UK: City with large Muslim population passes resolution to boycott Jewish businesses, Court of Appeals upholds ban, throws Jewish council appeal out

96

Leicester is 18.6% Muslim, and they do this. Imagine what they will do when they have a Muslim majority. Islamic Jew-hatred is in the Quran. Jews are already leaving France and other countries in Europe in large numbers because of the increasingly menacing presence of Islamic antisemitism all around them. Britain is no different. British authorities are busy, as in this case, pandering to their increasingly aggressive Muslim populations, but it won’t help: total submission will still be required.

Here is the ruling:

R. (on the application of Jewish Rights Watch Ltd (t/a Jewish Human Rights Watch)) v Leicester City Council

Story continues below advertisement

Where Reported Case Digest

Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 03 July 2018

Case Analysis

[2018] EWCA Civ 1551; Official Transcript;

Subject: Local government

Keywords: Boycotts; Israel; Judaism; Local authorities’ powers and duties; Occupied Palestinian Territories; Public sector equality duty; Resolutions

Summary: In passing a resolution calling for a boycott of any produce originating from illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank until such time as Israel complied with international law and withdrew from Occupied Palestinian territories, a local authority had not breached its public sector equality duty under the Equality Act 2010 s.149. It was clear from the proposed motion and ensuing debate at a councillors’ meeting that due regard had been given to the need to eliminate discrimination, harassment and victimisation, and to the need to foster good relations between the Jewish community and others.

Abstract: The appellant organisation appealed against the dismissal of its claim for judicial review of a resolution passed by the respondent local authority calling for a boycott of all produce from Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

The organisation had been incorporated as a vehicle to challenge rising anti-Semitism in the UK, and had expressed concerns that various groups and individuals were using condemnation of Israel as a means to attack British Jews. Following debate at a council meeting, the local authority’s council members had passed a resolution “insofar as legal considerations allow, to boycott any produce originating from illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank until such time as Israel complies with international law and withdraws from Palestinian Occupied territories.” The organisation had sought to quash the resolution on the basis that, by passing it, the local authority had singled out Israel for different treatment from that adopted in respect of other countries and failed properly or sufficiently to consider its effect on the Jewish community, thereby failing to comply with its public sector equality duty (PSED) under the Equality Act 2010 s.149 to have due regard to the need to eliminate discrimination and harassment of Jewish people and the need to foster good relations between those who were Jewish and those who were not. The Divisional Court held that the local authority had not breached its PSED, nor its obligations under the Local Government Act 1988 s.17.

Held: Appeal dismissed.

Application of PSED to local authority resolution – Even though the resolution would not have any substantive effect on the way in which the local authority carried out its procurement functions, in passing the resolution the assembly of elected councillors was acting for the local authority and was exercising a function of the authority for the purposes of s.149, Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [1992] 2 A.C. 1 applied. Accordingly, the issue in the instant case was whether the local authority, acting by the assembly of councillors, had had due regard to the need to eliminate discrimination, harassment and victimisation in accordance with s.149(1)(a), and to the need to foster good relations between persons who shared a relevant protected characteristic (being Jewish or practising the Jewish religion) and persons who did not share it, pursuant to s.149(1)(b) and s.149(5) (see paras 24-25, 28 of judgment).

Compliance with PSED – The s.149 duty was not a duty to achieve a result, but a duty to have due regard to the need to achieve the goals identified in s.149(1); the weight and extent of the duty were highly fact-sensitive and dependent on individual judgment, and provided that there had been a proper and conscientious focus on the statutory criteria, the court could not interfere simply because it would have given greater weight to the equality implications of the decision, Hotak v Southwark LBC [2015] UKSC 30, [2016] A.C. 811 followed. It was not necessary for a decision-maker to refer in terms to the PSED, provided that it was addressed in substance, R. (on the application of Baker) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2008] EWCA Civ 141, [2009] P.T.S.R. 809 applied. It was clear from the terms of the motion for the resolution and the content of the debate that the local authority, acting by its assembly of councillors, had complied with the PSED by having due regard to the need to eliminate discrimination, harassment and victimisation and to the need to foster good relations between the Jewish community and others. The motion itself had recognised the right of the State of Israel to exist in peace and free from incursion, and was concerned only to condemn certain actions of the Government of Israel. That condemnation was in line with a respectable body of opinion, including the UK government, the United Nations General Assembly, the European Union and the International Court of Justice. The criticism made was temperate and legitimate and the proposed boycott had a limited target in line with that criticism. There was legitimate scope for criticism of Israel without that implying anti-Semitic attitudes, and there was nothing to suggest that the resolution was in fact being proposed as a cover for or incitement to anti-Semitism. The importance of maintaining good community relations in the local area had been a major theme in the debate. Explicit reference had been made to the Jewish community, and how they might feel. On any fair reading of the transcript of the debate it was clear that the elected councillors had had due regard to the matters referred to in the PSED as a matter of substance (paras 29-30, 35, 37-40, 42).

Judge: Underhill LJ; Floyd LJ; Sales LJ
Counsel: For the appellant: Robert Palmer. For the respondent:

Andrew Sharland QC, Zac Sammour.

