‘moral code’ is a sure sign of anachronistic ‘history.’

As an older fart, I’m well aware of the long-standing attempt to recast pre-history as a paradise of pre-industrial, pre-war, pre-slavery utopia ruled by a matriarchal society with a simple Mother Goddess. This utopia gave way to the patriarchal society with an evil-Father God who demands war and slavery – ruled by toxic masculinity. Then all goodness and light began two hundred years ago as the anti-Western, anti-God, anti-Church, anti-Christians invented everything and solved every problem by chipping away the rotten evil-Father religion – aka Christianity. …

This is as short a summation of your sociological history that I’m willing to sum up. None of this is supported by either anthropological evidence or archeological evidence or history.

Life in pre-historic times was brutal and violent. People were forced to organize to defend themselves from other people. Social groups organized themselves according to their religious beliefs: Particularly their origin stories and their organizational myths. Moral codes came much later. You should have learned this in Comparative anthropology.

This should be obvious to any Phd candidate in any field. Only the deliberate damage to our educational system makes it possible for you not to know this.

2) You say “You don’t want to have an duties to those who made your life possible.” Those who made my life possible were my parents.

Congratulations on knowing the fifth commandment. However, I think most of us would not limit our obligations to just two people.

They were able to do that because of evolution for which there is a mountain of verifiable evidence.

Evolution has nothing to do with your ability to live in any society.

Evolution is a theory of biology, and it is not related to your moral, legal, or ethical obligations to the rest of us.

That does not take what you term faith to understand for the facts are right there.

What does this have to do with your obligations to the society you live in?

As I wrote, you do not want duties or responsibilities to the rest of us that arise from your participation in our society. Likely you want to rewrite those obligations to place all the burdens on me and mine, and heap all of the rewards on you.

For you there is not one single solitary piece of verifiable evidence that your supposed super deity, or any other super deity does, or ever did exist. Through all the 1000’s of years people have been relying on some sort of phantom super deity, no matter what form it takes, none of it has ever been positively, verifiably shown to exist. I will take solid verifiable facts any day over the vague hope that some super duper being is responsible for everything.

This is “your” opinion. Albeit, it is not yours. It’s just something you have been taught.

It’s also not relevant to our discussion, which is really about why it’s so important to you to try and make me uncomfortable – and why my reaction – which amounts to nothing more than teasing – continues to upset you.

3) You say’ ” You don’t want any responsibilities to those who will be affected by your decisions.” What has taking responsibility for those around you got to do with believing in some fairy tale?

My comment arose from your assertion that you can have a “good life” without my God.

This always comes from Atheists who refuse to accept the other side of the bargain.

At common law – the English codification of Western Christian principles – all duties arise as a consequence of rewards in a transaction. For example: You have a duty to your employer. All responsibilities arise as a consequence of a status. For example: You have a responsibility to your children.

If you do not want to accept your duties or responsibilities, but you want the rewards that go with your interactions, your transactions, or your relationships, you are a selfish and self-centered person.

Mere unbelievers – doubters – understand this. They also understand that the organization of these obligations in the West is no accident: It is a deliberate construction of a Christian society. As such they respect others, their nation, and their culture. Even if they disagree with some aspects.

They do not start a long series of posts to offend someone who merely wished them well in the name of God. 😉

Atheists, on the other hand, do want to change society and upset the series of obligations that have been constructed at great cost in lives for their own temporary and transient pleasure. They also pay no regard to the future generations which must live with the consequences of what they have so thoughtlessly and carelessly discarded.

You claimed you have a ‘good’ life. Yet it’s obvious something is bothering you. Assuming you’re not crazy, and I’m not ruling that out – you’re an extremely upset, uptight, high-strung individual who has trouble relating to others. You’re insecure. You’re hyper sensitive. And you have so little faith in your faith, you’re disturbed by the religion of others.

If any of that was false, you would have just let my well wishes go.

I have always taken responsibility for those around me

Good for you. What about the rest of us?

, as much as you have,

Gosh, thank you for the back-handed compliment.

if not more, and the evidence is there to prove it.

Maybe there is evidence to prove you have been ‘responsible’ in a limited sense. But you have not offered anything to suggest that you have done even that much.

You need a false reason to take responsibility for your actions i.e., you don’t want to suffer retribution from some super deity, which would indicate if that belief was proven false, which it is, there would be no other reason for you to take responsibility. You would feel free to run rampant over everyone.

