DNC officials solicited Ukraine officials for dirt on Trump to get his name REMOVED FROM BALLOT

50

The real collusion. The coup. It all makes sense now. The Democrats have been ranting and raving, manufacturing  all these false accusations, histrionics, political theater to distract from their high crimes and treason. The real collusion. The coup goes all all the way to the Obama White House who invited Ukrainian law enforcement for a meeting as Trump rose in the polls.

Ukrainian embassy confirms DNC contractor solicited Trump dirt in 2016

By John Solomon, The Hill May 3, 2019:

Story continues below advertisement

The boomerang from the Democratic Party’s failed attempt to connect Donald Trump to Russia’s 2016 election meddling is picking up speed, and its flight path crosses right through Moscow’s pesky neighbor, Ukraine. That is where there is growing evidence a foreign power was asked, and in some cases tried, to help Hillary Clinton.

In its most detailed account yet, Ukraine’s embassy in Washington says a Democratic National Committee insider during the 2016 election solicited dirt on Donald Trump’s campaign chairman and even tried to enlist the country’s president to help.

In written answers to questions, Ambassador Valeriy Chaly’s office says DNC contractor Alexandra Chalupa sought information from the Ukrainian government on Paul Manafort’s dealings inside the country, in hopes of forcing the issue before Congress.

Chalupa later tried to arrange for Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to comment on Manafort’s Russian ties on a U.S. visit during the 2016 campaign, the ambassador said.

Chaly says that, at the time of the contacts in 2016, the embassy knew Chalupa primarily as a Ukrainian-American activist, and learned only later of her ties to the DNC. He says the embassy considered her requests an inappropriate solicitation of interference in the U.S. election.

“The Embassy got to know Ms. Chalupa because of her engagement with Ukrainian and other diasporas in Washington D.C., and not in her DNC capacity. We’ve learned about her DNC involvement later,” Chaly said in a statement issued by his embassy. “We were surprised to see Alexandra’s interest in Mr. Paul Manafort’s case. It was her own cause. The Embassy representatives unambiguously refused to get involved in any way, as we were convinced that this is a strictly U.S. domestic matter.

“All ideas floated by Alexandra were related to approaching a Member of Congress with a purpose to initiate hearings on Paul Manafort or letting an investigative journalist ask President Poroshenko a question about Mr. Manafort during his public talk in Washington, D.C.,” the ambassador explained.

Reached by phone last week, Chalupa said she was too busy to talk. She did not respond to email and phone messages seeking subsequent comment.

Chaly’s written answers mark the most direct acknowledgement by Ukraine’s government that an American tied to the Democratic Party sought the country’s help in the 2016 election, and they confirm the main points of a January 2017 story by Politico on Chalupa’s efforts.

In that story, the embassy was broadly quoted as denying interference in the election and suggested Chalupa’s main reason for contacting the ambassador’s office was to organize an event celebrating women leaders.

The fresh statement comes several months after a Ukrainian court ruled that the country’s National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU), closely aligned with the U.S. embassy in Kiev, and a parliamentarian named Serhiy Leshchenko wrongly interfered in the 2016 American election by releasing documents related to Manafort.

The acknowledgement by Kiev’s embassy, plus newly released testimony, suggests the Ukrainian efforts to influence the U.S. election had some intersections in Washington as well.

Nellie Ohr, wife of senior U.S. Justice Department official Bruce Ohr, acknowledged in congressional testimony that, while working for the Clinton-hired research firm Fusion GPS, she researched Trump and Manafort’s ties to Russia and learned Leshchenko, the Ukrainian lawmaker, was providing dirt to Fusion.

Fusion also paid British intelligence operative Christopher Steele, whose anti-Trump dossier the FBI used as primary evidence to support its request to spy on Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.

In addition, I wrote last month that the Obama White House invited Ukrainian law enforcement officials to a meeting in January 2016 as Trump rose in the polls on his improbable path to the presidency. The meeting led to U.S. requests to the Ukrainians to help investigate Manafort, setting in motion a series of events that led to the Ukrainians leaking the documents about Manafort in May 2016.

The DNC’s embassy contacts add a new dimension, though. Chalupa discussed in the 2017 Politico article about her efforts to dig up dirt on Trump and Manafort, including at the Ukrainian embassy.

FEC records show Chalupa’s firm, Chalupa & Associates, was paid $71,918 by the DNC during the 2016 election cycle.