Solicitor: For the appellant: RHF Solicitors. For the respondent: In-house solicitor.

Divisional Court; 28 June 2016

R. (on the application of Jewish Rights Watch (t/a Jewish Human Rights Watch)) v Leicester City Council

[2016] EWHC 1512 (Admin); [2017] 3 All E.R. 505; [2017] P.T.S.R. 1433

Affirmed

Court of Appeal (Civil Division); 03 July 2018

R. (on the application of Jewish Rights Watch Ltd (t/a Jewish Human Rights Watch)) v Leicester City Council

[2018] EWCA Civ 1551

Hotak v Southwark LBC

[2015] UKSC 30; [2016] A.C. 811; [2015] 2 W.L.R. 1341; [2015] 3 All E.R. 1053; [2015] P.T.S.R. 1189; [2015] H.L.R. 23; [2015] B.L.G.R. 530; Times, May 25, 2015; SC; 13 May 2015

R. (on the application of Baker) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government

[2008] EWCA Civ 141; [2009] P.T.S.R. 809; [2008] B.L.G.R. 239; [2008] 2 P. & C.R. 6; [2008] J.P.L. 1469; [2008] A.C.D. 62; (2008) 105(10) L.S.G. 27; (2008) 152(10) S.J.L.B. 31; [2008] N.P.C. 26; CA (Civ Div); 28 February 2008

Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC

[1992] 2 A.C. 1; [1991] 2 W.L.R. 372; [1991] 1 All E.R. 545; 89 L.G.R. 271; (1991) 3 Admin. L.R. 549; [1991] R.V.R. 28; Times, January 25, 1991; Independent, January 25, 1991; (1991) 155 J.P.N. 527; (1991) 155 L.G. Rev. 527; Financial Times, January 29, 1991; Guardian, January 25, 1991; Daily Telegraph, February 4, 1991; (1991) 88(8) L.S.G. 36; (1991) 141 N.L.J. 127; HL; 24 January 1991

Hotak v Southwark LBC

[2015] UKSC 30; [2016] A.C. 811; [2015] 2 W.L.R. 1341; [2015] 3 All E.R. 1053; [2015] P.T.S.R. 1189; [2015] H.L.R. 23; [2015] B.L.G.R. 530; Times, May 25, 2015; SC; 13 May 2015

R. (on the application of Bracking) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

[2013] EWCA Civ 1345; [2014] Eq. L.R. 60; (2013) 16 C.C.L. Rep. 479; CA (Civ Div); 06 November 2013

R. (on the application of Lewisham LBC) v Assessment and Qualifications Alliance (AQA)

[2013] EWHC 211 (Admin); [2013] E.L.R. 281; [2013] A.C.D. 52; [2013] P.T.S.R. D18; QBD (Admin); 13 February 2013

R. (on the application of Hurley) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills

[2012] EWHC 201 (Admin); [2012] H.R.L.R. 13; [2012] Eq. L.R. 447; [2012] E.L.R. 297; [2012] A.C.D. 50; DC; 17 February 2012

Pieretti v Enfield LBC

[2010] EWCA Civ 1104; [2011] 2 All E.R. 642; [2011] P.T.S.R. 565; [2010] Eq. L.R. 312; [2011] H.L.R. 3; [2010] B.L.G.R. 944; (2010) 13 C.C.L. Rep. 650; [2010] N.P.C. 98; CA (Civ Div); 12 October 2010

R. (on the application of Brown) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

Significant Legislation Cited

Legislation Cited

[2008] EWHC 3158 (Admin); [2009] P.T.S.R. 1506; DC; 18 December 2008

R. (on the application of Baker) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government

[2008] EWCA Civ 141; [2009] P.T.S.R. 809; [2008] B.L.G.R. 239; [2008] 2 P. & C.R. 6; [2008] J.P.L. 1469; [2008] A.C.D. 62; (2008) 105(10) L.S.G. 27; (2008) 152(10) S.J.L.B. 31; [2008] N.P.C. 26; CA (Civ Div); 28 February 2008

Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC

[1992] 2 A.C. 1; [1991] 2 W.L.R. 372; [1991] 1 All E.R. 545; 89 L.G.R. 271; (1991) 3 Admin. L.R. 549; [1991] R.V.R. 28; Times, January 25, 1991; Independent, January 25, 1991; (1991) 155 J.P.N. 527; (1991) 155 L.G. Rev. 527; Financial Times, January 29, 1991; Guardian, January 25, 1991; Daily Telegraph, February 4, 1991; (1991) 88(8) L.S.G. 36; (1991) 141 N.L.J. 127; HL; 24 January 1991

Equality Act 2010 (c.15) s.149 Equality Act 2010 (c.15) s.149(1)(a) Equality Act 2010 (c.15) s.149(1)(b) Equality Act 2010 (c.15) s.149(5) Local Government Act 1988 (c.9) s.17

Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (c.50) s.49A Disability Discrimination Act 2005 (c.13) s.3 Equality Act 2010 (c.15) s.149
Equality Act 2010 (c.15) s.149(1)

Equality Act 2010 (c.15) s.149(1)(a) Equality Act 2010 (c.15) s.149(1)(b) Equality Act 2010 (c.15) s.149(5) Local Government Act 1988 (c.9) s.17 Localism Act 2011 (c.20) s.1

Race Relations Act 1976 (c.74) Race Relations Act 1976 (c.74) s.71

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
96 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bobi
Bobi
5 years ago

England is ruled by Germans

R. Arandas
R. Arandas
5 years ago
Reply to  Bobi

Or Pakistanis and Muslims. But modern-day Germans love Islam anyway, so it is the same difference.