Let’s assume that’s true. …

Since you do not believe in God, do you feel free to run rampant over everyone?

Let’s assume you do not …

So 1) you’re making the assumption that I would react differently if I changed my mind about God. Let’s ignore that fact that such a presumption is intolerant and could be intended to make me uncomfortable. I realize you’re upset, and you’re also untrained and unfamiliar with the material. So I’ll let it go.

2) The problem is that many of my readers know better. I know better. Many religious types know better. Even unbelievers know better: David Horowitz – an unbeliever – as written extensively about this problem.

Atheism is a dangerous religion. Like Islam, it gives its followers an almost unlimited license to do anything they want to do. This is not theory: I have personally know victims who escaped the horrors of Atheist death camps in communist countries. I have worked with many Russians who fully understood the consequences of Atheism, and what it has done to their country.

So you’re personal actions and decisions are merely anecdotal evidence. Evidence which in no way justifies your religion.

I don’t need that reason. I do it because it is the correct thing to do, nothing more.

What is the “correct” thing to do? Your whole comment falls apart on the word ‘correct.’ How do you decide what is ‘correct?’ The key word in the question is ‘you.’

You are not qualified to make that decision. Nor do you have the authority to do so. Thank God.

When Atheists start talking about the ‘correct’ thing to do … people die, cities burn, factories rust, and the Rule of Law becomes the Law of the Powerful.

It’s been a pleasure … God love ‘ya Stu.

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

I guess you wasted your time writing this garbage diatribe. After 4 lines I quit reading. your writing is just the ramblings of a tortured demented mind.

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

Hi Stu,

I guess you wasted your time writing this

Hardly. I’ve already had three compliments on my responses. Not counting any of those who have so kindly upvoted my posts.

You see. Unlike you. I am not so wrapped up in myself that everything I write is about me.

Admittedly, I do self-reference a lot, but experience is a better measure of reality than ‘studies have shown.’ It’s also more reliable than

garbage diatribe.

There you go again trying to make me feel uncomfortable.

tsk, tsk, tsk.

After 4
lines I quit reading.

And yet … here you are.

Stu, I’m living rent free in your head.

And you’re “stu-ing” in your own juices. Sorry for the groan-er.

The proof is that you came back four hours later, which we will get to later.

your writing is just the ramblings of a tortured
demented mind.

Projection Stu …

God love ‘ya ;-))

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

Don’t flatter yourself, I did not say it was garbage to make you uncomfortable. I said it was garbage because it was garbage.

You say “Unlike you. I am not so wrapped up in myself that everything I write is about me.”
Then you tell me ” I’ve already had three compliments on my responses. Not counting any of those who have so kindly upvoted my posts.”

What a hypocrite you are.

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

Hi Stu,

Don’t flatter yourself, I did not say it was garbage to make you uncomfortable. I said it was garbage because it was garbage.

Projection Stu. I don’t call you’re posts garbage.

Technically garbage is what we throw down the garbage disposal.

I know what your posts are, but I don’t want you to feel uncomfortable.

You say “Unlike you. I am not so wrapped up in myself that everything I write is about me.”

That’s correct.

Then you tell me ” I’ve already had three compliments on my responses.Not counting any of those who have so kindly upvoted my posts.”

Yes. I know you have a PhD …

But the response shows that the others I care about appreciate my attempt to help you.

I care about them more than I care about you, but I do care about you too. If I don’t say any more than that, it’s only because you’re too psychologically insecure to be teachable.

What a hypocrite you are.

Projection Stu.

The problem with calling me a ‘hypocrite’ can be analyzed by assuming it’s true.

Even if it was true Stu, you’re still upset, you’re wound too tight, and you’re insecure. And you’re still blowing up my inbox…. And…

You’re on your 8th response. I’ve learned a lot about you. You’re an elderly person who has spent your time on Earth spreading misinformation and disinformation to poorly educated victims. You’re suffering from a serious psychological disorder, and you have an inflated ego that far exceeds your area of competence.

But you’ve learned nothing about me.

You don’t learn about others because you don’t care about others.

And, as I pointed out earlier, you don’t want to be held accountable for what you’ve done or haven’t done. You don’t want to accept your duty to those to whom you owe your life. And you don’t want any responsibilities for those affected by your decisions.

This what we peons (me and my readers) are learning from your insults and your bombastic posts.

