[ April 18, 2024 ]
The world’s largest Islamic supremacist world body, the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) has relentlessly pursued resolutions on restrictions on free speech for decades. Back in 2012, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, then secretary general of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), said they wouldn’t try again for a ban at the UN on criticism of Islam. Going back on their word is sanctioned under Islamic law. The West still doesn’t get that. So here we are again. Clearly the OIC thinks it has the muscle to make it happen now.
Ironically, the United Nations was established to support and spread democracy and freedom not impose barbaric anti-human measures on the world.
The OIC is one of the largest intergovernmental organizations in the world. It encompasses 56 Muslim states plus the Palestinian Authority. Spread over four continents, it claims to speak in the name of the ummah (the universal Muslim community), which numbers about 1.3 billion. The OIC’s mission is to unite all Muslims worldwide by rooting them in the Koran and the Sunnah — the core of traditional Islamic civilization and values. It aims at strengthening solidarity and cooperation among all its members, in order to protect the interests of Muslims everywhere and to galvanize the ummah into a unified body. The OIC is a unique organization — one that has no equivalent in the world. It unites the religious, economic, military, and political strength of 56 states.
Story continues below advertisement
This new attack on freedom of speech tactic must have been formulated at the Organization of Islamic Cooperation’s (OIC) forum in London to counter Islamophobia.
The 56 Muslim countries (plus the “Palestinian” terror group) mean to impose the Islamic blasphemy laws which include the death penalty for those who blaspheme or mock Muhammad. Surely you jest? Surely you die.
To paraphrase Islamic scholar Bat Ye’or, the OIC is a “would-be, universal caliphate.” It might look different from the caliphates of the Ottomans, Fatimids, and Abbasids. It might resemble, instead, a thoroughly modern trans-national bureaucracy. But, already, the OIC exercises significant power through the United Nations, and through the European Union, which has been eager to accommodate the OIC while simultaneously endowing the U.N. with increasing authority for global governance. Among the other organizations that Bat Ye’or says are doing the OIC’s bidding are the U.N. Alliance of Civilizations, the U.N. Commission on Human Rights, and the European Parliamentary Association for Euro-Arab Cooperation (PAEAC).
In the eyes of OIC officials, no problem in the contemporary world is more urgent than “Islamophobia,” which it calls “a crime against humanity” that the U.N. and the EU must officially outlaw. Even discussing why so much terrorism is carried out in the name of Islam is to be forbidden. The OIC insists, too, that international bodies ban “defamation of religion,” by which it means criticism of anything Islamic. Defamation of Judaism, Christianity, Bahai, Hinduism, and even heterodox Muslim sects such as the Ahmadiyya is common within the borders of many OIC countries, a fact the OIC refuses to acknowledge.
Bat Yeor explains:
The Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) is a religious and political organization. Close to the Muslim World League of the Muslim Brotherhood, it shares the Brotherhood’s strategic and cultural vision: that of a universal religious community, the Ummah, based upon the Koran, the Sunna, and the canonical orthodoxy of shari’a. The OIC represents 56 countries and the Palestinian Authority (considered a state), the whole constituting the universal Ummah with a community of more than one billion three to six hundred million Muslims.
The OIC has a unique structure among nations and human societies. The Vatican and the various churches are de facto devoid of political power, even if they take part in politics, because in Christianity, as in Judaism, the religious and political functions have to be separated. Asian religions, too, do not represent systems that bring together religion, strategy, politics, and law within a single organizational structure.
Not only does the OIC enjoy unlimited power through the union and cohesion of all its bodies, but also to this it adds the infallibility conferred by religion. Bringing together 56 countries, including some of the richest in the world, it controls the lion’s share of global energy resources. The European Union (EU), far from anticipating the problems caused by such a concentration of power and investing in the diversification and autonomy of energy sources since 1973, acted to weaken America internationally in order to substitute for it the U.N., the OIC’s docile agent. In the hope of garnering a few crumbs of influence, the EU privileged a massive Muslim immigration into Europe, paid billions to the Mediterranean Union and Palestinian Authority, weakened the European states, undermined their unity, and wrapped itself in the flag of Palestinian justice, as though this would supply some protective system against the global jihad, which it endeavored to focus on Israel.
