News Ticker >
[ November 14, 2019 ]

FBI Scrutinizes Over 2,000 Cases Tied to Foreign Terrorist Organizations

[ November 13, 2019 ]

EPIC FAIL: Impeachment hearings fall flat so treasonous Dems trot out new charge

[ November 13, 2019 ]

Self-hating Jew and pro-jihad Code Pinker Ariel Gold Tweets Out Jewish Mourner’s Prayer For Dead...

[ November 13, 2019 ]

‘I MEANT IT’: Don Cherry won’t back down after he’s fired over immigration comment

[ November 13, 2019 ]

Ukrainian Officials Release Records Showing 46 Payments to Hunter Biden Totaling Over $3.1 Million

[ November 13, 2019 ]

Jihad-Rep. Ilhan Omar Abuses, Offends Republican Pete King’s Retirement: ‘Islamophobe… Good Riddance’

[ November 13, 2019 ]

Schiff Threatens Republicans: Don’t Criticize the Whistleblower During Public Impeachment Hearings or Else

[ November 13, 2019 ]

CORRUPT Schiff won’t let Republican list of witnesses testify in impeachment hearing after the Intelligence...

[ November 13, 2019 ]

WATCH: Rocket Hit Israel: Israel Under Rocket Attack After IDF Assassinates Major Terror Leader in...

[ November 12, 2019 ]

In landmark ruling, EU’s top court says Jewish settlement product labeling mandatory

Facebook’s Zuckerberg Vows Facebook Will Work With Governments on Hate Speech

65

Freedom of speech is the foundation of a free society. Without it, a tyrant can wreak havoc unopposed, while his opponents are silenced. Political speech, being the most protected form of speech under the First Amendment, warrants the highest level of scrutiny against the laws that regulate it.

Putting up with being offended is essential in a pluralistic society in which people differ on basic truths. If a group will not bear being offended without resorting to violence, that group will rule unopposed while everyone else lives in fear, while other groups curtail their activities to appease the violent group. This results in the violent group being able to tyrannize the others.

If speech that offends a group is outlawed, that group has absolute power, and a free society is destroyed. A group that cannot be criticized cannot be opposed. It can work its will no matter what it is, and no one will be able to say anything to stop it.
Inoffensive speech needs no protection. The First Amendment was developed precisely in order to protect speech that was offensive to some, in order to prevent those who had power from claiming they were offended by speech opposing them and silencing the powerless.

A free society is by its nature one in which people put up with others being uncivil and offensive. The alternative is a quiet authoritarian society in which only one opinion is allowed and the others are silenced, and ultimately sent to the camps.

Zuckerberg Vows Facebook Will Work With Governments on Hate Speech

By Alan Katz and Bloomberg, Fortune, May 10, 2019

Facebook Inc. Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg said his company would work with governments to determine what content is acceptable on social-media networks.

Zuckerberg made the comments in an interview on France2 television after meeting with President Emmanuel Macron on Friday and following the release of a French government report that said new regulation should be applied to large social-media companies.

“Democracy works, and that’s why we want to work with the Macron government,” Zuckerberg said in a French translation of the interview. “We’re responsible for making sure that hate speech isn’t on our products and services, but what seems important is that there needs to be a public process to determine what is unacceptable, what mustn’t be on these networks, and we’re going to work with governments to do it.”

Facebook and other social media companies are confronting a crescendo of criticism in Europe and the U.S. over how they handle personal data, hate speech, and their vulnerability to manipulation. The rising outrage prompted Zuckerberg in March to call for government regulation of four broad areas — harmful content, election integrity, privacy, and data portability.

The French government report, which will serve as a basis for redefining how France deals with hate speech, said new rules should make social networks accountable “for protecting the integrity their members, protecting users from abuse by other members and third-party attempts to manipulate the platform.”

Zuckerberg filed another post after his meeting with Macron. “We both believe governments should take a more active role around important issues like balancing expression and safety, privacy and data portability, and preventing election interference,” he wrote. “There are nuanced decisions to make here, such as how we should handle content that isn’t illegal but might cause harm.”

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute to our ground-breaking work here.


Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Contribute Monthly - Choose One

Have a tip we should know? Your anonymity is NEVER compromised. Email tips@thegellerreport.com

Pin It on Pinterest