Exactly how the Ukrainian embassy responded to Chalupa’s inquiries remains in dispute.

Chaly’s statement says the embassy rebuffed her requests for information: “No documents related to Trump campaign or any individuals involved in the campaign have been passed to Ms. Chalupa or the DNC neither from the Embassy nor via the Embassy. No documents exchange was even discussed.”

But Andrii Telizhenko, a former political officer who worked under Chaly from December 2015 through June 2016, told me he was instructed by the ambassador and his top deputy to meet with Chalupa in March 2016 and to gather whatever dirt Ukraine had in its government files about Trump and Manafort.

Telizhenko said that, when he was told by the embassy to arrange the meeting, both Chaly and the ambassador’s top deputy identified Chalupa “as someone working for the DNC and trying to get Clinton elected.”

Over lunch at a Washington restaurant, Chalupa told Telizhenko in stark terms what she hoped the Ukrainians could provide the DNC and the Clinton campaign, according to his account.

“She said the DNC wanted to collect evidence that Trump, his organization and Manafort were Russian assets, working to hurt the U.S. and working with Putin against the U.S. interests. She indicated if we could find the evidence they would introduce it in Congress in September and try to build a case that Trump should be removed from the ballot, from the election,” he recalled.

After the meeting, Telizhenko said he became concerned about the legality of using his country’s assets to help an American political party win an U.S. election. But he proceeded with his assignment.

Telizhenko said that, as he began his research, he discovered that Fusion GPS was nosing around Ukraine, seeking similar information, and he believed they, too, worked for the Democrats.

As a former aide inside the general prosecutor’s office in Kiev, Telizhenko used contacts with intelligence, police and prosecutors across the country to secure information connecting Russian figures to assistance on some of the Trump organization’s real estate deals overseas, including a tower in Toronto.

Telizhenko said he did not want to provide the intelligence he collected directly to Chalupa, and instead handed the materials to Chaly: “I told him what we were doing was illegal, that it was unethical doing this as diplomats.” He said the ambassador told him he would handle the matter and had opened a second channel back in Ukraine to continue finding dirt on Trump.

Telizhenko said he also was instructed by his bosses to meet with an American journalist researching Manafort’s ties to Ukraine.

About a month later, he said his relationship with the ambassador soured and, by June 2016, he was ordered to return to Ukraine. There, he reported his concerns about the embassy’s contacts with the Democrats to the former prosecutor general’s office and officials in the Poroshenko administration: “Everybody already knew what was going on and told me it had been approved at the highest levels.”

Telizhenko said he never was able to confirm whether the information he collected for Chalupa was delivered to her, the DNC or the Clinton campaign.

Chalupa, meanwhile, continued to build a case that Manafort and Trump were tied to Russia.

In April 2016, she attended an international symposium where she reported back to the DNC that she had met with 68 Ukrainian investigative journalists to talk about Manafort. She also wrote that she invited American reporter Michael Isikoff to speak with her. Isikoff wrote some of the seminal stories tying Manafort to Ukraine and Trump to Russia; he later wrote a book making a case for Russian collusion.

“A lot more coming down the pipe,” Chalupa wrote a top DNC official on May 3, 2016, recounting her effort to educate Ukrainian journalists and Isikoff about Manafort.

Then she added: “More offline tomorrow since there is a big Trump component you and Lauren need to be aware of that will hit in next few weeks and something I’m working on you should be aware of.”

Less than a month later, the “black ledger” identifying payments to Manafort was announced in Ukraine, forcing Manafort to resign as Trump’s campaign chairman and eventually face criminal prosecution for improper foreign lobbying.

DNC officials have suggested in the past that Chalupa’s efforts were personal, not officially on behalf of the DNC. But Chalupa’s May 2016 email clearly informed a senior DNC official that she was “digging into Manafort” and she suspected someone was trying to hack into her email account.

Chaly over the years has tried to portray his role as Ukraine’s ambassador in Washington as one of neutrality during the 2016 election. But in August 2016 he raised eyebrows in some diplomatic circles when he wrote an OpEd in The Hill skewering Trump for some of his comments on Russia. “Trump’s comments send wrong message to world,” Chaly’s article blared in the headline.

In his statement to me, Chaly said he wrote the article because he had been solicited for his views by The Hill’s opinion team.