Religion as the main aspect of the OIC emerges from its language and its targets. It seems that the OIC is restoring in the 21st century the Caliphate, the supreme controlling body for all Muslims. In their Charter (2008), Member States confirm that their union and solidarity are inspired by Islamic values. They affirm their aim to reinforce within the international arena their shared interests and the promotion of Islamic values. They commit themselves to revitalizing the pioneering role of Islam in the world, increasing the prosperity of the member states, and — in contrast to to the European states — to ensure the defense of their national sovereignty and territorial integrity. They proclaim their support for Palestine with al-Quds Al Sharif, the Arabized name for Jerusalem, as its capital, and exhort each other to promote human rights, basic freedoms, the state of law (shari’a), and democracy according to their constitutional and legal system — in other words, compliance with shari’a.
Read the rest.
Islamists demand U.N. launch censorship campaign
Want world group to ban speech that may offend Muhammad
By WND, June 22, 2019 (thanks to ONN)
Islamist nations, especially those in the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, long have sought a determination from the United Nations that any criticism of Islam or Muslims is “Islamophobia” and banned globally.
But each time it has come up for a vote more realistic arguments prevailed and the campaign never was legitimized.
However, the idea is back.
According to a report from MSN, it now is Pakistan that has endorsed a plan to combat “hate speech.”
Envoy Maleeha Lodhi endorsed a plan from U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, saying that without censorship, “An inevitable consequence is to fan the flames of bigotry, intolerance, anti-Muslim hatred and xenophobia.”
“My Prime Minister Imran Khan has recently again called for urgent action to counter Islamophobia, which is today the most prevalent expression of racism and hatred against ‘the other’,” the Pakistani told a meeting of diplomats and high ranking U.N. officials.
“The U.N. Strategy and Plan of Action provides a system-wide program with the overriding objective of identifying, preventing and confronting hate speech,” the report said.
ADVERTISINGGuterres said, “It targets the root causes of hate speech, pointing out that these include tackling violence, marginalization, discrimination, and poverty, as well as bolstering weak state institutions.”
In past attempts, the censorship program proposed at the U.N. have been described as “anti-defamation” efforts that would protect “religion.”
Almost invariably, those plans have protected Islam but not even mentioned other faiths.
It was in a report at the Investigative Project on Terrorism where it was explained that Khan already has been calling for the death penalty against “those who offend the Prophet Muhammad.”
He also urged the OIC to work to safeguard “the religious sentiments of Muslims,” the report said.
“It was up to us to explain to the Western people the amount of pain they cause us when they ridicule or mock our Holy Prophet,” Khan told the OIC’s recent Islamic summit in Mecca. “I would like to say from this platform that in the forums like the United Nations and the forums like the European Union, we must explain to them that they cannot hurt the sentiments of 1.3 billion people under the garb of freedom of expression.”
The OIC’s 57 members are the largest voting bloc in the U.N.
Guterres had been promoting a conference on the role of education in fighting “hate speech,” and Lodhi said he would be fully committed to that effort.
“We are fully committed to support the UN’s strategy on hate speech. This is a moment for all of us to come together to reverse the tide of hate and bigotry that threatens to undermine social solidarity and peaceful co-existence,” he said.
The U.S. has rejected speech censorship plans as a resolution to worries about “hate speech,” citing the U.S. Constitution’s protections for free speech.
The U.N., however, has in its plan the idea of engaging “private sector actors, including social media companies,” to do its bidding on censorship.