Whatever you have accomplished on Earth will be of less than no consequence because you have squandered your opportunities to advance our community with your time, talent, and treasure, and have chosen instead to waste it by attacking the central organizing principles of our culture. In other words, rather than laying down your life to preserve and restore our civilization, you have spent your time burning it to the ground.

Now you’re approaching the close of your life … and you have no positive and affirmative accomplishments to show for your efforts. Just a history of misinforming the gullible who have gone forth and sewn more disinformation and confusion.

Have I got that about right? 😉

God love ‘ya, Stu

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

Garbage talk from a big headed uneducated hypocrite. BLOCKED

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

Hi Stu,

“Blocked” … 😉

If you can’t take the heat, get out of the kitchen.

Garbage talk from a big headed uneducated hypocrite. BLOCKED

Translation: Thank you, Stu, for endorsing my entire post as a true, accurate, and exact analysis of your posts.

As it happens, your posts reveal far more than what I suggest here.

You’re a bully. You rely on aggression and insults to demean and attack people who resisting your violent Leftist ideology.

Honestly, I’m sad to see you go. Haven’t had a mouse as good as you for a long time.

I will pray for your conversion and for the safety of your family. It must be very hard to be related to an angry, hate-filled, bigoted person like you.

If you ever unblock me, we can continue your analysis. You need it.

God love ‘ya Stu.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

“Honestly, I’m sad to see you go. Haven’t had a mouse as good as you for a long time.”
TOO funny!

BBQman
BBQman
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

How come you get all the good trolls……ain’t fair!

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
4 years ago
Reply to  BBQman

Just lucky I guess … 😉

Of course – you have some real loonies too. Especially on AGW. Your CO2 religious trolls suffer from a such a deep and profound Dunning-Kruger effect … it should be classified as a Personality Disorder.

I don’t know how you put up with some of them. I would so lose my cool.

You and yours have a well smoked, tender, and delicious week ahead!

BBQman
BBQman
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

Ha ha, trolls are like unruly kids, just have to have patience with the little darlings!!

Same to your clan Dan Knight, have a great week!!!comment image

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
4 years ago
Reply to  BBQman

Thanks … I’m stealing that meme btw … ;-))

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

You say “If I was wrong, you would not be so upset”
What evidence do you have I am upset? Answer none for I am not upset. People like you who make up explanations out of nothing never upset me.

You say “I didn’t goad you. I just said ‘God love ‘ya.’

It’s an expression like ‘Merry Christmas.’ … It’s your psychological insecurities, which continue to be developed in this latest post that have created our conversation”

What psychological insecurities are these? Be sure to state specifically and show the criteria you use for the diagnosis as laid out in DSM 5 or ICD 11, your choice.

You say “Well, first Stu, I don’t know what your reaction is. I am reacting to your posts”
Well that shows you are either a liar or you cannot remember what you wrote a few lines ago.

You stated “If I was wrong, you would not be so upset”. Being upset is a reaction. You did not say something like “I think you are upset”, you made a definitive statement “you would not be so upset.

Now explain how you are able to state my reaction while at the same time state you don’t know my reaction? What are you, a liar, have major short term memory problems or just someone who rants with no thought at what they write?

As for you being retired, yes I believe you probably are. I however, am in my eighth decade, still work full time (60 hours at least per week) in an excellent position (out of choice not necessity) and also run my own company. I don’t lie around like an old couch potato spending all day on a website.

Now your short summation of sociological history is probably the biggest load of made up garbage imaginable. Where do you get such weird ideas? There is absolutely no doubt in my mind you know nothing about sociology or the development of moral codes. You just make up garbage. However, I will give you a pass because, as the research shows, if you are a couch potato then your cognitive skills decline faster than those of someone who actively uses their brain and stays active.

In your next little diatribe you again show your ignorance with your comical description of evolution. Evolution is NOT a theory of biology, it is a theory of how things change over time and it can be seen in countless different areas of which biology is just one.

You state “Life in pre-historic times was brutal and violent. People were forced to organize to defend themselves from other people. Social groups organized themselves according to their religious beliefs: Particularly their origin stories and their organizational myths. Moral codes came much later. You should have learned this in Comparative anthropology.

This should be obvious to any Phd candidate in any field. Only the deliberate damage to our educational system makes it possible for you not to know this.”

Again you show your ignorance and you just make up assumptions based on zero information.

I received my PhD in the 1970’s. I have had many PhD candidates through my hands over the years and not a single one would believe the tripe you spout.