Chaly’s office also acknowledged that a month after the OpEd, President Poroshenko met with then-candidate Clinton during a stop in New York. The office said the ambassador requested a similar meeting with Trump but it didn’t get organized.

Though Chaly and Telizhenko disagree on what Ukraine did after it got Chalupa’s request, they confirm that a paid contractor of the DNC solicited their government’s help to find dirt on Trump that could sway the 2016 election.

For a Democratic Party that spent more than two years building the now-disproven theory that Trump colluded with Russia to hijack the 2016 election, the tale of the Ukrainian embassy in Washington feels just like a speeding political boomerang.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
50 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
IndigoRed
IndigoRed
4 years ago

This appears very troubling for the DNC, Obama*, and Clinton.

felix1999
felix1999
4 years ago
Reply to  IndigoRed

It all depends on Barr. Either he will expose it all or just do cosmetic fixes to appease the public.

John Mitchell
John Mitchell
4 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

The latter meaning that he’s a member of the Deep State.

Mark Steiner
Mark Steiner
4 years ago
Reply to  John Mitchell

Hope not … we may have heard he has had “friendly” dealings with Mueller in and out of government settings.

felix1999
felix1999
4 years ago
Reply to  Mark Steiner

What concerns me is Barr’s close relationship with Barr.
Will Barr protect Mueller like Mueller protected Comey?

felix1999
felix1999
4 years ago
Reply to  Mark Steiner

What concerns me is Barr’s close relationship with Mueller.
Will Barr protect Mueller like Mueller protected Comey?

Mark Steiner
Mark Steiner
4 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

We have the same concern. Which “God” is served behind closed doors or other secret meetings?

These things have ways of coming out. Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.

felix1999
felix1999
4 years ago
Reply to  John Mitchell

Trump didn’t want to give them a reason for saying he was obstructing Mueller’s investigation. Smart move to NOT do it then, Now Trump can and has celled for the release of stuff after classified information is redacted. The Mueller investigation is over.
Mueller is deep state – not sure about Barr. We’ll see how Barr handles things.

John Mitchell
John Mitchell
4 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Ah.. but they accused him of obstruction anyway. You are never, ever going to reason with democRATS. Period.

All of the participants in this coup need to be prosecuted. NOT be rendered politically nonviable. Which seems to be the standard punishment for members of the Ruling Class.

Tilt
Tilt
4 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

The Wild card is Trump!!

The more evidence surface via FOIA (Thank God for Tom Fitton of ‘Judicial Watch’ & honest judges!!), Patriotic Congress people (‘Freedom Caucus’ etc) and 3rd party sources (foreign, discovery, whistle blowers) the harder it will be to cover this GIGA stink up (even partially)

Joe Digenova recently said that the FISA court already passed all of the relevant documents re Obama’s administration’s US citizen unmasking practices (Including the four instances in connection to the Trump administration) to the DOJ

Digenova also said that a separate investigation is due to report findings about Comey’s conduct with in a week or two from today!!

Michael Horowitz, Inspector General for the FBI is due to report findings re alleged FISA abuse with in the next 4-6 weeks, Barr said he is ‘working very closely’ with DOJ inspector general about this investigation

Barr already indicated he knows crimes were possibly committed (he said he is looking to see if unmasking of Trump campaign / administration people was properly ‘predicated’ or politically motivated…) and it will be close impossible to put the this Jinny back in the bottle at this point

Trump with is unlimited mandate (Under the US constitution) to declassify (sans necessary limitations pertaining to issues of US national security / Interest, pending judicial proceedings and privacy considerations re of non involved US citizens) ALL US Government work product!! So even if Barr is entertaining a partial cover up (going easy on Obama for example) which I believe he isn’t, it looks like Trump has a decisive upper hand (any thing suppressed by the ‘Deep State’ or Barr / Horowitz for that matter, could and will be exposed by Trump…) re controlling both the process and the outcome of this GIGANTIC swamp draining!!

The coming months up to the 2020 elections, will be a mixture of lots of fun, horror, disgust and glee for any US patriot

felix1999
felix1999
4 years ago
Reply to  Tilt

No, it’s all up to AG Barr,
Trump is not a lawyer.
Trump has already ordered declassification of documents. Now it is up to AG Barr and his group to redact what is not to be revealed such as Grand Jury testimony and sources and methods etc.. We’ll see if Barr is for real or not.

