What the media call “extremist position” on abortion, is the opinion of 70% of Americans

56

While 6 states have passed very restrictive abortion laws, a poll is destroying what the media would like you to think about the issue.

The latest survey by Harvard University’s Center for American Politics, in collaboration with Harris Interactive, revealed that a majority of American voters believe that abortion should be legal until the first trimester and no more, or only in cases of incest and rape.

Very few believe, as the Democratic Party claims, led by Hillary Clinton, that women should be able to have an abortion in the third trimester or until the time of delivery.

The survey, conducted online in the United States on May 29 and 30, 2019, among 1,295 registered voters, revealed:

Story continues below advertisement
  • 41% of voters believe that abortion should only be allowed in cases of incest and rape.
  • 29% think that abortion should be legal until the first trimester.
  • 17% believe it should be during the second quarter,
  • 8% believe it should be in the third quarter,
  • And only 6% of Americans believe that abortion should be allowed until the moment of birth – this is the official position of the media, which conveys the official position of the Democratic Party.

To the question: should a doctor and a mother be allowed to kill a baby born with deformities or not?

  • A 70% majority responded that the doctor and the mother should not be allowed to kill the baby after birth.

To the question: “Do you think that our current abortion laws are too liberal, too restrictive or simply fair?

  • 29% believe that the current laws are too liberal,
  • 37% believe they are too restrictive and
  • 34% believe that the current laws were fair.

The survey also revealed that most Americans want the Supreme Court to overturn or amend Roe v. Wade*.

  • 20% believe that the Supreme Court should set it aside,
  • 49% think it should change the decision,
  • 31% believe that Roe vs. Wade* should be upheld.

This survey comes at a time when several states have passed pro-life laws in recent weeks that limit abortions to the moment when a heartbeat is detected or at the time of conception, angering pro-abortion Democrats and 2020 presidential candidates.

On the other hand, President Trump has made it clear that he respects life. He is, according to the evangelicals, the most pro-life president they have ever known.

For Democratic activists and journalists, Roe vs. Wade is the red line that is forbidden to cross or the country would plunge into the darkness of fascism and medieval past.

It was in the name of the hysterical protection of Roe vs. Wade that the activists tried to derail the appointment of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, an episode you certainly remember, where a psychologist claimed to have been abused by Kavanaugh thirty years earlier when they were high school students – without being able to provide any evidence or testimony.

The opponents of Roe vs. Wade have two key arguments

  • The first argument is a classic conservative position, namely the harmfulness of the federal state’s involvement in the free decision of the States. They consider the Federal Supreme Court’s decision to be an abuse of State freedom. It deprives States, and therefore the citizens of each state, of the possibility of passing laws contrary to the decision without risking their cancelation.
  • The second argument, which stems from the first, is that if Roe vs. Wade were canceled, it would not prevent each state – California, New York State, New Jersey, Washington, to name only the most left-leaning ones as an example – from passing laws that resemble Roe vs. Wade, while others would pass laws that conform to the wishes of citizens – a democratic measure the leftists violently reject.

It is the reason why six States have just passed very tough laws that defy Roe vs. Wade: with 2 Conservative Supreme Court judges appointed by President Trump, which changes the balance of High Court, they hope that someone will file a complaint against the new laws, that the case will go all the way up to the Supreme Court, and that it will make a decision that will overturn Roe vs. Wade.

I might as well tell you that this is the media nightmare, the Democratic activists frightening bad dream. If such an event occurs, it will be a social earthquake. It will shake the strongest foundations of the American progressive left.

I would not be surprised if violence, triggered by the usual good humanists, would follow such a decision, as well as physical threats against Supreme Court judges and their families, and I am convinced that the judges know it, and that it represents a formidable pressure that will push them either to refuse to take such cases, or to vote for the continuation of Roe vs. Wade.

In other words, no media will mention the existence of this new important survey by a left-wing university, in the middle of a period of very harsh anti-abortion laws in Alabama, Georgia, and other states.

To avoid such tidal waves, wonderful France, nation of Human Rights, has outright passed a law banning to talk about these subjects. With respect for fundamental freedoms, of course.

 

*For once, Wikipedia gives a good definition of the judgment:

Roe v. Wade, 1973, was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides a fundamental “right to privacy” that protects a pregnant woman’s liberty to choose whether or not to have an abortion.

