New White House Counterterrorism Strategy Singles Out “Radical Islamists”

31

There is nothing “radical” within Islam about Islamic jihadists. Jihad as meaning warfare against unbelievers is as old as Islam itself. And the word “Islamist” is often used to separate Islam from jihad terrorism and sharia oppression, so as to maintain the fiction that Islam is benign and peaceful, and only those who have “hijacked” it are the problem. Nevertheless, this is a significant improvement over the Obama-era counterterror strategy, which studiously avoided any mention of Islam at all. You cannot defeat the enemy without knowing the enemy, and the terrorist enemy constantly makes it clear that he is operating on behalf of Islam and in accord with Islamic principles. So this is a welcome step in the right direction.

“New White House Counterterrorism Strategy Singles Out ‘Radical Islamists,’” by Adam Kredo, Washington Free Beacon, October 4, 2018 (thanks to Shirley):

The Trump administration is implementing a new, government-wide counterterrorism strategy that places renewed focus on combatting “radical Islamic terrorist groups,” marking a significant departure from the Obama administration, which implemented a series of policies aimed at deemphasizing the threat of Islamic terror groups.

Story continues below advertisement

In releasing the first national counterterrorism strategy since 2011, the Trump administration is working to take a drastically different approach than that of the former administration, according to senior U.S. officials.

While the Obama administration sought to dampen the United States’ focus on Islamic terror threats, the Trump administration has made this battle the centerpiece of its new strategy.

National Security Adviser John Bolton acknowledged in remarks to reporters Thursday afternoon that the new strategy is “a departure” from the former administration’s strategy, which has been characterized as a failure by Republican foreign policy voices due to the increasing number of domestic terror attacks and plots across the United States

“Radical Islamist terrorist groups represent the preeminent transnational terrorist threat to the United States, and to United States’ interests abroad,” Bolton said.

“The fact is the radical Islamic threat that we face is a form of ideology,” Bolton said. “This should not be anything new to anybody. King Abdullah of Jordan has frequently described the terrorist threat as a civil war within Islam that Muslims around the world recognize, and he is, after all, a direct descendent [sic] of the Sharif [inaudible], the keepers of the holy cities. If that’s how King Abdullah views it, I don’t think anybody should be surprised we see it as a kind of war, as well.”

“One may hope that the ideological fervor disappears, but sad to report, it remains strong all around the world, and even with the defeat of the ISIS territorial caliphate, we see the threat spreading to other countries,” Bolton added.

The Trump administration strategy also shifts the focus to Iran, characterizing the country as the foremost state sponsor of terror across the globe.

“The United States faces terrorist threats from Iran, which remains the most prominent state sponsor of terrorism that, really, the world’s central banker of international terrorism since 1979,” Bolton said. “And from other terrorist groups. Iran-sponsored terrorist groups such as Lebanese Hezbollah, Hamas, and Palestinian Islamic jihad, continue to pose a threat to the United States and our interests.”…

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
31 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Navy_Vet
Navy_Vet
5 years ago

The obama imported many military aged muslim men into the country under the guise of being refugees. Many of them are the seeds for future terror cells to sprout and start their jihad here in the US. Finding them may next near to impossible, especially in areas with large muslim populations.

No foreign country is a real threat to our country, however islam being incompatible with the western way of life, our judicial system, and our constitution will be the means of our destruction. Either rid our country of this cancer, or be prepared to live in a muslim run 3rd world country like the ones they came from.

Liatris Spicata
Liatris Spicata
5 years ago
Reply to  Navy_Vet

Spot on comment, ‘vet. This initiative is most welcome and long overdue, in my book, even if the article is a bit sketchy on the details.

I’d like to add that for all of what I see as Trump’s considerable limitations, this is the kind of thing that never would have happened under President Hillary. In that respect, if in no other, Trump is vastly preferable to what the Democrats offered in 2016, or are likely to offer in the foreseeable future.