Tilt
Tilt
4 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Trump can DE-classify anything he wants, when ever he wants (under specified limitations)!!

Trump said he will declassify documents but he didn’t yet (he was waiting for the Muller report to come out)!

Barr and any other Government bureaucrat for that matter, KNOW!! That if they will not “straight shoot” this thing (i.e. suppress / manipulate corroborating evidence in assistance of a cover-up for the DemonRats and / or the FBI / DOJ / CIA…), Trump can trump them and make them look at best as incompetent, or at worse, part of the Traitor contingent / DC cesspool

As of now, it looks like Barr is a “straight shooter” that also wants to be on the ‘right side of history’, regardless of the monumental pressures he must be facing (As a ‘Bushy’, a close friend of Muller, from Democrats…) but also is well aware of the fact that this time around, the sheer volume of red hot, smoking gun evidence in plain sight + Trump (+Giuliani etc) in attack mode, a furious, combative GOP (sans RINO Traitors), a battery of hungry investigative reporters (Solomon, Carter etc) that have their attack dog jaws locked on this political / criminal atrocity and more then half of the American people, ALL looking closely at him and what / when he does it… Barr has only one rational choice to make at this juncture, ‘Straight Shoot ‘ all the way…

Democrats giving Barr the “Cavanaugh treatment”, shows their utter desperation (As political / legal cataclysm is looming ever closer on their party and the reputation / livelihood / FREEDOM!! of many from their ranks) and will certainly not garner any excess of goodwill toward them, from Barr’s…

Next week (possible report from the investigation re FISA abuse on the part of Comey) could be the actual opening of the flood gates, after which the US political landscape, will be fundamentally altered for ever, in a very very good way!

felix1999
felix1999
4 years ago
Reply to  Tilt

Trump didn’t declassify a trove of documents WHILE the Mueller investigation was going on because his lawyers rightly informed him that could be used as “obstruction to an ongoing investigation.” Now that the Mueller investigation is over, the can be declassified and portions redacted to protect Grand jury testimony and sources ad methods – and THIS is done through Barr and his team. Trump isn’t pouring over these documents to do that.

John Mitchell
John Mitchell
4 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

The fact that Barr is a ‘Bushy’ is cause for concern and skepticism. The republican party has a long history of not going in for the kill when they have crooked democRATS dead to rights.

Should Barr show signs of weakness, he should be replaced with someone like Jay Sekulow or Tom Fitton. This can not be allowed to stand. Justice must be served!

Halal Bacon
Halal Bacon
4 years ago
Reply to  IndigoRed

I believe the term is “problematic” LMAO

felix1999
felix1999
4 years ago
Reply to  Halal Bacon

The media is so BRAIN DEAD. They openly admit to where theyget their leaks from.
“The Mueller investigative team gave copies of FBI notes (investigative notes)
to Buzzfeed news !!

Senator Grassley Questions AG Barr on Predicate of Steele Dossier and Mueller Team Leaks…
Posted on May 1, 2019
by sundance
….
Keep in mind… Recently Buzzfeed opened a can-of-worms, which is currently being ignored by MSM, when Buzzfeed openly published accounts of the Mueller team giving their reporters copies of FBI notes during the investigation. [Details Here]

This Buzzfeed admission was/is stunning…. I don’t even think Buzzfeed realized what they were admitting to. It’s in these paragraphs .

(Buzzfeed) […] I’d also like to share an accounting of how we came to our characterization, to give our audience and people who reasonably raised questions about our reporting as much information as possible about how the story came to be.

Our story was based on detailed information from senior law enforcement sources. That reporting included documents — specifically, pages of notes that were taken during an interview of [Michael] Cohen by the FBI.

The Mueller investigative team gave copies of FBI notes (investigative notes) to Buzzfeed news !!

Notice the use of the plural “reporters“; specifically the way “reporters” is used in the paragraph, infers that multiple media outlets were given the same FBI leaked documents.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/05/01/senator-grassley-questions-ag-barr-on-predicate-of-steele-dossier-and-mueller-team-leaks/#more-163226

Rocinante44
Rocinante44
4 years ago
Reply to  IndigoRed

and the repub congress who either knew all about it or were beyond stupid….you pick which one they are

felix1999
felix1999
4 years ago

This Russian farce is so awful…. from another angle, the GOP knew about and went along with it too.
Coordinated “leaks” to the press helped the DEMS have a blue wave in the midterms.

