Hugh Fitzgerald: Hannah Allam Advises Journalists: Islam Is Unfairly Treated (Part Two)

11

Editor’s note: Part I here.

Another one of Hannah Allam’s six tips to journalists covering Islam is this:

In seeking the perspectives of Muslims, look beyond the mosques:

Story continues below advertisement

According to a Pew Research Center survey, 4 in 10 American Muslims attend a mosque weekly. About 30 percent of American Muslims go to a mosque only a few times a year, and about 25 percent do not go at all.

Allam thus cautions journalists against talking to Muslims in a mosque as the only sources for a story about Islam in America. “When you rely only on the mosque for sources, you are getting views that are typically more conservative and orthodox, and they don’t represent the full spectrum of Islamic practice in the U.S.,” she says.

But who are these journalists whom Allam believes write stories based only on conversations with Muslims in a mosque? All kinds of sources are used by those who report on Islam and Muslims in America. Among the stories most often reported are those about Muslim wives. Some remain  at home, with their children, and thus do not work outside the house. They are viewed sympathetically, “it’s my choice,” they insist. Muslim women starting their own businesses is another favorite subject. The taunts some Muslim women claim to endure because they cover — everything from the hijab to the niqab — are reported on with appropriate indignation. Victimhood is powerful. Muslim fathers who are having trouble adjusting to a less patriarchal society, while continuing to control increasingly restive, because americanized, offspring, are given a chance to explain their views. Muslim children discuss with reporters how their opinions of Unbelievers have changed since they came to America or, if born here, since they started attending public school with non-Muslim classmates. A ten-year-old’s claim that “my best friend is Jewish” can go a long way to focusing attention away from the deep antisemitism to be found in the Qur’an. And Muslims are given a chance to vent, to complain of the great misunderstanding, or deliberate malice, of Islamophobes who fail to understand the peaceful, tolerant essence of Islam. Muslims are shown helping out at food banks, helping to clean parks (this is a favorite news item, invariably involving Ahmadis), winning spelling bees, running marathons, even taking the oath of office as the “first Muslim mayor of Town X or City Y,” or defending, as members of CAIR, “the civil rights of Muslims.” Meanwhile, in much of the coverage of terrorist attacks, there is often an initial reluctance to mention Islam or Muslims; the malefactor’s name is given, but not his likely motivation. Sometimes he is described as “mentally ill,” but he is never described as following Qur’anic commandments. Hannah Allam need not worry about how journalists cover Islam; many are doing all they can to  present Muslims and Islam in the best possible light.

Reporters by now are well aware that mosques differ in their ideological orientation. Some may be controlled by Salafists, and receive Saudi money. Others may be run by clerics connected to the Muslim Brotherhood, which may signify support for Hamas. Still others may be run by self-described moderates who deplore and denounce terrorism, and much else in Islam: the best example of such reformers, someone who is on the level, is the Australian Imam Mohammad Tawhidi. All these are sources that a good reporter will use, naturally weighing them as to their veracity. And aside from conversations with Muslims both inside and outside of mosques, reporters will also discuss the views of non-Muslims about Muslim neighbors (always very positive, always amazed at “just how like us” they are), and former enemies (who now admit that their minds have been changed by the Muslims they’ve met, who turn out to be swell folks). Articulate islamocritics, on the other hand, are rarely interviewed in these reports in the mainstream press. And Hannah Allam has identified a problem — the supposedly total reliance by reporters on Muslim informants who regularly attend a mosque — that does not exist.

As to where reporters can go, she suggests reaching out to groups such as associations of Muslim doctors and Muslim student associations. If reporters look around, they will also find professional groups such as arts groups and writers groups.

What could be less threatening than Muslims with interests in the arts? Or so Hannah Allam believes. Of course, for Muslims the “arts” they are allowed to practice are limited. They cannot include, for the devout Muslim,  paintings or statues of living creatures. Both are haram. So are musical instruments. But why doesn’t Allam suggest covering other groups that claim to speak for Muslims, such as the many campus groups of Muslim students, or even better, CAIR, the Council on American Islamic Relations, that claims to be the foremost civil rights organization representing Muslims in America? Surely Hannah Allam should not object to reporters discussing Islam and Muslims with CAIR and its staff, so well-versed in taqiyya? Or does she worry that some of the remarks made in the past by CAIR staff members (e.g., Nihad Awad), and the ties between CAIR and Hamas, might then be mentioned by reporters?

Before choosing to use an Arabic word in a story, think about why you’re choosing it:

When reporting on Islam for English-speaking news outlets, many journalists use Arabic terms or other foreign words such as “Allah,” “hijab” or “Sharia.” “Allah” is Arabic for God, while “hijab” is not just a head covering; it is a broad term that can be used to describe modest dress. It could mean many different kinds of covering for modesty — a headscarf, or a veil that partially covers the face; a burqa, which covers the face and body; or a chador, which is a cloak that covers the body. Help the reader understand what it is and be specific about what it is that is being called a hijab, Allam says.