Aleteia
Aleteia
5 years ago
Reply to  R. Arandas

Really? This is why the AfD is rising.

jerrys
jerrys
5 years ago
Reply to  Bobi

OH yea, Who owns Rolls-Royce and Bentley, those fine British cars?

taxpayer22
taxpayer22
5 years ago

when modern-day jihadists invoke Khaybar, they are recalling an aggressive, surprise raid by Muhammad which resulted in the final eradication of the once considerable Jewish presence in Arabia. To the jihadists, Khaybar means the destruction of the Jews and the seizure of their property by the Muslims.

Tilt
Tilt
5 years ago
Reply to  taxpayer22

Including beheadings / Crucifixions and taking the Jewish women / girls as sex slaves, just like ISIS is doing now days to any non Muslim female that crosses their path…

Same old degenerate, savagery and the lefties worship Muslim arse like there is no tomorrow…

taxpayer22
taxpayer22
5 years ago
Reply to  Tilt

Kinana’s wife was taken as a war prize; Muhammad claimed her for himself.

A hadith notes that “the Prophet had their warriors killed, their offspring and woman taken as captives.”

The seizure of Infidel girls and their use as sex slaves is sanctioned in the Qur’an. According to Islamic law, Muslim men can take “captives of the right hand” (Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 33:50).

chaim silver.
chaim silver.
5 years ago
Reply to  Tilt

the LEFTIES, kiss the right bum cheek as well. and then lick it clean. do they believe for a moment that they will save their necks, by doing so? not a chance in g'”henum…

IzlamDownpressesHumanity
IzlamDownpressesHumanity
5 years ago
Reply to  taxpayer22

What was done at Khybar is a holey act because it was committed at the behest of muhamMUD the pedophile prophet for profit, the man who is the example of good conduct for allah time.

taxpayer22
taxpayer22
5 years ago

Muhammad led a Muslim force against the Khaybar oasis, which was inhabited by Jews — many of whom he had previously exiled from Medina. When he did so, he was not responding to any provocation.

The Muslims met the workers of Khaybar coming out in the morning with their spades and baskets. When they saw the apostle and the army they cried, ‘Muhammad with his force,’ and turned tail and fled.

Muhammad gave orders concerning Kinana: “Torture him until you extract what treasure (gold) he has.” One of the Muslims built a fire on Kinana’s chest, but Kinana would not give up his secret. When he was at the point of death, one of the Muslims beheaded him

IzlamDownpressesHumanity
IzlamDownpressesHumanity
5 years ago
Reply to  taxpayer22

MuhamMUD was indeed a scumbag, he signed a peace treaty in good faith w/the Jews of Khybar (modern day Medina?) then broke the treaty by attacking them without any prior notice.

antimulticulturalism
antimulticulturalism
5 years ago
Reply to  taxpayer22

OH HELL,that is the plan for all of us as they hate all life forms and peace- they can’t even stand themselves as they have been at war with the world and themselves since the beginning of time!
The earth will never have peace until they have completely eradicated all life- especially their own!

Howard Goodman
Howard Goodman
5 years ago

The difference between communism and Islam is communism seeks worldwide domination WITHOUT a god while Islam seeks worldwide domination WITH.

chaim silver.
chaim silver.
5 years ago
Reply to  Howard Goodman

with what ???????

Howard Goodman
Howard Goodman
5 years ago
Reply to  chaim silver.

With a god they call Allah.

Howard Goodman
Howard Goodman
5 years ago
Reply to  chaim silver.

WITH A GOD.

aemoreira1981
aemoreira1981
5 years ago

The idea appears to be that Jewish businesses haven’t personally suffered harm as a result of this boycott, which only applies to business conducted by the City of Leicester. As such, the claim was dismissed for lack of standing. As for the issue stateside (beyond the scope of the article, but related since states are passing anti-BDS laws), I expect those laws to be tossed since they do infringe on citizen rights; here (returning to the article); Jewish businesses couldn’t demonstrate harm, since it was only Leicester as a city refusing to buy goods made in the West Bank.

For the businesses to have a case, they would have had to be offering a low bid for goods using West Bank made goods for a contract with city government, and then be denied. Then standing is established.

762x51FMJ
762x51FMJ
5 years ago

The Krystallnacht was the night of broken glass in Germany.
Marxist Socialists now run England.
And accuse Trump of being the Nazi.

The first thing Hitler did was burn down the Reichstag. Did Trump burn down the Capitol, No.
The second thing Hitler did was take over the media in Germany by confiscating all radios and The Nazi run newspapers loved Hitler ..do we see this with Trump? No, the media hate him.
The third thing Hitler did was to confiscate firearms
From the people… Do we see this with Trump? NO.