Rosenstein, Wray, NYT and WaPo Remind Everyone Devastating Impact of 2016 Russian Interference…
Posted on April 26, 2019 by sundance

The 2016 anti-Trump effort and 2017 soft-coup was not just an assembly created by Obama officials; there was/are a significant number of mutually aligned republican politicians willfully blind to the effort.

Within this Potomac alignment we note: President Obama, Susan Rice, Denis McDonough, Ben Rhodes, John Brennan, Ash Carter, James Clapper, James Comey, Sally Yates, Loretta Lynch, Andrew McCabe, Rod Rosenstein, Christopher Wray, David Bowditch, Dana Boente, James Baker, John Carlin, Paul Ryan, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Michael Kortan, Bill Priestap, Andrew Weissmann, Robert Mueller; the 40+ FBI agents; the 19+ Mueller team lawyers; the Clinton campaign officials and lawyers (Perkins Coie); the DNC; Fusion-GPS; U.S. State Department personnel; most of the DC political leadership and committee chairs; the former and current Gang of Eight (excluding Devin Nunes); the majority of the DOJ-National Security Division; elements of the U.K, AU and Italian government; approximately 15 to 20 GOP members of the U.S. Senate; and almost all of the DC media apparatus,…. aligned in common cause.

(Notice also how allot an unprecedented number of GOPers “retired” before the midterms. Bet ya they were all RINOS and aware of the coup.)

This group represents just the tippy-top of the system now at risk from President Trump saying “overthrow” and “coup attempt”.

(WHAT WILL BARR DO?)

The wild card is U.S. Attorney General William Barr. Previously AG Barr seemed to align himself with the Russia interference narrative; however, he was merely summarizing the Mueller report. Barr was not making the claim himself; he was repeating the claim of others. However, I guarantee you he is now receiving unrelenting pressure to do so.

That said, we see a mini-test now for Barr; laid down by that stupid Johnson and Grassley letter. If Barr ignores the senators, that’s a good sign. If he responds and tells them ‘no comment’ (or similar) that’s an even better sign. However, if Barr cedes to their request and begins justifying the 2016 and 2017 behavior of the DOJ and FBI from a position where those officials had no choice; well, then it seems likely the Attorney General is trying to move beyond the crisis without actually dealing with the underlying corruption.

More here:
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/04/26/rosenstein-wray-nyt-and-wapo-remind-everyone-devastating-impact-of-2016-russian-interference/

Lynn D
Lynn D
4 years ago

Well Watergate was found out… But this makes Watergate look like the Teddy Bears Picnic..

felix1999
felix1999
4 years ago
Reply to  Lynn D

This is huge and deep rooted.

WM1
WM1
4 years ago
Reply to  Lynn D

True! But so what?

Call me blind, naive and cynical. Whatever!

But none of this matters, to me, until Barry, Hillary, Bill and every single person found to be complicit in this attempted coup are all led away in handcuffs, actually stand trial, are convicted and sentenced to the maximum allowed by law for the legions of crimes-including treason-they committed.

Until then, reports such as these (to my mind) are little more than ‘sound and fury signifying nothing.’

felix1999
felix1999
4 years ago

Are you as impressed as I am with FOX news taking on Donna Brazille as a FOX news contributor? Sarcasm off.
She lied about feeding Hillary questions before the debate and even CNN fired her when her lying was exposed.
She knows all about what went on with Hillary’s collusion and Russia etc.. She was an interim chairperson for the DNC.

http://b1ff5939f6.nxcli.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/hillary-coup.jpg

sodacrackers2
sodacrackers2
4 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Seems pretty obvious that Brazile had quite a bit of power.

Mark Steiner
Mark Steiner
4 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Indeed – just as Fox embraces Democrat-voting Alan Dershowitz in an attempt to elevate his intellectual status as a tool of conservatives.

Drew the Infidel
Drew the Infidel
4 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

I never knew Shrillary used such harsh language, did you?/sarc

There’s no trash like white trash.

felix1999
felix1999
4 years ago

Ah, it goes along with throwing lamps at ole Bill.

Hans Wellington
Hans Wellington
4 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

I am surprised that this character is still running around free spreading her poison. Perhaps she should visit all the cemeteries of the 50 or so people who she had known and who unfortunately knew her too well.

