Israeli Government Blasts CNN and BBC: ‘Stop Your Manipulation!’ [Jew hatred]


It’s about time.

Israel’s Foreign Ministry slammed CNN [Cable News Network] and BBC [British Broadcasting Corporation] on Saturday for what it said was unbalanced coverage of recent events in Gaza, accusing the news outlets of “manipulating” events.

Quick note: Tech giants are snuffing us out. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense permenently banned us. Facebook, Twitter, Google search et al have shadowbanned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. Help us fight. Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW more than ever. Share our posts on social and with your email contacts.

Israeli Government Blasts CNN: ‘Stop Your Manipulation!’

By Hank Berrian, July 23, 2018 (thanks to Inexion)

On Sunday, the Israeli Foreign Ministry blasted CNN for a report in which it appeared CNN reversed the order of events in which a young Israeli soldier was murdered by Hamas so that it looked as though Israel’s retaliation came before the murder.
On Friday, members of Hamas opened fire on IDF soldiers on the border; 20-year-old Givati Brigade Staff Sergeant Aviv Levi was murdered. Israel reacted by bombing 60 different Hamas terror targets. Then, on Saturday, members of Hamas breached the Israeli border fence, prompting the IDF to shell a Hamas observation post.
But on Saturday, CNN International reported, “Israel says one of its tanks targeted a Hamas military post in Gaza Saturday in retaliation for a border fence breach, one day after violence that left four Palestinians, including three Hamas militants, and an Israeli soldier dead.” There was no mention that the entire series of events had been precipitated by the murder of Levi.
Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Emmanuel Nahshon tweeted:
No @cnni !!! You got it wrong and not for the first time – an Israeli soldier was killed by #Hamas and #IDF retaliated, protecting its country and citizens against murderous terrorists. By misrepresenting the facts you manipulate against #Israel! @cnni- STOP YOUR MANIPULATION !
CNN did not respond to the Israeli Foreign Ministry, Nahshon told the Israeli newspaper Yediot Ahronot that his ministry would confront media outlets that “deliberately distort events taking place in Israel,” adding, “We will respond to every distorted headline and demand its immediate correction.”
CNN has long had a history of bias against Israel; recent examples can be seen here, here, and here.

CNN, Hamas’ Favorite News Outlet, Strikes Again: Joseph’s Tomb ‘Catches Fire’

The media’s hatred for Israel has kicked into high gear, just as Palestinian Arab hatred for Jews kicks into higher gear. Despite Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu slamming the media yesterday for its moral equivalence between Palestinians stabbing Jews and the Jews being stabbed, CNN has doubled down on its pathetically pro-terrorist media coverage.
On Friday, Palestinian Arabs set fire to Joseph’s Tomb in the biblical city of Shechem, called Nablus by the Palestinians and the press. The terror attack on the Jewish holy site is not the first attempt to destroy or deface it by Palestinians – they tried the same routine in 201420132011, and 2008, as well as earlier this year. The Palestinians attempted to burn the Tomb at night because that is when Jews visit the shrine under Israeli Defense Force guard to pray.
But according to CNN, Joseph’s Tomb spontaneously combusted:
It “caught fire” in a “spate of Palestinian-Israeli violence.” It could have been the Israelis. It could have been the Palestinians. It could have been the Fire Fairy. Who knows? CNN continued:
Fire broke out at the compound housing Joseph’s Tomb overnight, a religious site venerated by Jews, the Israel Defense Forces said. Palestinian forces dispersed alleged Palestinian arsonists and put out the fire.
“Alleged” Palestinian arsonists? Is there any doubt as to who set the fire? Not according to the bulk of all media coverage, as well as both Israeli and Palestinian authorities.
The article then goes on to attribute the recent wave of deadly Palestinian attacks on Israeli civilians to the aforementioned “spate of violence.” In a classic instance of moral equivalence, CNN reports:
Palestinian attackers have wielded knifes against Israeli civilians and police, and Israeli security forces have turned their guns on them, but they have also fired during protests that have turned riotous. In the past month, eight Israelis died in 30 attacks with knives and other weapons that wounded many more. In the last two weeks, 34 Palestinians have been killed, including some who pulled knives. But others have been shot in clashes with Israeli security forces, Palestinian authorities have said. More than 1,100 Palestinians have been injured.
See? Those nasty Jews have killed more Palestinians than the Palestinians have killed Israeli civilians in terror attacks. CNN then continues by citing the Obama administration’s accusations of excessive force against Israel.
CNN then explains that tensions were exacerbated by Jews insisting on visiting Jewish holy sites:
Since the occupation began, an unwritten rule has said that Jews would not pray at the Temple Mount, one of the holiest sites in Islam and the holiest site in Judaism. But in recent years, hardline Jewish activists have demanded greater access to the spot, and right-wing politicians have called for the rights of Jews to pray there.
An “unwritten rule” demanding religious discrimination must be upheld, according to CNN. It is hardline for Jews to want to visit the holiest site in Judaism, but normality for Palestinian Muslims to ban them. CNN also tastefully neglects to mention Palestinian Authority dictator Mahmoud Abbas falsely accusing Jews of defacing the Temple Mount and Al-Aqsa Mosque, stating, “They have no right to desecrate them with their filthy feet.”
Finally, CNN blames Israeli settlements for the current tensions.
Last year, appearing on CNN, I explained that if Hamas could have created a media outlet, it would look like CNN. CNN has done nothing to deflect that charge with its coverage today.