The IPT reported, “Thus far, Twitter has shown a willingness to voluntarily enforce Pakistan’s Islamic blasphemy rules even if the U.S. government doesn’t abide by any potential hate speech treaty that could stem from the planned conference. This raises the possibility that it and other social media companies might voluntarily follow suggestions from U.N. bureaucrats to the detriment of free speech.”
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Please contribute here.
or
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.
Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding.Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.
Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.
Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.
Follow Pamela Geller on Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.
Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.
Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.
If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.
63 Comments
4 years ago
Hate speech? Stabbings, rapes, and throwing acid on innocent people…we can’t talk about it?
4 years ago
Reply to
caliroxanne
It’s not islamophobia when they really do want to off you.
There is no such thing as Islamophobia. The threats posed by Islam and its adherents are quite real. Phobias are irrational. Nothing irrational about fearing an ideology that seeks to destroy the civilization that your ancestors have been building for 3000 years.
Our own governments have betrayed us by allowing islam to be identified as a religion.
4 years ago
Reply to
Victor
No, not according to the left. People in Europe have been arrested for making online posts against Islam after major terror attacks:
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-34831227
4 years ago
This is nothing new. The reason Twitter sends legal notices of ” breaching Pakistani law ” to non(edit-autocorrect error) Pakistani citizens is because Pakistan seeks to extradite non citizens for blasphemy trials. To quote Sir Ian McKellen ” I’m afraid this is the end.”. Surah chapter 2 – non belief is a worse crime than murder. Why wasn’t this barbarism made illegal years ago ??
4 years ago
Reply to
eKane Pegg
It’s not too late.
PROSCRIBE ISLAM IN THE WEST!????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
4 years ago
Reply to
eKane Pegg
Worse than murder? An imam in Vancouver declared that saying Merry Christmas is worse than murder, and not a single politician denounced that horrible statement. That means they approve.
4 years ago
Reply to
eKane Pegg
The sentence for blasphemy in Pakistain is death or life imprisonment (w/the option to have the sentence commuted to death at any point by any muslum inmate or prison guard).
4 years ago
Screw Islam and the SNAKE it crawled in on. The United Nations DOES NOT RULE OVER THE UNITED STATES. Our U.S. Constitution is the final authority in America, not the U.N.
KICK THE UNITED NATIONS OUT OF THE UNITED STATES!
4 years ago
Reply to
SoftwareBabeOHIO
Actually, the U.N. is the problem, not just where the U.N. is located. Better for Trump to withdraw 100% ENTIRELY from the U.N. and stop ALL U.S. funding, both direct and indirect! GET THE U.S. OUT OF THE U.N.!!!
4 years ago
Reply to
caliroxanne
Yep, but that should have happened DECADES ago, it’s too late now. The UN is far too powerful for the U.S. to get rid of. And they will bring in a One World Government when Trump is out of office and the Dimocrats will have a hand in it, thinking it’s a great plan! By the time they realize it was a HORRIBLE plan, it will be too late. Stay prayed up, because the Tribulation is closer than anyone realizes!
4 years ago
Reply to
SoftwareBabeOHIO
Ahh but they WILL after Trump leaves office! The UN will create the One World Government and the Dimocrats will help! Stay prayed up because the Tribulation is coming VERY soon!! FAR sooner than most people realize!!!
4 years ago
Reply to
SoftwareBabeOHIO
The UN was created with a 3 fatal flaws.
Allowing dictatorships and fascist muslim states in the UN.
Allowing communists states in the UN.
Allowing Russia and China to have veto power.
All free countries should withdraw and stop all funding at once to the UN.
All free countries SHOULD reform under NATO, with one minor change.
Replace Turkey with Israel.
4 years ago
Are Shia–Sunni relations not the definition of criticism of shitslam? Can we not talk about the camel in the tent? Down with Shia-phobia and Sunni-phobia!
Shia and Sunni Islam are the two major denominations of Islam. They chose sides following the death of the Islamic prophet Muhammad in AD 632.
4 years ago
Reply to
Halal Bacon
You have a point there. How about the infidel-phobia hate speech that permeates the Koran?
