News Ticker >
[ February 15, 2019 ]

Jacques Brel on an open thread

[ February 15, 2019 ]

Muslim suspect in murder of Jewish teen: ‘I wanted to kill a Jew and be...

[ February 15, 2019 ]

Syracuse University: Anti-Israel Organizers Endorse Terrorist Group Hamas

[ February 15, 2019 ]

Muslim Researcher Mohamed Gad El-Zoghby: We Should Erect a Statue of Hitler Because of What...

[ February 15, 2019 ]

Address Records Show Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) Still Lived With Her First Husband Throughout Marriage...

[ February 15, 2019 ]

Bernie Sanders Called Ilhan Omar to Offer His Support After Her Jew-Hating Tweets

[ February 15, 2019 ]

BBC in full sharia mode: “Salman Rushdie radicalised my generation”

[ February 15, 2019 ]

In Jew-hating Muslim Rep. Ilhan Omar’s Minnesota district, police deal with gangs, tight-lipped Somali Muslim...

[ February 14, 2019 ]

“I did it for my daughter,” says woman arrested for headscarf protest in Iran

[ February 14, 2019 ]

US Ambassador Grenell blasts Germany for celebrating 40th anniversary of the Iranian Islamic Revolution, a...

New York Times Food Section Joins the Boycott-Jews Movement

29

The New York Times has found a new way to criticize Israel while building up the mostly Muslim communities that want nothing more than to see the Jewish state wiped from the face of the earth — use the food section to take antisemitic shots and endorse the Nazi BDS movement. This is typical of the enemedia: relentless anti-Israel propaganda, no matter how fact-free. No one should read the New York Times expecting to find actual news, and the only people who still do are leftist lemmings. Yet for the Times, there is no downside: its readers, including Jewish readers will continue to subscribe, the ADL will not say a single solitary word (after all, Trump isn’t involved), and the Jewish Federation will continue to focus only on the threat from white supremacists.

“New York Times Food Section Joins the Boycott-Israel Movement,” by Ira Stoll, Algemeiner, February 7, 2019 (thanks to Mark):

The New York Times, which favors trade with Iran and Cuba, has recently been throwing its institutional weight behind the movement to boycott, divest from, and sanction Israel.

The newspaper published an official Times staff editorial critical of steps to counter the BDS movement. The Times news columns issued a command that readers “celebrate” the election of a BDS-supporting congresswoman. On the op-ed page, one regular columnist, Michelle Alexander, praised a church pension fund’s boycott of five Israeli banks as act of “moral clarity” in the tradition of Martin Luther King Jr. Another regular Times columnist, Michelle Goldberg, insisted, “Anti-Zionism Isn’t the Same as Anti-Semitism.” Goldberg defended the BDS movement — “a movement of nonviolent resistance,” she called it, ignoring that it operates in parallel and alongside violent terrorism — in a Times podcast.

Now even the Times food section is getting into the BDS act.

It started small, almost imperceptibly. The print Times began identifying its contributor Yotam Ottolenghi as a “British chef,” suppressing his Israeli heritage.

Then, on January 23, 2019, the Times published an article with a recipe for what the newspaper called “pearl couscous with creamy feta and chickpeas.”

Times readers in the comments noted that they were confused by the terminology; previous Times articles calling for that ingredient, like one in 2014 for “spicy couscous salad with tomatoes, green beans, and peppers,” hadn’t been afraid to refer to “Pearl couscous, also called Israeli couscous.” As recently as October 2018, the Times had written, “Pearl couscous, also known as Israeli or giant couscous.”

I thought of writing about that change, but I held back, figuring I might be viewed as overly sensitive to minor slights of the Jewish state. I asked the recipe author, Melissa Clark, what to make of the shift in terminology, but she didn’t respond to the query I sent via her website.

This week, though, the Times food section crossed the line, dispelling any remaining doubt about where its heart lies. It published an adoring feature, beginning on the section front and continuing to a full page inside the section, about Yasmin Khan. The article is headlined, “A Writer Describes Palestinian Cuisine, and the World Around It.”

The Times article reports, “Ms. Khan fell in love with Palestinian food when she first found herself in the West Bank 10 years ago, in her past life working in human rights with War on Want, a British charity committed to anti-poverty initiatives. (Ms. Khan left the group in 2011. In 2018, it was one of 20 organizations Israel blacklisted because of its support of an economic, cultural and academic boycott of Israel.)”

That’s an unhelpful and tendentious Times passage. War on Want’s “anti-poverty initiative” was to boycott the Jewish state, which it conspiratorially and inaccurately held entirely at fault for the poverty of Arabs in the West Bank and Gaza. The Times doesn’t ask or say whether Khan still favors a boycott of Israel, though it does allow that she “made a point not to quote Israeli sources in the book.” The Times misleadingly makes it sound as if War on Want’s BDS activities only became an issue long after Khan left the organization. In fact, though, Khan’s role at the organization while she worked there involved advocating for a boycott of Israel. In a 2009 video, Khan is seen speaking at a public event about “the crimes of Israel against the Palestinian people” and telling an audience, “I want you all to get involved in the BDS movement.” Describing War on Want as a “human rights group” is naïve, since it appears to have no regard for the rights of the Israelis it is boycotting. It might be more accurate to describe the organization as an anti-Israel hate group….

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute to our ground-breaking work here.


Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Contribute Monthly - Choose One

Have a tip we should know? Your anonymity is NEVER compromised. Email tips@thegellerreport.com

Pin It on Pinterest