But in England a social media post unfavorable to the Crown could result in imprisonment.
England blocks and monitors internet access.
Took away guns, restricts travel, and watches everyone with cameras.
This sounds more like what Nazi’s do.

Ziggy46
Ziggy46
5 years ago
Reply to  762x51FMJ

Good post, 762; Britain is no longer a Democracy and has not been so for some time. Those whom died to save the Brit citizens from tyranny must be turning in their graves. Anyone who is not of the Progressivists’ autocratic diktat are deemed Nazis; Indeed Trump but also, those of us refusing to capitulate to the Leftists’ Manifesto of bowing to Islam, abject hatred of diversity, anti-Semitism, and totalitarianism.

leonore35
leonore35
5 years ago
Reply to  Ziggy46

No it is a bad post making incorrect statements showing a dire lack of historical knowledge. You would both do well by reading some history

antimulticulturalism
antimulticulturalism
5 years ago
Reply to  762x51FMJ

WHAT trudeau has in mind for we canadians. And he and his terrorist government call we who disagree with him, NAZIS, NEANDERTHALS AND RACISTS! bTW He wants to take away the rights of canadians to own guns and is moving fast forward with his shutting down info via the internet to Canadians while planning to pump money into all the media in Canada (not just the cbc) so he can CONTROL WHAT NEWS/INFO CANADIANS WILL HAVE!
Soon we won’t be permitted to leave canada even for vacation because that would allow us to find out what is going on.
It is also reported he is considering charges and possible jail for those of us who criticize him and his government. Fact! Was reported a few months back in a report on him going after facebook , twitter and other internet media threatening them if they continue to allow ” fake news” ( in other words the FACTS ON HIM AND HIS ISLAM AND WHAT ISLAM IS DOING ALL OVER THE WESTERN WORLD) TO BE SEEN BY CANADIANS!
And still the apathetic,self absorbed canadian sheeple continue to gleefully pay al their taxes which are growing and growing and growing in order to continue paying the salary, pension and perks of this morally bankrupt, lying, thieving, narcissitic, pathological lying, psychopathic tyrant and his invading death cult!
Canada is done so canadians best start planning how to explain to their innocent children why they allowed this to happen so their children are not going to have any future, country, life!

chaim silver.
chaim silver.
5 years ago

do these upper echelon people, living in their ivory towers, care about the man in the street? no way, forget it. they think that if they support the muzzies, they and their cohorts will save their necks. they have forgotten that in the eyes of the muslims, that, they are dhimmis, apostates and non believers. their koran legally allows the killing of them, not of their own breed. the hadith says that they must SMITE THE NECKS of non muslims. it also say that the muslims may legally lie to non muslims to ingraciate themselves.it is called teqiya.

Mr Paul Middleton
Mr Paul Middleton
5 years ago
Reply to  762x51FMJ

No no, we don’t have a Marxist or a Socialist government in the UK, we have a Conservative one. Our big battle though, is the same one all across Europe and indeed, the West. It is against neo-Liberalism which has infected all parties. It stands for Globalism and Multiculturalism. I am certain the UK populace had this in mind when it voted to leave the EU. I am not saying this fight will be simple, the Capitalist elite will fight with all it has got, it is naked greed, the antithesis of democracy. There are many good patriots here who have Islam’s card marked, that battle is necessarily the main front, and Brexit was at least in part, a manifestation of it. Once we are in control of our own borders again, that war can, and will, begin with a vengeance.

The Rise Of The Right in Europe belies Europe being a basket case. The National Front in France, UKIP (and others) in Britain, Golden Dawn in Greece, Jobvik in Hungary – countries’ largely anti-Islam parties are endless! And add to the list the Netherlands, Switzerland and Norway, because all these countries are either limiting immigration or talking tough about immigration. Greece has even de-naturalised tens of thousands of Muslims. And the UK is eager for its independence again from the unlimited freedom of movement that is one of the ‘pillars’ of the EU. An EU that it is already clear, is not going to be able to survive in its Merkel form, effectively insisting on treating Muslims as though they were just the same as us.

jimsmith43
jimsmith43
5 years ago

I’ll believe the UK will leave the EU when it happens. The politicians don’t want it and are dragging their feet.

Mr Paul Middleton
Mr Paul Middleton
5 years ago
Reply to  jimsmith43

Yes. They had better not dare.

chaim silver.
chaim silver.
5 years ago

angela is shortsighted, she suffers from merkular de-generation.

Mr Paul Middleton
Mr Paul Middleton
5 years ago
Reply to  chaim silver.

(degeneration, no hyphen). Yes. In the same way, I always liked Donald Trump’s tweet, “I do not have Islamophobia. I suffer from an even rarer condition called not wanting to have my head severed from my shoulders”.

chaim silver.
chaim silver.
5 years ago
Reply to  chaim silver.

i purposely put the hyphen in. she is wiping out this generation (literally debriding ) it.

BigRed
BigRed
5 years ago

The Tory’s are not conservatives. The Labour Party are not for the
working man. They are part of the LibLabCon liberal luvvie society.

