UK: Muslim migrant convicted rapist BACK ON STREETS after plane passengers stopped his deportation

This POS needs to have an “accident”.

What is needed is to rid him for once and for all by the people
vigilante

UK mapped areas
http://www.pmclauth.com/articles/mapping-the-problem

Pity victim, suffering awful injustice. In animal company, alien intruder violated English “Hannah”. (Early Age of Imperial GREAT Britain, when Kingdom foundation was Bible — as Queen Victoria unashamedly proclaimed; that base creature would swiftly have wound-up at end-of-hanging rope, gallows-justice suspended!) Yet, at no insignificant cost, ethically bankrupt “legal team” fight for criminal perpetrator. Broken judicial system — inflicts further psychological injury upon an already wounded victim! Wretched lawyers, probably smugly satisfied to loose their client back into society: Somali predator. ~~~ The “group of passengers – who were unaware of his crime – took pity on him and intervened.” — Raising voices to defend the guilty, they indicted and condemned themselves.

The left should invite the Muslims to their houses, with their families, since they are such badly misunderstood victims.

Cut the sub human POS nuts off then DEPORT!

Let him do it again. They don’t care why should we?

His fuken head should be separated from his body, the same way Muslims kill infidels.

They should have deplaned all the passengers and returned the rapist to his homeland.

Let’s be clear what’s really going on here. I was quite confused after reading the headline, but now I think I’ve put the pieces together.

1. His crime occurred in 2007.
2. He was CONVICTED, and sentenced to 9 years in jail.
3. He SERVED HIS TIME.
4. After spending 9 years in a UK jail, UK authorities were set to deport him, as any country has a right to do to a non-citizen convicted of crimes.
5. As he was being put on a plane LAST OCTOBER, half a year ago, foolhardy passengers on the commercial airliner they were shipping him away on, raised a ruckus, causing him to be taken off the plane. These fools were apparently doing the same thing a bunch of passengers in Sweden did to another similar deportation effort that was reported here on Ms. Geller’s page several months ago.
6. The deportee was taken off the plane for SAFETY reasons. Isn’t a commercial airliner the last place you want a bunch of angry people shouting and screaming? The authorities’ decision to take him off of that plane had nothing to do with whether THEY “took pity” with him or not, but simply with whether his presence on that particular plane at that particular time would disrupt the flight. It would have.
7. The convicted rapist DID NOT walk free the moment he was taken off the plane. He went BACK TO JAIL to await deportation on a different plane. This was SIX MONTHS AGO, remember.
8. Apparently, the rapist “lawyered up” and now has barristers advocating for him to avoid deportation. This is every person’s RIGHT, in a democracy governed by the rule of law, and regardless of his crime or its seriousness, denial of that right would be an equally grave threat to democratic governance, if not MORE so.
9. After KEEPING HIM IN JAIL FOR ANOTHER SIX MONTHS after this deportee had already served his sentence of NINE YEARS, his lawyers apparently persuaded a judge to let him out ON BAIL while his deportation proceedings were underway, until a decision could be reached. The judge did this LAST WEEK.
10. His victim then went public, and got her name in the paper, saying she did not feel safe with him walking the streets. I’m NOT DISAGREEING with her, there — she has a right to feel that way, too. But keep in mind that …
11. If this rapist had been a UK citizen, he would have been “walking the streets” SIX MONTHS AGO after he finished his 9-year sentence. That’s what we EXPECT a fair and impartial legal system to do, after a convict finishes his sentence.
12. Once this convicted rapist’s deportation proceedings are completed, and depending on what the judge then rules, he will either
(A) be put on a DIFFERENT plane and be deported, or
(B) be allowed to remain in the UK, because the judge will have found some reason why he could LEGALLY avoid deportation. All of which …
13. Has NOTHING to do with any sympathy the judge might (or might not) feel toward the passengers whose protests caused the deportee to be removed from THEIR plane. And …
14. Maybe the passengers protested his presence on the plane because THEY did not want to ride for several hours in the same aluminum tube eight miles up in the air as a CONVICT BEING DEPORTED. I don’t know, but that’s a possibility the Daily Mail article failed to mention. And …
15. Maybe the authorities (in the UK as well as Sweden and elsewhere) will wise up and realize that it is MORE cost-effective to figure out some BETTER way to deport a CONVICTED CRIMINAL than to put him, handcuffed, onto a plane full of civilian passengers. Even if they put him on a privately-chartered business jet, it would cost less than all the money they are spending on courts and lawyers.