cnn big.jpg 
Christiane Amanpour, CNN’s chief international correspondent and host of the network’s flagship global affairs program, Amanpour, turned to a fringe political group that holds Israel entirely responsible for the continuing conflict in the West Bank for a segment of her half-hour Nov. 24, 2016 broadcast. Amanpour introduced a superficial report: “In a new documentary called ‘Disturbing the Peace,’ we meet Combatants for Peace, a group of Israelis and Palestinians who’ve renounced violence to work for peace together.”
Amanpour, broadcasting from London, interviewed a pair from the “peace” group – Ms. Shifa al-Qudsi, in Nablus (West Bank), a Palestinian Muslim would-be suicide bomber who was intercepted by Israeli authorities the night before her planned bombing, and Chen Alon, in Tel Aviv, former Israeli military officer “turned peace campaigner.”
Combatants for Peace consists of former Israeli soldiers and former Palestinian combatants (ie. terrorists). Alon and al-Qudsi, representing the group, convey the message that Israel is mainly (if not entirely) responsible for the conflict. Alon expresses contrition for Israel’s role, but shows no concern for fellow Israelis victimized by Palestinian violence. Meanwhile, al-Qudsi adheres to the Palestinian victimization narrative heaping all the blame on Israel.
Alon describes his moment of alleged enlightenment:
One day at a checkpoint, I see a taxi filled with children and the driver is explaining to us that these are sick children. He asked us to let them go to hospital. And I said no, these are the orders. You don’t have permit. You have to arrange that and then he’s like – he was about to kill me, and at that moment I got a phone call from my wife.
Amanpour explains:
For Chen, that phone call was the turning point that turned him away from serving in the occupied territories [Alon spent time in jail after refusing to serve in the West Bank].
Amanpour continues,
For Shifa, the turning point came in an Israeli jail, where she met a guard whose child had been killed in a suicide attack. Shifa, I know that you went through a lot of death. You saw a lot of relatives killed. What was the one moment that turned you from a peaceful civilian into somebody who wanted to be a suicide bomber?”
Al-Qudsi replies through a translator:
The injustice that I’ve seen in my country, the killing of children and women and elder people –the destruction of [the] Palestinian people entirely. That made me to think about the turning point in my life.
Alon responds to Amanpour’s prompting:
… I realized that I’m violating basic human rights, that I’m struggling to provide for my children, and that was a crack that I couldn’t live with anymore.
Amanpour prompts the Palestinian:
Shifa, you were discovered before you were able to blow yourself up. You wanted to do it in the Israeli town of Netanya. And you went to jail. What kind of a conversion or realization did you have? How did that turn you?
Al-Qudsi replies:
It turned me from martyrdom operation to a non-violent movement because we’re trying to resist the political operations of the Israelis. We were trying to do something for both people. Whether they were Israelis or Palestinians, they are humans in the end.
Amanpour opines:
This film ‘Disturbing the Peace’ really shows how you’re trying to work together to actually achieve something that the political leaders haven’t been able to achieve and peace and a two-state solution still is not on the table.
A complete CNN transcript of the 6.2 minute segment is available at the Web page.
Amanpour’s production suggests that Israeli control in the West Bank (ancient Israel’s heartland of Judea and Samaria) is typified by violence and subjugation. She promotes a narrative that Israel’s victimization of the Palestinians precipitates the hopelessness that leads to understandable violence. Al-Qudsi charges that Israeli soldiers’ “killing of children and women and elder people” has led to “the destruction of [the] Palestinian people entirely.” But this is not factual. First, the checkpoints and Israeli military intrusions are a response to Palestinian violence, they are not the cause. The recurring violence is incited by longstanding and relentless anti-Israel and anti-Jewish invective from the Palestinian media, mosques and schools. Such incitement to violence violates Article 26 (2) of the U.N. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, as well as Israeli-Palestinian agreements.
< p class=”nopadding” >In contrast, no such incitement to violence or hatred against Arabs exists in mainstream Jewish society that is analogous to that found in Palestinian society. For example, the Palestinian Arabs (and their anti-Israel supporters) demand a Jew-free West Bank. Israel’s mainstream makes no such demand to remove Arab residents within Israel.
The recent Palestinian violence – a year-long spate of stabbings, shootings and car rammings has been fueled by daily Palestinian incitement against Jews by Palestinian Authority (PA) officials who honor terrorists and praise their acts of violence. The most recent wave of terror began around the time that an incendiary declaration was broadcast to Palestinians by PA controlled media.
Among the sources reporting on this matter was the Wall Street Journal on Oct. 18, 2015: “Mr. Abbas, the PA president, said the following on Palestinian television on Sept. 16: ‘We welcome every drop of blood spilled in Jerusalem. This is pure blood, clean blood, blood on its way to Allah. With the help of Allah, every martyr will be in heaven, and every wounded will get his reward.’”
Abbas has insisted that the recent Palestinian terror attacks against Israelis is a natural consequence of despair but the evidence shows that Palestinian incitement plays a major part in the phenomenon. The upshot of this is the attitude of Palestinians as a society towards their Jewish neighbors.