The only truly British party for both conservatives and the working man
is UKIP. The current Italian government came from nowhere to form a
marriage between left and right wing (Patriots) so can UKIP.
Please join now:
https://join.ukip.org/JoinOnline.aspx?type=1

Mr Paul Middleton
Mr Paul Middleton
5 years ago
Reply to  BigRed

And what chance do UKIP have these days, pray tell? I voted for them at the last two General Elections, and I feel my vote for them at the last General Election was a wasted vote as they only got 1.8% of the vote. It is a popular opinion that they are nothing without Nigel Farage.
I don’t want to believe that, but I feel it’s true. Personally, I wanted to like the new UKIP leader, but sadly, I feel Gerald Batten looks dull and is dull, and has all the appeal of a wet dishcloth.
I wish it were not so, but until and unless that changes, I do not think his qualities – what are they, I wonder? – and I have watched him – will excite the UK electorate whatsoever.

leonore35
leonore35
5 years ago
Reply to  762x51FMJ

NO Hitler did not confiscate all radios there was no TV at the time and radio (with movies) was a major tool for Dr Goebbel’s ministry to convey its message and directions to the population. Not everyone could attend the Nazi rallies to hear the speeches of the leaders, so how else could their words be heard? BTW Hitler’s speeches often lasted for hours. For the Nazis to confiscate the main communication device of the day would have been self defeating. It also enabled the Germans to listen to the BBC! Though that was forbidden and very dangerous. As for the ‘media’ ie, the press, there were only the papers allowed by the Nazis and they were told what and what not to print. There were no newspapers, except ones outside of Germany in any position to criticize the Nazis.
It was a main plank of Hitler’s rise to power that he made use of the main means of communication of the day to brilliant effect.
Hitler did not burn the Reichstag, that was done by a Dutch communist van der Lubbe in 1933. it would not have been in the Nazis interests to burn down the seat of German government. Hitler had endeavored to gain power by legitimate means and still needed the support of other powerful politicians and industrialists. However they did make good use of it by blaming it on the communists in general, (It would not have been in their interest either for that matter!) their chance to literally exterminate them, Hitler suspended key articles of the Weimar constitution to do so and spread the lie that it was the start of a massive communist uprising (as had happened in Russia and was feared by most non communist Germans). Van der Lubbe actually did Hitler a favour by enabling him to make his grip on power absolute. Had he not set fire to the Reichstag things might have been different
As for your last paragraph it is essentially nonsense.

jimsmith43
jimsmith43
5 years ago
Reply to  leonore35

Do you really believe Van der Lubbe started the Reichstag fire?

Suresh
Suresh
5 years ago

Left/Libs welcome jihadis and run around like cowards after they start committing gang rapes, assaults.

Here’s one such woman from Germany who was brutally murdered https://tinyurl.com/yad8pdug

Ziggy46
Ziggy46
5 years ago

The city’s anti-Semitic judicial banning of Jewish businesses is the rise of Britain’s Nuremberg Laws. It is not shocking as the British overlords; social hierarchy has always been anti-Semitic. Today, however, it has unfolded into brazen Nazism not only by the Muslim scourge but the inner-sanctum of the Parliamentary body politic to the judiciary. City councils, mayors, and others are equally culpable in the Jew-bashing mandate. It is the beginning of the end of Britain, especially Jews but others deemed enemies of Islam are not immune to the inhumanity to man which is at its embryonic, germinal stage. Undoubtedly, there are Brit non-Muslims who are not of this perfidy, unabashed hatred; they, too, must revolt against the embedded Nazism of Islam, PM MAY and the House of Commons, the treacherous judiciary, and the Progressivists whose sole intent mirrors that of Hitler’s Holocaust.

Rider
Rider
5 years ago

I don’t get it. If a million Jews want to go to a country what happens? A lot of prosperity. A million mulims? Read the papers every day. What do you get?

Rocinante44
Rocinante44
5 years ago
Reply to  Rider

it’s beyond comprehension. a healthy jewish neighborhood is a guarantee of a clean, peaceful, prosperous, and well-educated neighborhood. a healthy muslim neighborhood is a guarantee of fear, violence, squalor, and poverty. just look at the prosperity and the literal appearance of the land in the nation of israel before and after 1948, and ask yourself, what changed?

caliroxanne
caliroxanne
5 years ago
Reply to  Rider

Very sad! Jew hatred is a poison. Many Brits hate Jews, so they welcome and celebrate the Jew-hating Muslims. While celebrating Jew hatred with their Muslim “friends”, the Brits have become blind to the poison fruit this will bear.
GEN 12:3

chaim silver.
chaim silver.
5 years ago
Reply to  Rider

MURDER, KILLING , MAYHEM AND SUBJUGATION. NO PROGRESS AND LIVING IN AN ERA OF MILLENIUM YEARS AGO,

Sgtsnuffy
Sgtsnuffy
5 years ago

comment image WOW !! WHAT NEXT FORCING THE LOCAL JEWS TO WEAR THE YELLOW STAR OF DAVID AGAIN ???? MAN ENGLAND HAS REGRESSED BACK TO THE MIDDLE AGES . AND ANOTHER THOUGHT , DIDN’T WE MARCH INTO BERLIN IN 1945 TO PUT A STOP TO THIS CRAP ???? DIDN’T YOU BRITS HELP LIBERATE NAZI DEATH CAMPS WHERE IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT HITLER AND COMPANY WERE EXTERMINATING THE JEWS BY THE MILLIONS ALONG WITH MILLIONS OF OTHER FOLKS ??? YET WE ARE STARTING TO SEE THE SAME THING OCCUR IN ENGLAND NOW !!!!