Suresh
Suresh
5 years ago
Reply to  Navy_Vet

They are aided by the dumb , ignorant Left/Liberal loons coming out of colleges/schools run by pro-jihadi left/liberal loons

And by the time they realise their stupidity they get assaulted , gang raped or murdered like this couple its too late for them https://tinyurl.com/yahupccy

Problem is they enable evil while not able to see evil thanks to pro-jihadi left/liberal indoctrination in schools/colleges where real history of islam and America is no longer taught.

felix1999
felix1999
5 years ago
Reply to  Navy_Vet

Let’s take that a step further. To the chagrin of The Daily Mail, I posed this question.
Why aren’t these military aged males fighting for their country?

Go back to WW2, imagine, if the Brits had fled their country as “refugees” and “migrants” before, during and after the Blitz back in 1940. The U.K. would be speaking German! Instead they had a leader, Churchill who united them and they fought back and won. Why aren’t these Muslim military aged men fighting for their country? If they don’t think it is worth fighting for I see less of a reason for us to be fighting for them.

The most obvious question is WHY when we are at war with a country are we taking in their people?
During WW2 were were not taking in Germans or the Japanese as “migrants” or “refugees” as we fought against them. Why would we take in Muslims from ANY country? It is a Holy War in their eyes.

The truth is there will never be peace with Muslims. They don’t want a democracy. They don’t want a secular government, our Constitution or Bill of Rights. They want Islam and Sharia law to enforce their particular flavor of Islam. Their revered leader, Mohammad is nothing more than a gigolo, demented pedophile and a sadist and extreme male chauvinist pig with no conscience.

Halal Bacon
Halal Bacon
5 years ago

shitslam is the Walter Mitty of religions (actually a cult masquerading as a religion, but using it this way shows it to be so ludicrous)

spacearcadian
spacearcadian
5 years ago

Islam is peace. 50 MILLIONS of MUSLIMS in Europe, 10 MILLIONS of MUSLIMS in USA are a GROWING FORCE of peace. You better accept muslim demands or face the consequences

CharlieSeattle
CharlieSeattle
5 years ago
Reply to  spacearcadian

The USA does NOT need to allow thousands of backward, 7th century, unvetted and violent muslim savages into our country that have ‘enshrined’ sexual slavery, rape, forced conversion, assault, murder and genocide in their FAKE religion!

ed
ed
5 years ago
Reply to  spacearcadian

pisslam is a piece alright….a piece of sh1te, just like YOU.

knightsstrength
knightsstrength
5 years ago

Good we reversing Obama’s laws, deals for the better of USA.

Close down the Muslim terror camps in the USA for starts, do not hear much about them. Blow the Muslims away

TD
TD
5 years ago

So it’s 2018…
has any Democrat learned to say “Radical Islamic Terrorism”?

and they never will.

michaelofsydney
michaelofsydney
5 years ago
Reply to  TD

Well, I learned to say it.
Then I learned to say Islamic Terrorism
Then I learned to say Terrorism
And guess what.
It is (in the main) the same duck

CharlieSeattle
CharlieSeattle
5 years ago
Reply to  TD

>> Radical Islamic Terrorism? …Radical islam? …Muslim Extremists? …No!

islam itself the problem.

The real “Radical Muslim Extremists” are the ones that do NOT attack, murder, rape infidels or support those that do. But that civilized act puts themselves in danger of attack from uncivilized muslims, for Apostasy.

Apostasy in Islam (Arabic: ردة‎‎ riddah or ارتداد irtidād) is commonly defined as the conscious abandonment of Islam by a Muslim in word or through deed. The definition of apostasy from Islam and its appropriate punishment(s) are controversial, and they vary among Islamic scholars and Islamic schools of thought.

…The usual punishment is death!

THE PUNISHMENT FOR APOSTASY FROM ISLAM

http://www.answering-islam.org/Silas/apostasy.htm

The punishment for apostasy from Islam is a controversial topic for Muslims living in the West and for ex-Muslims everywhere. That’s because Islam teaches that apostates are to be killed. We know from historic Islamic documents that during Muhammad’s lifetime, and the lifetimes of the next four “Rightly Guided Caliphs”, tens of thousands of Muslims left the faith of Islam and thousands were killed. On a large scale the Muslims made war on groups that chose to leave Islam and massacres of apostates occurred. On a smaller scale individual apostates were executed. This death sentence is in effect whether or not the apostasy occurred in or out of the Islamic state.