4 years ago
Reply to
Halal Bacon
Regardless of the differences the Shia and Sunnis have with each other, the one thing they agree on is hatred of infidels and the desire to spread Islam over the entire planet.
4 years ago
Drawing ever closer to the great tribulation. Buckle up boys and girls, the road ahead is going to be bumpy…
4 years ago
Any organization that is recognized by government authorities in any way as worthy of public respect can not be permitted to issue religious punishments including any form of financial abuse or consequences, and form of force or coercion, any level of physical or sexual assault including the death penalty.
Period.
Respect for or support of Islam constitutes a severe human rights offense and should be struck from existence including legal reforms that respect such beliefs and practices worldwide.
4 years ago
Reply to
Tamara Hussey-Mecklenburg
Why don’t you just say Mouslems must stop their Christianophobia? 😉
4 years ago
Reply to
Alleged-Comment
Historically, Muslims have lied about wanting religious reforms, about violently opposing the abuse of women and children through their religious beliefs and practices to gain entry and the trust of nonMuslims. As soon as they entered a new area/country in sufficient quantities, all in the name of fleeing tyranny from their leadership in their homelands, they slaughter any Muslims genuinely seeking these reforms or having legitimate safety issues, followed by millions of our own people. Stopping Christianophobia is essentially blasphemy and apostasy and absolutely the death penalty level offense in their religion. If the rules aren’t changed such that only Muslims completely abandoning their beliefs are welcome and everyone else must remain in their Islamic homelands, then we will see this pattern repeat itself over and over again exactly the way we are now. This has all been done before in what are now islamic countries. No became Muslim by choice. They lie afterward and say otherwise but it’s propaganda. Islam makes you a violent extremist. Period.
This proposed resolution is additional evidence of exactly that.
4 years ago
Not only that, but RAVELRY, the knitting and crochet site has BANNED TRUMP, HIS FOLLOWERS AND ANY MENTION OF HIM on their site. I used to go there, NOW I WILL NEVER AGAIN.
TIME TO START PUSHING BACK, PATRIOTIC CONSTITUTIONAL AMERICANS!
STOP GOING TO THESE SITES AND TELL YOUR FRIENDS!
4 years ago
Reply to
SoftwareBabeOHIO
I think the US has gone too far down the road of division to be united anymore. The f’ing Dem0nrats and their muslum overlords are against everything the US stands for, it’s time for a civil war.
4 years ago
Who cares about the un.
4 years ago
Reply to
mezcukor
It should be that the U.N. is entirely irrelevant, but unfortunately it is on the way to becoming a world government. It is not just the OIC and Islamic countries; it is also the entire 3rd World bloc as well as Europe that gives the U.N. its strength and power. The U.N. has become nothing more than a way for the world to team up against the U.S. (and Israel) and we pay for it. Trump TALKS about the U.S. getting ripped off and taken advantage of, well, the U.N. should be his #1 target. Talk about bad deals, the U.N. is the worst! We are BY FAR the top funder of the U.N. and we pay them to attack us! Trump MUST take the U.S. out of the U.N. 100%.
4 years ago
They’ve basically declared war on nonMuslims.
4 years ago
Reply to
Tamara Hussey-Mecklenburg
They have already done the declaring war on infidel thing this is just another attack.
4 years ago
Reply to
ProudInfidelConservativeCanuck
Well said!
And yet our world leaders continue to let enemy combatants into our countries, even giving them citizenship and more privileges and respect than our people!
4 years ago
Muhammud is in a tent with a camel…and 3 piggies1
4 years ago
What’s the difference between “islamist nations” and muslum states? That’s right, nothing, nothing at all, because “islamist” like islamophobia “is a word created by fascists and used by cowards to manipulate morons.”
4 years ago
So, in that case let me just say muhammed, the founder of the demonic cult of pedophelia, sex slavery, sodomy, and terrorism that is enshrined in the so called religion of peace may he rot in hell… Anyone who follows this cult should also rot in hell… Send this to the UN please.