Philip Dyer
Philip Dyer
5 years ago
Reply to  Sgtsnuffy

Muslimes are liars, bigots and haters. What else would anyone expect from them?

antimulticulturalism
antimulticulturalism
5 years ago
Reply to  Sgtsnuffy

boggles the mind doesn’t it!
Our brave western men left their families, homes, jobs, countries and placed their own lives on the line to protect and serve we western nations and citizens and now we all are bowing to islam and falling like a house of cards and they haven’t even had to put a gun to our heads, yet! Pathetic! None of us deserve to have had our countries or lives saved by these brave men. Perhaps they all should have stayaed home, enjoyed their lives and families and let whatever would have happened to future generations, happen! Clearly (at least here in canada) we have no respect or gratitude for the lives lost to protect us and canada and like trudeau we SPIT ON THEIR GRAVES!

Rocinante44
Rocinante44
5 years ago

it’s been my observation for 60 years that the nazis really weren’t much different than the french and the brits

IzlamDownpressesHumanity
IzlamDownpressesHumanity
5 years ago
Reply to  Rocinante44

Did the Brits or Fwench operate extermination camps?

Rocinante44
Rocinante44
5 years ago

essentially yes. the french happily rounded up the jews in paris and put them in the velodome for weeks without food and water, where some died before the krauts shipped them off to be more efficiently exterminated. the vichy french also happily rounded up the jews in their part of france and handed them over the krauts for the final blow. the brits new about the camps and neither said nor did anything about it until the american army stumbled into them. why any jew stays in europe is beyond me. america is the only place where they are safe

IzlamDownpressesHumanity
IzlamDownpressesHumanity
5 years ago
Reply to  Rocinante44

The British were in no position to stop Hitler or the extermination camps, they were defeated along w/the Free French and had to flee from Dunkirk or face capture. Until Hitler invaded Russia Britain was fighting for its life over its own territory (i.e. the Battle of Britain).

chaim silver.
chaim silver.
5 years ago
Reply to  Rocinante44

THE AMERICANS ONLY CAME IN WHEN THE NAZIS STARTED ATTACKING THEIR MAILSHIPS. WHEN THEY STARTED RETALIATING, THEY NEVER EVEN DAMAGED THE RAILWAY LINES THAT LED TO THE CAMPS. ,

IzlamDownpressesHumanity
IzlamDownpressesHumanity
5 years ago
Reply to  chaim silver.

I’ve read that there were discussions at the highest echelons of power about bombing concentration camps (which were all located on spur railroad lines by the way). Some of the objections to bombing concentration camps?
1. Nazis were launching hundreds of V1 and V2 rockets at London and airplanes were needed to go after the factories and launch sites of those weapons, by the end of the war ten thousand V1 and V2 vengeance weapons had been launched by the nazis at London.

2. bombing concentration camps did nothing to defeat the Nazis militarily and the nazis were, surprisingly enough, putting up a good enough fight to kill a million Brits, Canadians, French, Poles and Americans.
3. the luftwaffe and nazi AA were still a threat to allied aircraft (thousands of allied planes were shot down over occupied Europe)
4. by bombing concentration camps the allies would be doing the nazis job for them (i.e. by killing the inmates)
5. it was felt the total destruction of the concentration camps would be ineffective as some of them were beyond the range of allied air power and the nazis would just find other ways to kill people

R. Arandas
R. Arandas
5 years ago

Europe has betrayed the Jews…yet again. 🙁

Aleteia
Aleteia
5 years ago
Reply to  R. Arandas

Soros finances organizations which smuggle “immigrants” to Europe, US and Canada.

0349 JAT
0349 JAT
5 years ago

Everywhere islam has touched the earth death, destruction, fear and misery has followed.
We tie ourselves into knots trying to accommodate muslims. No matter how hard we try to accommodate muslims it is never enough. They always want more power over non-muslims.
When we bend our laws to accommodate islam soon the muslim savages will bend us to their law.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
5 years ago

Under no circumstance support the palestinians by purchasing anything produced by them, which isn’t much. About all they are good for is public ridicule.

IzlamDownpressesHumanity
IzlamDownpressesHumanity
5 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

I’m sure the Paleswine must produce a very fine vintage of aged camel urine that has a pale yellow colour and just a hint of minty freshness. Perfect over the rocks, mixed or straight up.

chaim silver.
chaim silver.
5 years ago

they do not marry their goats and camels, because they cannot cook.

IzlamDownpressesHumanity
IzlamDownpressesHumanity
5 years ago
Reply to  chaim silver.