However, it ruled that this right is not absolute, and must be balanced against the government’s interests in protecting women’s health and protecting prenatal life.

The Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of abortion to the three trimesters of pregnancy:

  1. During the first trimester, governments could not prohibit abortions at all
  2. During the second trimester, governments could require reasonable health regulations
  3. During the third trimester, abortions could be prohibited entirely so long as the laws contained exceptions for cases when they were necessary to save the life or health of the mother.

Because the Court classified the right to choose to have an abortion as “fundamental”, the decision required courts to evaluate challenged abortion laws under the “strict scrutiny” standard, the highest level of judicial review in the United States.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
56 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Anaksuper Nuakal
Anaksuper Nuakal
4 years ago

Can someone tell him that my vegan friends DO NOT eat eggs because they’re somebody’s kidscomment image
Source: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1005037019886803&set=p.1005037019886803&type=3&theater

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
4 years ago

Hypocrisy is normal
– if people reject logic

Nabi Rasch
Nabi Rasch
4 years ago

Huh? What’s your point?

Anaksuper Nuakal
Anaksuper Nuakal
4 years ago
Reply to  Nabi Rasch

Can’t you get it? It’s not that really hard. The very reason that liberals use to justify abortion as you can see here, is not…reasonable. When they are trying to tell us that egg is not a chicken, they don’t realize that these vegans with their own strict rules won’t eat eggs no matter what, because they think the egg contains living thing or it’s living thing itself. You see, it’s LIVING THING like the one/s inside woman’s belly. And I do believe with them, but I don’t mind eating eggs as well as eating any meat (except human’s of course) especially pork, because I’m not vegan.

Nabi Rasch
Nabi Rasch
4 years ago

Yeah, I missed it because chicken eggs generally aren’t fertilised anyway.

Anaksuper Nuakal
Anaksuper Nuakal
4 years ago
Reply to  Nabi Rasch

The eggs are not fertilized but they’re obviously not some kind of feces comes from excretion process. And I believe those chicks are coming out from the eggs. I never saw those chicks coming out from humans even though they eat eggs. And if the eggs aren’t fertilized then how can they compare these chicken eggs with human’s egg? It’s like suggesting that apple and banana are the same things.

Nabi Rasch
Nabi Rasch
4 years ago

Happy to confess I never thought about it like you do.

Anaksuper Nuakal
Anaksuper Nuakal
4 years ago
Reply to  Nabi Rasch

You mean, with your so-called knowledge, you never thought those chicks coming out from the eggs and you’re happy about it? Oh okay.

Anaksuper Nuakal
Anaksuper Nuakal
4 years ago
Reply to  Nabi Rasch

I don’t mean to deny your biology knowledge. If you need some acknowledgement on your biology knowledge then I will admit it that you really know something about biology. But please can you give your biology lesson in somewhere else? I have link up there and you can go there, you know. In here you would distract my point. Should people value the existence of chicken eggs whether they’re fertilized or not, they should give higher value on human egg. This what these liberals ignore just to justify their idea on supporting abortion, and thus all their excuses are not reasonable. And what your knowledge did in reaching my point? I’m afraid they did nothing, they didn’t even make you see my point. But I still have hope, though, that you can see my point. But not so high.

Nabi Rasch
Nabi Rasch
4 years ago

Geez, you’re insanely touchy. Don’t mind staying clear at all.

Anaksuper Nuakal
Anaksuper Nuakal
4 years ago
Reply to  Nabi Rasch

Am I? I hope I’m not being too harsh to you. It’s just what it is, okay. All I’m saying is the truth. I admit it that I feel regret. I regret that your so-called knowledge would help emphasizing my point, but it turned out it didn’t. In fact it only distracted my point. But I think it’s just a common case of common person who wants to be acknowledged by some people around that he has vast knowledge on certain topic. The thing is to face liberals goons you need to put aside your own interest for getting acknowledgement unless you don’t want to bring down these goons.

Nabi Rasch
Nabi Rasch
4 years ago

Okay.

Joe Smith
Joe Smith
4 years ago

Failed meme. Chicken eggs that are not fertilized do not start the process of cell division. A tree seed does have all the necessary chromosomes to start another tree if planted. The silk of a silkworm was not intended by nature to make dresses for us. A human egg that is already fertilized IS a human, undergoing the process of cell division and grow. I guess you never went to biology class and cant even search topics properly.