For example, a December 2015 poll conducted by the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research (PCPSR) showed that a majority of Palestinians favor violence against Israelis.
Meanwhile Israel’s Prime Minister Netanyahu awaits a meaningful response regarding negotiations from the Palestinian side while his Palestinian counterpart Abbas has repeatedly and explicitly rejected the idea of two states for two peoples. Palestinian leaders rejected U.S. and Israeli offers of two-state solutions in 2000, 2001, 2008 and spurned renewed talks on such an agreement proposed by Secretary of State John Kerry in 2014.
The PA insists on various conditions unlikely to be accepted by any Israeli government before peace negotiations can take place, including: Israel must accede to the demands that it abide Palestinian refusal to recognize Israel as a Jewish state (evidently 22 Arab Muslim states is fine but one Jewish state is one too many) and a “right of return” (that does not exist in international law) for millions of Arabs (nearly all of whom have never lived in Israel) which would inevitably result in the transformation of the land of Israel into a 23rd Arab Muslim state of Palestine.
Israel currently views the West Bank as consisting of three areas. The PA has complete control in Areas A and B, where the vast majority of Palestinians live. The PA sets its own civil laws in areas A and B, and Israel does not have any control at all over that realm. Israel does have authority over civilian law in Area C, where a small minority (less than seven percent) of Palestinians live.
Amanpour’s segment fails to inform viewers of crucial historical context. Israeli troops had withdrawn from the majority of Palestinian population centers in the West Bank after Israel and the PA signed an interim agreement on Sept. 28, 1995. But with the resumption of Palestinian violence against Israelis during the second intifada (2000 to 2005), Israeli troops re-established a major presence in the West Bank.
In any case, the current situation is that the PA has jurisdiction over the daily lives of almost all West Bank Arabs, while Israel remains the legal, obligatory military occupational authority pending conclusion of a negotiated agreement on the territories’ final status.
Amanpour’s speech speaks volumes
The reporter’s unreliability is evidenced in a speech she delivered to the Committee to Protect Journalists in New York on 22 November 2016. She included this in her opening remarks:
“… I believe in being truthful, not neutral.”
But who defines “the truth”? Should we rely on Christiane Amanpour to tell us what the truth is?
Amanpour asserts that for her, the key goal is to “fight to remain relevant and useful.” To her that is more important than to remain consistent with old-fashioned journalistic ethics to report objectively.
Sampling Amanpour’s airings
• In January 2015, Amanpour described as “activists,” the Islamist terrorists who murdered 12 employees of the satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo, that published pictures of the Prophet Mohammed.
• Amanpour’s programs often reprove Israel for its alleged myriad faults. She has inaccurately likened Israel to apartheid South Africa. An example of this is in the coverage of a 2014 memorial service for former South African President Nelson Mandela in Johannesburg. She drew what was supposed to be a key lesson from Mandela’s leadership applicable to an intractable conflict of today. Not Syria’s civil war, not Iraq’s civil war nor any number of other bloody internecine conflicts, but to the Palestinian Arab conflict with Israel, in falsely equating the struggle of South African blacks to the travails of the Palestinian Arabs.
• In 2016, Amanpour used the death of Shimon Peres, former Israeli president and prime minister, as an excuse to malign Israel’s policies towards the Palestinians. This was accomplished largely through Amanpour’s hosting of two far left Israeli politicians who opposed the current government’s policies along with two Palestinian politicians who spewed propaganda. Amanpour failed to provide any guest to counter these critics.
• In Amanpour’s 2009 specialGeneration Islam, (an investigation of the battle between extremists and moderates for the “hearts and minds” of young Muslims, especially in Afghanistan and Gaza), she included among the bad guys Jews of Israel for allegedly oppressing the Palestinians in Gaza, while ignoring the Islamists who rule Gaza, teach hatred of Christians and Jews, and use Gaza as a base to attack Israeli civilians with suicide bombers and thousands of rockets. She failed to offer a single mention of the hate indoctrination by Hamas.
• CNN’s God’s Warriors, h
osted by Amanpour, was a 2007 three-part series that examined the growing role of religious fundamentalism in today’s world. In the first part, Amanpour falsely equated Jewish (and Christian) religious fervency with Muslim radicals endorsing “martyrdom,” or suicide-killing. The series emphasized the alleged sins of the Jews and slurred Christians.
Challenging CNN
It is a disservice to viewers for the network to provide a lead role in international reporting on Israel to Amanpour, an advocacy journalist, who demonstrates a consistent bias against the Jewish state, and has treaded softly on Islamism. Amanpour’s bias prevents her from presenting the full spectrum of viewpoints and factual context necessary to understanding the situation in the West Bank and Gaza.
CNN remains derelict in failing to provide factual accuracy and necessary oversight. It demonstrates an undeserved deference toward their presumed media star who advocates under the guise of reporting.

