UK: Only 40 of Those 400 Jihadis Who Had Come Back From Syria Have Been Successfully Prosecuted

10

When it comes to proseccuting jihads who’ve trained and fought in Syria, the United Kingdom’s record of success is disastrously low.

In fact, only a handful of the hundreds of known jihadis who fought for ISIS in Syria and then made it back to the United Kingdom have been detained and jailed.

More, it seems, are simply let go into the general population, freed to mix with civilians — who are largely unaware of the jihadi dangers that lurk.

Story continues below advertisement

In a related video, here’s a first-hand account of a British man who left his U.K. lifestyle to join with ISIS as a jihad, back in 2014:

The Spectator has more:

What happens to Brits who’ve returned from fighting for Islamic State in Syria and Iraq? Most would expect that they’d immediately fall into the criminal justice system, and wouldn’t then emerge for a very long time. Today it emerged that Home Secretary Sajid Javid had dropped Britain’s blanket opposition to the death penalty so that two Isis fighters from the group dubbed the ‘Beatles’ could be sent to the US. But in most cases, the question isn’t where someone will face justice, but whether they can face justice at all.

We know that there are hundreds of people who have returned from fighting for Islamic State. But what is less well-known is what happens when these individuals get back to Britain. A common assumption is that they go from Turkish detention centre to British jail, where they can regret their terrorist trip at Her Majesty’s Pleasure. But this assumption is wrong.

There are those who have clear evidence of wrongdoing against them, such as those ‘Beatles’ fighters. But then there are those who only have a suspicion of wrongdoing that is not backed up by any evidence.

I saw one such case when I visited three Brits detained in Turkey on suspicion of terrorism last year. I arrived at the detention centre in Izmir expecting to meet three angry young men, only to be told that I would in fact be interviewing a mother and her very young children.

These weren’t stereotypical jihadis caught on the border between Turkey and Syria, and awaiting the full might of the criminal justice system when they finally arrived back in Britain. In fact, when Nasra, as I’ll call her, and her children got back to London, they went home, rather than to a custody suite. This little family is far less unusual than you might think: in fact, very few suspected jihadis are convicted of any offence after they return to the UK from Syria or Iraq. Many of them are left to get on with their lives as before.

Nasra is British and was arrested by the Turkish authorities as she came back over the border from Syria with her dual Turkish-British national husband and children. They detained her on suspicion of terrorism and endangering national security, and spent a year trying to deport her. The husband, Oktay, was cleared in a Turkish court, but Nasra hasn’t been through the Turkish justice system at all. Initially, she refused to talk to officials, but once she discovered that even after she left the detention centre, she would still have to sign in every day, she grew more enthusiastic about deportation. It took months, though, for a DNA test to prove that her youngest child, who she held throughout our interview, was hers so that the Home Office would permit her to return. When we met, she had been there just short of a year, and was nearly on her way back to London.

You might think that being photographed, as Nasra was, on the Syrian border would be enough for the British courts to convict her of joining Islamic State. But British law does not currently consider travelling to Syria to be a criminal offence in itself, and there is no other evidence against this family. Nasra and her husband claim that they were actually set up: their story is that they were stopped while driving in Kilis, which is close to the border and has been witness to a number of arrests of returning jihadis. The police discovered that Nasra’s visa was out of date, and arrested them both.

Then, she told me, they were driven to the border by soldiers. ‘They rounded up everybody, took us to – with guns and everything – the border and then they took a picture of us’. ‘They took us to a big field,’ claimed Oktay in a separate conversation. ‘And they told us to get onto our knees in a form of being captured.’

Turkey hardly has the best record on human rights at the moment, so it’s difficult to know who is telling the truth. Nasra’s account was confused and taking her back through key moments turned up slightly different versions each time. Initially she claimed that me asking about the Syrian border was the first she’d even heard that she was suspected of terrorism, though she later contradicted that, as did her husband.