Anaksuper Nuakal
Anaksuper Nuakal
4 years ago
Reply to  Joe Smith

I didn’t make the meme and I didn’t even posted it, but I guess you’re referring to someone else, right? Go directly to the source if the picture above couldn’t make you see who made or posted the meme in the first place. And by doing that you may as well tell him that eggs are still somebody’s kids.

BRUH
BRUH
4 years ago

LOL ITS LIKE I BEEN SAYING

YALL DONT HATE THEOCRATIC MUSLIMS

YALL ARE JUST JEALOUS OF THEIR THEOCRACIES

disqus_MGDxkELpy4
disqus_MGDxkELpy4
4 years ago

So, abortion is available in every state and a contentious standoff exists with anti abortionists complaining about having to pay for it, having to recognize that the best that they can do is be vocal and press their case…but then the Left begins a new attack and we can see that a child can be born, swaddled as was Jesus and a ‘Conversation” , how civilized, between the Doctor and birth vehicle will ensue and may end up with a legal murder of the child. One bridge too far, the mask of Leftism pulled down to see the grotesque mass murderer underpinning their lust for Power…the response has been swift and brought on by the Left..

felix1999
felix1999
4 years ago

How about this –
My right,
my body and
MY BILL!

How come these rapid abortion loving people don’t want to pay THEIR BILL FOR IT?
I don’t want my tax dollars paying for the murder of babies – little human beings!

Have a heart! Who cares what ethnicity the baby is. Let he or she have the right to life too!comment image?1540393670

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
4 years ago

Yes, they are RABID about free and easy abortion
– this is not about abortion itself
– because most of those who oppose abortion
– have accepted that they cannot completely outlaw it
– but the tyrant Left in insists on a knock down, drag-out fight
– over an issue that is already settled: abortion is legal
– they fight because they just WANT social chaos

Lydia Church
Lydia Church
4 years ago
Reply to  DemocracyRules

Yup.
I’m one of those opposed to abortion.
All the what if’s, what it amounts to is only letting the baby live if the circumstances are perfect… killing an unborn baby for physical deformities is like what the nazi’s used to do, killing humans that they deemed imperfect, or labeled them as subhuman…
It’s also ironic that these people fighting for abortion once were the same size as that unborn baby they are advocating to kill, if that were done to them at that stage, they would not be here to argue for their ‘right’ to murder unborn human life.
It is a sick and depraved society, ready to implode upon itself such as the fall of Rome, that murders its own young.
Their ‘right’ not to become a mother ended when they opened their legs. That is how nature works and it’s as simple as that. Murder is not a ‘right’ because it is convenient, and that’s what 99% of abortions are, murders of convenience!
Thank you for sharing this Pamela, and God bless you!
: )

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
4 years ago
Reply to  Lydia Church

Yes
– Goebbels described the National Socialist plan this way:
– “Our starting point is not the individual: We do not subscribe to the view that one should feed the hungry, give drink to the thirsty, or clothe the naked … Our objectives are different: We must have a healthy people in order to prevail in the world.” ~ Joseph Goebbels
– tyrants like genocide and death because it helps them subjugate
– Lenin liquidated 10% of the Russian population
– this had several ‘benefits’ for the communists
– it got rid of the thought leaders
– who could oppose the communists
– it provided rewards to the liquidators
– [who begged for more to liquidate]
– because liquidators grabbed the victims’ assets
– it temporarily increased wealth, as victim assets
– and land was distributed to the population
– and of course, it made governance easier
– because the opposition was gone
– so for all tyrant socialists, communists, Islamists, Globalists…
– genocide and death is a deliberate thing
– and abortion just reduces
– the number of mouths to feed

Nabi Rasch
Nabi Rasch
4 years ago

Hasn’t anybody heard of the various pills–including the MAP? Must they use abortion as the default choice?

Marc
Marc
4 years ago

It is actually “logical” that the left not only want to abolish
entire states, cultures and nations, but also families, chil-
dren and themselves. This reflects their parasitic ideology,

which only wants to take everything but contribute nothing.

Marc
Marc
4 years ago
Reply to  Marc

Cancer will eat itself, but
with him, all healthy cells.

Marc
Marc
4 years ago
Reply to  Marc

Ideological cancer always uses attrition tac-
tics: It pulls you into its negativism through
which you lose energy you need to survive.