LOL, don’t forget the little boys! But I guess they can’t marry them…

tatka150
tatka150
5 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

Do they produce anything besides of the riots, murders, the constant complaints in UN, burning kites flying across the Israel borders, burning tires. The list is endless. I guess the best way to push back is to stop give them the financial help. We all know that they use this money to support the terror.

ahad_ha_amoratsim
ahad_ha_amoratsim
5 years ago
Reply to  tatka150

They produce propaganda, too. Lots of it.

tatka150
tatka150
5 years ago

same as our DamonCrap’s Socialist/Commy party.

antimulticulturalism
antimulticulturalism
5 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

yes and death threats, beatings of innocent people and so on. Just look at Calgary and see what they have done during peaceful protests out there! To aid them, the islamic mayor was no where to be seen nor were the police even though this violent attack to this peaceful protest was in front of city hall!!!

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
5 years ago

Once again I was wrong, when nenshi got elected mayor, I thought he, as a muslim in a contemporary urban progressive city, would be demonstrate that all muslims were not all bigots. Oooopsy, his comment on not enough coloured people in city hall removed that idea, he, like many other non whites, is a worse bigot than anyone else, they only see colour, not ability.

IzlamDownpressesHumanity
IzlamDownpressesHumanity
5 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

I’m surprised JP hasn’t demanded payment from Canada for getting you.

chaim silver.
chaim silver.
5 years ago

we know that they do not go out on the streets, themselves to protest. they have enough lackeys to do the dirty work for them.

J Butterfield
J Butterfield
5 years ago

It is downright dishonest to state that there was a resolution to boycott Jewish businesses. Leicester and hundreds of cities and towns in many countries vote not to import goods from the Israeli illegal settlements as they constitute a flagrant violation under international law. The Irish parliament is voting on July 11th to approve a ban on goods from Israel’s settlements in the occupied West Bank.

Dennis
Dennis
5 years ago
Reply to  J Butterfield

You apparently refuse to accept the FACT that it is the Arab world that is being dishonest and that they are the ones who flagrantly take liberties with the truth. They never acknowledge that ever since the legal creation of Israel by the U.N. that the Arab world in the region has declared and fought war after war, losing every time while rejecting any opportunities given to them to live peacefully and prosper alongside Israel. Even today, their leaders promote hate and vitriol, and promise the destruction of everything that is Israeli. Israel, like any other country should be allowed to create borders that will protect its citizens. The fact that those necessary defensible borders may involve the taking of land to protect its citizens is not a basis for claiming that such steps amount to “occupying. This fallacious claim, in light of Islam seeking the destruction of everything Jewish, and the Arab worlds failure to even attempt to live in harmony with Israel and its people, does not justify any attempt at accepting or legislating anywhere the BDS movements. I am sorry that people like you refuse to and cannot see that light of truth.

IzlamDownpressesHumanity
IzlamDownpressesHumanity
5 years ago
Reply to  Dennis

The Arabpigs didn’t just merely fight wars against Israel, some of them were wars of extermination. Because when Gamal Abdel Nasser threatened to “push the Jews into the sea” he wasn’t talking about having the mother of all beach parties.

https://www.algemeiner.com/2014/02/20/did-arab-states-really-promise-to-push-jews-into-the-sea-yes/

Dennis
Dennis
5 years ago

Although I recognize that this court decision is essentially being resolved by the court refusing to act out and usurp the administrative functions of those elected to legislative positions, the one major problem of this decision is the refusal of the court to even comment or consider on the fact that the claim of “occupying” being made by those who supported the resolution involved, has no meritorious basis in that claim. Therefore, the resolution at issue has not granted due process or equal treatment to those who would be hurt by that resolution. England has since the Magna Carter been a country that prided itself with guarantees of due process and equal protection, and it is a very sad day that this once great country is allowing itself to fall into the abyss of becoming a lawless society unduly influenced by the false narrative being claimed by the Arab world. Very SAD!

Glen Benjamin
Glen Benjamin
5 years ago

I have NEVER gone to England and people in the US need to boycott England. DO NOT GO THERE ON VACATION or donate any money. The British people are scum and even in the 15th century banned Jews until reversed several centuries later. What us worse is that England has been sucking up to Muslims for over a hundred years. WHY? Because they have oil bRitain needs. So when Jews tried to escape Europe to ancient Israel it was the British who stopped them. Many Arab countries demanded the English stop Jews who were then condemned to die. Setting up post war problems and British still preventing Jews from getting to Israel.
In fact one country queen never visited is Israel and dopey Prince William made first trip ever. So to the British I give you a with friends like that who needs enemies. Netanyahu should recall ambassador and break ties with England unless reversed.

chaim silver.
chaim silver.
5 years ago
Reply to  Glen Benjamin

I, REPEAT, mad dogs and englishmen go out in the midday sun.

lostlegends
lostlegends
5 years ago

This takes the cake. Reminds me of 1930’s Germany. Same, same. Well, we know how it ends. Never have so many owed so much BS to so Few.

Free Milo
Free Milo
5 years ago

Pathetic 3rd world type activity. UK, you’re on the brink.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
5 years ago

Legislated muslim bigotry and hatred, this is the ignorance that islam would impose of humanity. muslims aren’t human, they must never be allowed to have any control of anything.