Israel slams CNN, CBS coverage of Jaffa Gate terror attack

Government Press Office lodges complaint with US media outlets for lumping together attackers, victims in fatal stabbing

Israeli security personnel at the scene where two Palestinians carried out a stabbing attack near the Old City’s Jaffa Gate in Jerusalem, December 23, 2015. (Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)

Israeli security personnel at the scene where two Palestinians carried out a stabbing attack near the Old City’s Jaffa Gate in Jerusalem, December 23, 2015. (Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)
Israel’s Government Press Office on Thursday sent letters to CNN and CBS censuring their media coverage of the Jaffa Gate stabbing on Wednesday and demanding explanations.
Two Palestinian men stabbed two Israelis outside Jerusalem’s Old City on Wednesday, before security forces opened fire and killed them. Rabbi Reuben Birmajer later died of wounds sustained in the stabbing. Also killed in the attack was Ofer Ben Ari, 46, who died after being mistakenly shot by police amid the chaos of the attack. Another Israeli was badly wounded in the terror attack.
In covering the attack, after the two Israelis succumbed to their injuries, CNN’s headline read: “Four die in violent stabbing at Jaffa Gate.” CBS, meanwhile, initially wrote: “2 Palestinians killed after stabbing attack in Jerusalem.” The headline was later changed to “2 Israelis dead after stabbing attack in Jerusalem; 2 Palestinian assailants killed.”

View image on Twitter
In a letter to CNN, GPO chief Nitzan Chen said he was “deeply concerned” by the headline.


View image on Twitter



CNN: “four die in violent stabbing” outrageous headline number 3.


“We believe that combining the two murderers with the two victims into ‘four dead’ is not only dishonest and unethical journalism, but also borders on incitement, since the viewer can easily misinterpret it,” he wrote, according to the Ynet news website.
“Reporting ‘four dead’ only leads us to conclude that the person who wrote this headline had a clear political agenda. We strongly condemn such journalism,” continued Chen. Earlier CNN reports of the attack distinguished between the wounded Israelis and the Palestinian attackers.
In his letter to CBS, Chen said he was “stunned” by the headline, and maintained: “We cannot think of a worse example of anti-Israel bias than the unfortunate headline that appeared on your website yesterday, even if it was only for a short time.
“The first headline is clearly turning the murderers into victims in the most inflammatory way possible,” he wrote. “There can be no justification for this. Beyond the immediate risk it poses to Israelis against possible Arab revenge attacks, it is simply dishonest and unethical journalism.”
Also fiercely criticized on social media was the initial New York Times headline, which read: “2 Palestinian attackers killed, 2 Israelis die in Jerusalem.” The headline was revised several hours later to: “Palestinian stabbers kill Israeli, assailants shot dead.”


Have a tip we should know? Your anonymity is NEVER compromised. Email tips@thegellerreport.com

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.


Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Pin It on Pinterest