Marc
Marc
4 years ago
Reply to  Marc

If your neighbour among you wants to make you sick or drive you crazy, he only has to go to
his balcony every 10 minutes and smoke stinking cigars. You will be deprived of your oxygen
and the window will be closed. The neighbor above you tramples with his heels so loud that
you wake up from it, you will no longer get rest and your healthy sleep will be robbed of you.

Marc
Marc
4 years ago
Reply to  Marc

Is there a counter-strategy? Of course. Every time you smell the stench, you take a
bucket of cold water, which you pour onto your neighbour’s balcony below you. When
you need your healthy sleep, use earplugs and a vibrating wristwatch to wake you up.

felix1999
felix1999
4 years ago

Do convince me that OBAMA APPOINTED JUDGES support the will of the MAJORITY of the people.
I challenge YOU to convince ME that Obama didn’t PACK THE COURTS with anti-American radical LEFT WINGERS that also HATE America. Go ahead – convince me. BTW you don’t need to ADD SEATS to a court. Obama had a LEFTIST LITMUS TEST that required judges had to conform to Obama’s agenda of HATE of all that is decent to be given a seat.

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
4 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

socialist tyrants ALWAYS hijack the judiciary
– they must, because true justice is their enemy
– since tyrants constantly do criminal acts

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
4 years ago

Abortion is NOT in the Constitution
– because it does not belong in the Constitution
– abortion is not in the Bible either
– the trouble is that even biologists cannot agree upon what life actually is
– and right now it looks like DNA makes a blueprint
– and replicates it like a photocopy machine in offspring
– and sexual reproduction recombines the DNA in new ways
– but the DNA blueprint does not begin or end in the womb
– and that is just a biological theory, a belief
– but science ALWAYS changes
– as knowledge changes
– and it is up to ‘we the people’ to figure this out
– in ways that conforms with political tolerance
– and religious tolerance
————————–
– meanwhile, socialist and Islamist tyrants just like killing people
– because tyrants are psychopaths
– so they like abortion, infanticide, euthanasia,
– human sacrifice, eugenics, genocide, etc.
– it’s what tyrants do
– and therefore, tyrants should have no control over abortion issues
– because they will ALWAYS bargain in bad faith
– “A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic.”
~ Joseph Stalin

felix1999
felix1999
4 years ago
Reply to  DemocracyRules

Abortion doesn’t have to be explicitly stated in the Bible to be wrong.
The very idea of abortion is repugnant to God’s nature.
You can see it is not God’s nature to murder babies or an unborn baby.
I dare say that dismembering a little human being is “offensive” to God under any circumstance.

Matt.18:6
[6] But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.
Mark.9:42
[42] And whosoever shall offend one of these little ones that believe in me, it is better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he were cast into the sea.
Luke.17:2
[2] It were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he cast into the sea, than that he should offend one of these little ones.

Translation to “offending” one is capital punishment.
http://www.urdubible.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/abortion-bible-verses.jpg

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
4 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Felix: yes
– but you see my argument
– abortion issues will be settled by people of compassion and good faith
– and there will be strong disagreements, and a need for tolerance
– but socialist and Islamist tyrants must be excluded from this debate
– because they like death
– Hollywood obsesses on a million movies about murder and death
– because socialist tyrants like those topics

felix1999
felix1999
4 years ago
Reply to  DemocracyRules

I understand where you are coming from and understand that many may not agree with me. Trust me, I am not out to behead others, throw people off roof tops etc. who disagree with me.

People of Christian faith and other faiths have FREE WILL! I don’t believe this is the best way to use it to be pro choice but because of what I also believe, I have to be tolerant of their FREE WILL.. I’m a just a cheer leader for pro life in the issue of abortion. No baby would chose being dismembered like that or chose a mother who would do that. It’s also not their fault on the circumstances upon how they were conceived. I am sad that many people don’t see it that way. Don’t mind me…. We can easily coexist and I am not better than you or anyone else out there. I missed out on being perfect.