4 years ago
Who would have ever thought that out of the hope for a “UNITED NATIONS” which was to defeat totalitarianism would spring forth a greater totalitarianism? Maybe we should have been a more discriminatory and banned totalitarian dictatorships such as Muslim countries.
4 years ago
Here’s some hate speech.
I hate the Muslims. I wish they would disappear into thin air and leave the rest of us out of their hate agendas.
And as far as I’m concerned, I would never so much as interact with a Muslim in person. Anyone capable of respecting Islam is an a-hole.
4 years ago
Reply to
Tamara Hussey-Mecklenburg
Saudi Arabia is building Mosques in the west faster than Starbucks is building coffee shops.
4 years ago
Reply to
Tamara Hussey-Mecklenburg
Polish lawmaker: Saudis can build mosque in Warsaw “once they agree for Poland to build a cathedral in Saudi Arabia”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/08/polish-lawmaker-saudis-can-build-mosque-in-warsaw-once-they-agree-for-poland-to-build-a-cathedral-in-saudi-arabia
4 years ago
Ridiculous!!!!! We need to withdraw from the UN and stop allowing them usage of our country for meetings.
4 years ago
Islam is evil. Islam can suck it.
4 years ago
I will say what I want when I want and how I want about the Pedophile that Islam rode in on. SCREW ISLAM and
Muhammad..!..
4 years ago
It’s happening already. I’ve just been banned from FPM for calling mohamad morsi a five coil steamer.
4 years ago
I happily mock pisslam and mohaMad on a daily basis.
Come and get Me!
4 years ago
Using the UN to try to bring down the West. But we aren’t governed by the UN, right?
Doesn’t the UN stand for Undermining Nations?
4 years ago
If this crap actually passes, then the US should pull out of the UN — and withdraw its lease on the building. Give the UN a good year to find another home, maybe some poor country like Guatemala, or Somalia, which could profit from the presence of all those sleek diplomats.
4 years ago
This “ban” would also restrict the TRUE FACTS about the BARBARIAN CULT OF DEATH known as islam. In these books are the written instructions on “how to treat non-believers. These books are: the koran, the sira, the hadith and the suhih.
Get your hands on them. READ, LEARN the TRUE FACTS about the IDOL WORSHIPING CULT OF DEATH!!!
4 years ago
UN must die. not to pay contributions to the UN
4 years ago
Islamophobia. A genuine and valid fear of a cult that exists on the use of fear and violence.There is nothing “peaceful” about Islam. Nothing.
4 years ago
My dog eats muslims for breakfast.
4 years ago
Moe and all his followers can kiss my…
4 years ago
So what will the penalty be for mocking the UN and the camel it trotted in on and will it be called UNAPHOBIA?
I can picture the T shirt.
4 years ago
Islam is a religion of peace. If you dispute that statement, its followers will kill you.
4 years ago
OK, ban “hate speech” , Ban any criticisim of moslems , ban islamophobia. What do we replace this with? It will be finding hundreds of muslim bodies every morning in back alleys. It will be pork hot dog stands in mecca. Proscribe the UN, Proscribe islam or you will be slaves under sharia.
4 years ago
“It was up to us to explain to the Western people the amount of pain
they cause us when they ridicule or mock our Holy Prophet,” Khan told
the OIC’s recent Islamic summit in Mecca. “I would like to say from this
platform that in the forums like the United Nations and the forums like
the European Union, we must explain to them that they cannot hurt the
sentiments of 1.3 billion people under the garb of freedom of
expression.”
= Unintended consequences. Like steam coming out of the safety valve so block it off!
4 years ago
Please, abolish the OIC as soon as possible.
4 years ago
Islime needs to just suck it up. If they can trash talk every body else religion or beliefs then every body should have the same right to criticize their little inbred pedo cult of lunatics.
Sauce for the gooser is sauce for the gander.