Alleged-Comment
Alleged-Comment
4 years ago

Remember what I said about the left’s PROJECTION. What they accuse you of or say of you is WHAT THEY ARE or ARE DOING.

They are very easy to figure out they are so deranged with their Harry Pothead magic sh it of theirs.

John Acord
John Acord
4 years ago

The time has come for AG Barr to appoint a special counsel to investigate the attempted coup d’etat against Trump And the American people that began in 2015 and continues to this day. A grand jury needs to be impaneled to hear the evidence. There Is no doubt that the most serious of crimes have been committed and are continuing to be committed the Commiecrats and their allies in the MSM. If This is not done immediately then the Republic is finished and civil war will be on the horizon.

Rocinante44
Rocinante44
4 years ago
Reply to  John Acord

nah, that would never get to first base. i say they grab page off of a sidewalk and waterboard her in a van right there and then. in 5 minutes they could issues hundreds of arrest warrants

John Acord
John Acord
4 years ago
Reply to  Rocinante44

You’re 100% correct. Never met a LIbTard that I would share a fox hole with. They are all cowards and will defect, talk, incriminate, makeup stories, and plain rat in a minute of rough interrogation. Unfortunately, Barr plays by the rules and the Libtards will hide behind a phalanx of lawyers and Obama judges. Need a special counsel.I suggest Ryan Patrick, the US Attorney for Southern Texas who is the son of Dan Patrick our Lt.Governor and is capable of getting the truth from these LibTards even if it might bend some of the “rules.”

Drew the Infidel
Drew the Infidel
4 years ago

Now that the “collusion” narrative against President Trump has fallen on its ass, the commiecrats are “busier than a cat covering sh*t in an ash pile”, as the old saying goes. They are trying to keep the lie alive by attempting to discredit AG Barr, the new source of their troubles.

As Lincoln once said, no man has a good enough memory to be a successful liar. Or,

“O what a tangled web we weave,
When first we practice to deceive!” — Sir Walter Scott

Stephen Honig
Stephen Honig
4 years ago

Put that anti American, anti Semite scumbag in prison. He almost destroy my country before Trump became POTUS. He destroyed Europe!

AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ DEPLORABLE 2020
AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ DEPLORABLE 2020
4 years ago

Obama’s involvement to ensure Hilliary Clinton’s Presidential bid was a ‘Slam Dunk’,….. has shown his, and their complete inept ability to run even the simplest corrupt use of government power, pathetically !!

comment image

John Mitchell
John Mitchell
4 years ago

I think that if you started water-boarding these traitors we would get the whole story.

felix1999
felix1999
4 years ago
Reply to  John Mitchell

It’s okay for Muslims to behead us but God forbid we simulate drowning.

Rocinante44
Rocinante44
4 years ago
Reply to  John Mitchell

yeah, i’d pick page. one look at her mug and you now she’s a squealer. i doubt they’d even get the towel over her face before she caved

John Mitchell
John Mitchell
4 years ago
Reply to  Rocinante44

More severe methods are available if that doesn’t work.

AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ DEPLORABLE 2020
AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ DEPLORABLE 2020
4 years ago

comment image

AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ DEPLORABLE 2020
AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ DEPLORABLE 2020
4 years ago

comment image

felix1999
felix1999
4 years ago

LOL!
comment image

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago

What, little one, did Clownton not say?

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
4 years ago

That’s beside the point, little one. You made a statement, “Clinton never said that”. What was “never said” by Clownton, little one?

Bart's Bantering
Bart's Bantering
4 years ago

Yet more treasonous ‘collusion’ by the evil marxist left –

Rocinante44
Rocinante44
4 years ago

any of you believe that the muslim himself didn’t direct all this?

Badger
Badger
4 years ago

Isn’t it time the administration started prosecutions? All these tales of treason and corruption are well and good but let’s see some court action.

dhd123
dhd123
4 years ago

The time to let bygones be bygones is over, there needs to be aggressive prosecution of every person involved, even if it leads up to Obama, which I believe it does.

felix1999
felix1999
4 years ago

Oh, Biden, you have shady dealings along with your son with the Ukraine…
comment image

fastfood
fastfood
4 years ago

All good things come in time! While only piece by piece, JW continually uncovers the scams – no wine truly satisfies before it time!

fuster
fuster
4 years ago

Pamela Geller is not just a liar and a bigoted piece of crap, she’s also a freaking lunatic

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!