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
4 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Well said

Patriotic American
Patriotic American
4 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Even without bringing G-d into the argument, facts are facts:
– While abortion has always had a racist component to it (Margaret Sanger’s infamous “Negro Project,” as one example), in today’s identity politics-fueled race warfare against whites (including Hispanic Schools Chancellor Richard Carranza’s purge of white staffers based on his obsession with “toxic whiteness”), abortion is increasingly being used as a weapon to wipe out the white race by attrition. More whites dying off than being born did not just “happen,” it was MADE to happen.
– Abortion is sexist as well, on top of it: Most abortions are of unborn girls. However, radical feminists now favor killing off nine boys for every 10th being born.
– The birth rate in the U.S. has plummeted to 1.7 children per family – reaching unsustainable levels in terms of continuing our survival. Yet the elites favor countering this by – you guessed it – bringing in more and more Third World illegals, ergo more drugs, human trafficking, etc.
Abortion isn’t merely murder, it is:
– A war on the unborn and on the more vulnerable and helpless in our society
– A war on the family and on parental rights and authority (why else would Dems favor handing out abortion pills to girls under 18 like candy and without a doctor’s prescription other than to circumvent and subvert parental notification laws, and usurp parental rights?)
– A war on religious liberty and on people of faith (Exhibits A and B: Little Sisters of the Poor and Hobby Lobby)
– A war on life itself, and a war on the very culture, sanctity, value and cause of life (the abortion culture considers life very much worthless and of absolutely no value or consequence or meaning or purpose whatsoever)
Abortion isn’t just infanticide, it is also genocide by attrition. As well, like politics, attitudes toward life flow downstream from culture – and the abortion culture’s open disrespect for life has seeped down to young women, to the point where we ended up with Casey Anthony and Jada McClain and Marylinn Feher (and other cases of young mothers murdering their newborns or infants or toddlers).

Dave
Dave
4 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

The Roe v Wade decision was one of a series of bad choices made by the Supreme Court. It gave women a reason to have less control over their sexual desires, and therefore an alternative to a inappropriate adventure. Men are just as responsible! Abortion is not found in the Bible or the Constitution-because God does not condone it and neither should the Court. I welcome the shock of overturning RvW, and a return to higher moral values. I place this decision in the hands of God.

Joe Smith
Joe Smith
4 years ago
Reply to  DemocracyRules

Abortion is mentioned in the Bible, not that it is mentioned in a positive light but it is there. Search the Bible with the term “untimely birth”. Job 3:16, Psalm 58:8, Ecclesiastes 6:3.

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
4 years ago
Reply to  Joe Smith

Thnx!

Keith1941
Keith1941
4 years ago
Reply to  DemocracyRules

Abortion is not in the Constitution and neither is education. This was to left up to the states. Look what has happened to education since Moron Carter gave us the Department of Education…more federal control…more liberal control of what is being taught.

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
4 years ago
Reply to  Keith1941

Keith
– yes, we MUST privatize the schools
– there are many training organizations
– that would willingly bid on running schools
– and since private medical clinics work well
– under close regulation
– so the same thing must be done with schools
– otherwise communists will dominate the schools
– and destroy the country
– because communists have no intention
– of educating or improving the USA
– all predicted by the US National Security Council
– in 1950
– [‘NSC-68’ Cold War planning document, free online]

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
4 years ago
Reply to  DemocracyRules

For Tyrants of all kinds
– educated people are the enemy
– Lenin and Stalin liquidated the top 10%
– because smart people are dangerous thought leaders
– who can challenge the tyrant
– so for communist tyrants, a failed education system
– is a very good thing
– Maduro shut down most education in Venezuela

Marc
Marc
4 years ago

Time Is On My Side (Rolling Stones). The leftists claim a fetus
is just a cell lump. Everyone was a cell lump that takes time to
develop. Even these leftists were “cell lumps”. Factor time was
unfortunately on their side, but not on the side of their victims.

Marc
Marc
4 years ago
Reply to  Marc

If children are not given the time to deve-
lop in the womb where they are safest, it
means we are in a hostile environment.

Marc
Marc
4 years ago
Reply to  Marc

Israel is consistently regarded as a his-
torical “cell lump” that is to be aborted.

RCCA
RCCA
4 years ago

My take away from this study is there is no more reason for the Republican Party to officially push for abolishing the legal right to an abortion than there is for the Democrat Party to push for late term abortions. Neither of those extreme positions represent the will of the people and abortion should not be a partisan issue. The Harvard Poll makes this clear: the vast plurality of people want to keep abortion legal, a significantly smaller percentage want some modification or limits. According to the Harvard/Harris poll cited only 18% believe the Court SHOULD overturn Roe vs. Wade. That’s a pretty small minority to be making this an election turning point. 46% think the Court should affirm Roe vs. Wade, 36% think the Court should modify. That’s 82% of the respondents (registered voters) who think women should have a right to choose. Why Republicans insist on ignoring the will of the people and shooting themselves in the foot is beyond me.