IzlamDownpressesHumanity
IzlamDownpressesHumanity
5 years ago

But are these muslums “moderate”, “good”, “decent” and “kind”? After all, they’re not calling for the extermination of Jews or committing any violence in service of their damned, dumb, fascist death cult so they must be the “good” guys? Maybe someone can provide me w/a scorecard so I can more precisely differentiate the “radical” muslum from the “moderate” muslum.

j b
j b
5 years ago

Nations that do not follow the policy of Poland will perish from the disease known as Islam. And that’s a sure bet!

Super Geek
Super Geek
5 years ago

Racist leicester. In keeping with the general support of Pedophile May and her Pedophile Government. With this continued attitude and support of Muslim Rape and Murder their Christian Women will soon be raped after their daughters. By the way – why is Tommy Robinson in Jail?

Alleged-Comment
Alleged-Comment
5 years ago

Harbinger of things to come with Moslems. Watch and learn……

Steve
Steve
5 years ago

1930 to 1945 all over again. Thanks U.K.

Philip Dyer
Philip Dyer
5 years ago

Boycott ALL Muslime services and businesses. Who needs their kebabs, taxis, barbers, corner shops etc.?

IzlamDownpressesHumanity
IzlamDownpressesHumanity
5 years ago
Reply to  Philip Dyer

I’d only suggest extending that to include all businesses, politicians, judges who pander to the muslums in any way.

chaim silver.
chaim silver.
5 years ago

MAD DOGS and ENGLISHMEN, go out in the midday sun.

jerrys
jerrys
5 years ago

Its that governmental language, all but understandable gobbelygook. Meant to bend and break the mind of normal people.

Stephen Honig
Stephen Honig
5 years ago

What Muslims are doing to the the Jews in Europe is what King Ferdinand did to the Jews in Spain in 1492.

garry pollack
garry pollack
5 years ago
Reply to  Stephen Honig

…is what Hitler did to the Jews in Germany in 1935.

kim
kim
5 years ago

Every poster who cares about the UK and its future please read “The Strange Death of Europe” Douglas Murray.
I would never agree with any form of racism but we really need to start paying attention to islam.
Its not about muslims, its about religion and 1 billion deluded people who believe in a script that is so evil it has become the downfall of the UK .
The politicians and main stream media think we the people are stupid at all the hidden facts and crimes that are not allowed to be reported incase they are labelled racist and worried about political correctness.
Please forget about the term racism and look at facts then we will start to see the future that our grand children will have to live in, I for one do not like where this country is heading.
My intension is not to offend but to research and make your own conclusion.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
5 years ago

If an identical law pertaining to blacks was implemented, there would be an international intervention to stop it. Legeslayed hatered of jews appears to be u. n. Policy.

Heidi K.
Heidi K.
5 years ago

The end times are screaming at us, get rapture ready, people!

jimsmith43
jimsmith43
5 years ago

At this rate it won’t be long before the dhimmi Limey Government and their Muslim Overlords begin Inquisition II so they can persecute Jews and seize their property. After that they’ll go after all non-Muslims. England should have built a wall about 40 years ago.

c777
c777
5 years ago

Yea I’ve been to Leicester, last time I went was in 2001, its a Shitzenhole like London, no longer a part of the UK…

joc22
joc22
5 years ago

Ah good old fascist UK hard at work showing how really racist they really are

HebrewProphet
HebrewProphet
5 years ago

Once again a vociferous Muslim minority in a major UK city ( Birmingham -Leicester ) deems
it necessary to BDS the Jewish state of Israel,while turning an blind eye to creeping Islamic
Sharia law in in a Labour Party stronghold.
Jeremy Corbyn surely must be pleased with such hypocrisy.

mimimoomoo
mimimoomoo
5 years ago

Thanks Pam, brought this up in our shul on Shabbat!

ahad_ha_amoratsim
ahad_ha_amoratsim
5 years ago

Disgusting resolution.
Disgusting judicial opinion.
Misleading headline.

Meg
Meg
5 years ago

The jewish people should be given refugee status in the US, not the muslims.

Howard Goodman
Howard Goodman
5 years ago

Communism + Islam + mosquitoes (yes, mosquitoes!) contribute ZERO to civilization, and we know what we DO to mosquitoes!

BigRed
BigRed
5 years ago

The Jew always stands by the graveside of their persecutors.
They have done so for thousands of years. This will be no different.
Boycott Jewish businesses? Why don’t they boycott all Jewish inventions more especially in medicine?
The courts upholding the boycott requested by an evil medieval religion is just crazy.
The world has gone mad and will pay for it. Watch this space.
God Willing, I will stand with the Jews at the graveside of their modern persecutors.

knightsstrength
knightsstrength
5 years ago

Where is Theresa May on this, maybe UK maybe better with Boris Johnson and do many things to turn back Brexit, Refugees and the !uslim domination by getting them out of UK

Britain did not go to protect Muslims as we fought many of them and we’re horrified of what the Nazis did tongue Jews and sort not to repeat this, and now UK turns on the Jews.

Wake up UK, your father’s fought and died to protect freedom for you and your children. Do not give it to the Muslims.

shaongaon
shaongaon
5 years ago

The very old and long British-arab love affair continues. They are very similar. Too much..

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!