My advise to you is stop being a couch potato, stop making up things you know nothing about and go and actually get an education instead of pretending you actually have one.

PS my name is not Stu.

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

Hi Stu,

What evidence do you have I am upset?

Seven irate responses. Insults. Ad homs. All started to one comment that was not addressed to you. Most of your comments are focused on your religious bias. …

Triggered by my wishing you well. tut, tut, tut …

Answer none for I am not upset.

And for another reason posts like this. If you were not upset, you would let it go … but you cannot let it go because you are upset.

And you’re wound too tight.

People like you who make up explanations out of nothing never upset me.

And stuff like this. Who are ‘people like you?’ … Who is this mysterious group that bothers you? …

If “people like you who make up explanations out of nothing” never upset you … why do I keep finding you in my inbox??? ;-))) LOL.

You’re just responding to ‘Dan Knight’ – an anonymous handle – anonymous to protect my friends and colleagues from wicked, lying, dangerous, and violent Leftists … .

You say ” … It’s your psychological insecurities, which continue to be developed in this latest post thathave created our conversation” What psychological insecurities are these?

Psychological insecurities that …

1. Force you to troll people on and on and on …

2. Upset you when someone says, “God love ‘ya” …
3. Cause you to need insults and ad homs to bolster your confidence …
4. Create the conceit to think you know more than others …
5. Create the arrogance to think your paperwork gives you any authority … with people you’re insulting …
6. And this is a doozy … you think your entitled to make others uncomfortable … and not take any flak …

All of these are symptoms. As for a diagnosis, that would obviously require testing to identify indications and contraindications.

Be sure to state specifically and show the criteria you use for the diagnosis as laid out in DSM 5 or ICD 11, your choice.

Not required. Psychological insecurities can be identified, and have been as I just pointed out without a diagnosis.

I would also point out that there is no requirement that I diagnose you just because I see a particular set of symptoms point to psychological insecurities.

This is more than just gamesmanship. If a client walked into my office with your symptoms, I would either a) insist on testing or b) find a way to avoid testing depending on the case and circumstances. How would I justify that? I would base it on symptoms. … And if I jumped to a snap diagnosis, someone would ask where the heck I got my degree as a shrink.

So this shows how unfamiliar you are with professional procedure. Not to mention ethics.

You say “Well, first Stu, I don’t know what your reaction is. I am reacting to your posts”

Yes exactly. I am only reacting to your posts.

Well that shows you are either a liar or you cannot remember what you wrote a few lines ago.

Again with the insults and another attempt to make me feel uncomfortable.

You stated “If I was wrong, you would not be so upset”. Being upset is a reaction. You did not say something like “I think you are upset”, you made a definitive statement “you would not be so upset.

Quibbling and nitpicking is a sign of being upset. Even if you were right on this point, you’re insecurities are showing.

Why are you so determined to be right – on this particular issue?

Answer: Because you’re upset and either you’re not thinking clearly about your writing or you’re expressing your insecurities or both.

As it happens, for my readers, I will explain the difference … since you as a PhD cannot see it. Even though a child can.

Yes, I can see you’re upset because I can read your post. But I have I no idea why you’re upset.

I don’t know if you’re just neurotic, or you’re having a bad hair day, or if you’re suffering from OCPD, Bipolar, Borderline or some other serious personality disorder.

I don’t have a CCTV trained on you, and I don’t have a psych profile or a home study … so I do not know your reaction to my posts.

Attempting to make a point by distinguishing between my reaction to your posts by claiming that your post is a reaction is to suggest …

that your post is the sum total and complete whole of your reaction. Which it is not. Certainly if it was, you would be a very narrow and incomplete person indeed

Now explain how you are able to state my reaction while at the same time state you don’t know my reaction? What are you, a liar, have major short term memory problems or just someone who rants with no thought at what they write?

I think I just addressed this diatribe to a sufficient extent for a social media post.

As for you being retired, yes I believe you probably are. I however, am in my eighth decade, still work full time (60 hours at least per week) in an excellent position (out of choice not necessity) and also run my own company.

More insecurity … with a dash of one-upmanship … which is soooo

what’s the word … oh, yeah … immature.

Good for you, Stu. I’m glad you find joy in your work and your business, and I’m not disrespecting that. But …

It’s irrelevant to me. Maybe you’re the one trying to convince me that you have a ‘good life,’ but I have found that most people with a ‘good life’ …

1. Do not have to use it to lambast others on social media … and
2. They do not list work, positions, business, or other material accomplishments to make their point …
3. They list their immaterial accomplishments first, and count their material accomplishments as secondary blessings or mere luck.