Furthermore, the Supreme Court has upheld their abortion ruling based on a citizen’s right to be secure in their persons (4th Amendment), and that no state can abridge a citizen’s privileges, (14th Amendment, Section 1, US Constitution). No way that abortion rights will be nullified based on a states’ rights argument.

FYI According to Gallup Daily tracking, as of Nov. 2017: Republicans and Independents leaning Republican represent 37% of Americans with party affiliations; Democrats and Independents leaning Democrat represent 44%. (https://news.gallup.com/poll/223124/democratic-party-maintains-edge-party-affiliation.aspx)

Worsethanitlooks
Worsethanitlooks
4 years ago

While they refuse to accept this, the left has become the minority viewpoint on many issues, not just abortion. Propogation of far left minority viewpoints has become job one for CNN, BBC, NBC, and NYT. Every position championed by the left (expanding the Supreme Court, abolishing the Electoral College, Medicare for all, and upholding Roe vs Wade) has a common theme. The majority of Americans do not support these positions. They also reduce the power of red states and consolidate the power of the left-controlled federal govt. The only thing leftists hate more than saving the unborn from slaughter is a functioning 50-state Republic.

leonore35
leonore35
4 years ago

I have always maintained that if men had to carry the child for nine months, enduring the many discomforts of the changing mothers body, like morning sickness, back pain, flatulence etc. Then have to feed it and care for it for a further lengthy period the matter of abortion would not be under discussion at all!!

R. Arandas
R. Arandas
4 years ago

According to this Jerusalem Post article, “Abortion is not a right, and pregnancy is a responsibility” –
https://www.jpost.com/American-Politics/In-Judaism-abortion-is-not-a-right-and-pregnancy-is-a-responsibility-591181

Alleged-Comment
Alleged-Comment
4 years ago

It is shocking the highest court in the land is leading this nation astray from two founding principals that made this nation so great.

God and life!

What happened America? Do you want to return to what you were pulled out of??

Murielle
Murielle
4 years ago

So sick of the liberal/democrat media cramming their agenda down our throats.

John Acord
John Acord
4 years ago

The Catholic Church is complicit in promoting abortion,not because if its teachings on the subject,but its refusal to excommunicate Catholic politicians like Pelosi, Hoyer and Biden and many, manyothers who publjcally support the Commiecrat proabotionunderf nay condition agenda. As a Catholic I find it abhorrent that the Church has not told its millions of adherents that these people are separated from God and the Church and are separated from the Church and will go to hell unless they repent. IMHO far fewer Catholics world cast their votes for he Commiecrats knowing they are supporting a sinner who had been excommunicated. At the very least, it would bput the issue squarely on the table for the entire Christian world to see.

Marc
Marc
4 years ago

My goodness, was I drunk last night. Stuff it. Well, stuff it. Today all kids of the western
world get the full dose of homo-propaganda swallowed by an artist named “Nate Swine-
hart”. German-speaking countries additionally read the request “Celebrate with us – 50
years LGBT+”. Whole Eastern Europe, Africa and Asia are spared. Range of the doodle:

comment imagecomment image

Marc
Marc
4 years ago
Reply to  Marc

To the one who answered and
pointed out the Pink Swastika.

I know. “Comradeship” & ho-
mosexuality are inseparable.

Marc
Marc
4 years ago
Reply to  Marc

Very simple: whether someone’s “Jewish”
depends on whether they’re real or fake.

Marc
Marc
4 years ago
Reply to  Marc

And if the authenticity of the few dri-
ves away the falsehood of the many.

Marc
Marc
4 years ago
Reply to  Marc

Women want to know who they are through men. Who could mirror that to them except
“self-experienced” men? Pam’s so fanatical, there’s no time for love. At least not much.

oceanfloor1
oceanfloor1
4 years ago

Women’s rights to their own bodies do not end at the point when the worshippers of Jesus or any other god become nervous because self-sacrifice is not being sufficiently practiced. Forcing a woman to bear and raise a child with a terrible birth defect is the kind of cruelty to be expected of a religion that bases its view of women on a fantasy that a god condemned all women to suffer in childbirth BECAUSE! EVE! BIT! THE! APPLE!!!

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!