News Ticker >
[ October 14, 2019 ]

Massive pro-Trump national rally set for Oct. 17

[ October 14, 2019 ]

JW Investigation: Ousted Ukraine Ambassador Ordered State Dept. to Monitor Journalists, Trump Allies Including Pamela...

[ October 14, 2019 ]

ABC News Airs U.S. Gun Range Video, Calling It a Syrian War Zone — Twice

[ October 14, 2019 ]

CNN Head Jeff Zucker Pushing Impeachment, Has ‘Personal Vendetta Against Trump

[ October 14, 2019 ]

Democrats to propose resolution to keep U.S. troops in Syria

[ October 14, 2019 ]

Turkey and Terrorist Group Hezb’Allah orders Europe to “kneel” or “we will send 3.6 million...

[ October 14, 2019 ]

NY Post: Fox News “MISREPRESENTED” impeachment poll

[ October 14, 2019 ]

Addended: Actual Conditions For Jews Less Than A Year Ago in The Iraqi Kurdistan Paradise:...

[ October 14, 2019 ]

Trump Administration Dares to Question How Its Funds are Spent by Universities (Part 2)

[ October 14, 2019 ]

Trump calls Tlaib a ‘despicable human being’ for considering detaining officials who don’t comply with...

SHARIA: BBC bans word ‘terror’ – London Bridge killings now ‘van attack’

93

Rewarding terror. You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand. You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. This gives terrorists carte blanche to terrorize.

BBC backlash: Anger as Beeb to ban word ‘terror’ – London Bridge killings now ‘van attack’

BBC has been accused of ‘sanitising’ terrorism after banning its journalists from using the word ‘terror’ when reporting on atrocities, prompting an outcry from staff and MPs alike.

By Joe Gamp, The Express, Jun 10, 2019:

Reporters working for the corporation are to be effectively banned from using the word – unless they are quoting a source or someone else using the word. The outlet will no longer use the words “terror attack” to describe the appalling events that took place at locations such as London Bridge or the Manchester Arena – despite the corporation using the phrase at the time of the attack. BBC journalists will now refer to terror attacks by location and the methods used when atrocities were carried out.

Reporters would now describe the events as the “London Bridge van attack” or “Manchester Arena bomb attack”.

But the new rules have sparked rage, with experts and MPs accusing the BBC of “failing in its public duties”.

Former Home Office advisor and head of think tank Civitas, said of the new edict: “If they don’t want to use that then they’re failing in their public service duty which is to be clear and accurate.

“I think there is a common usage, which has some recognition in law, which if you use attempted killing or injury to a political objective, then that’s terrorism.

“It would be misleading not to say that these are terrorist episodes if they are attempts to advance political or ideological cause through violence.

“The Christchurch one [in New Zealand] was someone a bit wacky but he was trying to make a political point, and all the Islamist episodes are aimed at a political outcome.”

Reiterating opposition to the new rule, Tory MP Andrew Bridgen said: “They are terrorists and these are terror attacks.

“The BBC should not try to sanitise the behaviour of terrorists by not calling it out.”

A senior source from BBC News said: “It boils down to that phrase ‘one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter’.

“Our question is: Is Darren Osbourne, who was behind the Finsbury Park attack, a terrorist?

“He is being motivated by far-right thinking in the same way as the guys in the attack on London Bridge.

“Consistency will be the key.”

But according to the Daily Mail, many BBC reporters are angered by the decision to ban the phrase, which comes into force when new editorial guidelines are published this month.

An unnamed source said: “The end result is a desire to squeeze the word terror out altogether, which many people think is nuts.”

Under guidance drawn up during the IRA bombings, current guidelines instruct staff: “Terrorism is a difficult and emotive subject with significant political overtones”.

As such, BBC broadcast journalists use the words “militants” or “jihadists” as substitutes.

According to the Oxford Dictionary, a “terrorist” is “someone that uses violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims”.

A spokesman for the BBC said: “People should wait to read the editorial guidelines.”

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute to our ground-breaking work here.


Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Contribute Monthly - Choose One

Have a tip we should know? Your anonymity is NEVER compromised. Email tips@thegellerreport.com

Pin It on Pinterest