I don’t lie around like an old couch potato spending all day on a website.

Another insult and another attempt to make me feel uncomfortable.

For someone with a ‘good life,’ who is not ‘upset,’ or wound too tight …

You sure spend a lot of time blowing up my inbox!!! ;-)))

Ha, ha, ha, ha …

Now your short summation of sociological history is probably the biggest load of made up garbage imaginable. Where do you get such weird ideas?

College. You should try it sometime.

There is absolutely no doubt in my mind you know nothing about sociology

Now there’s a clue … if you can’t do, teach, if you can’t teach, study sociology.

or the development of moral codes. You just make up garbage. … then your cognitive skills decline faster than those of someone who actively uses their brain and stays active.

More insults … 😉

In your next little diatribe you again show your ignorance with your comical description of evolution. Evolution is NOT a theory of biology, it is a theory of how things change over time and it can be seen in countless different areas of which biology is just one.

Wow … That’s a keeper.

You had better tell the biologists. They’re obviously misinformed, and are in need of this wisdom.

So tell me, how does evolution work outside the biological realm? I’m curious.

You state “Life in pre-historic times was brutal and violent. … Only the deliberate damage to our educational system makes it possible for you not to know this.”

That’s what I said …

Again you show your ignorance and you just make up assumptions based on zero information.

Translation: I summarized mankind’s pre-history, history, and the history of the Left in 49 words, and managed to come so close to the truth of the matter that you cannot stand it.

To reprise for my readers: You asserted that religion arose out of moral codes. Ostensibly to refute the notion that our current moral code arose out of the West’s religious tradition … i.e. Christianity.

First, our current moral code is a recent development that arose from Christianity, and it’s application and principles embodied in our institutions have taken centuries to develop.

Second, religious activity began long before any kind of ‘code’ could have existed in the ancient world.

Third, the attempt to reverse this view is a political agenda arising from Leftist ideologies that arose to resist Christianity and reverse the moral progress of the West. It’s most successful incarnation began with the ‘Mother Goddess’ craze back in the 60s.

Fourth, the damage to the education system done by the Left has successfully disinformed many Westerners who no longer understand the long and difficult history and pre-history that led to their present success.

I received my PhD in the 1970’s.

You keep repeating this as if its significant. Who cares?

I have had many PhD candidates through
my hands over the years

So you’ve had no experience in real life. No experience in working with others. No multi-disciplinary experience. And no experience in getting anything done. You’ve revealed much more in this slip, but I’ll leave it at that.

and not a single one would believe the tripe you spout.

Proving my point. You’re teaching unqualified students who were disinformed by a damaged education system.

And no doubt you wonder why real people make fun of eggheads …

A PhD is what one gets when one studies more and more about less and less until one knows everything about nothing at all … 😉

My advise to you is stop being a couch potato, stop making up things you know nothing about and go and actually get an education instead of pretending you actually have one.

Three insults, but I have to respond to the projection.

It’s obvious you don’t know anything about biology, law, archeology, anthropology, or religion.

Evolution is a biological theory.

Our morals are codified in our law. It has a history, which apparently you think you can ignore.

Archeology has found religious activity going back thousands of years.

Anthropology has investigated hundreds of indigenous and unspoiled cultures. None of which have anything like a “code” oral or otherwise … much less any concepts of ‘morality’ … and …

No doubt you’re unfamiliar with the recent, dynamic shifts in ethics over the last 50 years.

Sheesh, Stu … are you working in a cube? Does your office have a window? Just asking.

For someone who is so busy, and has such a ‘good life’ … you’re sure wasting a lot of time in my inbox. 😉

PS my name is not Stu.

No offense intended Stu. It’s just the first three letters of your handle. Do you have another preference?

P.S. I’d bet you’re OCD … and angry. If you weren’t angry, you’d not be so worked up by my teasing you.

P.P.S. … God love ‘ya, Stu!!! ;-))

eassa
eassa
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

Excellent!

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
4 years ago
Reply to  eassa

Thank you!

santashandler
santashandler
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

Dan, God bless you for trying to show the light to a mental patient. Hes simply just too far gone. The orderlies at the institution have left him hooked up to the electro shock therapy device a little too long, each session and the mess we see here on this forum, is a direct result of that.