Many Muslims living in Islamic countries have no problem with the rule of putting apostates to death. The examples of Robert Hussein[1] of Kuwait, Abdul Rahman[2] of Afghanistan, and Bahaa el-Din Ahmed Hussein el-Akkad[3] of Egypt come to mind. These ugly Muslim governments are succored by the West’s finances and blood while they impose an imperial and brutal religion upon its citizens.

On the other hand, Muslims living in the West are embarrassed by this death sentence. The West values the freedoms of thought and speech, Islam does not, and these virtues have never blossomed under Islamic rule. Consequently, when asked about the Islamic law for apostates many Western Muslims do their best to cover up Islam’s edict. Motivated by conviction, or shame, they make up various defenses and say whatever they can to put your mind at ease and make Islam more acceptable to a naïve, gullible, and ignorant Western audience.

>>> The way around that little Catch 22, …is to lie.

>>> The Taqiyya Factor

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/11/the_taqiyya_factor.html

Taqiyya is an Islamic doctrine that allows Muslims to deceive non-Muslims. As in lie to them. Dr. Sami Mukaram, author of Taqiyya in Islam, writes: “Taqiyya is of fundamental importance in Islam. Practically every Islamic sect agrees to it and practices it…

>>> Former President Obama expertly practices Taqiyya. That is why he was not condemned to death for Apostasy for renouncing islam, for saying he is a Christian.

R. Arandas
R. Arandas
5 years ago

Unless Islam itself changes, terror in our world will never truly end.

Rick Reynolds
Rick Reynolds
5 years ago
Reply to  R. Arandas

Islam will never change, it had 1400 years to do so and it’s remained as dangerous as it was on the day it was invented. The only solution for Islam is isolation (from free nations) or total eradication.

felix1999
felix1999
5 years ago

Here is something else that is hilarious!
You are reading that right. The UNITED NATIONS orders the U.S. a sovereign country,
to lift some sanctions on Iran!

Thursday, 04 October 2018
UN Court “Orders” United States to Lift Some Sanctions on Iran
Written by James Murphy

The UNITED NATIONS ‘highest court, the INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE (ICJ) handed the Islamic Republic of Iran a partial victory against the United States on Wednesday, ruling that America must halt sanctions on certain humanitarian items going into Iran. (WHY are we sending ANY “aid” to Iran?)

Among those “humanitarian” items are AIRPLANE PARTS.

Iran had asked the 15-judge panel for ALL sanctions to be terminated without delay and for COMPENSATION
for REVENUE LOSSES it had incurred after the United States’ May 8 WITH DRAWL from the Iran Nuclear Deal. While the court rejected the compensation request, it did ORDER the United States to “remove by means of its choosing, any impediments arising from the measures of May 8 to the free exportation to the territory of the Islamic Republic of Iran” of medicines and medical devices; foodstuffs and agricultural commodities; and spare parts, equipment, and services necessary for the safety of civil aviation.

The new ruling is “binding,” but the ICJ has no enforcement mechanism. Therefore, led by President Trump, the United States is likely to ignore it.

With its phony International Court of Justice, its useless bureaucracies, and its rampant anti-Americanism, isn’t it long past time that the United States remove itself from the ineffective and corrupt United Nations and use that money for better purposes?
https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/item/30242-un-court-orders-united-states-to-lift-some-sanctions-on-iran?vsmaid=1340&vcid=4584

The U.S. also needs to dump the WTO (World Trade Organization).

CharlieSeattle
CharlieSeattle
5 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

The UN was created with a 3 fatal flaws.

Allowing dictatorships and fascist muslim states in the UN.
Allowing communists states in the UN.
Allowing Russia and China to have veto power.

All free countries should withdraw and stop all funding at once to the UN.
All free countries SHOULD reform under NATO, with a few minor changes.

Deport all muslims, CITIZENS OR not, from the west at once!!
Replace Turkey with Israel.

IzlamDownpressesHumanity
IzlamDownpressesHumanity
5 years ago

“Radical islamist” a word salad of meaningless verbiage. There is no muslum, no muslum state, no imam, mullah, ayatrollah who describes himself as “islamist” because islamist, like islamophobia is “a word created by fascists and used by cowards to manipulate morons.”