Even if there were stronger evidence that Nasra had definitely been in Syria, which she denied vehemently, such as mobile phone records showing she was in Raqqa, this would not be enough to convict her. She was detained as part of a larger group who returned quickly to Britain as its members did not try to fight the deportation order. The Home Office is tight-lipped about what happened to these alleged associates, but recently Security Minister Ben Wallace told the House of Commons that only 40 of those 400 who had come back had been successfully prosecuted for ‘direct action they’ve carried out in Syria’.

So what happens to the rest of them? The British intelligence services do not have the resources to monitor all 400 people who’ve come back from Syria. They do, however, assess that a significant number of these people no longer pose a security risk. For those that do, there are Temporary Exclusion Orders, which might involve someone’s passport being taken away, or their re-entry to the UK being conditional on complying with the Prevent de-radicalisation programme. But that’s it. If there isn’t enough evidence to convict someone, then they have a right to a free life.

The government could change the law to make travelling to Syria a criminal offence in itself, as is the case in Australia, something Javid has already hinted at. Given investigators are hardly going to be able to collect CCTV evidence of someone in Homs, this is the only option really open to ministers. Beyond that, they have to hope that either Nasra really was stitched up, having merely overstayed her visa, or that any longings for jihad that she and the others deported back to this country once held have now evaporated.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Suresh
Suresh
5 years ago

And the clown Left/liberal Pope wants christians to take in more of these Islamic wolves http://tinyurl.com/ydy8fkhl

Insane ?

felix1999
felix1999
5 years ago
Reply to  Suresh

Whew!!!!

From your link, Suresh:

THE PONTIFF WHO HELD ISLAMIC PRAYERS IN THE VATICAN, HAS BEEN CAUGHT ON CAMERA ATTEMPTING TO STEER HIS FLOCK AWAY FROM JESUS CHRIST, WARNING A HUGE CROWD OF CATHOLICS IN ROME THAT “HAVING A PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP WITH JESUS IS DANGEROUS AND VERY HARMFUL.“

THE SPEECH, WHICH TOOK PLACE ON JUNE 25, IS MERELY THE LATEST EYEBROW-RAISING ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE LIBERAL POPE.

LAST WEEK POPE FRANCIS TOLD THE ITALIAN NEWSPAPER LA REPUBBLICA THAT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA HAS “A DISTORTED VISION OF THE WORLD” AND AMERICANS MUST BE RULED BY A WORLD GOVERNMENT, AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, “FOR THEIR OWN GOOD.”

Dave Glynn
Dave Glynn
5 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Wasn’t this pope a former Nazi?

Es werde Licht
Es werde Licht
5 years ago
Reply to  Suresh

That´s why I prefer the ( so called ) Old Testament.
The Christians are ( mostly) like the super-liberals. They think that with love and hugs they can solve all problems.
It might work with people who have sence but not with fanatics who just want themself.
https://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/07/24/italian-bishop-i-would-turn-all-churches-into-mosques-to-save-migrants/
“Eye for an eye, tooth for an tooth” – sound fair for me.
We must bring the evil forces to a point were they are afraid to start violence in any form.

0349 JAT
0349 JAT
5 years ago

Meanwhile in CANADA .
(shiny pony) Turdeau has said he will facilitate the return of isis fighters back into CANADIAN society. (with free everything)….
While our vets who fought them are left wanting.

felix1999
felix1999
5 years ago

My God!
WHY let them into the country?
They should be striped of citizenship and sent back to where ever they came from.
This is more insanity!

R. Arandas
R. Arandas
5 years ago

It is because the elite does not WANT them to be prosecuted, they believe the more chaos Muslims create, the less trouble they will have in distracting the masses.

ed
ed
5 years ago

That sure is one plug-ugly hijabbed muslima pictured above this story……

Stephen Honig
Stephen Honig
5 years ago

Too bad all his sons who went to fight for jihad should have all been killed.

Dave Glynn
Dave Glynn
5 years ago

Do not call the muzrat scumbags “Brits or British” they may be citizens of the UK and might even have been born on the British isles but they definitely have never been Britons and to call them such is a grave insult to any patriotic British Men & Women.
DEATH TO JIHADI SCUM AND PROSCRIBE ISLAM IN THE UK!

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!