She emphasizes that these terms might be fairly well known but are certainly not widely understood. If you’re thinking about using foreign terms, ask if there is a more accessible word, she says.

Her suggestion that the  use of Arabic words be reduced to a bare minimum is meant to make Islam less foreign and forbidding to Unbelievers. Of course “Allah” can be replaced, in most cases, by “God,” though there is one case in which the exact Arabic phrase should always be given. This is the triumphalist exclamation “Allahu Akbar,” meaning “Our God is greater than yours,” a phrase which can be used in a variety of situations, but especially significant is its use before, during, or after a terrorist attack. Whatever else it may be, “Allahu akbar” is also a war cry. So, too, the one-word “inshallah” could be translated as “God willing” or “if God wants,” but “inshallah” is more evocative and fatalistic than its English version.

As for other Arabic words that are now used, I suspect that three words she carefully did not mention — dhimmi, jizyah, taqiyya — are words that she would prefer never be used. They bring up the most disturbing aspects of Islamic practice. Instead, for “dhimmi” she might substitute “tolerated non-Muslims’’; for “jizyah” a “tax on non-Muslims to pay for their physical protection,” and for “taqiyya,” something like “the practice of occasional minor misrepresentation in order to protect Islam from its enemies.”

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
11 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Halal Bacon
Halal Bacon
5 years ago

shitslam is a private secular cult, now go fawk off please and thank you

Lucinta Luna
Lucinta Luna
5 years ago
Reply to  Halal Bacon

see “What Men Want” on this site! Everything is available !! click on the blog here: zerozeroseries00.blogspot.com

Dennis
Dennis
5 years ago

Another interesting article by Fitzpatrick. While I accept
Fitzpatrick’s underlying premise that Islam remains a very dangerous belief
system to our American ways, mores, conduct, togetherness and humanity, I am hoping that
this women’s comments are trying to say that the less contact had by Muslims
with their Mosques, the more likely they will learn that it is to their
advantage to accept what Americanism is all about, and like all previous
migrants to this country, assimilate by recognizing that becoming American in
your actions and conduct supersedes what any so-called religious belief system
demands of you, unless to do so violates the reverence, good neighborliness and
moral conduct expected of anyone from their religious belief system. Clearly, she
is stating that the Mosques tend to promote the orthodoxy of the Islamic belief
system, which is directly contrary to everything we pride in what being
American is all about. Orthodoxy promotes and preaches the dangerous belief
that true believers of Islam must dominate, and look with disdain on all
others. With those comments, I continue to wonder why our legal authorities are
not prosecuting all those who preach hate and violence, as a method to stop
terrorist Islamic activity here in the states. All in all, if becoming
Americanized will end the orthodoxy belief of the Quran and related books and
teachings of the belief system that is Islam, I, for one, would wish her people
well. Until I really see that happening, I will remain vigilant and concerned
that these believers cannot assimilate into what being American is truly all
about.

felix1999
felix1999
5 years ago
Reply to  Dennis

Because they are NOT on our side. We still have some resistance in authority positions but little justice is served. Once you can understand that it won’t be so puzzling. It is maddening.
comment image

felix1999
felix1999
5 years ago

Sickening!
Muslims always have to play the victim card when exposed.
Yet they can lie like hell and be absurd in their lies and insults to others.
comment image

MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
5 years ago

In other news, neo-nazis think Nazi Germany was unfairly treated.

jerrys
jerrys
5 years ago

Moslems are trained from birth in taqiya, kitman and a hundred other ways of lying, deceit and treachery so that lying is so natural that it does not register on a polygraph. The Western mind is not able to cope with this as we are taught from birth that lying is wrong. When the call to war with us comes every moslem will stab you in the back without a thought.
Proscribe islam or be a slave or worse under sharia.

Tom
Tom
5 years ago

Where muslims are a minority, they whine about being oppressed. When muslims are a majority, there is no minority.

Gene
Gene
5 years ago

It’s so true. Islam is constantly treated as a kind, tolerant, and peaceful religion, which is very unfair treatment.

Woodcarver
Woodcarver
5 years ago

The takeover has begun the jihadists are in our congress now and will continue to get in thanks to the stupidity of liberals get them out now before its to late they along with the socialists are trying to take our president down and if
that happens the Muslims will eat the liberals alive.

Cauc-Asian Patriot
Cauc-Asian Patriot
5 years ago

JUST REMEMBER THAT WHATEVER YOU DO, DON’T OFFEND ISLAM’S DEAD PROPHET OR THEY WILL COME FOR YOU TO KILL YOU BY OFFERING BOUNTIES ON YOUR HEAD! SO FOLKS WHO HAVE A PHOBIA OF MUSLIMS ARE WRONG? WOW! GUESS THOSE WHO FEARED MAFIA KILLINGS HAD A PHOBIA TOO?

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!