Rick Reynolds
Rick Reynolds
5 years ago

Well said Pam and spot on. While I agree that this is a sea-change compared to Obama’s open support of “radical” Islam, I’m worried that the Trump admin might narrow itself to fighting Islam the way GW Bush did. It leaves one easily open to being manipulated by the very enemy you should be fighting (as Bush was).

The Saudis not only got away with murdering nearly 3,000 US citizens on 9/11 but they masterfully re-directed American anger away from themselves towards their own targets in Iraq and Afghanistan. Granted these nations all played a part, including Iran but the greatest share of responsibility and blame lied with the Saudis and the US completely let them get away with it.

It would’ve made more sense to invade Saudi Arabia, eradicate their terrorist groups/madrassas and take their oil to fund the war. I really don’t care what Trump/Bolton publicly call their enemy, whether it’s “radical Muslims” or “extremists” so long as they’re fighting our real enemy. In fact I think it’d be a wise ploy not to overtly name who we’re fighting and just carry out the dirty work in the background so the enemy has no time to prepare a counter-offensive.

However I don’t believe they know who they’re fighting. Bolton/Giuliani have often spoken at MeK conferences who themselves were considered terrorists and radical Muslims. What’s the point of replacing one terrorist Islamic group with your preferred terrorist Islamic group? That’s what Bush did in Iraq and nothing has changed.

That’s what is so frustrating about all of this. Nearly 20 years after 9/11, most of our leaders still haven’t figured out or simply refuse to accept that we’re at war with Islam. Can you imagine if in the 1940s they said we were at war with the “radical Germans” and completely left Nazism alone? Well that is exactly what we’re doing with Islam today.

This isn’t a game, it’s not like you could be wrong and there are no consequences. If we lose the war against Islam we lose everything including our lives and we’ll end up like the other 57 nations that were taken over by Muslims and are now backwards barbaric hell-holes where women, gays, non-Muslims have no freedom and you could be jailed or killed for saying the wrong words about Mohammad and Islam.

Our leader’s failure to realize we’re at war with Islam will mean that the vast majority of Muslims will be left alone to continue plotting the conquest of western countries. It also means the rape, terrorism, destruction of our freedoms and way of life by Muslims will continue unabated. The censorship of the media to protect Islam, the demonization of critics of Islam will only mean that things will keep getting a lot worse before they get better, if they do.

It seems the only thing that will wake people up is more mass scale terrorist attacks. Until then people will continue to foolishly believe Muslims pose no threat to us, until they climb into a truck and drive it into a crowd of pedestrians.

Dave
Dave
5 years ago
Reply to  Rick Reynolds

Well said Rick. Islam started it 1400 years ago and now they want to bring their war here. The muslim indoctrination starts at birth with the mere word: muslim.Nicholas Ginex has some reasonable approach to defeating islam by “Expose the Quran with Worldwide Communication”. since the ideology stems from the book, the idea is to expose it for all it’s flaws.
Here in America we must expose the people who infiltrate our political system (Keith Ellison, Andre Carson, T Perez, Linda Sarsour, El Sayed,etc and now the next budding people like K Gillibrand-NY>)
See the examples of betrayal by politicians in Britain, Germany, France, Sweden and others.
As for our government officials: expose any and all muslims starting with the State Dept, judicial appointees esp by Obama, DOJ lawyers who keep force feeding us with mosques we don’t want. Expose the judges who put a man in prison for a piece of bacon.
Most important is keep islam out of our schools, Muslim Student associations out of our college campuses.
As for our military: restore the training manuals to include Jihad, radical islam and other suggestions as outlined by Phil Haney. If you want to live win the US: you assimilate or leave! We don’t want the vile behaviors of the “perfect man” or any of characteristics of the Quran. Monitor the mosques and the churches for there is the potential for evil in anyone. Expose it, Shame it, Remove it! BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY.
PS: CAIR is as evil as communism-kill it.

Rick Reynolds
Rick Reynolds
5 years ago
Reply to  Dave

Thanks Dave and likewise, I think those are great ideas. Most of the supporters of Islam think they’re safe and immune because they’re “unknown” and work in the shadows. Like judges who give light sentences to Muslim terrorists, politicians who support Islamic fascist groups, etc. So if they were exposed, their faces plastered everywhere as traitors, then people will think twice.