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
4 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

Thank you.

It’s not for him … I may be Christian, but I’m not going to cast out any of his demons … LOL.

Besides Achmed has him covered. Achmed’s way more qualified than I to help him … 😉

Just trying to be nice for the sake of our other readers.

You and yours have an excellent week, and God bless you all too!

santashandler
santashandler
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

Thanks, Dan. You have a great week as well. It would be too much work to cast all of them out.

And yes, Achmed is more qulified than I as well 🙂

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

Says the little one, stuey, with the intellect of an aphid and an exceedingly low level of education. We truly must feel pity for poor such a poor little thing.

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago

Extinction.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

“moot”

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago

Extinction.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

“moot”.

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago

Extinction.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

“moot”.

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago

Extinction

santashandler
santashandler
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

Now don’t worry. That kind of extreme repetitiveness is just a side effect of the combination of electro-shock therapy and the new psych meds the orderlies thought it would be fun to try on you. But, you should stay off the keyboard until it wears off, as evidenced by this mess of yours here.

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

Actually, it is nothing of the kind. It is based on scientific behavioral principles and it achieved exactly what it was intended to.

santashandler
santashandler
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

????????????????Now, is that what the orderlies told you to say, under the threat of removing your recreation time?

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

No, it is what is learned if you study scientific behavioral principles at the graduate level.
Look up Skinner.
Go get an education.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

“moot”

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago

Extinction.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

“moot”.

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago

Extinction.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

“moot”.

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago

Extinction

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago
Reply to  Studentenviro

“moot”

Studentenviro
Studentenviro
4 years ago

Extinction.

Halal Bacon
Halal Bacon
4 years ago

A bear walks into a bar and asks the bartender for a beer. The bartender says, “Sorry, we don’t give beer to bears in bars.”

The bear replies, “If you don’t give me a beer, I’ll eat that lady over there.”

The bartender says, “Go ahead.”

So the bear eats the lady and asks for a beer. The bartender says, “Sorry, we don’t give beer to bears on drugs.”

“What do mean,” asks the bear. “I’m not on drugs.”

“Yes, you are, that was the bar bitch you ate.”

thinkwell
thinkwell
4 years ago

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was seen recently just outside a 7-11 Quicki-mart crying uncontrollably over the cramped and frozen conditions inside the store’s ICE detention center.

created4el
created4el
4 years ago
Reply to  thinkwell

She must have been completely distraught seeing the little cube-cicles that are even too small for kids to sit on.

Alleged-Comment
Alleged-Comment
4 years ago

This is a DUMB broad that lives in another world. A Barbie doll world that believes Ken waped her.

Underzog
Underzog
4 years ago

I wonder if Occasional Cortex even has the brains to realize that the witness she was questioning smacked her dwon…intellectually, that is.

Underzog
Underzog
4 years ago

p.s. it is necessary to keep in mind when dealing with the Left, that the issue is never the issue. These commies never complained when Obama separated families. They only make up this complzint now because they want to bash POTUS. No complaint of the Left should betaken at face value.

created4el
created4el
4 years ago
Reply to  Underzog

Underzog
“No complaint of the Left should betaken at face value.”

That needs repeating! The RIght seems to keep falling for the Left’s outrage-o-rama… but as you state so aptly… the “thing” is never THE thing…. it’s only a thing when they think they can make the Right look bad with it.

John Acord
John Acord
4 years ago

I guess she spilt coffee on her script.

leonore35
leonore35
4 years ago

Vet=ry often when children are apprehended they are not with their parents but alone. If girls they are very likely to end in sex exploitation. The blame is on their parents not on CBP and ICE

created4el
created4el
4 years ago
Reply to  leonore35

The Left has no problem with girls being sex trafficked… Epstein would certainly welcome her on his island… and customers like Bill Clinton would be first in line to enjoy her. The only time they are outraged about a girl being sexplointed is when they think they can get away with pointing their finger at a Republican for doing something resembling it.

dad1927
dad1927
4 years ago
Reply to  leonore35

The parents sold them to the travelers who hope to resell them into the sex trade

Art~Spectrum
Art~Spectrum
4 years ago

Radical Democrats, honed professionals at baseless SLANDER & malicious ACCUSATION, and inverted false-spun narratives. If not promoting society-damaging policies, they’re mostly useless at solving serious national problems. Though effective at generating them. (Republicans, for their part, good seat-warmers, mostly. Contempt on “Never Trumpers” — NEVER for America! Only their Swamp habitats.)