I also agree that education is the key to defeating Islam, knowledge is power. Islam is succeeding because most people are naive and don’t want to be seen as “bigots” and hatemongers, so they tow the Islam line, usually unwittingly. It will definitely take a multipronged approach to deal with this very evil enemy but thanks to social media, we’ve been able to bypass the Leftist censorship and educate our fellow citizens about Islam.

This is why in Europe we see the rise of right-wing/conservative anti-Islam parties. Hopefully the trend will continue, we definitely need that to happen here also in Canada and the US. The best would be if our leaders clued in, then they could use all the resources and powers the State possess to defeat this ideology. Ultimately our goal should be to ban Islam and deport Muslims, except the ones who pose no threat, who’ve left Islam and can integrated.

I believe we will win in the end, but we have to keep educating fellow non-Muslims and keep doing what we can to stop Islam from spreading in our own communities.

RevRoy
RevRoy
5 years ago

There ought to be a law. Hmmmm. As Islam is NOT a religion but a socio-economic, military, cult-dictatorship that controls Muslims from cradle to grave, Trump should pass an Executive Order BANNING all Cult-members, KKK, ISIS, ISLAM, etc. from entering the USA unless they are willing to abandon…declare in writing, that they are willing to leave this CULT and are desirous of joining the American experiment of Freedom, Prosperity and Safety for all. Remove ANY mention of religion and it’s all OK. (He should place a ban on ALL immigration first, for a year, to clean up O’Bummers mess and get rid of all the scum while he builds the wall. When the wall is complete, then he can re-open the doors of immigration to a limited few.

iprazhm
iprazhm
5 years ago
Reply to  RevRoy

Islam is indeed a religion. It began as a religion. It has grown into a monstrous and powerful pagan ‘theocracy’ – a system of government in which priests rule in the name of God or a god. ~ The Oxford English Dictionary ;

What Qualifies Islam as a Religion? An illiterate Arab some 1500 years ago claimed he was commissioned by Allah as his emissary. What’s the proof for his claim? By Amil Imani http://b1ff5939f6.nxcli.net/2018/09/qualifies-islam-religion.html/

Robert Spencer in PJ Media: New York Times Sees ‘Disturbing Trend’ of Treating Islam as ‘Not a Religion’
OCT 3, 2018 1:21 PM BY ROBERT SPENCER Merriam Webster defines “religion” as “a personal set or institutionalized system of religious attitudes, beliefs, and practices.” Islam certainly qualifies as a religion by that definition. Religions profess to connect human beings to the divine. Islam professes to do that. At the same time, however, it is also a political system that is authoritarian, supremacist, discriminatory, expansionist, violent, and aggressive. https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/10/robert-spencer-in-pj-media-new-york-times-sees-disturbing-trend-of-treating-islam-as-not-a-religion

iprazhm
iprazhm
5 years ago

“In the name of distinguishing the enemy from Muslims who mean us no harm, far too many Western commentators have avoided using the name “Islam” for the enemy’s ideology, and instead have decided to create their very own terms for the threat we’re facing, terms that are alien to the enemy. Terms such as:

Islamic Fundamentalism.
Islamic Extremism.
Totalitarian Islam.
Islamofascism.
Islamonazism.
Political Islam.
Bin Ladenism.
Radical Islam.
Militant Islam.
Islamism.
Jihadism.” By Bosch Fawstin a Recovered Muslim

https://fawstin.blogspot.com/2012/04/who-cares-about-islam.html

CharlieSeattle
CharlieSeattle
5 years ago
Reply to  iprazhm

No, islam itself is the root problem.

iprazhm
iprazhm
5 years ago
Reply to  CharlieSeattle

Please explain your position. There are over one hundred verses in the Quran ordering violence. Violence against non-believers, specifically naming Jews and Christians, also apostates. Islam tells men to beat their wives and to rape women they take into their possession. It does not matter if an individual muslim lives in a free country and chooses to not be obedient, they can, and have suddenly decided to be obedient, to be devout and slave unbelievers.

CharlieSeattle
CharlieSeattle
5 years ago
Reply to  iprazhm

…if an individual muslim lives in a free country and chooses to not be obedient, they can, and have suddenly decided to be obedient, to be devout and slave unbelievers? …Not for long.

>> Radical Islamic Terrorists …Radical islam …Muslim Extremists? …No!

The real “Radical Muslim Extremists” are the ones that do NOT attack, murder, rape infidels or support those that do. But that civilized act puts themselves in danger of attack from uncivilized muslims, for Apostasy.

Apostasy in Islam (Arabic: ردة‎‎ riddah or ارتداد irtidād) is commonly defined as the conscious abandonment of Islam by a Muslim in word or through deed. The definition of apostasy from Islam and its appropriate punishment(s) are controversial, and they vary among Islamic scholars and Islamic schools of thought.

…The usual punishment is death!

THE PUNISHMENT FOR APOSTASY FROM ISLAM

http://www.answering-islam.org/Silas/apostasy.htm

The punishment for apostasy from Islam is a controversial topic for Muslims living in the West and for ex-Muslims everywhere. That’s because Islam teaches that apostates are to be killed. We know from historic Islamic documents that during Muhammad’s lifetime, and the lifetimes of the next four “Rightly Guided Caliphs”, tens of thousands of Muslims left the faith of Islam and thousands were killed. On a large scale the Muslims made war on groups that chose to leave Islam and massacres of apostates occurred. On a smaller scale individual apostates were executed. This death sentence is in effect whether or not the apostasy occurred in or out of the Islamic state.

Many Muslims living in Islamic countries have no problem with the rule of putting apostates to death. The examples of Robert Hussein[1] of Kuwait, Abdul Rahman[2] of Afghanistan, and Bahaa el-Din Ahmed Hussein el-Akkad[3] of Egypt come to mind. These ugly Muslim governments are succored by the West’s finances and blood while they impose an imperial and brutal religion upon its citizens.

On the other hand, Muslims living in the West are embarrassed by this death sentence. The West values the freedoms of thought and speech, Islam does not, and these virtues have never blossomed under Islamic rule. Consequently, when asked about the Islamic law for apostates many Western Muslims do their best to cover up Islam’s edict. Motivated by conviction, or shame, they make up various defenses and say whatever they can to put your mind at ease and make Islam more acceptable to a naïve, gullible, and ignorant Western audience.
>>> The way around that little Catch 22, …is to lie.

>>> The Taqiyya Factor

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/11/the_taqiyya_factor.html

Taqiyya is an Islamic doctrine that allows Muslims to deceive non-Muslims. As in lie to them. Dr. Sami Mukaram, author of Taqiyya in Islam, writes: “Taqiyya is of fundamental importance in Islam. Practically every Islamic sect agrees to it and practices it…

>>> Former President Obama expertly practices Taqiyya. That is why he was not condemned to death for Apostasy for renouncing islam, for saying he is a Christian.

iprazhm
iprazhm
5 years ago
Reply to  CharlieSeattle

I reread your first reply and realize you said, ‘islam ‘is’ the root of the problem’. For some crazy reason I saw ‘isn’t’.
I completely agree with you!

iprazhm
iprazhm
5 years ago

It’s a step in the right direction for sure. But the truth is still muffled and the aim is off target because islam is the enemy, not ‘radical’ islam. It’s an absolute impossibility to determine which muslim will decide to be devout and carry out the clear and numerous orders of their holy Quran to murder, rape, rob or torture unbelievers.
That would be like trying to determine which shark in the ocean is going to decide to strike, or simply pass it’s prey by.
It is the nature of islam.

GRA
GRA
5 years ago

And we should publicly execute every last damn one of them.

Defence Man
Defence Man
5 years ago

The Trump administration has recognized the threat of Islamism. To defeat an enemy one must know the enemy. The administration has a way to go regarding understanding Islam, Islamism, jihad, and Muslims in general, they’ve made a decent start. The left / democrats on the other hand have embraced Islamism as their friend, an extremely dangerous problem for the country and its security !

Skip V. Patel
Skip V. Patel
5 years ago

comment image comment image

Even before O’Bama the US was begging Muslims, legal or illegal, to join the US military.

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!