Too many character assassins, in empty suits and skirts, Democrats who wag hypocritical fingers at honorable men (some), who’ve accomplished more, even at risk to their own lives, than corrupt politicians, who proud-sit on well-guarded high horses of self-righteous delusion. — Fake-indignant “law”-makers, who cheerfully support baby-slayers.

Bravo to Mr. Homan for refusing to tolerate Mr. Garcia’s malign, oblique-delivered personal attack! And shutting ill-informed chimp-monk’s performance-scripted mouth, Ms. Cortez. (Conquistadoress of Socialism?)

Former top-level cop of New York 9/11 era service, said he should have walked out. Better, as Mr. Homan later said, he boldly stood lawful ground, and for his brothers spoke HARD TRUTH to the Nation, while shaming the shameless.

One asked on Fox & Friends: WHAT ABOUT “ANGEL MOM’S” (nothing angelic about what happened to their beloved!) — FOREVER SEPARATED FROM THEIR CHILDREN? Slain by law-breaking, non-citizen illegal intruders! From the hypocrite bankrupt, and utterly corrupt Left — “Who cares!”

No law — anarchy. No border, NO NATION. —— Just Democrat induced abject surrender to Country-destroying INVASION! —— Left-wing Democrats, most of all, the greatest security risk! Enemy within: a real and present danger.

created4el
created4el
4 years ago

Gotta love how AOC tries to make it sound like the illegal aliens are completely innocent of breaking any laws so she can try to state that there is no reason to separate the parents from their children and then Homan just comes in and starts giving multiple examples of law breakers being separated from their children… as a result of the parents actions which is not the fault of law enforcement. But rather than receive that point, she just ignores it as if it was never stated and keeps on trying to sound like she is “right”… of course when you are “morally right” you don’t have to be factually correct.

Maranatha
Maranatha
4 years ago

A House divided…somebody would say.

knightsstrength
knightsstrength
4 years ago
Poppey
Poppey
4 years ago

Pass and read ” The Riot Act “, then shoot on sight.

They think they’re still in Africa, geography is not their strong point ks.

Dorrie - Conservative
Dorrie - Conservative
4 years ago
Reply to  Poppey

THAT should be happening on our border! If it WAS happening, the invasion would stop IMMEDIATELY!!!

knightsstrength
knightsstrength
4 years ago
Reply to  Poppey

Be good to shoot them. They should also deport the families, get rid of them in what ever fashion.

There are other gangs including girls. I wonder if any ties to Islam

dad1927
dad1927
4 years ago

ALL Islamic countries…

dad1927
dad1927
4 years ago

all not true. The cops say so… hahahahahahah…. Who could have known this would happen? In Canada, see something, report something go to jail. Bill M-103 protects them

knightsstrength
knightsstrength
4 years ago

I know what I would love seen to her, but will not say here.

Such a creep, has no respect for the US. Should never been elected into politics

Chris Wolf
Chris Wolf
4 years ago

La Raza is a beggar race.

Name
Name
4 years ago

This what the US now elects to the Congress?

dad1927
dad1927
4 years ago
Reply to  Name

those are liberal districts, or muslim districts

Dorrie - Conservative
Dorrie - Conservative
4 years ago

This kind of asinine ignorance in our government has GOT to be stopped!! She has all the brains of a 5-year old, yet she’s IN OUR GOVERNMENT!! We simply CANNOT continue to allow this to continue!!

191njstatechamp
191njstatechamp
4 years ago

The AOC is an incredibly stupid person..

Dorrie - Conservative
Dorrie - Conservative
4 years ago

AOC= Ass Of Congress

dad1927
dad1927
4 years ago

very expensive liberal education. worthless, of course. Like the end of Rome stupid

Poppey
Poppey
4 years ago

The bartender AOC should go find another car park fence and blub over it.

Pea brained soppy twit.

E. Feldmann
E. Feldmann
4 years ago

It really doesn’t take much to put this toddler in her place. She is a kid playing in an adult world and is unable dialog with intelligent people when she isn’t capable.

dad1927
dad1927
4 years ago
Reply to  E. Feldmann

Omar is helping her compare detention centers to Auschwitz, which she has never even heard about before. Omar in the right environment would be sending AOC to a death camp

dad1927
dad1927
4 years ago

occlusional cortex

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!